[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article

A Strategic Analysis of Competition Between Open Source and Proprietary Software

Published: 01 July 2007 Publication History

Abstract

This paper analyzes a software market consisting of a freely available open source software (OSS), the commercial version of this OSS (OSS-SS), and the competing commercial proprietary software (PS). We find that in software markets characterized by low direct network benefits, the PS vendor is better off in the presence of competition from OSS-SS. Furthermore, the OSS-SS vendor in these markets is better off by having lower usability than PS. Therefore, the PS vendor has little incentive to improve the usability of their software in these markets. On the other hand, in software markets characterized by high network benefits, a PS vendor is threatened by the presence of OSS-SS and can survive only if the PS is more usable than the competing OSS-SS.

References

[1]
<!{CDATA{Adams, D.A.; Nelson, R.R.; and Todd, P.A. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16, 2 (June 1992), 227-247.}}>
[2]
<!{CDATA{Bagozzi, R., and Dholakia, U. Open source software user communities: A study of participation in Linux user groups. Management Science, 42, 7 (July 2006), 1099-1115.}}>
[3]
<!{CDATA{Bessen, J. What good is free software? In R. Hahn (ed.), Government Policy Towards Open Source Software. Washington, DC: AEI Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, 2002 (available at <a target="_blank" href='http://www.aei.brookings.org/admin/authorpdfs/page.php?id=212'>www.aei.brookings.org/admin/authorpdfs/page.php?id=212.</a>}}>
[4]
<!{CDATA{Casadesus-Masanell, R., and Ghemawat, P. Dynamic mixed duopoly: A model motivated by Linux vs. Windows. Management Science, 42, 7 (July 2006), 1072-1084.}}>
[5]
<!{CDATA{Crowston, K., and Scozzi, B. Open source software projects as virtual organizations: Competency rallying for software development. IEE Proceedings Software, 149, 1 (2002), 3-17.}}>
[6]
<!{CDATA{Davis, F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 3 (September 1989), 319-340.}}>
[7]
<!{CDATA{DeLone, W.H., and McLean, E.R. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 4 (Spring 2003), 9-30.}}>
[8]
<!{CDATA{Economides, N., and Katsamakas, E. Linux vs. Windows: A comparison of application and platform innovation incentives for open source and proprietary software platforms. Law and Economics Research Paper No. 05-21, New York University, October 2005 (available at <a target="_blank" href='http://ssrn.com/abstract=822894'>http://ssrn.com/abstract=822894.</a>}}>
[9]
<!{CDATA{Farrell, J., and Saloner, G. Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. Rand Journal of Economics, 16, 1 (Spring 1985), 70-83.}}>
[10]
<!{CDATA{Farrell, J., and Saloner, G. Installed base and compatibility: Innovation, product pronouncements, and predation. American Economic Review, 76 (December 1986), 940-955.}}>
[11]
<!{CDATA{Frishberg, N.; Dirks, A.M.; Benson, C.; Nickell, S.; and Smith, S. Getting to know you: Open source development meets usability. In CHI 2002. New York: ACM Press, 2002, pp. 932-933 (available at <a target="_blank" href='http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/510000/506666/p932-frishberg.pdf?key1=506666&key2=1429429711&coll=&dl=&CFID=15151515&CFTOKEN=6184618'>&coll=&dl=&CFID=15151515&CFTOKEN=6184618'>&dl=&CFID=15151515&CFTOKEN=6184618'>&CFID=15151515&CFTOKEN=6184618'>&CFTOKEN=6184618'>>http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/510000/506666/p932-frishberg.pdf?key1=506666&key2=1429429711&coll=&dl=&CFID=15151515&CFTOKEN=6184618.<&coll=&dl=&CFID=15151515&CFTOKEN=6184618.<&dl=&CFID=15151515&CFTOKEN=6184618.<&CFID=15151515&CFTOKEN=6184618.<&CFTOKEN=6184618.<</a>}}>
[12]
<!{CDATA{Gaudeul, A. The LaTeX project: A case study of open-source software. TUGBoat, 24, 1 (2003), 1001-1015.}}>
[13]
<!{CDATA{Green, E.L. Economics of open source. December 6, 2002 (available at <a target="_blank" href='http://badtux.org/home/eric/editorial/economics.php'>http://badtux.org/home/eric/editorial/economics.php.</a>}}>
[14]
<!{CDATA{Hartwick, J., and Barki, H. Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science, 40, 4 (December 1994), 440-465.}}>
[15]
<!{CDATA{Hughes, J., and Lang, K.R. Open source culture and digital remix: A theoretical framework. McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin, April 14, 2006 (available at <a target="_blank" href='http://www.mccombs.utexas.edu/events/osworkshop/Open%20Source%20Culture%20and%20Digital%20Remix%20JMIS%202006.doc.pdf'>www.mccombs.utexas.edu/events/osworkshop/Open%20Source%20Culture%20and%20Digital%20Remix%20JMIS%202006.doc.pdf.</a>}}>
[16]
<!{CDATA{Johnson, J.P. Economics of open source software. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 11, 4 (2002), 637-662.}}>
[17]
<!{CDATA{Kankanhalli, A.; Tan, C.Y.; and Wei, K. Conflict and performance in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 3 (Winter 2006-7), 237-274.}}>
[18]
<!{CDATA{Karahanna, E.; Straub, D.W.; and Chervany, N.L. 1999. Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23, 2 (June 1999), 183-213.}}>
[19]
<!{CDATA{Katz, M., and Shapiro, C. Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 4 (August 1986), 822-841.}}>
[20]
<!{CDATA{Katz, M., and Shapiro, C. Antitrust in software markets. In J. Eisenach and T. Lenard (eds.), Competition, Innovation and the Microsoft Monopoly: Antitrust in the Digital Market place. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999, 29-82.}}>
[21]
<!{CDATA{Koch, C. Your open source plan. CIO (March 15, 2003) (available at <a target="_blank" href='http://www.cio.com.au/index.php/id;219455497'>www.cio.com.au/index.php/id;219455497.</a>}}>
[22]
<!{CDATA{Krishnamurthy, S. Cave or community? An empirical examination of 100 mature open source projects. First Monday, 7, 6 (June 2002) (available at <a target="_blank" href='http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_6/krishnamurthy/'>www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_6/krishnamurthy/.</a>}}>
[23]
<!{CDATA{Lederer, A.L.; Maupin, D.J.; Dena, M.P.; and Zhuang, Y. The technology acceptance model and the Worldwide Web. Decision Support Systems, 29, 3 (October 2000), 269-282.}}>
[24]
<!{CDATA{Lerner, J., and Tirole, J. Some simple economics of open source. Journal of Industrial Economics, 50, 2 (June 2002), 197-234.}}>
[25]
<!{CDATA{Manes, S. Linux gets friendlier. Forbes (June 10, 2002), 134-136.}}>
[26]
<!{CDATA{Mockus, A.; Fielding, R.; and Herbsleb, J. A case study of open source software: The Apache server. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Conference on Software Engineering. New York: ACM Press, 2002, pp. 263-272.}}>
[27]
<!{CDATA{Moon, J.Y., and Sproull, L. Essence of distributed work: The case of the Linux kernel. First Monday, 5, 11 (2000) (available at <a target="_blank" href='http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue5_11/moon/'>www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue5_11/moon/.</a>}}>
[28]
<!{CDATA{Moore, G.C., and Benbasat, I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information System Research, 2, 3 (September 1991), 192-222.}}>
[29]
<!{CDATA{Mustonen, M. Copyleft-The economics of Linux and other open source software. Information and Economics Policy, 15, 1 (2003), 99-121.}}>
[30]
<!{CDATA{Nelson, M.; Sen, R.; and Subramanium, C. Understanding open source software development-A research classification framework. Communications of the AIS, 17, 12 (February 2006), 266-287.}}>
[31]
<!{CDATA{Nichols, D.M., and Twidale, M.B. The usability of open source software. First Monday, 8, 1 (January 2003) (available at <a target="_blank" href='http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue8_1/nichols/'>www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue8_1/nichols/.</a>}}>
[32]
<!{CDATA{Nielsen, J. Usability Engineering. Boston: Academic Press, 1993.}}>
[33]
<!{CDATA{Raymond, E.S. The Cathedral and Bazaar. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly, 2000.}}>
[34]
<!{CDATA{Roberts, A.J.; Hann, I.; and Slaughter, S. Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the Apache project. Management Science, 42, 7 (July 2006), 984-999.}}>
[35]
<!{CDATA{Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press, 1995.}}>
[36]
<!{CDATA{Shah, S. Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Science, 52, 7 (July 2006), 1000-1014.}}>
[37]
<!{CDATA{Tirole, J. The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.}}>
[38]
<!{CDATA{Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F.D. Theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 2 (February 2000), 186-204.}}>
[39]
<!{CDATA{Venkatesh, V., and Morris, M.G. Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24, 1 (March 2000), 115-139.}}>
[40]
<!{CDATA{Viega, J. Open source security: Still a myth. O'Reilly Network, September 2004 (available at <a target="_blank" href='http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/security/2004/09/16/open_source_security_myths.html'>www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/security/2004/09/16/open_source_security_myths.html.</a>}}>

Cited By

View all
  1. A Strategic Analysis of Competition Between Open Source and Proprietary Software

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Journal of Management Information Systems
    Journal of Management Information Systems  Volume 24, Issue 1
    Number 1 / Summer 2007
    349 pages

    Publisher

    M. E. Sharpe, Inc.

    United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 July 2007

    Author Tags

    1. Commercial Open Source
    2. Economics Of Open Source
    3. Floss
    4. Open Source Software
    5. Software Competition
    6. Software Market

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    View options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media