[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3532213.3532337acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Robust and Accurate Post-Validation Voting Scheme for Ranking 3D Correspondences

Published: 13 July 2022 Publication History

Abstract

As a key step of the high-level 3D vision perception, extracting reliable inlier correspondences from the random correspondences with a high fraction of outliers is a challenging task. In this paper, we present a robust two-stage voting scheme to assess and rank the initial correspondences. Specifically, we first generate a geometric consistency point pair voting set by enforcing point pair feature constraints (PPFC) on the pairwise correspondences from an elected correspondence subset. Then, by combining the point pair voting set and the initial correspondence set, the compatible correspondence triples that satisfy PPFC are elaborately picked up to estimate the corresponding hypothesis poses, resulting in the pose voting set. Finally, by performing a kernel density estimation technique on the pose voting set, an optimal post-validation pose is estimated to compute the likelihood scores for the initial correspondence set. Extensive experiments on two challenging datasets demonstrate that the proposed voting scheme is robust against over 99% outlier ratio, outperforming the state-of-the-art methods in terms of inlier precision.

References

[1]
Wei Li, Cheng Wang, Congren Lin, Guobao Xiao, Chenglu Wen, and Jonathan Li. 2020. Inlier extraction for point cloud registration via supervoxel guidance and game theory optimization. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 163, 284-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.01.021
[2]
Xu Cheng, Zhongwei Li, Kai Zhong, and Yusheng Shi. 2017. An automatic and robust point cloud registration framework based on view-invariant local feature descriptors and transformation consistency verification. Optics and Lasers in Engineering 98, 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2017.05.011
[3]
Hyeon Min Lee and Woo Chun Choi. Algorithm of 3D Spatial Coordinates Measurement Using a Camera Image. Journal of Image and Graphics 3, 1 (June 2015), 30-33. https://doi.org/10.18178/joig.3.1.30-33
[4]
Anders Glent Buch, Lilita Kiforenko, and Dirk Kraft. 2017. Rotational subgroup voting and pose clustering for robust 3d object recognition. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). IEEE, Venice, Italy, 4137–4145. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2017.443
[5]
Jianwei Guo, Xuejun Xing, Weize Quan, Dong-Ming Yan, Qingyi Gu, Yang Liu, and Xiaopeng Zhang. 2021. Efficient center voting for object detection and 6d pose estimation in 3d point cloud. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 30 (May 2021), 5072–5084. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2021.3078109
[6]
Kazumasa Oniki, Toshiki Kikuchi, and Yuko Ozasa. Training Data Generation Based on Observation Probability Density for Human Pose Refinement. Journal of Image and Graphics 9, 2 (June 2021), 50-54. https://doi.org/10.18178/joig.9.2.50-54
[7]
Seyma Yucer and Yusuf Sinan Akgul.3D Human Action Recognition with Siamese-LSTM Based Deep Metric Learning. Journal of Image and Graphics 6, 1(June 2018), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.18178/joig.6.1.21-26
[8]
Meng Jie, Wan Li, Shuting Wang, Liquan Jiang, Gen Li, Lang Wu and Yuanlong Xie. 2021. Efficient and reliable LIDAR-based global localization of mobile robots using multiscale/resolution maps. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 70,1-15. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2021.3093933
[9]
Vaishali Ailani, Disha Prakash, and K. S. Venkatesh. Self-Localization with Edge Detection in 3D Space. Journal of Image and Graphics 1, 2(, June 2013), 99-103. https://doi.org/10.12720/joig.1.2.99-103
[10]
Jie Meng, Shuting Wang, Gen Li, Liquan Jiang, Xiaolong Zhang, Chao Liu, and Yuanlong Xie. 2021. Iterative-learning error compensation for autonomous parking of mobile manipulator in harsh industrial environment. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2020.102077
[11]
Samuele Salti, Federico Tombari, and Luigi Di Stefano. 2014. SHOT: Unique signatures of histograms for surface and texture description. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 125 (August 2014), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2014.04.011
[12]
Lang Wu, Kai Zhong, Zhongwei Li, Ming Zhou, Hongbin Hu, Congjun Wang and Yusheng Shi. 2021. PPTFH: Robust local descriptor based on point-pair transformation features for 3D surface matching. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21093229
[13]
Jiaqi Yang, Ke Xian, Peng Wang, and Yanning Zhang. 2021. A performance evaluation of correspondence grouping methods for 3d rigid data matching. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 43, 6 (June 2021), 1859–1874. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2960234
[14]
Martin A. Fischler and Robert C. Bolles. 1981. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun. ACM 24, 6 (June 1981), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1145/358669.358692
[15]
Anders Hast, Johan Nysjö, and Andrea Marchetti. 2013. Optimal RANSAC—towards a repeatable algorithm for finding the optimal set. Journal of World Society for Computer Graphics 21, 21-30
[16]
Lowe, D. G. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision 60, 91-110. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94
[17]
Hui Chen and Bir Bhanu. 2007. 3D free-form object recognition in range images using local surface patches. Pattern Recognition Letters 28, 10 (July 2007), 1252–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2007.02.009
[18]
H. Sahloul, S. Shirafuji and J. Ota. 2020. An accurate and efficient voting scheme for a maximally all-inlier 3D correspondence set. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 43, 2287-2298. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2020.2963980.
[19]
Anders Glent Buch, Yang Yang, Norbert Krüger, and Henrik Gordon Petersen. 2014. In search of inliers: 3d correspondence by local and global voting. In 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, Columbus, OH, USA, 2075–2082. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2014.266
[20]
Jiaqi Yang, Yang Xiao, Zhiguo Cao and Weidong Yang. 2019. Ranking 3D feature correspondences via consistency voting. Pattern Recognition Letters 117, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2018.11.018
[21]
Umeyama S. 1991. Least-squares estimation of transformation parameters between two point patterns. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 13 (April 1991), 376–380. https://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/34.88573
[22]
A.S. Mian, M. Bennamoun, and R. Owens. 2006. Three-dimensional model-based object recognition and segmentation in cluttered scenes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 28, 10 (October 2006), 1584–1601. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2006.213
[23]
Curless, Brian and Marc Levoy. A volumetric method for building complex models from range images. 1996. In 23rd annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques. SIGGRAPH, New York, USA, 303-312. https://doi.org/10.1145/237170.237269

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICCAI '22: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computing and Artificial Intelligence
March 2022
809 pages
ISBN:9781450396110
DOI:10.1145/3532213
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 July 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. 3D feature correspondence
  2. geometric consistency
  3. optimal post-validation pose
  4. point pair feature constraints

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • National Key Research and Development Program of China
  • Major Project of Technological Innovation in Hubei Province
  • Basic Research and General Program of Shenzhen
  • Excellent Young Program of Natural Science Foundation in Hubei Province
  • Key Research and Development Program of Hubei Province

Conference

ICCAI '22

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 79
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 26 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media