[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3608251.3608283acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccmsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Novel Implicit Stress Integration Algorithm and its Verification Using von Mises and Drucker Prager Plasticity

Published: 17 August 2023 Publication History

Abstract

We introduce a novel fully implicit algorithm for integrating the rate form of plasticity, and compare its main attributes with Closest Point Projection Method (CPPM) and Cutting Plane Method (CPM). Inspired by CPM, the field variables such as stress, hardening modulus are expressed as functions of the plastic consistency parameter, and yet the field variables are treated as implicit. The latter was conceived by the superior performance of CPPM. The proposed method possesses a consistent tangent operator that is straight forward to obtain. The mathematical formulation and the geometric details of the return mapping show that the proposed method is a distinct algorithm. Numerical tests are carried out to verify, and explore the accuracy and computational performance of the proposed method. The benchmark tests for single material point integration indicate that the accuracy of the proposed method is as good as CPPM in the case of von Misses plasticity, while it is slightly lower in the case of Drucker Prager plasticity with nonlinear pressure dependent elastic constitutive relations. Further, the multi-element tests demonstrate that the consistent tangent operator of the proposed method is on par with that of CPPM, both in accuracy and numerical performance.

References

[1]
A. Anandarajah. 2010. Computational Methods in Elasticity and Plasticity. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6379-6
[2]
Bernard D. Coleman. 1964. Thermodynamics of materials with memory. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 17, 1 (1964), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00283864
[3]
Robert H. Dodds. 1987. Numerical techniques for plasticity computations in finite element analysis. Computers & Structures 26, 5 (1987), 767–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(87)90026-5
[4]
Nam-Ho Kim. 2015. Introduction to Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis. Springer New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1746-1
[5]
E. A. de S. Neto, D. Perić, and D.R.J. Owen. 2008. Computational methods for plasticity: theory and applications. Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex, UK.
[6]
M. Ortiz and P.M. Pinsky. 1981. Global analysis methods for the solution of the elastoplastic and viscoplastic dynamic problems. Technical Report UCB/SESM 81/08. University of California, Berkeley.
[7]
M. Ortiz and J. C. Simo. 1986. An analysis of a new class of integration algorithms for elastoplastic constitutive relations. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 23, 3 (1986), 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620230303
[8]
Dorival M. Pedroso, Daichao Sheng, and Scott W. Sloan. 2008. Stress update algorithm for elastoplastic models with nonconvex yield surfaces. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 76, 13 (2008), 2029–2062. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2407
[9]
Giulia Scalet and Ferdinando Auricchio. 2017. Computational Methods for Elastoplasticity: An Overview of Conventional and Less-Conventional Approaches. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 25, 3 (2017), 545–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-016-9208-x
[10]
Rich Thorpe Shield and Hans Ziegler. 1958. On Prager's hardening rule. ZAMP Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik 9, 3 (1958), 260–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02033030
[11]
J. C. Simo and T. J. R. Hughes. 1998. Computational inelasticity. Springer New York, NY. 392 pages.
[12]
Bojan Starman, Miroslav Halilovič, Marko Vrh, and Boris Štok. 2014. Consistent tangent operator for cutting-plane algorithm of elasto-plasticity. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 272 (2014), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2013.12.012
[13]
M. L. Wilkins. 1964. Calculation of elastic-plastic flow. In Methods in computational physics. Academic Press, New York.
[14]
Hans Ziegler. 1959. A modification of Prager’s hardening rule. Quart. Appl. Math. 17, 1 (1959), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1090/qam/104405

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Enhancing curvature prediction in flexible printed circuits: A computational approach integrating analytical models with finite element simulationsAlexandria Engineering Journal10.1016/j.aej.2024.07.070107(547-558)Online publication date: Nov-2024

Index Terms

  1. A Novel Implicit Stress Integration Algorithm and its Verification Using von Mises and Drucker Prager Plasticity

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICCMS '23: Proceedings of the 2023 15th International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation
      June 2023
      293 pages
      ISBN:9798400707919
      DOI:10.1145/3608251
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 17 August 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. consistent tangent operator
      2. cutting plane method
      3. integrating the rate form
      4. novel algorithm
      5. plasticity
      6. return mapping

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      ICCMS 2023

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)23
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
      Reflects downloads up to 21 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Enhancing curvature prediction in flexible printed circuits: A computational approach integrating analytical models with finite element simulationsAlexandria Engineering Journal10.1016/j.aej.2024.07.070107(547-558)Online publication date: Nov-2024

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media