[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.3115/981251.981294dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaclConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

Scruffy text understanding: design and implementation of 'tolerant' understanders

Published: 16 June 1982 Publication History

Abstract

Most large text-understanding systems have been designed under the assumption that the input text will be in reasonably "neat" form, e.g., newspaper stories and other edited texts. However, a great deal of natural language text, e.g., memos, rough drafts, conversation transcripts, etc., have features that differ significantly from "neat" texts, posing special problems for readers, such as misspelled words, missing words, poor syntactic construction, missing periods, etc. Our solution to these problems is to make use of <u>expectations</u>, based both on knowledge of surface English and on world knowledge of the situation being described. These syntactic and semantic expectations can be used to figure out unknown words from context, constrain the possible word-senses of words with multiple meanings (ambiguity), fill in missing words (ellipsis), and resolve referents (anaphora). This method of using expectations to aid the understanding of "scruffy" texts has been incorporated into a working computer program called NOMAD, which understands scruffy texts in the domain of Navy messages.

References

[1]
Birnbaum, L. and Selfridge, M. 1980. Conceptual Analysis of Natural Language, in R. Schank and C. Riesbeck, eds., Inside Computer Understanding. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N. J.
[2]
Cullingford, R. 1977. Controlling Inferences in Story Understanding. Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Cambridge, Mass.
[3]
DeJong, G. 1979. Skimming Stories in Real Time: An Experiment in Integrated Understanding. Ph.D. Thesis, Yale Computer Science Dept.
[4]
Goldman, N. 1973. The generation of English sentences from a deep conceptual base. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University.
[5]
Granger, R. 1977. FOUL-UP: A program that figures out meanings of words from context. Proceedings of the Fifth IJCAI, Cambridge, Mass.
[6]
Granger, R. H. 1980. When expectation fails: Towards a self-correcting inference system. In Proceedings of the First National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Stanford University.
[7]
Granger, R. H. 1981. Directing and re-directing inference pursuit: Extra-textual influences on text interpretation. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Vancouver, British Columbia.
[8]
Lebowitz, M. 1981. Generalization and Memory in an Integrated Understanding System. Computer Science Research Report 186, Yale University.
[9]
McGuire, R. 1980. Political Primaries and Words of Pain. Unpublished ms., Dept. of Computer Science, Yale University.
[10]
Riesbeck, C. and Schank, R. 1976. Comprehension by computer: Expectation-based analysis of sentences in context. Computer Science Research Report 78, Yale University.
[11]
Schank, R. C., and Abelson, R. 1977 Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N. J.
[12]
Wilensky, R. 1978. Understanding Goal-Based Stories. Computer Science Technical Report 140, Yale University.

Cited By

View all
  • (1986)Automatic sense disambiguation using machine readable dictionariesProceedings of the 5th annual international conference on Systems documentation10.1145/318723.318728(24-26)Online publication date: 1-Jun-1986
  • (1984)Interpreting syntactically ill-formed sentencesProceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 22nd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics10.3115/980491.980605(534-539)Online publication date: 2-Jul-1984
  • (1983)Deterministic parsing of syntactic non-fluenciesProceedings of the 21st annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics10.3115/981311.981336(123-128)Online publication date: 15-Jun-1983
  1. Scruffy text understanding: design and implementation of 'tolerant' understanders

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image DL Hosted proceedings
    ACL '82: Proceedings of the 20th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
    June 1982
    178 pages
    • Program Chair:
    • Madeleine Bates

    Publisher

    Association for Computational Linguistics

    United States

    Publication History

    Published: 16 June 1982

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 85 of 443 submissions, 19%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)182
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
    Reflects downloads up to 21 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (1986)Automatic sense disambiguation using machine readable dictionariesProceedings of the 5th annual international conference on Systems documentation10.1145/318723.318728(24-26)Online publication date: 1-Jun-1986
    • (1984)Interpreting syntactically ill-formed sentencesProceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 22nd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics10.3115/980491.980605(534-539)Online publication date: 2-Jul-1984
    • (1983)Deterministic parsing of syntactic non-fluenciesProceedings of the 21st annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics10.3115/981311.981336(123-128)Online publication date: 15-Jun-1983

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media