[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

DynaLearn — An Intelligent Learning Environment for Learning Conceptual Knowledge

Published: 01 December 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Articulating thought in computer‐based media is a powerful means for humans to develop their understanding of phenomena. We have created DynaLearn, an intelligent learning environment that allows learners to acquire conceptual knowledge by constructing and simulating qualitative models of how systems behave. DynaLearn uses diagrammatic representations for learners to express their ideas. The environment is equipped with semantic technology components that are capable of generating knowledge‐based feedback and virtual characters that enhance the interaction with learners. Teachers have created course material, and successful evaluation studies have been performed. This article presents an overview of the DynaLearn system.

References

[1]
André, E. 2008. Design and Evaluation of Embodied Conversational Agents for Educational and Advisory Software. In The Handbook of Conversation Design for Instructional Applications, ed. R. Luppicini. Toronto, ON: IRM Press.
[2]
Beek, W., and Bredeweg, B. 2012. Providing Feedback for Common Problems in Learning by Conceptual Modeling Using Expectation‐Driven Consistency Maintenance. Paper presented at the 26th International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning, Playa Vista, CA, 16–18 July.
[3]
Beek, W., Bredeweg, B.; and Latour, S. 2011. Context‐Dependent Help for the DynaLearn Modelling and Simulation Workbench. In Proceedings of the 15th Artificial Intelligence in Education Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 420–422. Berlin: Springer.
[4]
Bouwer, A., and Bredeweg, B. 2010. Graphical Means for Inspecting Qualitative Models of System Behaviour. Instructional Science 38(2): 173–208.
[5]
Bredeweg, B., and Forbus, K. 2004. Qualitative Modeling in Education. AI Magazine 24(4): 35–46.
[6]
Bredeweg, B., and Salles, P. 2009. Qualitative Models of Ecological Systems — Editorial Introduction. Ecological Informatics 4(5–6): 261–262.
[7]
Bredeweg, B., and Winkels, R. 1998. Qualitative Models in Interactive Learning Environments: An Introduction. Interactive Learning Environments 5(1–2): 1–18.
[8]
Bredeweg, B., Liem, J., Beek, W., Salles, P.; and Linnebank, F. 2010. Learning Spaces as Representational Scaffolds for Learning Conceptual Knowledge of System Behaviour. In Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6383, 7–61. Berlin: Springer.
[9]
Bredeweg, B., Linnebank, F., Bouwer, A.; and Liem, J. 2009. GARP3 — Workbench for Qualitative Modelling and Simulation. Ecological Informatics 4(5–6): 263–281.
[10]
Bredeweg, B., Salles, P.; and Nuttle, T. 2007. Using Exogenous Quantities in Qualitative Models about Environmental Sustainability. AI Communications 20(1): 49–58.
[11]
Bredeweg, B., Salles, P., Bertels, D., Rafalowicz, J., Bouwer, A., Liem, J., Feltrini, G. M., Caldas, A. L. R., Resende, M. M. P., Zitek, A.; and Nuttle, T. 2007. Training Report on Using QR for Learning About Sustainable Development. Technical Report Deliverable D7. 2, Strep Project Fp6 No. 004074, Naturnet‐Redime, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
[12]
Cioaca, E., Linnebank, F. E., Bredeweg, B.; and Salles, P. 2009. A Qualitative Reasoning Model of Algal Bloom in the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve. Ecological Informatics 4(5–6): 282–298.
[13]
de Kleer, J., and Williams, B. C. 1987. Diagnosing Multiple Faults. Artificial Intelligence Journal 32(1): 97–130.
[14]
de Koning, K., Bredeweg, B., Breuker, J.; and Wielinga, B. 2000. Model‐Based Reasoning About Learner Behaviour. Artificial Intelligence Journal 117(2): 173–229.
[15]
de Koning, K. 1997. Model‐Based Reasoning about Learner Behaviour. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
[16]
Elio, R., and Sharf, P. B. 1990. Modeling Novice‐to‐Expert Shifts in Problem Solving and Knowledge Organization. Cognitive Science 14(4): 579–639.
[17]
Eurydice 2006. The Information Network on Education in Europe. Science Teaching in Schools in Europe: Policies and Research. Technical Report, Directorate‐General for Education and Culture. Brussels, Belgium: European Union.
[18]
Forbus, K. D. 2008. Qualitative Modeling. In Handbook of Knowledge Representation, Volume 3 of Foundations of Artificial Intelligence, ed. F. van Harmelen, V. Lifschitz, and B. Porter, 361–393. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
[19]
Forbus, K. D. 1984. Qualitative Process Theory. Artificial Intelligence 24(1–3): 85–168.
[20]
Forbus, K. D., and Falkenhainer, B. 1990. Self‐Explanatory Simulations: An Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Knowledge. In Proceedings of the 8th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 380–387. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
[21]
Forbus, K. D., Carney, K., Sherin, B. L.; and Ureel II, L. C. 2005. Vmodel — A Visual Qualitative Modeling Environment for Middle‐School Students. AI Magazine 26(3): 63–72.
[22]
Forbus, K. D., Carney, K., Sherin, B. L.; and Ureel II, L. C. 2004. Vmodel: A Visual Qualitative Modeling Environment for Middle‐School Students. In Proceedings of the 16th Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, 820–827. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Presss.
[23]
Frederiksen, J. R., and White, B. Y. 2002. Conceptualizing and Constructing Linked Models: Creating Coherence in Complex Knowledge Systems. In The Role of Communication in Learning to Model, ed. P. Brna, M. Baker, K. Stenning, and A. Tiberghien, 69–96. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[24]
Goddijn, F., Bouwer, A.; and Bredeweg, B. 2003. Automatically Generating Tutoring Questions for Qualitative Simulations. Paper presented at the 17th International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning, Brasilia, Brazil, August 20–22.
[25]
Gracia, J., Liem, J., Lozano, E., Corcho, O., Trna, M., Gómez‐Pérez, A.; and Bredeweg, B. 2010. Semantic Techniques for Enabling Knowledge Reuse in Conceptual Modelling. In Proceedings of the 9th International Semantic Web Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6497, 82–97. Berlin: Springer.
[26]
Grau, B., Horrocks, I., Motik, B., Parsia, B., Patelschneider, P.; and Sattler, U. 2008. Owl 2: The Next Step for Owl. We b Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 6(4): 309–322.
[27]
Grimm, V. 1994. Mathematical Models and Understanding in Ecology. Ecological Modelling 75/76:641–651.
[28]
Haefner, J. W. 2005. Modeling Biological Systems: Principles and Applications. Berlin: Springer.
[29]
Hucke, L., and Fischer, H. E. 2003. The Link of Theory and Practice in Traditional and in Computer‐Based University Laboratory Experiments. In Teaching and Learning in the Science Laboratory, Volume 16 of Science and Technology Education Library, ed. K. Tobin, D. Baker, B. Bell, R. Duit, M. Espinet, B. Fraser, O. Jegede, R. Lazarowitz, W.‐M. Roth, T. Hsiao‐Lin, L. R. Herrera, D. Psillos, and H. Niedderer, 205–218. Berlin: Springer.
[30]
Kinnebrew, J. S., and Biswas, G. 2011. Modeling and Measuring Self‐Regulated Learning in Teachable Agent Environments. Journal of E‐Learning and Knowledge Society 7(2): 19–35.
[31]
Kuipers, B. 1994. Qualitative Reasoning: Modeling and Simulation with Incomplete Knowledge, 452. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[32]
Leelawong, K., and Biswas, G. 2008. Designing Learning by Teaching Agents: The Betty's Brain System. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 18(3): 181–208.
[33]
Liem, J., Beek, W.; and Bredeweg, B. 2010. Differentiating Qualitative Representations Into Learning Spaces. Paper presented at the 24th International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning, Portland, OR, 8–10 August.
[34]
Lozano, E., Gracia, J., Corcho, O., Noble, R. A.; and Gómez‐Pérez, A. 2012. Problem‐Based Learning Supported by Semantic Techniques. Interactive Learning Environments 20(4): 351–357.
[35]
Mehlmann, G., Häring, M., Bühling, R., Wiβner, M.; and André, E. 2010. Multiple Agent Roles in an Adaptive Virtual Classroom Environment. In Proceedings of the 10th Intelligent Virtual Agents, 10th International Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6356, 250–256. Berlin: Springer.
[36]
Mettes, C. T. C. W., and Roossink, H. J. 1981. Linking Factual and Procedural Knowledge in Solving Science Problems: A Case Study in a Thermodynamics Course. Instructional Science 10(4): 333–361.
[37]
Mioduser, D., Zuzovsky, R., Salles, P., Souza, A., Portella, A., Braga, E., Wilhelms, L., Pereira Resende, M., Morison, G., Assumpção da Costa e Silva, P., Gontijo de Sá, I., Pires, L., Simões, A., Noble, R., Cowx, I., Borisova, P., Liem, J., Uzunov, Y., Zurel, D., Leiba, M., Benayahu, H., Nachmias, R., Ram J., Zitek, A., Poppe, M.; and Stelzhammer, M. 2012. Final Report on DynaLearn Evaluation Studies. DynaLearn, EC FP7 Strep Project 231526, Deliverable D7.4. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Universiteit Van Amsterdam.
[38]
Mylopoulos, J. 1992. Conceptual Modeling, Databases, and Case: An Integrated View of Information System Development. In Conceptual Modeling and Telos, 49–68. New York: Wiley.
[39]
Nakova, E., Linnebank, F. E., Bredeweg, B., Salles, P.; and Uzunov, Y. 2009. The River Mesta Case Study: A Qualitative Model of Dissolved Oxygen and Sustainable Development in Aquatic Ecosystems. Ecological Informatics 4(5–6): 339–357.
[40]
Niedderer, H., Aufschnaiter, S., Tiberghien, A., Buty, C., Haller, K., Hucke, L., Sander, F.; and Fischer, H. E. 2003. Talking Physics in Labwork Contexts — A Category Based Analysis of Videotapes. In Teaching and Learning in the Science Laboratory, Volume 16 of Science and Technology Education Library, ed. K. Tobin, D. Baker, B. Bell, R. Duit, M. Espinet, B. Fraser, O. Jegede, R. Lazarowitz, W.‐M. Roth, T. Hsiao‐Lin, L. R. Herrera, D. Psillos, and H. Niedderer, 31–40. Berlin: Springer.
[41]
Novak, J. D., and Gowin, D. B. 1984. Learning How to Learn. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
[42]
Osborne, J., Simon, S.; and Collins, S. 2003. Attitudes Towards Science: A Review of the Literature and Its Implications. International Journal of Science Education 25(9): 1049–1079.
[43]
Ploetzner, R., and Spada, H. 1998. Constructing Quantitative Problem Representations on the Basis of Qualitative Reasoning. Interactive Learning Environments 5(1–2): 95–108.
[44]
Pratap, R. 2009. Getting Started with Matlab: A Quick Introduction for Scientists and Engineers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
[45]
Richmond, G., and Peterson, S. 1992. Stella II: An Introduction to Systems Thinking. Hanover, NH: High Performance Systems, Inc.
[46]
Salles, P., Assumpção Costa e Silva, P., Gontijo de Sá, I., Noble, R., Zitek, A., Uzunov, Y.; and Mioduser, D. 2009. DynaLearn Environmental Science Curriculum Requirements. DynaLearn, Ec Fp7 Strep Project 231526, Deliverable D6.1. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Universiteit Van Amsterdam.
[47]
Salles, S., Souza, A., Noble, R., Zitek, A., Borisova, P., Leiba, M.; and Bredeweg, B. 2012. DynaLearn Curriculum for Environmental Science. DynaLearn, Ec Fp7 Strep Project 231526, Deliverable D6.5. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Universiteit Van Amsterdam.
[48]
Schwarz, C. V., and White, B. Y. 2005 Metamodeling Knowledge: Developing Students' Understanding of Scientific Modeling. Cognition and Instruction 23(2): 165–205.
[49]
Wiβner, M., Beek, W., Lozano, E., Mehlmann, G., Linnebank, F., Liem, J., Häring, M., Bühling, R., Gracia, J., Bredeweg, B.; and André E. 2012. Increasing Learners' Motivation Through Pedagogical Agents: The Cast of Virtual Characters in the DynaLearn ILE. In Agents for Educational Games and Simulations, International Workshop, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 7471, ed. M. Beer, C. Brom, F. Dignum, and V.‐W. Soo, 151–165. Berlin: Springer.
[50]
Zitek, A., Poppe, M., Stelzhammer, M., Muhar, S.; and Bredeweg, B. 2013. Learning by Conceptual Modelling — Changes in Knowledge Structure and Content. IEEE Transactions of Learning Technologies 6(1).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The effectiveness of lightweight automated support for learning about dynamic systems with qualitative representationsProceedings of the 39th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing10.1145/3605098.3635950(11-20)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Integration of a Teacher Dashboard in a Hybrid Support Approach for Constructing Qualitative RepresentationsTechnology Enhanced Learning for Inclusive and Equitable Quality Education10.1007/978-3-031-72315-5_15(208-221)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Calcium Regulation Assignment: Alternative Styles in Successfully Learning About Biological MechanismsArtificial Intelligence in Education10.1007/978-3-031-64302-6_16(220-234)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image AI Magazine
AI Magazine  Volume 34, Issue 4
Winter 2013
126 pages
ISSN:0738-4602
EISSN:2371-9621
DOI:10.1002/aaai.v34.4
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

United States

American Association for Artificial Intelligence

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 December 2013

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 12 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The effectiveness of lightweight automated support for learning about dynamic systems with qualitative representationsProceedings of the 39th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing10.1145/3605098.3635950(11-20)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Integration of a Teacher Dashboard in a Hybrid Support Approach for Constructing Qualitative RepresentationsTechnology Enhanced Learning for Inclusive and Equitable Quality Education10.1007/978-3-031-72315-5_15(208-221)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Calcium Regulation Assignment: Alternative Styles in Successfully Learning About Biological MechanismsArtificial Intelligence in Education10.1007/978-3-031-64302-6_16(220-234)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
  • (2019)Methods of AI for Multimodal Sensing and Action for Complex SituationsAI Magazine10.1609/aimag.v40i4.481340:4(50-65)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2019
  • (2015)Cognitive Prosthetics for Fostering LearningAI Magazine10.1609/aimag.v36i4.261536:4(34-50)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2015

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media