More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Toward a Grassroots Culture of Technology Practice

Authors:

Sucheta Ghoshal,

Rishma Mendhekar,

Amy BruckmanAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 4, Issue CSCW1

Article No.: 54, Pages 1 - 28

https://doi.org/10.1145/3392862

Published: 29 May 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) can support grassroots social movements toward greateroutreach and better day-to-day communication. In this paper, we present the results of action research with alarge-scale grassroots social movement, the Southern Movement Assembly (SMA), exploring their uses andperceptions of ICTs. We find that the ICTs chosen by the SMA are often at odds with their grassroots cultureof inclusion and participation-which results in inequitable sociotechnical realities within the movement. Forexample, people with technical skills gain more power as they start to control organizational processes. Astechnical skills are most commonly associated with racial, gender, and socioeconomic privileges, this leads toinequitable participation. We conclude by calling for a grassroots culture of technology practice rooted inanalyses of systemic exclusion with a continuous effort to center the marginalized voices and experienceswith technology.

References

[1]

Mark Ackerman. 2000. The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 15, 2 (2000), 179--203. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_5

Digital Library

[2]

Louis Althusser. 2006. Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (notes towards an investigation). The anthropology of the state: A reader, Vol. 9 (2006), 86.

[3]

Catherine Ashcraft, Elizabeth Eger, and Michelle Friend. 2012. Girls in iT: the facts. Technical Report. National Center for Women & Information Technology, Boulder, CO. 79 pages. https://www.ncwit.org/resources/girls-it-facts

[4]

Liam J Bannon and Kjeld Schmidt. 1989. CSCW: Four characters in search of a context. In ECSCW 1989: Proceedings of the First European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Computer Sciences Company, London.

[5]

Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI : Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2010), 1301--1310. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753521

Digital Library

[6]

Cynthia L. Bennett and Daniela K. Rosner. 2019. The Promise of Empathy: Design, Disability, and Knowing the "Other". In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19. ACM Press, Glasgow, Scotland Uk, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300528

Digital Library

[7]

Priyanka Bhatt, Priya Sreenivasan, Anthony Rivera, Daniel Yoon, Kevin Caron, and Azadeh Shahshahani. 2018. Inside Atlanta's Immigrant Cages A Report on the Conditions of the Atlanta City Detention Center. Technical Report August. https://projectsouth.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/InsideATL_Imm_Cages_8_DIG.pdf

[8]

Wiebe Bijker. 1995. Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Elements for a Theory of (1995).

[9]

Avtar Brah and Ann Phoenix. 2004. Ain't I A woman? Revisiting intersectionality. Journal of international women's studies, Vol. 5, 3 (2004), 75--86.

[10]

André Brock. 2018. Critical technocultural discourse analysis. New Media & Society 2007 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816677532

[11]

André Brock Jr. 2019. Distributed Blackness: African American Online Technoculture.

[12]

Joy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru. 2018. Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research ), Sorelle A. Friedler and Christo Wilson (Eds.), Vol. 81. PMLR, New York, NY, USA, 77--91. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html

[13]

Clifford G Christians. 2007. Cultural continuity as an ethical imperative. Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 13, 3 (2007), 437--444.

[14]

Hill Collins. 2011. Truth and Method : Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited., Vol. 22, 2 (2011), 341--365.

[15]

Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2018. Design Justice: Towards an Intersectional Feminist Framework for Design Theory and Practice. Proceedings of the Design Research Society 2018 in (2018). https://doi.org/10.21606/dma.2017.679

[16]

Ruth Schwartz Cowan. 2011. More work for mother: the ironies of household ; technology from the open hearth to the microwave .Basic Books, New York.

[17]

Catalina M de Onís. 2018. Energy colonialism powers the ongoing unnatural disaster in Puerto Rico. Frontiers in Communication, Vol. 3 (2018), 2.

[18]

John Dewey. 1916. Progress. The International Journal of Ethics, Vol. 26, 3 (1916), 311--322.

[19]

Jill P. Dimond. 2012. Feminist HCI for Real: Designing Technology in Support of a Social Movement. December (2012), 153. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.13650

[20]

Jill P Dimond, Michaelanne Dye, Daphne Larose, and Amy S Bruckman. 2013. Hollaback !: The Role of Collective Storytelling Online in a Social Movement Organization. (2013).

[21]

Joel Dinerstein. 2013. Technology and Its Discontents: On the Verge of the Posthuman., Vol. 58, 3 (2013), 569--595. https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2006.0056

[22]

Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon, and Sarah Fox. 2016. Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS '16 (2016), 656--671. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901861

Digital Library

[23]

Jack Dorsey. 2018. Testimony of Jack Dorsey (Chief Executive Officer Twitter, Inc. ). https://docs.house.gov/meetings/IF/IF00/20180905/108642/HHRG-115-IF00-Wstate-DorseyJ-20180905.pdf

[24]

Richard Dyer. 1997. The matter of whiteness. In The matter of whiteness. Routledge, London.

[25]

Thomas Erickson, Wendy A Kellogg, and I B M T J Watson. 2000. Social Translucence : An Approach to Designing Systems that Support Social Processes., Vol. 7, 1 (2000), 59--83.

[26]

Will Evans and Sinduja Rangarajan. 2017. Hidden figures: How Silicon Valley keeps diversity data secret. Reveal News (October 26, 2017) (2017).

[27]

James Ferguson and Akhil Gupta. 2008. Beyond ?culture': space, identity, and the politics of difference. In The cultural geography reader. Routledge, 72--79.

[28]

Casey Fiesler, Shannon Morrison, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2016. An Archive of Their Own: A Case Study of Feminist HCI and Values in Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16. ACM Press, Santa Clara, California, USA, 2574--2585. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858409

Digital Library

[29]

Mary Flanagan, Daniel C Howe, and Helen Nissenbaum. 2008. Embodying values in technology: Theory and practice. Information technology and moral philosophy, Vol. 322 (2008).

[30]

Philip Sheldon Foner (Ed.). 1995. The Black Panthers speak 1st da capo press ed ed.). Da Capo Press, New York.

[31]

Jo Freeman. 1972. The tyranny of structurelessness. Berkeley Journal of Sociology (1972), 151--164.

[32]

Paulo. Freire. 1970. Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury Publishing.

[33]

Paulo Freire. 1973. Cultural Action for Freedom. (1973), 1--12.

[34]

Batya Friedman and David Hendry. 2019. Value sensitive design: shaping technology with moral imagination. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

[35]

Batya Friedman, Peter Kahn, and Alan Borning. 2002. Value sensitive design: Theory and methods. University of Washington technical report 02--12 (2002).

[36]

Ruben Solis Garcia, Seth Markle, Foluke Nunn, Emery Wright, and Stephanie Guillod. 2016. Peoples Movement Assembly Organizing Handbook. Technical Report.

[37]

Sucheta Ghoshal and Amy S. Bruckman. 2019. The Role of Social Computing Technologies in Grassroots Movement Building. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction [Preprint] (2019). http://www.sucheta.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/sghoshal-grassroots-technology-preprint.pdf

[38]

Sucheta Ghoshal, Andrea Parker, Christopher A. Le Dantec, Carl Disalvo, Lilly Irani, and Amy Bruckman. 2019. Design and the Politics of Collaboration: A Grassroots Perspective. In Companion of the 2019 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17 Companion. ACM Press, Austin, Texas, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311957.3359438 Forthcoming.

Digital Library

[39]

Jonathan Grudin. 1988. Why CSCW Applications Fail : Problems in the Design and Evaluation of Organizational Interfaces. Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computersupported cooperative work CSCW 88, Vol. 4 (1988), 85--93. https://doi.org/10.1145/62266.62273

Digital Library

[40]

Aimi Hamraie. 2017. Building access: Universal design and the politics of disability .U of Minnesota Press.

[41]

Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri. 2017. Assembly .Oxford University Press, New York.

[42]

Gillian R. Hayes. 2011. The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 18, 3 (jul 2011), 1--20. https://doi.org/10.1145/1993060.1993065

Digital Library

[43]

G. L. Herr, K., & Anderson. 2014. The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. Sage Publications.

[44]

E. Hopkins, D., Joyce, B., & Calhoun. 2002. A teacher's guide to classroom research. Open University Press.

[45]

Lilly Irani. 2018. CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES " Design Thinking " : Defending Silicon Valley at the Apex of Global Labor Hierarchies. Irani Catalyst, Vol. 4, 41 (2018), 1--19. https://doi.org/10.28968/CFTT.V4I1.243.G323

[46]

Lily C. Irani and M. Six Silberman. 2013. Turkopticon: Interrupting worker invisibility in amazon mechanical turk. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on łdots (2013), 611--620. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470742

Digital Library

[47]

Marina Karides, Rose M Brewer, and Alice Lovelace. 2007. The United States Social Forum : Perspectives of a Movement. (2007).

[48]

L. A. Kauffman. 2017. Direct action: protest and the reinvention of American radicalism .Verso, London ; New York.

[49]

Os Keyes. 2018. The Misgendering Machines: Trans/HCI Implications of Automatic Gender Recognition. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), 1--22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274357

Digital Library

[50]

Martin Luther King and Jesse Jackson. 2000. Why we can't wait .New American Library, New York.

[51]

Naomi Klein. 2005. The rise of disaster capitalism .National Emergency Training Center.

[52]

Naomi Klein. 2018. The battle for paradise: Puerto Rico takes on the disaster capitalists .Haymarket Books.

[53]

Jaron Lanier. 2010. You are not a gadget: A manifesto .Vintage.

[54]

Christopher a. Le Dantec, Erika Shehan E.S. Poole, and S.P. Susan P. Wyche. 2009. Values as lived experience: Evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery. Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '09) (2009), 1141--1150. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518875

Digital Library

[55]

Sam Levin. 2018. Is Facebook a publisher? In public it says no, but in court it says yes. The Guardian (July 2018). https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jul/02/facebook-mark-zuckerberg-platform-publisher-lawsuit

[56]

John Lofland. 1996. Social movement organizations: guide to research on insurgent realities .Aldine de Gruyter, New York.

[57]

Seth Markle, Foluke Nunn, Emery Wright, Ruben Solis, and Stephanie Guilloud. 2016. People's Movement Assembly. http://www.peoplesmovementassembly.org/

[58]

Janet Masters. 1995. The history of action research. Action research electronic reader, Vol. 22 (1995), 2005.

[59]

Enid Mumford. 2000. Socio-technical design: An unfulfilled promise or a future opportunity? In Organizational and social perspectives on information technology. Springer, 33--46.

[60]

Safiya Umoja Noble. 2018. Algorithms of oppression: how search engines reinforce racism .New York University Press, New York.

[61]

Michael Omi and Howard Winant. 2015. Racial formation in the United States third edition ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York.

[62]

Wanda J. Orlikowski. 2000. Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, Vol. 11, 4 (Aug. 2000), 404--428. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600

Digital Library

[63]

Wanda J Orlikowski and Jack J Baroudi. 1991. Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information systems research, Vol. 2, 1 (1991), 1--28.

[64]

Elinor Ostrom. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. (1990).

[65]

Arnold Pacey. 1983. The Culture of Technology. The MIT Press.

[66]

Francesca Polletta. 2002. Freedom is an Endless Meeting: Democracy in American Social Movements 2004 ed.). The University of Chicago Press.

[67]

Paul Resnick et al. 2001. Beyond bowling together: Sociotechnical capital. HCI in the New Millennium, Vol. 77 (2001), 247--272.

[68]

Howard Rheingold. 2007. Smart mobs: The next social revolution .Basic books.

[69]

Tom Rodden. 1991. A survey of CSCW systems. Interacting with computers, Vol. 3, 3 (1991), 319--353.

[70]

Ari Schlesinger, W Keith Edwards, and Rebecca E Grinter. 2017. Intersectional HCI: Engaging identity through gender, race, and class. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 5412--5427.

Digital Library

[71]

Ari Schlesinger, Kenton P. O'Hara, and Alex S. Taylor. 2018. Let's Talk About Race: Identity, Chatbots, and AI. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18. ACM Press, Montreal QC, Canada, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173889

Digital Library

[72]

Carmen Sirianni. 2007. Neighborhood planning as collaborative democratic design: The case of Seattle. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 73, 4 (2007), 373--387. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360708978519

[73]

Project South. 2017. Out of Struggle: Stregthening and expanding movement journalism in the U.S. South. Technical Report. https://projectsouth.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Out-of-Struggle-7.26.pdf

[74]

Lee Staples. 2016. Roots to power : a manual for grassroots organizing. 483 pages. https://vufind.carli.illinois.edu/all/vf-knx/Record/15696699/Description

[75]

Randy Stoecker. 1994. Defending community: the struggle for alternative redevelopment in Cedar-Riverside. Temple University Press, Philadelphia.

[76]

Latanya Sweeney. 2013. Discrimination in Online Ad Delivery. Queue, Vol. 11, 3 (March 2013), 10:10--10:29. https://doi.org/10.1145/2460276.2460278

Digital Library

[77]

Miriam E Sweeney and André Brock. 2014. Critical informatics: New methods and practices. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 51, 1 (2014), 1--8.

[78]

Sidney G. Tarrow. 2011. Power in movement : social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=zpeVVfesY2AC&oi=fnd&pg=PR13&dq=tarrow+power+in+movement&ots=rH2eR2Vzv2&sig=RNH0tUXV3B5JoUbRDoTwstSwmjQ#v=onepage&q=tarrow power in movement&f=false

[79]

David R Thomas. 2006. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American journal of evaluation, Vol. 27, 2 (2006), 237--246.

[80]

Sherry Turkle. 2017. Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other .Hachette UK.

[81]

Ralph H. Turner and Lewis M. Killian. 1972. Collective behavior 2. ed ed.). Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs/N.J.

[82]

Marlon Twyman, Brian C Keegan, and Aaron Shaw. 2017. Black Lives Matter in Wikipedia: Collective memory and collaboration around online social movements. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 1400--1412.

Digital Library

[83]

Hollis Watkins and C. Liegh McInnis. 2015. Brother Hollis: the sankofa of a movement man. OCLC: 958707833.

[84]

Langdon Winner. 1978. Autonomous technology: Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. MIT Press.

[85]

Langdon Winner. 2009. Do Artifacts Have Politics? Author (s): Langdon Winner Published by : The MIT Press on behalf of American Academy of Arts & Sciences Stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024652 Do Artifacts Have Politics?, Vol. 109, 1 (2009), 121--136.

Cited By

Doğan AKotut L(2025)Tomatoes Die: A Design Fiction for Grassroots Climate AIProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/37012129:1(1-14)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2025
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3701212
Doğan AD’Ignazio C(2025)Data activism and social media in the case of racialized and gendered deaths and disappearancesFeminist Media Studies10.1080/14680777.2024.2447804(1-18)Online publication date: 15-Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2024.2447804
Das DGandhi DSemaan B(2024)Reimagining Communities through Transnational Bengali Decolonial Discourse with YouTube Content CreatorsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869008:CSCW2(1-36)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686900
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Toward a Grassroots Culture of Technology Practice
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Collaborative and social computing
    1. Collaborative and social computing theory, concepts and paradigms
      1. Computer supported cooperative work
    2. Empirical studies in collaborative and social computing
  2. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. HCI theory, concepts and models

Recommendations

Design and the Politics of Collaboration: A Grassroots Perspective
CSCW '19 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2019 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing

This workshop aims to advance our knowledge of how CSCW technologies can be better aligned with grassroots politics of collaboration. What politics are inherent in CSCW tools and techniques? How can we examine whether so- ciotechnical systems support ...
Between Grassroots and the Hierarchy: Lessons Learned from the Design of a Public Services Directory
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

There is a growing interest in HCI research studying technology for citizen engagement in civic issues. We are now seeing issues around technologies for empowerment and participation, long discussed in HCI literature, appropriated and formalised in ...
Ethical dilemmas and PD as important steps towards critical e-government design
PDC '14: Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium papers, and Keynote abstracts - Volume 2

The delivering of public services to citizens through the internet -- also known as e-government - has gained serious momentum, driven by political ambitions of improved efficiency. E-government, however, is considered complex and e-government failures ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 4, Issue CSCW1

CSCW

May 2020

1285 pages

EISSN:2573-0142

DOI:10.1145/3403424

Editors:
Cliff Lampe
University of Michigan
,
Jeff Nichols
Google
,
Karrie Karahalios
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
,
Geraldine Fitzpatrick
Vienna University of Technology
,
Uichin Lee
KAIST
,
Andres Monroy-Hernandez
Microsoft Research
,
Wolfgang Stuerzlinger
Simon Fraser University, Canada

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 May 2020

Published in PACMHCI Volume 4, Issue CSCW1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

36
Total Citations
View Citations
773
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)122
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Doğan AKotut L(2025)Tomatoes Die: A Design Fiction for Grassroots Climate AIProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/37012129:1(1-14)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2025
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3701212
Doğan AD’Ignazio C(2025)Data activism and social media in the case of racialized and gendered deaths and disappearancesFeminist Media Studies10.1080/14680777.2024.2447804(1-18)Online publication date: 15-Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2024.2447804
Das DGandhi DSemaan B(2024)Reimagining Communities through Transnational Bengali Decolonial Discourse with YouTube Content CreatorsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869008:CSCW2(1-36)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686900
Li J(2024)Toward Appropriating Tools for Queer UseProceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium10.1145/3686169.3686186(1-4)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686169.3686186
Upadhyay PBhattacharjee SPaudel SFarzan RLópez CCardoso Llach DQuercia DMustafa MNiu SWong-Villacrés M(2024)Positionality of Researchers Identifying with the "Global South": Shared Heritages, Ways of Thinking and Doing ResearchCompanion Publication of the 2024 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3678884.3687142(679-683)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3678884.3687142
Tran A(2024)Doing What Counts: Following Eviction Data from the Community to the CourtCompanion Publication of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3656156.3665128(15-18)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3656156.3665128
Tran ADisalvo C(2024)Counting Up: Designing Agonistic Data Collection in the Court RoomProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661616(3257-3271)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661616
Flawn LSoden R(2024)Autonomy, Affect, and Reframing: Unpacking the Data Practices of Grassroots Climate Justice ActivistsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661585(3016-3028)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661585
Halperin BRhodes WLeshne KPsarra ARosner D(2024)Resistive Threads: Electronic Streetwear as Social Movement MaterialProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661537(69-85)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661537
Murray MPantidi NMccarthy J(2024)Designing for Dissensus: Socially Engaged Art to access experience and support participation.Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661516(2851-2865)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661516
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Issue’s Table of Contents