More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

metaphactory: : A platform for knowledge graph management

Editors: Mayank Kejriwal, Vanessa Lopez, Juan F. Sequeda Authors: Peter Haase, Daniel M. Herzig, Artem Kozlov, Andriy Nikolov, Johannes TrameAuthors Info & Claims

Semantic Web, Volume 10, Issue 6

Pages 1109 - 1125

https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-190360

Published: 01 January 2019 Publication History

Abstract

In this system paper we describe metaphactory, a platform for building knowledge graph applications. The metaphactory platform aims at supporting different categories of knowledge graph users within the organization by realizing relevant services for knowledge graph data management tasks, providing a rich and customizable user interface, and enabling rapid building of use case-specific applications. The paper discusses how the platform architecture design built on open standards enables its reusability in various application domains and use cases as well as facilitates integration of the knowledge graph with other parts of the organizational data and software infrastructure. We highlight the capabilities of the platform by describing its usage in four different knowledge graph application domains and share the lessons learnt from the practical experience of building knowledge graph applications in the enterprise context.

References

[1]

M. Acosta, M.-E. Vidal, T. Lampo, J. Castillo and E. Ruckhaus, ANAPSID: An Adaptive Query Processing Engine for SPARQL Endpoints, 10th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2011), Bonn, Germany.

[2]

J. Attard, F. Orlandi and S. Auer, ExConQuer: Lowering barriers to RDF and linked data re-use, Semantic Web 9(2) (2018), 241–255.

Digital Library

[3]

D. Calvanese, B. Cogrel, S. Komla-Ebri, R. Kontchakov, D. Lanti, M. Rezk, M. Rodriguez-Muro and G. Xiao, Ontop: Answering SPARQL queries over relational databases, Semantic Web 8(3) (2017), 471–487.

Digital Library

[4]

D.V. Camarda, S. Mazzini and A. Antonuccio, LodLive, exploring the web of data, in: 8th International Conference on Semantic Systems, I-SEMANTICS ’12, Graz, Austria, 2012, pp. 197–200.

Digital Library

[5]

M. Doerr, A. Kritsotaki and K. Boutsika, Factual argumentation – a core model for assertions making, JOCCH 3(3) (2011), 8–1834.

Digital Library

[6]

J. Dolby, A. Fokoue, M. Rodriguez-Muro, K. Srinivas and W. Sun, Extending SPARQL for data analytic tasks, in: 15th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2016), Kobe, Japan, 2016, pp. 437–452.

Digital Library

[7]

M. Dudás, S. Lohmann, V. Svátek and D. Pavlov, Ontology visualization methods and tools: A survey of the state of the art, Knowledge Engineering Review 33 (2018), e10.

[8]

T. Franz, J. Koch, R.Q. Dividino and S. Staab, LENA-TR: Browsing linked open data along knowledge-aspects, in: Linked Data Meets Artificial Intelligence, 2010 AAAI Spring Symposium, Stanford, CA, USA, 2010.

[9]

M. Galkin, S. Auer, M. Vidal and S. Scerri, Enterprise knowledge graphs: A semantic approach for knowledge management in the next generation of enterprise information systems, in: 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2017), Porto, Portugal, 2017, pp. 88–98.

[10]

O. Görlitz and S. Staab, SPLENDID: SPARQL endpoint federation exploiting VOID descriptions, in: COLD2011 Workshop, 10th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2011), Bonn, Germany, 2011.

[11]

F. Haag, S. Lohmann, S. Siek and T. Ertl, Visual querying of linked data with QueryVOWL, in: Joint Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Summarizing and Presenting Entities and Ontologies and the 3rd International Workshop on Human Semantic Web Interfaces (SumPre 2015, HSWI 2015) Co-located with the 12th Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2015), Portoroz, Slovenia, 2015.

[12]

P. Haase, A. Nikolov, J. Trame, A. Kozlov and D.M. Herzig Alexa, Ask Wikidata! Voice interaction with knowledge graphs using Amazon Alexa, in: Proceedings of the ISWC 2017 Posters & Demonstrations and Industry Tracks Co-located with 16th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2017), Vienna, Austria, 2017.

[13]

T. Hubauer, S. Lamparter, P. Haase and D.M. Herzig, Use cases of the industrial knowledge graph at Siemens, in: Proceedings of the ISWC 2018 Posters & Demonstrations, Industry and Blue Sky Ideas Tracks Co-located with 17th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2018), Monterey, CA, USA, 2018.

[14]

S. Idreos, O. Papaemmanouil and S. Chaudhuri, Overview of data exploration techniques, in: ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, May 31–June 4, 2015, 2015, pp. 277–281.

Digital Library

[15]

F. Kräutli and M. Valleriani, CorpusTracer: A CIDOC database for tracing knowledge networks, DSH 33(2) (2018), 336–346.

[16]

L. Lane et al., neXtProt: A knowledge platform for human proteins, Nucleic Acids Research 40(Database–Issue) (2012), 76–83.

[17]

D. Mouromtsev, D. Pavlov, Y. Emelyanov, A. Morozov, D. Razdyakonov and M. Galkin, The simple web-based tool for visualization and sharing of semantic data and ontologies, in: Proceedings of the ISWC 2015 Posters & Demonstrations Track Co-located with the 14th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-2015), Bethlehem, PA, USA, 2015.

[18]

D. Mouromtsev, G. Wohlgenannt, P. Haase, D. Pavlov, Y. Emelyanov and A. Morozov, A diagrammatic approach for visual question answering over knowledge graphs, in: ESWC 2018 Satellite Events, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 2018, pp. 34–39.

Digital Library

[19]

A. Nikolov, P. Haase, D.M. Herzig, J. Trame and A. Kozlov, Combining RDF graph data and embedding models for an augmented knowledge graph, in: BigNet@WWW’18 Workshop, the Web Conference 2018, (TheWebConf 2018), Lyon, France, 2018, pp. 977–980.

Digital Library

[20]

A. Nikolov, P. Haase, J. Trame and A. Kozlov, Ephedra: Efficiently combining RDF data and services using SPARQL federation, in: 8th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Semantic Web (KESW 2017), Szczecin, Poland, 2017, pp. 246–262.

[21]

A.G. Nuzzolese, V. Presutti, A. Gangemi, S. Peroni and P. Ciancarini, Aemoo: Linked data exploration based on knowledge patterns, Semantic Web 8(1) (2017), 87–112.

Digital Library

[22]

D. Oldman and D. Tanase, Reshaping the knowledge graph by connecting researchers, data and practices in ResearchSpace, in: 17th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2018), Monterey, CA, USA, 2018.

[23]

B. Quilitz and U. Leser, Querying distributed RDF data sources with SPARQL, in: 7th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2008), Vol. 5021, Springer, Karlsruhe, Germany, 2008, pp. 524–538.

[24]

M. Saleem and A.-C. Ngonga Ngomo, HiBISCuS: Hypergraph-based source selection for SPARQL endpoint federation, in: 11th Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2014), Heraklion, Greece, 2014.

[25]

A. Schwarte, P. Haase, K. Hose, R. Schenkel and M. Schmidt, FedX: Optimization techniques for federated query processing on linked data, in: 10th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2011), Heraklion, Greece, 2011, pp. 601–616.

[26]

A. Soylu, M. Giese, E. Jiménez-Ruiz, G. Vega-Gorgojo and I. Horrocks, Experiencing OptiqueVQS: A multi-paradigm and ontology-based visual query system for end users, Universal Access in the Information Society 15(1) (2016), 129–152.

Digital Library

[27]

B. Stringer, A. Meroño-Pe nuela, S. Abeln, F. van Harmelen and J. Heringa, SCRY: Extending SPARQL with custom data processing methods for the life sciences, in: 9th International Conference on Semantic Web Applications and Tools for Life Sciences (SWAT4LS), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016.

[28]

M. Tvarozek and M. Bieliková, Generating exploratory search interfaces for the semantic web, in: Human-Computer Interaction – Second IFIP TC 13 Symposium, (HCIS 2010), Brisbane, Australia, 2010, pp. 175–186.

[29]

K. Tzompanaki and M. Doerr, Fundamental Categories and Relationships for querying CIDOC-CRM based repositories, Technical Report, TR-429, ICS-FORTH, 2012.

[30]

E.L. Willighagen et al., The ChEMBL database as linked open data, J. Cheminformatics 5 (2013), 23.

Cited By

Ding GYi PFeng X(2023)Constructing a Knowledge Graph for the Chinese Subject Based on Collective IntelligenceInternational Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems10.4018/IJSWIS.32735519:1(1-19)Online publication date: 31-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.4018/IJSWIS.327355
Daquino MWigham MDaga EGiagnolini LTomasi F(2023)CLEF. A Linked Open Data Native System for CrowdsourcingJournal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 10.1145/359472116:3(1-17)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3594721
de Lama Sanchez NHaase PRoman DProdan RVieira MCardellini VDi Marco ATuma P(2023)Boosting the Impact of Extreme and Sustainable Graph Processing for Urgent Societal Challenges in Europe Graph-Massivizer: A Horizon Europe ProjectCompanion of the 2023 ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering10.1145/3578245.3585334(233-238)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3578245.3585334
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

metaphactory: A platform for knowledge graph management

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

UWKGM: A Modular Platform for Knowledge Graph Management
CIKM '20: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management

A knowledge graph becomes a central data hub in the enterprise and the research communities. Nevertheless, the development of knowledge graphs is challenging due to the insufficient functionalities of knowledge graph management platforms. In this paper, ...
A subgraph matching algorithm based on subgraph index for knowledge graph
Abstract
The problem of subgraph matching is one fundamental issue in graph search, which is NP-Complete problem. Recently, subgraph matching has become a popular research topic in the field of knowledge graph analysis, which has a wide range of ...
A Crowdsourcing-Based Knowledge Graph Construction Platform
Service-Oriented Computing – ICSOC 2020 Workshops
Abstract
Nowadays, knowledge graphs are backbones of many information systems that require to have access to structured knowledge. While there are many openly available knowledge graphs, self-constructed knowledge graphs in specific domains are still in ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Semantic Web

Semantic Web Volume 10, Issue 6

Knowledge Graphs: Construction, Management and Querying

2019

234 pages

ISSN:1570-0844

EISSN:2210-4968

Issue’s Table of Contents

© 2019 – IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.

Publisher

IOS Press

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 January 2019

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

8
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 04 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Ding GYi PFeng X(2023)Constructing a Knowledge Graph for the Chinese Subject Based on Collective IntelligenceInternational Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems10.4018/IJSWIS.32735519:1(1-19)Online publication date: 31-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.4018/IJSWIS.327355
Daquino MWigham MDaga EGiagnolini LTomasi F(2023)CLEF. A Linked Open Data Native System for CrowdsourcingJournal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 10.1145/359472116:3(1-17)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3594721
de Lama Sanchez NHaase PRoman DProdan RVieira MCardellini VDi Marco ATuma P(2023)Boosting the Impact of Extreme and Sustainable Graph Processing for Urgent Societal Challenges in Europe Graph-Massivizer: A Horizon Europe ProjectCompanion of the 2023 ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering10.1145/3578245.3585334(233-238)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3578245.3585334
Bernasconi ECeriani MMecella MCatarci T(2023)Design, realization, and user evaluation of the ARCA system for exploring a digital libraryInternational Journal on Digital Libraries10.1007/s00799-022-00343-024:1(1-22)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s00799-022-00343-0
Färber MLamprecht DKrause JAung LHaase P(2023)SemOpenAlex: The Scientific Landscape in 26 Billion RDF TriplesThe Semantic Web – ISWC 202310.1007/978-3-031-47243-5_6(94-112)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-47243-5_6
Ikkala EHyvönen ERantala HKoho M(2022)Sampo-UISemantic Web10.3233/SW-21042813:1(69-84)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.3233/SW-210428
Zhu GHao MZheng CWang L(2022)Design of Knowledge Graph Retrieval System for Legal and Regulatory Framework of Multilevel Latent Semantic IndexingComputational Intelligence and Neuroscience10.1155/2022/67810432022Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1155/2022/6781043
Listl FFischer JSohr AGrimm SWeyrich M(2022)Ontological Architecture for Knowledge Graphs in Manufacturing and Simulation2022 IEEE 27th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)10.1109/ETFA52439.2022.9921284(1-8)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/ETFA52439.2022.9921284

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

View Issue’s Table of Contents