[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Enhanced group decision-making through an intelligent algorithmic approach for multiple-attribute credit evaluation with 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic sets

Published: 14 March 2024 Publication History

Abstract

With the development of the internet economy, e-commerce has rapidly risen, and a large number of small and micro e-commerce enterprises have emerged. However, these enterprises have low financial information transparency, small scale, and high development uncertainty. Therefore, combining the characteristics of the internet economy, it is of great significance to dynamically evaluate credit risk. This not only helps to enhance the quality and rationality of credit risk evaluation results, but also helps to improve financing efficiency and reduce financing risks. The credit evaluation for small and micro enterprises is a multiple-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM). Recently, the TODIM (an acronym in Portuguese of interactive and multicriteria decision making) and TOPSIS method has been inaugurated to cope with MAGDM issues. The 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic sets (2TLNSs) are inaugurated as an effective tool for characterizing uncertain information during the credit evaluation for small and micro enterprises. In this paper, the 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic TODIM-TOPSIS (2TLNN-TODIM-TOPSIS) method is inaugurated to solve the MAGDM under 2TLNSs. Finally, a numerical case study for credit evaluation for small and micro enterprises is inaugurated to confirm the proposed method. The prime contribution of this paper are outlined: (1) The information entropy based on score function and accuracy function are built on the 2TLNSs to obtain weight information; (2) an integrated the 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic TODIM-TOPSIS (2TLNN-TODIM-TOPSIS) method is established to cope with MAGDM; (3) An illustrative example for credit evaluation for small and micro enterprises has accomplished to illustrate the 2TLNN-TODIM-TOPSIS; (4) some comparative analysis are employed to verify the 2TLNN-TODIM-TOPSIS method.

References

[1]
Zhang S, Sun H, Wang S. Research on the credit evaluation system of small and micro enterprises in an uncertain environment. Journal of North China Institute of Aerospace Technology. 2014; 24(02): 46-50.
[2]
Zhu XQ, Wang F, Wang HY, Liang CZ, Tang R, Sun XL, et al. Topsis method for quality credit evaluation: A case of air-conditioning market in china. Journal of Computational Science. 2014; 5(2): 99-105.
[3]
Sun J, Lang J, Fujita H, Li H. Imbalanced enterprise credit evaluation with dte-sbd: Decision tree ensemble based on smote and bagging with differentiated sampling rates. Information Sciences. 2018; 425: 76-91.
[4]
Wang ZK, Guan H, editors. Research on the evaluation of chinese herbal medicine quality and safety credit index based on topsis. 8th International Conference on Health Information Science (HIS); 2019 Oct 18–20; Shaanxi Normal Univ, Xian, PEOPLES R CHINA. CHAM: Springer International Publishing Ag; 2019.
[5]
Wei ZK, Ning B, Zhu TB, Niu JQ, Liu J, Iop, editors. Credit risk evaluation and analysis of power generation enterprises under the spot trading. 5th International Conference on Advances in Energy Resources and Environment Engineering (ICAESEE); 2019 Dec 06–08; Chongqing, PEOPLES R CHINA. BRISTOL: Iop Publishing Ltd; 2020.
[6]
Yang K, Zhang LL. Research on credit risk evaluation of online supply chain finance with triangular fuzzy information. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2019; 37(2): 1921-28.
[7]
Zhang JS, Lyu TJ, Li RY, editors. A study on smie credit evaluation model based on blockchain technology. 11th CIRP Conference on Industrial Product-Service Systems; 2019 May 29–31; Peoples R China. AMSTERDAM: Elsevier; 2019.
[8]
Ic YT. A multi-objective credit evaluation model using moora method and goal programming. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. 2020; 45(3): 2035-48.
[9]
Shuang H, Ieee, editors. Research on e-commerce credit information evaluation based on social big data. 5th International Conference on Smart Grid and Electrical Automation (ICSGEA); 2020 Jun 13–14; Zhangjiajie, PEOPLES R CHINA. LOS ALAMITOS: Ieee Computer Soc; 2020.
[10]
Wang FT, Ding LH, Yu HX, Zhao YJ. Big data analytics on enterprise credit risk evaluation of e-business platform. Information Systems and E-Business Management. 2020; 18(3): 311-50.
[11]
Zhang LL, Zuo X, editors. Credit of small and medium sized scientific and technological enterprises based on bp neural network evaluation research. 2nd International Conference on Computer Science Communication and Network Security (CSCNS); 2020 Dec 22–23; Sanya, PEOPLES R CHINA. CEDEX A: E D P Sciences; 2021.
[12]
Zhao XH, Chu CC, Gao AY, Iop, editors. Application on credit evaluation and supervision of highway construction enterprise in china. 4th International Workshop on Renewable Energy and Development (IWRED); 2020 Apr 24–26; Electr Network. BRISTOL: Iop Publishing Ltd; 2020.
[13]
He F, Wang M, Zhou P. Evaluation of market risk and resource allocation ability of green credit business by deep learning under internet of things. Plos One. 2022; 17(4): 20.
[14]
Konovalova N, Savchina O, editors. Evaluation of credit policy implementation in commercial banks: Evidence from latvia. 21st International Multidisciplinary Conference on Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication (RelStat); 2021 Oct 14–15; Riga, LATVIA. CHAM: Springer International Publishing Ag; 2022.
[15]
Lei F, Wei GW, Chen XD. Some self-evaluation models of enterprise’s credit based on some probabilistic double hierarchy linguistic aggregation operators. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2021; 40(6): 11809-28.
[16]
Liu JJ, Jiang PY. A blockchain-driven cyber-credit evaluation approach for establishing reliable cooperation among unauthentic msmes in social manufacturing. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2021; 121(4): 724-49.
[17]
Peng H. Research on credit evaluation of financial enterprises based on the genetic backpropagation neural network. Scientific Programming. 2021; 2021: 8.
[18]
Xie XF, Hu XY, Xu K, Wang JY, Shi XY, Zhang FY, editors. Evaluation of associated credit risk in supply chain based on trade credit risk contagion. 8th International Conference on Information Technology and Quantitative Management (ITQM) – Developing Global Digital Economy after COVID-19; 2021 Jul 09–11; Chengdu, PEOPLES R CHINA. AMSTERDAM: Elsevier Science Bv; 2022.
[19]
Zhang X, Zeng QC, Ieee, editors. Credit evaluation of the highway construction enterprises based on the combination weighting-grey correlation topsis model. 9th International Conference on Traffic and Logistic Engineering (ICTLE); 2021 Aug 09–11; Electr Network. NEW YORK: Ieee; 2021.
[20]
Du MR, Ma Y, Zhang ZQ. A meta-path-based evaluation method for enterprise credit risk. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience. 2022; 2022: 14.
[21]
Du MR, Ma Y, Zhang ZQ. A path-based feature selection algorithm for enterprise credit risk evaluation. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience. 2022; 2022: 11.
[22]
Han L, Rajasekar A, Li ST. An evidence-based credit evaluation ensemble framework for online retail smes. Knowledge and Information Systems. 2022; 64(6): 1603-23.
[23]
Li ZZ, Dai R, Feng X, Xiong YM. The analysis of two-way e-commerce credit evaluation model based on the c2c mode. Journal of Global Information Management. 2022; 30(11): 21.
[24]
Wang BS, Wang ZJ, Wei R, Destech Publicat INC, editors. The research of third-warty b2b supply chain finance credit risk identification & evaluation system. International Conference on Mathematics, Modelling and Simulation Technologies and Applications (MMSTA); 2017 Dec 24–25; Xiamen, PEOPLES R CHINA. LANCASTER: Destech Publications, Inc; 2017.
[25]
Long JJ, Jiang CQ, Dimitrov S, Wang Z. Clues from networks: Quantifying relational risk for credit risk evaluation of smes. Financial Innovation. 2022; 8(1): 41.
[26]
Sun J, Li J, Fujita H. Multi-class imbalanced enterprise credit evaluation based on asymmetric bagging combined with light gradient boosting machine. Applied Soft Computing. 2022; 130: 13.
[27]
Zhang LF, Chao XR, Qian Q, Jing FY. Credit evaluation solutions for social groups with poor services in financial inclusion: A technical forecasting method. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022; 183: 13.
[28]
Liang ZH, Du JM, Hua Y, Si YB, Li M. Research on credit evaluation indicator system of high-tech smes: From the social capital perspective. Systems. 2023; 11(3): 23.
[29]
Xie XF, Zhang JX, Luo YX, Gu J, Li YF. Enterprise credit risk portrait and evaluation from the perspective of the supply chain. International Transactions in Operational Research. 2023; 31.
[30]
Zhang J, Liu YH. Pooling factoring financing strategy based on the big data credit evaluation technology of b2b platform. Electronic Commerce Research. 2023; 17.
[31]
Turskis Z, Dzitac S, Stankiuviene A, Sukys R. A fuzzy group decision-making model for determining the most influential persons in the sustainable prevention of accidents in the construction smes. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control. 2019; 14(1): 90-106.
[32]
Urena R, Kou G, Wu J, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E. Dealing with incomplete information in linguistic group decision making by means of interval type-2 fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems. 2019; 34(6): 1261-80.
[33]
Utama WP, Chan APC, Zahoor H, Gao R, Jumas DY. Making decision toward overseas construction projects an application based on adaptive neuro fuzzy system. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management. 2019; 26(2): 285-302.
[34]
Zeng SZ, Peng XM, Balezentis T, Streimikiene D. Prioritization of low-carbon suppliers based on pythagorean fuzzy group decision making with self-confidence level. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja. 2019; 32(1): 1073-87.
[35]
Amin F, Fahmi A, Aslam M. Approaches to multiple attribute group decision making based on triangular cubic linguistic uncertain fuzzy aggregation operators. Soft Computing. 2020; 24(15): 11511-33.
[36]
Shakeel M, Abdullah S, Shahzad M, Siddiqui N. Geometric aggregation operators with interval-valued pythagorean trapezoidal fuzzy numbers based on einstein operations and their application in group decision making. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics. 2019; 10(10): 2867-86.
[37]
Shakeel M, Abduulah S, Shahzad M, Mahmood T, Siddiqui N. Averaging aggregation operators with pythagorean trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and their application to group decision making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2019; 36(2): 1899-915.
[38]
Shang Y, Li Z, Wang ZL, Yang SF, Zhou JL. Progress of uncertain and fuzzy methods in group decision making: A graphical overview. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2019; 37(6): 8603-12.
[39]
Shariat R, Roozbahani A, Ebrahimian A. Risk analysis of urban stormwater infrastructure systems using fuzzy spatial multi-criteria decision making. Science of the Total Environment. 2019; 647: 1468-77.
[40]
Shumaiza, Akram M, Al-Kenani AN, Alcantud JCR. Group decision-making based on the vikor method with trapezoidal bipolar fuzzy information. Symmetry-Basel. 2019; 11(10): 21.
[41]
Wieckowski J, Kizielewicz B, Paradowski B, Shekhovtsov A, Salabun W. Application of multi-criteria decision analysis to identify global and local importance weights of decision criteria. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making. 2022; 26.
[42]
Shekhovtsov A, Kizielewicz B, Sałabun W. Advancing individual decision-making: An extension of the characteristic objects method using expected solution point. Information Sciences. 2023; 647: 119456.
[43]
Wieckowski J, Kizielewicz B, Salabun W. Handling decision-making in intuitionistic fuzzy environment: Pyifdm package. Softwarex. 2023; 22: 8.
[44]
Wieckowski J, Kizielewicz B, Shekhovtsov A, Salabun W. Rancom: A novel approach to identifying criteria relevance based on inaccuracy expert judgments. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2023; 122: 21.
[45]
Riaz M, Razzaq A, Aslam M, Pamucar D. M-parameterized n-soft topology-based topsis approach for multi-attribute decision making. Symmetry-Basel. 2021; 13(5): 31.
[46]
Tchier F, Ali G, Gulzar M, Pamucar D, Ghorai G. A new group decision-making technique under picture fuzzy soft expert information. Entropy. 2021; 23(9): 23.
[47]
Pamucar D, Macura D, Tavana M, Bozanic D, Knezevic N. An integrated rough group multicriteria decision-making model for the ex-ante prioritization of infrastructure projects: The serbian railways case. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 2022; 79: 16.
[48]
Ijaz S, Ullah K, Akram M, Pamucar D. Approaches to multi-attribute group decision-making based on picture fuzzy prioritized aczel-alsina aggregation information. Aims Mathematics. 2023; 8(7): 16556-83.
[49]
Das S, Roy BK, Kar MB, Kar S, Pamucar D. Neutrosophic fuzzy set and its application in decision making. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. 2020; 11(11): 5017-29.
[50]
Pamucar D, Deveci M, Canitez F, Lukovac V. Selecting an airport ground access mode using novel fuzzy lbwa-waspas-h decision making model. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2020; 93: 20.
[51]
Pamucar D, Deveci M, Schitea D, Eriskin L, Iordache M, Iordache I. Developing a novel fuzzy neutrosophic numbers based decision making analysis for prioritizing the energy storage technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2020; 45(43): 23027-47.
[52]
Gomes L, Lima M. Todim: Basics and apllication to multicriteria ranking of projects with environmental impacts. Foundations of Control Engineering. 1991; 16: 113-27.
[53]
Gomes L, Rangel LAD. An application of the todim method to the multicriteria rental evaluation of residential properties. European Journal of Operational Research. 2009; 193(1): 204-11.
[54]
Lai Y-J, Liu T-Y, Hwang C-L. Topsis for modm. European Journal of Operational Research. 1994; 76(3): 486-500.
[55]
Wang J, Wei GW, Wei Y. Models for green supplier selection with some 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic number bonferroni mean operators. Symmetry-Basel. 2018; 10(5): 36.
[56]
Wang J, Wei GW, Lu M. Todim method for multiple attribute group decision making under 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic environment. Symmetry-Basel. 2018; 10(10): 15.
[57]
Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal. 1948; 27(4): 379-423.
[58]
Wu SJ, Wang J, Wei GW, Wei Y. Research on construction engineering project risk assessment with some 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic hamy mean operators. Sustainability. 2018; 10(5): 26.
[59]
Liu H. Performance evaluation of family business strategic transition based on the 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic number multiple attribute group decision making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2022; 44(2): 3271-83.
[60]
Wang P, Wang J, Wei GW, Wu J, Wei C, Wei Y. Codas method for multiple attribute group decision making under 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic environment. Informatica. 2020; 31(1): 161-84.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image International Journal of Knowledge-based and Intelligent Engineering Systems
International Journal of Knowledge-based and Intelligent Engineering Systems  Volume 28, Issue 1
2024
206 pages

Publisher

IOS Press

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 14 March 2024

Author Tags

  1. Multiple-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM)
  2. 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic sets (2TLNSs)
  3. TODIM
  4. TOPSIS
  5. credit evaluation for small and micro enterprises

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media