[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.23919/AE.2018.8501415guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article

Safety Integrity Evaluation of Safety Function

Published: 11 September 2018 Publication History

Abstract

For a possibility of using the safety relevant system in practice, it is necessary to prove, that safety requirements, which are defined based on results of risk analysis, are fulfilled. Part of proving the safety of safety relevant system is also quantitative evaluation of safety integrity of the hardware which is involved in the safety functions realization. Objective of the paper is to compare different ways of the quantitative hardware safety integrity evaluation. For a specific technological process are identified hazards, their consequences and from them resulting safety functions. For each defined safety function is, by three different procedures, calculated the probability of dangerous failure per hour. At the end of the paper are stated reasons of results mismatch, which were obtained using different approaches.

References

[1]
IEC EN 61508-1: “Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems”, 2010.
[2]
Rástočný K., Ždánsky J., Hrbček J., “Influence of architecture and diagnostic to the safety integrity of SRECS output part”, in International conference of Applied electronics (AE), 2015, pp. 297–301, ISBN: 978-80-261-0386-8.
[3]
LIEC 60812: “Analysis techniques for system reliability – Procedure for failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA)”, 2006.
[4]
IEC 61078: “Analysis techniques for dependability - Reliability block diagram and boolean methods”, 2016.
[5]
IEC 61025: “Fault tree analysis”, 2006.
[6]
IEC 61165: “Application of Markov techniques”, 2006.
[7]
IEC EN 61508-6: “Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems - Part 6: Guidelines on the application of IEC 61508–2 and IEC 61508-3”, 2010.
[8]
Siemens.com, “Safety Evaluation Tool”, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://www.industry.siemens.com/topics/global/en/safety-integrated/machine-safety/safety-evaluation-tool/Pages/default.aspx. [Accessed: 14-Feb-2018].
[10]
Siemens, “Simatic ET 200SP Digital input modul F-DI 8x24VDC HF (6ES7136-6BA00-0CA0). Manual”, 2013. [Online].Available: http://industry.siemens.com/dl/files/499/78589499/att_878784/v1/et200sp_f-di_8x24vdc_hf_manual_en-US_en-US.pdf. [Accessed: 14-Feb-2018].
[11]
Siemens, “Simatic ET 200SP Digital output modul F-DQ 4x24VDC/2A PM HF (6ES7136-6DB00-0CA0). Manual”, 2013.[Online].Available: http://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/attachments/78645789/et200sp_f-dq_4x24vdc_2a_pm_hf_manual_en-US_en-US.pdf. [Accessed: 14-Feb-2018].
[13]
Siemens, “Simatic ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN ST interface module (6ES7155-6AU01-0BN0). Manual”, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/attachments/59768173/et200sp_im_155_6_pn_st_manual_en-US_en-US.pdf. [Accessed: 14-Feb-2018].
[14]
Siemens, “Industrial controls. Detecting devices. Sirius RFID safety switch. Configuration manual”, 2013. [Online], Available: http://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/attachments/52233535/Configuration_Manual_Safety_Switch_3SE6_en-US.pdf. [Accessed: 14-Feb-2018].
[15]
Siemens, “SIMATIC Safety Integrated for Factory Automation. Light curtain SIMATIC FS400 with muting in F- CPU in category 4 according to EN 954-1: 1996 (with evaluation according to EN 62061 and EN ISO 13849-1: 2006)”,2007.[Online].Available: http://cache.industry.siemens.com/dl/files/201/21331201/att_15594/v1/21331201_as_fe_i_005_v20_en_lcurtain.pdf. [Accessed: 14-Feb-2018].
[16]
http://Ifm.com, “O5P502 (O5P-FNKG/US100). Photoelectric senzors”,2007.[Online].Available: http://www.ifm.com/au/en/product/O5P502. [Accessed: 14-Feb-2018].
[18]
Ilavský J., Rástočný K., “Considerations of the recovery in 2- out-of-3 safety-related control system”, in 11th IFAC/IEEE International Conference on Programmable Devices and Embedded Systems (PDeS). MAY 23-25,2012, Brno, Czech Republic. DOI: 10.3182/20120523-3-CZ-3015.00032.
[19]
Rástočný K., Franeková M., Zolotová I., Rástočný K. Jr., “Quantitative assessment of safety integrity level of message transmission between safety-related equipment”, in: The journal Computing and Informatics, Volume 33, pp. 1001–1026 (2014). ISSN: 1335–9150.
[20]
Siemens, “Safety integrated. Overview of safety-related parameters for Siemens components in accordance with ISO 13849-1 and IEC 62061”, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.industry.siemens.nl/topics/nl/nl/safety-integrated/machineveiligheid/Documents/SIEMENS-producten_PFHd_SIL_PL_B10-waarden%20(EN).pdf. [Accessed: 14-Feb-2018].
[21]
Rausand M., Reliability of safety-critical systems: Theory and applications. Wiley, 2014. ISBN 978-1-118-11272–4.

Index Terms

  1. Safety Integrity Evaluation of Safety Function
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image Guide Proceedings
        2018 International Conference on Applied Electronics (AE)
        Sep 2018
        176 pages

        Publisher

        IEEE Press

        Publication History

        Published: 11 September 2018

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • 0
          Total Citations
        • 0
          Total Downloads
        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        View Options

        View options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media