[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Architecture-Based Comparative Advantage — A Design Information View of Manufacturing

  • Article
  • Published:
Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores basic concepts of architecture-based comparative advantage, based on a hypothesis that dynamic fit between organizational capability in manufacturing and productprocess architecture tends to result in international competitive advantage of an industry. First, the paper discusses elements of this framework such as design-based approach to manufacturing (monozukuri in Japanese), field of manufacturing (genba in Japanese), organizational capability in manufacturing, evolution of organizational capabilities, hierarchy of competitive performance, and product-process architecture (integral, modular, closed, and open types). Evolutionally framework indicates that organizational capability in manufacturing goes through a process of multi-path system emergence, which results in uneven distribution of certain types of organizational capabilities across countries and regions. Second, we discuss the definition, classification, and measurement of productprocess architecture. Third, these components of the present framework are synthesized into a hypothesis that Japan tends to enjoy higher comparative advantage (i.e., higher export ratio) in those products with a more integral architecture. A simple statistical analysis is conducted, and the results are generally consistent with the hypothesis. As a result, our data analysis indicates that, particularly in the area of assembled products, production bases located in Japan are still enjoying export competitiveness in multi-skilled-labor-intensive products with integral architecture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abernathy, W. J. (1978) The Productivity Dilemma, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • - and M. Utterback (1978) “Patterns of Industrial Innovation,” Technology Review 80.7: 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. (1964) Notes on the Synthesis of Form, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M. (2001) Towards a Comparative Institutional Analysis, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balassa, B. (1963) “An Empirical Demonstration of Classical Comparative Cost Theory,” Review of Economics and Statistics 4: 231–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, C. Y. and K. B. Clark (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. A. (1994) “Fading Memories: A Process Theory of Strategic Business Exit in Dynamic Environments,” Administrative Science Quarterly 39: 24–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G. R., L. S. Bigelow, M. L. Seidel and L. B. Tsai (1996) “The Fates of De Novo and De Alio Producers in the American Automobile Industry 1885–1981,” Strategic Management Journal 17: 117–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D. (1990) Scale and Scope, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • - (1992) “What Is a Firm?” European Economic Review 36: 483–492.

  • Chesbrough, H. W. and K. Kusunoki (2001) “The Modularity Trap; Innovation, Technology Phase Shifts and the Resulting Limits of Virtual Organaization,” in I. Nonaka and D. Teece (eds) Managing Industrial Knowledge, Sage Press, London, pp. 202–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, D. S. and H. C. Moon (2000) From Adam Smith to Michael Porter: Evolution of Competitiveness Theory, World Scientific, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. B. (1985) “The Interaction of Design Hierarchy and Market Concepts in Technological Evolution,” Research Policy 14: 235–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • - and T. Fujimoto (1991) Product Development Performance, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal (1990) “Adaptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal (1994) “Fortune Favors the Prepared Firm,” Management Science 40.2: 227–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornbusch, R., S. Fischer and P. Samuelson (1977) “Comparative Advantage, Trade and Payments in a Ricardian Model with a Continuum of Goods,” American Economic Review 67: 823–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1982) “Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories,” Research Policy 11: 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, C. H. (1998) Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage, Perseus Books, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, T. (1998) “Reinterpreting the Resource-Capability View of the Firm: A Case of the Development-Production Systems of the Japanese Auto-Makers,” in A. D. Chandler, P. Hagström and Ö. Sölvell (eds) The Dynamic Firm: The Role of Technology, Strategy, and Organization, and Regions, Oxford University Press, pp. 15–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • - (1999) The Evolution of a Manufacturing System at Toyota, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • - (2000) “Why Product Architectures Matter,” Focus Japan, JETRO 27.9: 10–13.

  • - (2006) “Architecture-Based Comparative Advantage in Japan and Asia,” in K. Ohno and T. Fujimoto (eds) Industrialization of Developing Countries: Analysis by Japanese Economics, National Graduate Institute of Policy Studies, Tokyo, pp. 1–10.

  • - (2007) Competing to Be Really, Really Good, I House Press, Tokyo.

  • - and D. Ge (2007) “The Architectural Attributes of Auto Parts and Transaction Patterns on Design Drawings,” International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management 6.4: 370–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • - and T. Oshika (2006) Empirical Analysis of the Hypothesis of Architecture-based Competitive Advantage and International Trade Theory, MMRC Discussion Paper F-71, The University of Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • -, D. Ge and J. Oh (2006) Competition and Co-operation in Automotive Steel Sheet Production in East Asia, MMRC Discussion Paper F-73, The University of Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goepfert, J. and M. Steinbrecher (1999) “Modular Product Development: Managing Technical and Organizational Independencies,” mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1991) “The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation,” California Management Review, 33.3: 114–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • - (2005) Contemporary Strategy Analysis, 5th ed., Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T. and J. Freeman (1989) Organizational Ecology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecksher, E. F. (1949) “The Effect of Foreign Trade on the Distribution of Income,” in H. E. Howard and A. M. Lloyd (eds) Readings in the Theory of International Trade, Irwin, Homewood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hounshell, D. A. (1984) From the American System to Mass Production 1800–1932: The Development of Manufacturing Technology in the U.S., Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. R. and M. Obstfeld (1994) International Economics: Theory and Policy, 3rd ed., Harper Collins College Publisher, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R. N. and P. L. Robertson (1992) “Networks and Innovation in a Modular System: Lessons from the Microcomputer and Stereo Component Industries,” Research Policy 21: 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1995) Firms, markets and Economics Change: A Dynamic Theory of Business Institutions, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1992) “Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development,” Strategic Management Journal 13: 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, B. and J. G. March (1988) “Organizational Learning,” Annual Review of Sociology 14: 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1987) “Crafting Strategy,” Harvard Business Review 65.4: 66–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • - and J. A. Waters (1985) “Of Strategies, Deliberate and Emergent,” Strategic Management Journal 6.3: 257–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monden, Y. (1983) Toyota Production System, Industrial Engineering and Management Press, Norcross.

    Google Scholar 

  • - (1993) Toyota Production System, 2nd ed., Industrial Engineering and Management Press, Norcross.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. and S. G. Winter (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (eds) (1993) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1985) Kigyo Shinkaron [The Theory of Corporate Evolution] (in Japanese), Nihon Keizai Shinbunsha, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T. (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1990) Competitive Advantage of Nations, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. and G. Hamel (1990) “The Core Competence of the Corporation,” Harvard Business Review 68.3: 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinertsen, D. G. (1997) Managing Design Factory, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, D. (1971) On the Principles of Political Economy, and Taxation, Penguin, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1948) “International Trade and the Equalization of Factor Prices,” Economic Journal 58: 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • - (2004) “Where Ricardo and Mill Rebut and Confirm Arguments of Mainstream Economists Supporting Globalization,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 18.3: 135–146.

  • Schonberger, R. J. (1982) Japanese Manufacturing Techniques, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiozawa, Y. (2007) “A New Construction of Ricardian Trade Theory—A Many-country, Many-commodity Case with Intermediate Goods and Choice of Production Techniques —,” Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review 3.2: 141–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1969) The Science of the Artificial, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh, N. P. (1990) The Principles of Design, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeishi, A. and T. Fujimoto (2001) “Modularisation in the Auto Industry: Interlinked Multiple Hierarchies of Product, Production and Supplier Systems,” International Journal Automotive Technology and Management 1.4: 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. and G. Pisano (1994) “The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction,” Industrial and Corporate Change 3.3: 537–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and A. Shuen (1992) Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, Rev. ed. (Working Paper, June), University of California at Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • -, R. Rumelt, G. Dosi and S. Winter (1994) “Understanding Corporate Coherence: Theory and Evidence,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 23: 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomke, S. and T. Fujimoto (2000) “The Effect of ‘Front-Loading’ Problem Solving on Product Development Performance,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 17: 128–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, K. T. (1995) “The Role of Product Architecture in the Manufacturing Firm,” Research Policy 24: 419–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. (1966) “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 80.2: 190–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J., D. T. Jones and D. Roos (1990) The Machine that Changed the World, Rawson Associates, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan

    Takahiro Fujimoto

Authors
  1. Takahiro Fujimoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takahiro Fujimoto.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fujimoto, T. Architecture-Based Comparative Advantage — A Design Information View of Manufacturing. Evolut Inst Econ Rev 4, 55–112 (2007). https://doi.org/10.14441/eier.4.55

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14441/eier.4.55

Keywords

Search

Navigation