[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/377435.377467acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

The effect of student attributes on success in programming

Published: 25 June 2001 Publication History

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between student results in a first year programming course and predisposition factors of gender, prior computing experience, learning style and academic performance to date. While the study does not suggest that any dominant attributes are related to success in programming, there are some interesting outcomes which will have implications for teaching and learning.

References

[1]
Bostrom,R.P. Olfman,L. & Sein,M.K. (1990), The Importance of Learning Style in End-User Training, MIS Quarterly March 1990.
[2]
Camp T. (1997), The incredible shrinking pipeline. Communications ACM 40:10.
[3]
Carbone, A. & Kaasboll, J.J. (1998), A survey of methods used to evaluate computer science teaching, ITiCSE conference1998.
[4]
Evans, G.E. & Simkin, M.G. (1989), What best predicts computer proficiency? Communications ACM 32:11, pp. 1322-1327.
[5]
Fisher, A. Margolis, J. Miller F. (1997), Undergraduate women in computer science: experience, motivation and culture. SIGCSE conference 1997.
[6]
Goold, A & Rimmer, R. (2000) Factors affecting performance in First Year Programming, ACM CIGCSE Bulletin, Vol. 32, pp. 39 - 43.
[7]
Guinan, T. & Stephens, L. (1988), Factors affecting the achievement of high school students in beginning computer science courses, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching.
[8]
Hostetler, T.R. (1983), Predicting student success in an introductory programming course, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 15:3, pp. 40-49.
[9]
Kolb, D. (1985) Leaning Style Inventory, Hay/McBer, Boston,Ma.
[10]
Mc Quillan, H. & Bradley, M. R. (1999) Barriers for Women in Computing, University of Limerick.
[11]
Murphy, C.A., Coover, D & Owen, S.V. (1989), Development and validation of the computer selfefficacy scale, Educational and Psychological Measurement 49, pp.893-899.
[12]
Norton, D.A. Williamson, P.N. & Waker, P. (1990), Criteria by which pupils can be selected to offer computer studies in the Senior Secondary school, Proceedings IFIP world conference on Computers in Education 1990.
[13]
Scragg, G. Smith, J. (1998), A study of barriers to women in undergraduate computer science, ACM SIGCSE conference 1998.
[14]
Selby, R. Ryba, K. Young, A. (1998), Women in computing: what does the data show? ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 30:4.
[15]
Sims,R.R. (1990),Adapting training to trainee learning styles, Journal of European industrial training 14:2, pp. 17-22.
[16]
Winslow, L. E. (1996), Programming pedagogy - a psychological overview, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
[17]
Woodhouse,D. (1983), Student selection for computing courses, Australian Computer Journal

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)FUZZY LOGIC APPROACH FOR PREDICTING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN SCRATCHKonya Journal of Engineering Sciences10.36306/konjes.1372676(344-357)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Exploring the Predictive Potential of Complex Problem-Solving in Computing Education: A Case Study in the Introductory Programming CourseMathematics10.3390/math1211165512:11(1655)Online publication date: 24-May-2024
  • (2024)Testing Programming Aptitude through Commonsense ComputingProceedings of the 26th Australasian Computing Education Conference10.1145/3636243.3636255(104-113)Online publication date: 29-Jan-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ITiCSE '01: Proceedings of the 6th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
June 2001
198 pages
ISBN:1581133308
DOI:10.1145/377435
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 June 2001

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

ITICSE01
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

ITiCSE '01 Paper Acceptance Rate 43 of 139 submissions, 31%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)32
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 26 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)FUZZY LOGIC APPROACH FOR PREDICTING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN SCRATCHKonya Journal of Engineering Sciences10.36306/konjes.1372676(344-357)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Exploring the Predictive Potential of Complex Problem-Solving in Computing Education: A Case Study in the Introductory Programming CourseMathematics10.3390/math1211165512:11(1655)Online publication date: 24-May-2024
  • (2024)Testing Programming Aptitude through Commonsense ComputingProceedings of the 26th Australasian Computing Education Conference10.1145/3636243.3636255(104-113)Online publication date: 29-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Generation of Student’s Programming Exercises Using SCT GeneratorProceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2024, Volume 310.1007/978-3-031-73125-9_43(670-680)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2023)The Effect of Teaching Physical Programming on Computational Thinking Skills and Self-Efficacy Perceptions Towards Computational ThinkingJournal of Educational Computing Research10.1177/0735633123122031362:3(785-815)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Factors Affecting Student’s Academic Performance In Programming Using Association Rule MiningProceedings of the 2023 Fifteenth International Conference on Contemporary Computing10.1145/3607947.3608030(371-374)Online publication date: 3-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Correlating Students' Class Performance Based on GitHub Metrics: A Statistical StudyProceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3587102.3588799(526-532)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Whiteboarding: A Tool to Improve CS1 Student Self-EfficacyProceedings of the ACM Conference on Global Computing Education Vol 110.1145/3576882.3617925(36-42)Online publication date: 5-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Exploring Personality and Learning Motivation Influences on Students’ Computational Thinking Skills in Introductory Programming CoursesJournal of Science Education and Technology10.1007/s10956-023-10052-132:6(778-792)Online publication date: 26-May-2023
  • (2022)Effectiveness of Feedback Based on Log File Analysis in Introductory Programming CoursesJournal of Educational Computing Research10.1177/0735633122113265161:3(696-719)Online publication date: 25-Oct-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media