[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3297001.3297040acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescodsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Emotive Stimuli-triggered Participant-based Clustering Using a Novel Split-and-Merge Algorithm

Published: 03 January 2019 Publication History

Abstract

EEG signal analysis is a powerful technique to decode the activities of the human brain. Emotion detection among individuals using EEG is often reported to classify people based on emotions. We questioned this observation and hypothesized that different people respond differently to emotional stimuli and have an intrinsic predisposition to respond. We designed experiments to study the responses of participants to various emotional stimuli in order to compare participant-wise categorization to emotion-wise categorization of the data. The experiments were conducted on a homogeneous set of 20 participants by administering 9 short, one to two minute movie clips depicting different emotional content. The EEG signal data was recorded using the 128 channel high-density geodesic net. The data was filtered, segmented, converted to frequency domain and alpha, beta and theta ranges were extracted. Clustering was performed using a novel recursive-split and merge unsupervised algorithm. The data was analyzed through confusion matrices, plots and normalization techniques. It was found that the variation in emotive responses of a participant was significantly lower than the variation across participants. This resulted in more efficient participant-based clustering as compared to emotive stimuli-based clustering. We concluded that the emotive response is perhaps a signature of an individual with a characteristic pattern of EEG signals. Our findings on further experimentation will prove valuable for the progress of research in cognitive sciences, security and other related areas.

References

[1]
Tapan Gandhi, Bijay Ketan Panigrahi, Manvir Bhatia, Sneh Anand. 2010. Expert model for detection of epileptic activity in EEG signature. Expert Systems with Applications. 37(4), 3513--3520.
[2]
Abeer Al- Nafjan et al. 2017. Review and Classification of Emotion Recognition Based on EEG Brain-Computer Interface System Research: A Systematic Review. Appl.Sci. 7, 1239.
[3]
Junichi Chikazoe, Daniel H Lee, Nikolaus Kriegeskorte and Adam K Anderson. 2014. Population coding of affect across stimuli, modalities and individuals. Nature Neuroscience.
[4]
Cornell University. 2014. Study cracks how brain processes emotions. ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/07/140709135836.htm
[5]
Tobias Brosch et al. 2009. The perception and categorisation of emotional stimuli: A review.
[6]
Marni Y. V. Bekkedal, John Rossil III and Jaak Panksepp. 2011. Human brain EEG indices of emotion: Delineating responses to affective vocalizations by measuring frontal theta event-related synchronization. Neuroscience and Biobehaviorial Reviews. 35(9), 1959--1970.
[7]
M. Teplan. 2002. Fundamentals of EEG Measurement. Measurement Science Review. 2(2).
[8]
Maria V. Ruiz-Blondet et al. 2016. CEREBRE: A Novel Method for Very High Accuracy Event-Related Potential Biometric Identification. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security. 11(7).
[9]
Douglas Steinley. 2010. K-means Clustering: A Half-century Synthesis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology.
[10]
M. Venkat Reddy, M. Vivekananda and R U V N Satish. 2017. Divisive Heirarchical Clustering with K-means and Agglomerative Heirarchical Clustering. Int. J. Comp. Sci. Trends Technol., 5(5), 6--11.
[11]
Dieter Scheibler and Wolfgang Schneider. 1985. Monte Carlo Tests of the Accuracy of Cluster Analysis Algorithms: A Comparison of Hierarchical and Nonhierarchical Methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 20(3), 283--304.
[12]
R. Tripathi, D. Mukhopadhyay, C. K. Singh, K. P. Miyapuram, S. Jolad. 2018. Characterizing Functional Brain Networks and Emotional Centers based on Rasa Theory of Indian Aesthetics. arXiv:1809.05336v1.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Classifying students based on cognitive state in flipped learning pedagogyFuture Generation Computer Systems10.1016/j.future.2021.08.018126:C(305-317)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
CODS-COMAD '19: Proceedings of the ACM India Joint International Conference on Data Science and Management of Data
January 2019
380 pages
ISBN:9781450362078
DOI:10.1145/3297001
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 January 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Brain Computer Interface
  2. Clustering
  3. EEG
  4. Emotional Recognition
  5. K-means

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

CoDS-COMAD '19
CoDS-COMAD '19: 6th ACM IKDD CoDS and 24th COMAD
January 3 - 5, 2019
Kolkata, India

Acceptance Rates

CODS-COMAD '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 62 of 198 submissions, 31%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 197 of 680 submissions, 29%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 15 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Classifying students based on cognitive state in flipped learning pedagogyFuture Generation Computer Systems10.1016/j.future.2021.08.018126:C(305-317)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media