[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Research on incentive strategy based on service quality in spatial crowdsourcing task allocation

Published: 01 January 2022 Publication History

Abstract

In order to further improve the enthusiasm of spatial crowdsourcing workers, considering the service quality of workers, different incentive strategies are proposed and tasks are assigned. Firstly, the incentive model is constructed from the unit time revenue of task and online idle time, and the evaluation function of the evaluation model is constructed; Secondly, the task allocation is transformed into a combinatorial optimization problem by delay matching, and an improved glowworm swarm algorithm is proposed to solve the problem by discrete coding, introducing six kinds of mobile modes, adaptive probability matching and infeasible solution processing; Finally, the algorithm is used to solve the task allocation. The experimental results show that compared with the travel cost minimization strategy and random allocation strategy, the positive incentive index of the proposed strategy is improved by 11.79% and 14.60% respectively, and the fair incentive index is improved by 0.83% and 0.22% respectively, which can effectively improve the positive incentive range and incentive fairness of workers.

References

[1]
Tong Y.X., Zhou Z.M. and Zeng Y.X., Spatial crowd-sourcing: a survey, The VLDB Journal 29 (2020), 217–250.
[2]
Tong Y.X., Yuan Y. and Cheng Y.R., Survey on spatiotemporal crowdsourced data management techniques, Journal of Software 28 (2017), 35–58.
[3]
Kazemi L., Shahabi C. and Geocrowd, Enabling query answering with spatial crowdsourcing, In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (2012), 189–198.
[4]
Tran L., To H. and Fan L., A real-time framework for task assignment in hyperlocal spatial crowdsourcing, ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 9 (2018), 1–26.
[5]
Cheng P., Lian X. and Chen L., Task assignment on multi-skill oriented spatial crowdsourcing, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 28 (2016), 2201–2215.
[6]
Kalyanasundaram B. and Pruhs K., Online weighted matching, Journal of Algorithms 14 (1993), 478–488.
[7]
Kooti F., Grbovic M. and Aiello L.M., Analyzing uber’s ridesharing economy, In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion (2017), 574–582.
[8]
Lu A., Frazier P.I. and Kislev O., Surge pricing moves uber’s driver-partners. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (2018), 3.
[9]
Banerjee S., Johari R. and Riquelme C., Pricing in ride-sharing platforms: A queueing-theoretic approach, In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (2015), 1–54.
[10]
Asghari M., Deng D. and Shahabi C., Priceaware real-time ride-sharing at scale: an auction-based approach, In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM sigspatial International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems 3 (2016), 1–10.
[11]
Zhang J., Wen D. and Zeng S., A discounted trade reduction mechanism for dynamic ridesharing pricing, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 17 (2016), 1586–1595.
[12]
Chen M., Shen W. and Tang P., et al., Optimal vehicle dis-patching for ride-sharing platforms via dynamic pricing, In: Companion of The Web Conference (2018), 51–52.
[13]
Wang Q., He W., Wang X., et al., Quality-assure and budget aware task assignment for spatial crowdsourcing, In: International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Work sharing (2016), 60–70.
[14]
Wu P. and Ngai E.W., Toward a real-time and budget-aware task package allocation in spatial crowdsourcing, Decision Support System 110 (2018), 107–117.
[15]
Mitsopoulou E., Boutsis I. and Kalogeraki V. A cost aware incentive mechanism in mobile crowdsourcing systems. In: 2018 19th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (2018), 239–244.
[16]
Deng W., Xu J., Gao X., et al., A Novel Gate Resource Allocation Method Using Improved PSO-Based QEA, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (2020), 2168–2216.
[17]
Guo H.X., Luo Z.B., Zhang J.F., et al., Network optimization simulation of wireless temperature sensing device in public area based on ant colony algorithm, In: Proceedings of 2021 6th International Conference on Automation, Control and Robotics Engineering (2021), 7.
[18]
Han P.X., Sun Z., Jing X.T., et al., An Improved Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm to Port L-AGV Scheduling Problems, In: Proceedings of 2021 6th International Conference on Automation, Control and Robotics Engineering (2021), 6.
[19]
Krishnanand K.N. and Ghose D., Glowworm swarm based optimization algorithm for multimodal functions with collective robotics applications, Multiagent Grid Systems 2 (2006), 209–222.
[20]
Ni Z.W., Xiao H.W. and Wu Z.J., Attribute selection method based on improved discrete glowworm swarm optimization and fractal dimension, Pattern Recognition & Artificial Intelligence 26(12) (2013), 1169–1178.
[21]
Yang X.S. Firefly algorithm. Nature-Inspired Meta heuristic Algorithms (2008), 79–90.
[22]
Jie L., Teng L. and Yin S., An Improved Discrete Firefly Algorithm Used for Traveling Salesman Problem. In: Advances in Swarm Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 10385 (2017), 593–600.
[23]
Saifullah, Baizal and Gunawan, Optimization of Tour Scheduling Using Firefly Algorithm, 7th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (2019), 372–377.
[24]
Xia P.F., Ni Z.W. and Zhu X.H., et al., Selective ensemble approach based on reverse binary glowworm swarm optimization and diversity measure, Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences 41(3) (2021), 730–746.
[25]
Ran J.M., Ni Z.W. and Peng P., Task allocation strategy considering service quality of spatial crowdsourcing workers and its glowworm swarm optimization algorithm solution, Journal of Computer Applications 41 (2021), 794–802.
[26]
Christy J., Rekha D., Vijayakumar V., et al., Optimal broadcast scheduling method for VANETs: An adaptive discrete firefly approach, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 39 (2020), 8125–8137.
[27]
Ni Z.W., Liu H. and Zhu X.H., Task Allocation Strategy of Spatial Crowdsourcing Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning, Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence 34 (2021), 191–205.
[28]
Hao L., Yang F. and Zhang. Q.W., Re discussion on Statistical Measure on Gini Coefficient, Statistics & Decision 37 (2021), 27–32.
[29]
Koenker R. and Machado J.A., Goodness of fit and related inference processes for quantile regression, Journal of the American Statistical Association 94 (1999), 1296–1310.
[30]
Li B.Y., Cheng Y.R. and Wang G.R., 3D-online stable matching problem for new spatial crowdsourcing platforms, Journal of Software 12 (2020), 3837–3849.
[31]
Geng H.T., Xu K. and Dai Z.B., Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm with multiple operators based on double credit assignment, Control and Decision 4 (2021), 1–8.
[32]
Liu S.Y., Liu Y.H. and Ni L.M., Towards Mobility-based Clustering, In: Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD (2010), 919–927.
[33]
Real time congestion details of major cities in China, http://jiaotong.baidu.com/top/congestDetail/citycode 289 (2021), May, 29.
[34]
Song T.S., Song Y.X. and Wang L.B., Online task assignment for three types of objects under spatial crowdsourcing environment, Journal of Software 3 (2017), 612–630.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Application of clustering cooperative differential privacy in spatial crowdsourcing task allocationJournal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology10.3233/JIFS-23073445:4(5587-5600)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023

Index Terms

  1. Research on incentive strategy based on service quality in spatial crowdsourcing task allocation
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

            Information & Contributors

            Information

            Published In

            cover image Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology
            Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology  Volume 43, Issue 5
            2022
            1496 pages

            Publisher

            IOS Press

            Netherlands

            Publication History

            Published: 01 January 2022

            Author Tags

            1. Spatial crowdsourcing
            2. service quality
            3. task assignment
            4. glowworm swarm algorithm

            Qualifiers

            • Research-article

            Contributors

            Other Metrics

            Bibliometrics & Citations

            Bibliometrics

            Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
            Reflects downloads up to 17 Jan 2025

            Other Metrics

            Citations

            Cited By

            View all
            • (2023)Application of clustering cooperative differential privacy in spatial crowdsourcing task allocationJournal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology10.3233/JIFS-23073445:4(5587-5600)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023

            View Options

            View options

            Media

            Figures

            Other

            Tables

            Share

            Share

            Share this Publication link

            Share on social media