[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article

The Role of Reputation Systems in Reducing On-Line Auction Fraud

Published: 01 April 2006 Publication History

Abstract

On-line auction fraud is the most frequently reported Internet crime. This research investigates whether on-line reputation systems are a useful mechanism for potential buyers to avoid fraudulent auctions. Content analysis of complaints posted in an on-line auction reputation system is used to improve understanding of on-line auction fraud and the role of reputation systems in documenting, predicting, and reducing fraud. The results show (1) that the number of fraud allegations found in an on-line reputation system significantly exceeds the number of fraud allegations made through official channels, (2) that recent negative feedback posted in an on-line reputation system is useful in predicting future on-line auction fraud, and (3) that experienced on-line auction buyers are in a better position to use reputation system data to avoid potentially fraudulent auctions.

References

[1]
<!{CDATA{Ba, S., and Pavlou, P.A. Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quarterly, 26, 3 (2002), 243-268.}}>
[2]
<!{CDATA{AARP. Off the Hook: Reducing Participation in Telemarketing Fraud. Washington, DC: American Association of Retired Persons Foundation, 2003, http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/consume/d17812_fraud.pdf.}}>
[3]
<!{CDATA{Abarca, J., and Armstrong, E.P. How to use multiple logistic regression in retrospective database analyses. Formulary, 35, 10 (2000), 832-841.}}>
[4]
<!{CDATA{Akerlof, G. The market for "lemons": Quality under uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 3 (1970), 488-500.}}>
[5]
<!{CDATA{Anonymous. Scam Casts Doubt on eBay's Anti-fraud Software. CNN.com (March 26, 2003), www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/internet/03/26/ ebay.fraud.ap/index.html.}}>
[6]
<!{CDATA{Lee, M.K., and Turban, E. A trust model for consumer Internet shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6, 1 (fall 2001), 75-91.}}>
[7]
<!{CDATA{Zacharia, G.; Moukas, A.; and Maes, P. Collaborative reputation mechanisms for electronic marketplaces. Decision Support Systems, 29, 4 (2000), 371-388.}}>
[8]
<!{CDATA{Zucker, L.G. Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840-1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8 (1986), 53-112.}}>
[9]
<!{CDATA{Spence, M. Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 3 (1973) 355-374.}}>
[10]
<!{CDATA{Standifird, S.S. Reputation and e-commerce: eBay auctions and the asymmetrical impact of positive and negative ratings. Journal of Management, 27, 3 (2001), 279-295.}}>
[11]
<!{CDATA{Standifird, S.S. Online auctions and the importance of reputation type. Electronic Markets, 12, 1 (2002), 58-62.}}>
[12]
<!{CDATA{Suh, B., and Han, I. The impact of consumer trust and perception of security control on the acceptance of electronic commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7, 3 (spring 2003), 135-161.}}>
[13]
<!{CDATA{Tan, Y., and Theon, W. Toward a generic model of trust for electronic commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5, 2 (winter 2000-1), 61-76.}}>
[14]
<!{CDATA{Tukey, J.W. Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1977.}}>
[15]
<!{CDATA{Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185 (1974), 1124-1131.}}>
[16]
<!{CDATA{Warner, M. eBay's worst nightmare. Fortune, 147, 10 (2003), 89-91.}}>
[17]
<!{CDATA{Wilcox, R.T. Experts and amateurs: The role of experience in Internet auctions. Marketing Letters, 11, 4 (2000), 363-374.}}>
[18]
<!{CDATA{Wang, W.; Hidvégi, Z.; and Whinston, A.B. Designing mechanisms for e-commerce security: An example from sealed-bid auctions. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6, 2 (2001), 139-156.}}>
[19]
<!{CDATA{Richins, M. Negative word-of-mouth by dissatisfied consumers: A pilot study. Journal of Marketing, 47, 3 (1983), 68-78.}}>
[20]
<!{CDATA{Richins, M. A multivariate analysis of responses to dissatisfaction. Academy of Marketing Science, 15, 3 (1987), 24-31.}}>
[21]
<!{CDATA{Rothstein, B., and Stolle, D. How political institutions create and destroy social capital: An institutional theory of generalized trust. Paper presented at the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 2002, http://upload.mcgill.ca/politicalscience/ 011011RothsteinB.pdf.}}>
[22]
<!{CDATA{Schonfeld, E. The world according to eBay. Business 2.0 (January 19, 2005), www.business2.com/b2/web/articles/0,17863,1016530,00.html.}}>
[23]
<!{CDATA{Schwartz, S.H. Moral decision making and behavior. In J. Macauley and L. Berkowitz (eds.), Altruism and Helping Behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1970, pp. 127-141.}}>
[24]
<!{CDATA{McKnight, D.H., and Chervany, N.L. What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6, 2 (winter 2001-2), 35-59.}}>
[25]
<!{CDATA{Pavlou, P. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7, 3 (spring 2003), 101-134.}}>
[26]
<!{CDATA{Resnick, P., and Zeckhauser, R. Trust among strangers in Internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay's reputation system. In M.R. Baye (ed.), The Economics of the Internet and E-Commerce. Amsterdam: JAI Press, 2002, pp. 127-157.}}>
[27]
<!{CDATA{Lee, Z.; Im, I.; and Lee, S.J. The effect of negative buyer feedback on prices in Internet auction markets. In W. Orlikowski, P. Weil, S. Ang, and H. Krcmar (eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-first International Conference on Information Systems. Atlanta: Association for Information Systems, 2000, pp. 286-287.}}>
[28]
<!{CDATA{Lewicki, R.J.; Mcallister, D.J.; and Bies, R.J. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23, 3 (1998), 438-458.}}>
[29]
<!{CDATA{Lewis, C. Watch out online auction scammers: The e-posse's in town. CNN.com (May 22, 2003), www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/05/22/ctv.eposse/ index.html.}}>
[30]
<!{CDATA{Marshall, R.C., and Marx, L.M. Bidder collusion. Working paper, Duke University, 2004, http://faculty.fuqua.duke.edu/~marx/bio/papers/ biddercollusion.pdf.}}>
[31]
<!{CDATA{Mayer, R.C.; Davis, J.H.; and Schoorman, F.D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 3 (1995), 709-734.}}>
[32]
<!{CDATA{McAuliffe, W.E. On the statistical validity of standards used in profile monitoring of health care. American Journal of Public Health, 68, 7 (1978), 645-651.}}>
[33]
<!{CDATA{McKnight, D.H.; Cummings, L.L.; and Chervany, N.L. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23, 3 (1998), 472-490.}}>
[34]
<!{CDATA{Mellinger, G.D. Interpersonal trust as a factor in communication. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 52 (1956), 304-309.}}>
[35]
<!{CDATA{Mishra, D.P.; Heide, J.B.; and Cort, S.G. Information asymmetry and levels of agency relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 3 (1998), 277-295.}}>
[36]
<!{CDATA{Moon, J.M., and Kim, Y.G. Extending the TAM for the World Wide Web context. Information and Management, 28, 4 (2001), 217-230.}}>
[37]
<!{CDATA{National Consumers League, Internet Fraud Watch 2004, www.fraud .org/2004-internet%20scams.pdf.}}>
[38]
<!{CDATA{Ottaway, T.A.; Bruneau, C.L.; and Evans, G.E. The impact of auction item image and buyer/seller feedback ratings on electronic auctions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 43, 3 (2003), 56-60.}}>
[39]
<!{CDATA{Pavlou, P.A., and Gefen, D. Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research, 15, 1 (2004), 37-59.}}>
[40]
<!{CDATA{Ratnasingham, P. The importance of trust in electronic commerce. Information Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 8, 4 (1998), 313-321.}}>
[41]
<!{CDATA{Read, W.H. Upward communication in industrial hierarchies. Human Relations, 15, 3 (1962), 3-15.}}>
[42]
<!{CDATA{Resnick, P.; Zeckhauser, R.; Friedman, E.; and Kuwabara, K. Reputation systems. Communications of the ACM, 43, 12 (2000), 45-48.}}>
[43]
<!{CDATA{Ba, S.; Whinston, A.B.; and Zhang, H. Building trust in online auction markets through an economic incentive mechanism. Decision Support Systems, 35, 3 (2003), 273-286.}}>
[44]
<!{CDATA{Brockner, J.; Siegel, P.A.; Daly, J.P.; Tyler, T.; and Martin, C. When trust matters: The moderating effect of outcome favorability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 3 (1997), 558-583.}}>
[45]
<!{CDATA{Brunker, M. Cautionary tales of two auctions: Phantom bids draw a warning, alleged stamp ring unchecked. MSNBC.com (October 10, 2002), www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3078735/.}}>
[46]
<!{CDATA{Chakraborty, I., and Kosmopoulou, G. Auctions with shill bidding. Economic Theory, 3, 2 (2004), 271-287.}}>
[47]
<!{CDATA{Cohen, J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Education and Psychological Measurement, 20, 1 (1960), 37-46.}}>
[48]
<!{CDATA{De Figueiredo, J.M. Finding sustainable profitability in electronic commerce. Sloan Management Review, 14, 4 (2000), 41-52.}}>
[49]
<!{CDATA{Dekleva, S. Electronic commerce: A half-empty glass? Communications of the AIS, 3, 18 (2000).}}>
[50]
<!{CDATA{Delener, N. International counterfeit marketing: Success without risk. Review of Business, 21, 1/2 (2000), 16-20.}}>
[51]
<!{CDATA{Kirshner, J. Bitten bidders. U.S. News & World Report, 134, 21 (June 2003), 56-57.}}>>
[52]
<!{CDATA{Klein, B., and Leffler, K. The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance, Journal of Political Economy, 89, 4 (1981), 615-641.}}>
[53]
<!{CDATA{Koehn, D. The nature of and conditions for online trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 1 (2003), 3-19.}}>
[54]
<!{CDATA{Kollock, P. The production of trust in online markets. In E.J. Lawler, M. Macy, S. Thyne, and H.A. Walker (eds.), Advances in Group Processes, vol. 16. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1999, www.sscnet.ucla.edu/soc/faculty/kollock/ papers/online_trust.htm.}}>
[55]
<!{CDATA{Konrad, R. eBay profit jumps as online auction giant assumes burdens of mature companies. Detroit News (January 23, 2004), www.detnews.com/ 2004/technology/0401/25/technology-43387.htm, accessed on April 10, 2004.}}>
[56]
<!{CDATA{Kramer, R.M. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 1 (1999), 569-598.}}>
[57]
<!{CDATA{Kramer, R.M. The sinister attribution error: Paranoid cognition and collective distrust in organizations. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 3 (1994), 199-230.}}>
[58]
<!{CDATA{Krippendorff, K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.}}>
[59]
<!{CDATA{Langenderfer, J., and Shimp, T.A. Consumer vulnerability to scams, swindles, and fraud: A new theory of visceral influences on persuasion. Psychology & Marketing, 18, 7 (2001), 763-783.}}>>
[60]
<!{CDATA{Dellarocas, C. The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Science, 49, 10 (2003), 1407-1424.}}>
[61]
<!{CDATA{Dellarocas, C. Efficiency through feedback-contingent fees and rewards in auction marketplaces with adverse selection and moral hazard. In D. Menasce and N. Nisan (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. New York: ACM Press, 2003, pp. 11-18.}}>
[62]
<!{CDATA{Deutsch, M. Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 4 (1958), 265-279.}}>
[63]
<!{CDATA{Deutsch, M. The effect of motivational orientation upon trust and suspicion. Human Relations, 13, 2 (1960), 123-139.}}>
[64]
<!{CDATA{Eisenhardt, K.M. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14, 1 (1989), 57-74.}}>
[65]
<!{CDATA{Elster, J. Emotions and economic theory. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 1 (1998), 47-74.}}>
[66]
<!{CDATA{Friedman, E., and Resnick, P. The social cost of cheap pseudonyms. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10, 2 (2001), 173-199.}}>
[67]
<!{CDATA{Fung, R., and Lee, M. E-commerce trust: Exploring the antecedent factors. In W.D. Haseman and D.L. Nazareth (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Americas Conference on Information Systems. Milwaukee: Association for Information Systems, 1999, pp. 517-519.}}>
[68]
<!{CDATA{Garson, G.D. Logistic regression. In PA 765 Statnotes: An Online Textbook, www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/logistic.htm.}}>
[69]
<!{CDATA{Gefen, D.; Karahanna, E.; and Straub, D.W. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27, 1 (2003), 51-90.}}>
[70]
<!{CDATA{Gilly, M.C., and Gelb, B.D. Post-purchase consumer processes and the complaining consumer. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 3 (1982), 323-328.}}>
[71]
<!{CDATA{Grazioli, S., and Jarvenpaa, S. Peril of Internet fraud: An empirical investigation of deception and trust with experienced Internet consumers. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 30, 4 (2000), 395-410.}}>
[72]
<!{CDATA{Grazioli, S., and Jarvenpaa, S. Consumer and business deception on the Internet: Content analysis of documentary evidence. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7, 4 (spring 2003), 93-118.}}>
[73]
<!{CDATA{Green, R., and Smith, T. Executive insights: Countering brand counterfeiters. Journal of International Marketing, 10, 4 (2002), 89-106.}}>
[74]
<!{CDATA{Harvey, P.J., and Walls, W.D. Laboratory markets in counterfeit goods: Hong Kong versus Las Vegas. Applied Economics Letters, 10, 14 (2003), 883-887.}}>
[75]
<!{CDATA{Hodson, R. Analyzing Documentary Accounts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1999.}}>
[76]
<!{CDATA{Hosmer, L.T. Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 2 (1995), 379-403.}}>
[77]
<!{CDATA{IC3. IC3 2004 Internet Fraud Crime Report, January 1, 2004-December 31, 2004. Washington, DC: National White Collar Crime Center and Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2004, www.ifccfbi.gov/strategy/2004_IC3Report .pdf.}}>
[78]
<!{CDATA{IFCC. Internet Auction Fraud. Washington, DC: National White Collar Crime Center and Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2001, www1.ifccfbi.gov/ strategy/AuctionFraudReport.pdf.}}>
[79]
<!{CDATA{Jarvenpaa, S.L., and Tractinsky, N. Consumer trust in an Internet store: A cross-cultural validation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5, 2 (1999).}}>
[80]
<!{CDATA{Jarvenpaa, S.L.; Tractinsky, N.; and Vitale, M. Consumer trust in an Internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1, 12 (1999), 331-336.}}>
[81]
<!{CDATA{Kauffman, R.J., and Wood, C.A. Running up the bid: Detecting, predicting, and preventing reserve price shilling in online auctions. In N. Sadeh (ed.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Electronic Commerce. New York: ACM Press, 2003, pp. 259-265.}}>

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Rate This TransactionManagement Science10.1287/mnsc.2023.469470:1(567-588)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • (2021)Online marketplace sellers’ influence on rating scores and comment orientationElectronic Commerce Research10.1007/s10660-021-09511-x23:2(1241-1270)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2021
  • (2021)Determinants of investor satisfaction with e‐commerce platforms and traded products in student housing development in GhanaThe Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries10.1002/isd2.1216287:3Online publication date: 7-May-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. The Role of Reputation Systems in Reducing On-Line Auction Fraud
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image International Journal of Electronic Commerce
      International Journal of Electronic Commerce  Volume 10, Issue 3
      Number 3/Spring 2006
      136 pages

      Publisher

      M. E. Sharpe, Inc.

      United States

      Publication History

      Published: 01 April 2006

      Author Tags

      1. Complaint
      2. Fraud
      3. On-Line Auction
      4. Reputation System
      5. Trust

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 21 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Rate This TransactionManagement Science10.1287/mnsc.2023.469470:1(567-588)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
      • (2021)Online marketplace sellers’ influence on rating scores and comment orientationElectronic Commerce Research10.1007/s10660-021-09511-x23:2(1241-1270)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2021
      • (2021)Determinants of investor satisfaction with e‐commerce platforms and traded products in student housing development in GhanaThe Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries10.1002/isd2.1216287:3Online publication date: 7-May-2021
      • (2020)Platform-mediated reputation systems in the sharing economy and incentives to provide service qualityElectronic Commerce Research and Applications10.1016/j.elerap.2019.10083539:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2020
      • (2019)Inflated ReputationsManagement Science10.1287/mnsc.2018.319165:11(5371-5391)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2019
      • (2019)The Impact of Physician’s Login Behavior on Patients’ Search and Decision in OHCsSmart Health10.1007/978-3-030-34482-5_14(155-169)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2019
      • (2018)A multi-criteria detection scheme of collusive fraud organization for reputation aggregation in social networksFuture Generation Computer Systems10.1016/j.future.2017.09.02779:P3(797-814)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2018
      • (2016)E-commerce alarming security symptoms review and discussion of attacks indicators in e-commerceProceedings of the 18th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications and Services10.1145/3011141.3011206(313-317)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2016
      • (2013)Finding the needleExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2013.02.02740:12(4805-4811)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2013
      • (2012)Online modeling of proactive moderation system for auction fraud detectionProceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web10.1145/2187836.2187927(669-678)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2012
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      View options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media