[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3472634.3472636acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesacm-turcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Recognition Of Learners’ Personality Traits For Software Engineering Education

Published: 02 October 2021 Publication History

Abstract

It is vital for educators to teach learners in accordance with their aptitude, which can be useful to help learners reach their full potential. Educators have been taking the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) as a powerful tool to understand the differences in students’ learning styles, adopting appropriate teaching strategies to accommodate the learning styles of different types of students can effectively prevent students from being tired of studying. It is a problem worthy of research to recognize the students’ personality traits with technological means. Therefore, we propose a method to recognize learners’ MBTI from videos, which can be applied in the course learning and practice stages of software engineering education. We propose a novel approach to recognize the MBTI personality traits of learners from videos. Personality and emotion unconsciously affect facial expression, the speaking style in social contexts. However, in the current literature, there is no publicly available source of images dataset labeled with the MBTI personality scale; nearly all the available data are text. In this paper, we use two datasets: images extracted from ChaLearn First Impressions dataset and the Myer-Briggs Personality Type Dataset from Kaggle for our training tasks. Furthermore, we take plentiful text data labeled with the MBTI personality scale as the source domain and image data as the target domain for borrowing knowledge from the source domain to facilitate the learning task in a target domain. By adopting feature transfer, a bridge is built between the source domain and the target domain. We perform experiments on the transfer task and evaluate the effectiveness of this approach, the results of this study can assist educators in regards to the identification of learners’ MBTI personality types in a new way.

References

[1]
Akiko Aizawa. 2003. An information-theoretic perspective of tf–idf measures. Information Processing & Management 39, 1 (2003), 45–65.
[2]
Mohammad Hossein Amirhosseini and Hassan Kazemian. 2020. Machine Learning Approach to Personality Type Prediction Based on the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator®. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 4, 1 (2020), 9.
[3]
Süleyman Aslan and Uğur Güdükbay. 2019. Multimodal Video-based Apparent Personality Recognition Using Long Short-Term Memory and Convolutional Neural Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.00381(2019).
[4]
Luiz Fernando Capretz. 2002. Implications of MBTI in software engineering education. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 34, 4 (2002), 134–137. https://doi.org/10.1145/820127.820185
[5]
Stewart E. Cooper and John A. Miller. 1991. Mbti Learning Style-Teaching Style Discongruencies. Educational & Psychological Measurement 51, 3 (1991), 699–706.
[6]
Peter Craig, Paul Dieppe, Sally Macintyre, Susan Michie, Irwin Nazareth, and Mark Petticrew. 2008. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Bmj 337(2008).
[7]
Brandon Cui and Calvin Qi. 2017. Survey Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Natural Language Processing for MBTI Personality Type Prediction.
[8]
Matej Gjurković and Jan Šnajder. 2018. Reddit: A gold mine for personality prediction. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Computational Modeling of People’s Opinions, Personality, and Emotions in Social Media. 87–97.
[9]
Jennifer Golbeck, Cristina Robles, Michon Edmondson, and Karen Turner. 2011. Predicting personality from twitter. In 2011 IEEE third international conference on privacy, security, risk and trust and 2011 IEEE third international conference on social computing. IEEE, 149–156.
[10]
Scott I Hernandez RK. 2017. Predicting Myers-Briggs type indicator with text.
[11]
Douglas N Jackson and Paul F Tremblay. 2002. The six factor personality questionnaire.(2002).
[12]
JCSJ Junior, C Jacques, Yağmur Güçlütürk, Marc Pérez, Umut Güçlü, Carlos Andujar, Xavier Baró, Hugo Jair Escalante, Isabelle Guyon, MA van Gerven, 2018. First impressions: A survey on computer vision-based apparent personality trait analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.08046(2018).
[13]
Jayakumar Kaliappan, Jain Shreyansh, Mohan Sai Singamsetti, 2019. Surveillance Camera using Face Recognition for automatic Attendance feeder and Energy conservation in classroom. In 2019 International Conference on Vision Towards Emerging Trends in Communication and Networking (ViTECoN). IEEE, 1–5.
[14]
Michael C Komisin and Curry Guinn. 2011. Identifying personality types using document classification methods. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of North Carolina Wilmington.
[15]
Yunan Li, Jun Wan, Qiguang Miao, Sergio Escalera, Huijuan Fang, Huizhou Chen, Xiangda Qi, and Guodong Guo. 2020. CR-Net: A Deep Classification-Regression Network for Multimodal Apparent Personality Analysis. International Journal of Computer Vision(2020), 1–18.
[16]
François Mairesse and Marilyn Walker. 2006. Automatic recognition of personality in conversation. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL, Companion Volume: Short Papers. 85–88.
[17]
Navonil Majumder, Soujanya Poria, Alexander Gelbukh, and Erik Cambria. 2017. Deep learning-based document modeling for personality detection from text. IEEE Intelligent Systems 32, 2 (2017), 74–79.
[18]
Yash Mehta, Navonil Majumder, Alexander Gelbukh, and Erik Cambria. 2019. Recent trends in deep learning based personality detection. Artificial Intelligence Review(2019), 1–27.
[19]
Isabel Briggs Myers and Linda K Kirby. 1995. Introduction to Type: A Guide to Understanding Your Results on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Australian Council for Educational Research.
[20]
James W Pennebaker, Martha E Francis, and Roger J Booth. 2001. Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 71, 2001 (2001), 2001.
[21]
James W. Pennebaker and Laura A. King. 1999. Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference.J Pers Soc Psychol 77, 6 (1999), 1296–1312.
[22]
Argamon Shlomo, S Dhawle, Koppel Moshe, and J W Pennebaker. 2005. Lexical Predictors of Personality Type. In 2005 Joint Annual Meeting of the Interface and the Classification Society of North America.
[23]
Tommy Tandera, Derwin Suhartono, Rini Wongso, Yen Lina Prasetio, 2017. Personality prediction system from facebook users. Procedia computer science 116 (2017), 604–611.
[24]
Y. R. Tausczik and J. W. Pennebaker. 2009. The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods. Journal of Language & Social Psychology 29, 1 (2009), 24–54.
[25]
Daniel Varona and Luiz Fernando Capretz. [n.d.]. Assessing a candidate’s natural disposition for a software development role using MBTI. In 31st Annual Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group (PPIG 2020).
[26]
Yuan Yao, Yu Zhang, Xutao Li, and Yunming Ye. 2019. Heterogeneous domain adaptation via soft transfer network. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 1578–1586.
[27]
Yuan Yao, Yu Zhang, Xutao Li, and Yunming Ye. 2019. Heterogeneous Domain Adaptation via Soft Transfer Network. CoRR abs/1908.10552(2019). arxiv:1908.10552http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10552
[28]
Chen Lin Zhang, Hao Zhang, Xiu Shen Wei, and Jianxin Wu. 2016. Deep Bimodal Regression for Apparent Personality Analysis.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)UBRMTC: User Behavior Recognition Model With Transaction CharacterIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2023.325722711:2(1589-1601)Online publication date: Apr-2024
  • (2023)Board 363: Promoting the Dispositional Dimension of Competency in Undergraduate Computing Programs2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings10.18260/1-2--43018Online publication date: Jun-2023
  • (2023)A Combined Knowledge and Competency (CKC) Model for Computer Science CurriculaACM Inroads10.1145/360521514:3(22-29)Online publication date: 16-Aug-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Recognition Of Learners’ Personality Traits For Software Engineering Education
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ACM TURC '21: Proceedings of the ACM Turing Award Celebration Conference - China
          July 2021
          284 pages
          ISBN:9781450385671
          DOI:10.1145/3472634
          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 02 October 2021

          Permissions

          Request permissions for this article.

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          1. Computer Education.
          2. Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)
          3. Deep learning
          4. Heterogeneous domain adaptation
          5. Personality trait recognition

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Funding Sources

          • the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
          • the National Natural Science Foundation of China

          Conference

          ACM TURC 2021

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)48
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
          Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          Cited By

          View all
          • (2024)UBRMTC: User Behavior Recognition Model With Transaction CharacterIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2023.325722711:2(1589-1601)Online publication date: Apr-2024
          • (2023)Board 363: Promoting the Dispositional Dimension of Competency in Undergraduate Computing Programs2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings10.18260/1-2--43018Online publication date: Jun-2023
          • (2023)A Combined Knowledge and Competency (CKC) Model for Computer Science CurriculaACM Inroads10.1145/360521514:3(22-29)Online publication date: 16-Aug-2023
          • (2023)Applications of convolutional neural networks in educationExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120621231:COnline publication date: 30-Nov-2023

          View Options

          Login options

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format.

          HTML Format

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media