[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2048147.2048187acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessplashConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A case study for prioritizing features in environments with multiple stakeholders

Published: 22 October 2011 Publication History

Abstract

In corporations where the focus is a very dynamic business inserted in web environments, agile methods can fully meet almost all needs. However, in some particular companies, there are multiple stakeholders, who represent different interests in prioritizing activities. There is, consequently, a heavy challenge to implement agile methodologies which deal with such conflicts in order to prioritize the features of the system. It is important to focus on higher earned value as possible and consider the technical risks exposed by the development team. These barriers often lead these companies to abandon such agile methods, incorporating an approach of a chaotic work environment. This paper proposes an agile technique for prioritizing features in environments with multiple stakeholders and reports a successful experience in its usage.

References

[1]
COHN, Mike. "Agile Estimating and Planning", Addison Wesley, TBD.
[2]
COHN, Mike. "User Stories Applied", Addison Wesley, 2004.
[3]
PMBOK. "A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge", 2004.
[4]
SCRUM GUIDE. ""Scrum Guide"", Ken Schwaber and Jeff Sutherland. Scrum.org. 2009. http://www.scrum.org/scrumguides. Retrieved 2010-02-03.
[5]
GROUNDED THEORY. ""What is Grounded Theory?"", Jillian Rhine. 2009. http://www.groundedtheory.com/what-is-gt.aspx. Visited in 2010-10-15.
[6]
COLEMAN, G.; O'Connor, R. 2007. ""Using grounded theory to understand software process improvement: A study of Irish software product companies, Information and Software Technology"". Journal of Information and Software Technology, v. 49, n. 6, p. 654--667, jun.
[7]
COHN, Mike. ""Prioritizing Your Product Backlog Presentation"". 2009. http://www.mountaingoatsoftware.com/system/presentation/file/101/Cohn_NDC09_Prioritizing.pdf?1267636319. Retrieved 2011-02-05.
[8]
JISC infoNet, ""A JISC Advance service"". 2009. http://www.jiscinfonet.ac.uk/InfoKits/infokit-related-files/riskmatrixpic/view. Visited in 2011-06-22.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
OOPSLA '11: Proceedings of the ACM international conference companion on Object oriented programming systems languages and applications companion
October 2011
360 pages
ISBN:9781450309424
DOI:10.1145/2048147
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 October 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. agile
  2. conflict of interests
  3. estimating
  4. planning
  5. prioritization
  6. stakeholders

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SPLASH '11
Sponsor:

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 277
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media