[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2783258.2788578acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Probabilistic Modeling of a Sales Funnel to Prioritize Leads

Published: 10 August 2015 Publication History

Abstract

This paper shows how to learn probabilistic classifiers that model how sales prospects proceed through stages from first awareness to final success or failure. Specifically,we present two models, called DQM for direct qualification model and FFM for full funnel model, that can be used to rank initial leads based on their probability of conversion to a sales opportunity, probability of successful sale, and/or expected revenue. Training uses the large amount of historical data collected by customer relationship management or marketing automation software. The trained models can replace traditional lead scoring systems, which are hand-tuned and therefore error-prone and not probabilistic. DQM and FFM are designed to overcome the selection bias caused by available data being based on a traditional lead scoring system. Experimental results are shown on real sales data from two companies. Features in the training data include demographic and behavioral information about each lead. For both companies, both methods achieve high AUC scores. For one company, they result in a a 307% increase in number of successful sales, as well as a dramatic increase in total revenue. In addition, we describe the results of the DQM method in actual use. These results show that the method has additional benefits that include decreased time needed to qualify leads, and decreased number of calls placed to schedule a product demo. The proposed methods find high-quality leads earlier in the sales process because they focus on features that measure the fit of potential customers with the product being sold, in addition to their behavior.

References

[1]
M. J. Berry and G. S. Linoff. Data mining techniques for marketing, sales, and customer relationship management. John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
[2]
I. Bose and R. K. Mahapatra. Business data mining-a machine learning perspective. Information & Management, 39(3):211--225, 2001.
[3]
G. Cui, M. L. Wong, and H.K. Lui. Machine learning for direct marketing response models: Bayesian networks with evolutionary programming. Management Science, 52(4):597--612, 2006.
[4]
C. Elkan and K. Noto. Learning classifiers from only positive and unlabeled data. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 213--220. ACM, 2008.
[5]
J. H. Friedman. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, pages 1189--1232, 2001.
[6]
J. H. Friedman. Stochastic gradient boosting. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 38(4):367--378, 2002.
[7]
S. Kaufman, S. Rosset, C. Perlich, and O. Stitelman. Leakage in data mining: Formulation, detection, and avoidance. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD), 6(4):15, 2012.
[8]
P. Kotler, N. Rackham, and S. Krishnaswamy. Ending the war between sales and marketing. Harvard Business Review, 84(7/8):68, 2006.
[9]
R. T. Moriarty and G. S. Swartz. Automation to boost sales and marketing. Harvard Business Review, Reprint Service, 1989.
[10]
F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:2825--2830, 2011.
[11]
M. J. Shaw, C. Subramaniam, G. W. Tan, and M. E. Welge. Knowledge management and data mining for marketing. Decision support systems, 31(1):127--137, 2001.
[12]
A. Smith and C. Elkan. Making generative classifiers robust to selection bias. In Proceedings of the SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pages 657--666. ACM Press, 2007.
[13]
B. Zadrozny and C. Elkan. Obtaining calibrated probability estimates from decision trees and naive Bayesian classifiers. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 609--616. Morgan Kaufmann, June 2001.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Novel Approach for Commercial Opportunities Qualification Using the BANT Methodology under the Fuzzy Set Theory Framework.Procedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.553246(1271-1280)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Digital Transformation of Sales Process Management: A Case of Project-Oriented Large Manufacturing Enterprise in ChinaThe Eighteenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management10.1007/978-981-97-5098-6_76(1112-1120)Online publication date: 4-Aug-2024
  • (2023)Predicting rare events by shrinking towards proportional oddsProceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning10.5555/3618408.3618791(9547-9602)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
KDD '15: Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
August 2015
2378 pages
ISBN:9781450336642
DOI:10.1145/2783258
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 August 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. decision trees
  2. gradient boosted trees
  3. machine learning
  4. marketing
  5. predictive lead scoring
  6. sales

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

KDD '15
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

KDD '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 160 of 819 submissions, 20%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,133 of 8,635 submissions, 13%

Upcoming Conference

KDD '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)255
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)18
Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Novel Approach for Commercial Opportunities Qualification Using the BANT Methodology under the Fuzzy Set Theory Framework.Procedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.553246(1271-1280)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Digital Transformation of Sales Process Management: A Case of Project-Oriented Large Manufacturing Enterprise in ChinaThe Eighteenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management10.1007/978-981-97-5098-6_76(1112-1120)Online publication date: 4-Aug-2024
  • (2023)Predicting rare events by shrinking towards proportional oddsProceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning10.5555/3618408.3618791(9547-9602)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
  • (2023)The Use of Social MediaConnecting With Consumers Through Effective Personalization and Programmatic Advertising10.4018/978-1-6684-9146-1.ch013(243-267)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Entwicklung datenbasierter Lead-Scoring-ModelleZeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb10.1515/zwf-2023-1169118:12(867-871)Online publication date: 28-Dec-2023
  • (2023)NEON: Living Needs Prediction System in MeituanProceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3580305.3599874(5292-5302)Online publication date: 6-Aug-2023
  • (2023)The state of lead scoring models and their impact on sales performanceInformation Technology and Management10.1007/s10799-023-00388-w25:1(69-98)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2023
  • (2023)A Glance at the “Drop-Outs”Marketingtechnologien10.1007/978-3-658-42294-3_17(241-254)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2023
  • (2022)Customer agility in the modern automotive sector: how lead management shapes agile digital companiesTechnological Forecasting and Social Change10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121362175(121362)Online publication date: Feb-2022
  • (2022)Accurately Predicting User Registration in Highly Unbalanced Real-World Datasets from Online News PortalsDatabase and Expert Systems Applications10.1007/978-3-031-12423-5_23(302-315)Online publication date: 29-Jul-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media