[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1609/aaai.v37i5.25709guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article

Strategic facility location with clients that minimize total waiting time

Published: 07 February 2023 Publication History

Abstract

We study a non-cooperative two-sided facility location game in which facilities and clients behave strategically. This is in contrast to many other facility location games in which clients simply visit their closest facility. Facility agents select a location on a graph to open a facility to attract as much purchasing power as possible, while client agents choose which facilities to patronize by strategically distributing their purchasing power in order to minimize their total waiting time. Here, the waiting time of a facility depends on its received total purchasing power. We show that our client stage is an atomic splittable congestion game, which implies existence, uniqueness and efficient computation of a client equilibrium. Therefore, facility agents can efficiently predict client behavior and make strategic decisions accordingly. Despite that, we prove that subgame perfect equilibria do not exist in all instances of this game and that their existence is NP-hard to decide. On the positive side, we provide a simple and efficient algorithm to compute 3-approximate subgame perfect equilibria.

References

[1]
Ahn, H.-K.; Cheng, S.-W.; Cheong, O.; Golin, M.; and van Oostrum, R. 2004. Competitive Facility Location: The Voronoi Game. TCS, 310(1): 457-467.
[2]
Aziz, H.; Chan, H.; Lee, B.; Li, B.; and Walsh, T. 2020. Facility Location Problem with Capacity Constraints: Algorithmic and Mechanism Design Perspectives. In AAAI, 1806-1813.
[3]
Bhaskar, U.; Fleischer, L.; Hoy, D.; and Huang, C.-C. 2015. On the uniqueness of equilibrium in atomic splittable routing games. Mathematics of Operations Research, 40(3): 634-654.
[4]
Boppana, M.; Hod, R.; Mitzenmacher, M.; and Morgan, T. 2016. Voronoi Choice Games. In ICALP, 23:1-23:13.
[5]
Brethouwer, J.-T.; de Jong, J.; Uetz, M.; and Skopalik, A. 2018. Analysis of Equilibria for Generalized Market Sharing Games. In WINE.
[6]
Chan, H.; Filos-Ratsikas, A.; Li, B.; Li, M.; and Wang, C. 2021. Mechanism Design for Facility Location Problems: A Survey. In IJCAI, 4356-4365.
[7]
Cohen, A.; and Peleg, D. 2019. Hotelling Games with Random Tolerance Intervals. In WINE, 114-128.
[8]
de Berg, M.; Kisfaludi-Bak, S.; and Mehr, M. 2019. On One-Round Discrete Voronoi Games. In ISAAC, 37:1-37:17.
[9]
Deligkas, A.; Eiben, E.; and Goldsmith, T. 2022. Parameterized Complexity of Hotelling-Downs with Party Nominees. In IJCAI, 244-250.
[10]
Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 65(2): 135-150.
[11]
Durr, C.; and Thang, N. K. 2007. Nash Equilibria in Voronoi Games on Graphs. In ESA, 17-28.
[12]
Eiselt, H. A.; Laporte, G.; and Thisse, J.-F. 1993. Competitive Location Models: A Framework and Bibliography. Transportation Science, 27(1): 44-54.
[13]
Elsasser, R.; and Tscheuschner, T. 2011. Settling the complexity of local max-cut (almost) completely. In ICALP, 171-182.
[14]
Feldman, M.; Fiat, A.; and Golomb, I. 2016. On Voting and Facility Location. In EC, 269-286.
[15]
Feldman, M.; Fiat, A.; and Obraztsova, S. 2016. Variations on the Hotelling-Downs Model. In AAAI, 496-501.
[16]
Feldotto, M.; Lenzner, P.; Molitor, L.; and Skopalik, A. 2019. From Hotelling to Load Balancing: Approximation and the Principle of Minimum Differentiation. In AAMAS, 1949-1951.
[17]
Fotakis, D.; and Patsilinakos, P. 2021. Strategyproof Facility Location in Perturbation Stable Instances. In WINE, 95-112.
[18]
Fournier, G.; Van der Straeten, K.; and Weibull, J. 2020. Spatial competition with unit-demand functions. arXiv:2001.11422.
[19]
Gairing, M. 2009. Covering Games: Approximation through Non-Cooperation. In WINE, 184-195.
[20]
Garey, M. R.; and Johnson, D. S. 1990. Computers and Intractability; A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. USA: W. H. Freeman & Co.
[21]
Goemans, M.; Li, E. L.; Mirrokni, V. S.; and Thottan, M. 2006. Market Sharing Games Applied to Content Distribution in Ad hoc Networks. Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 24(5): 1020-1033.
[22]
Harks, T.; and Timmermans, V. 2021. Equilibrium computation in resource allocation games. Mathematical Programming, 194: 1-34.
[23]
Harrenstein, P.; Lisowski, G.; Sridharan, R.; and Turrini, P. 2021. A Hotelling-Downs Framework for Party Nominees. In AAMAS, 593-601.
[24]
Hotelling, H. 1929. Stability in Competition. The Economic Journal, 39(153): 41-57.
[25]
Kakutani, S. 1941. A generalization of Brouwer's fixed point theorem. Duke Mathematical Journal, 8(3): 457-459.
[26]
Kohlberg, E. 1983. Equilibrium Store Locations When Consumers Minimize Travel Time Plus Waiting Time. Economics Letters, 11(3): 211-216.
[27]
Krogmann, S.; Lenzner, P.; Molitor, L.; and Skopalik, A. 2021. Two-Stage Facility Location Games with Strategic Clients and Facilities. In IJCAI, 292-298.
[28]
Krogmann, S.; Lenzner, P.; and Skopalik, A. 2022. Strategic Facility Location with Clients that Minimize Total Waiting Time. arXiv:2211.14016.
[29]
Mavronicolas, M.; Monien, B.; Papadopoulou, V. G.; and Schoppmann, F. 2008. Voronoi Games on Cycle Graphs. In MFCS, 503-514.
[30]
Monderer, D.; and Shapley, L. S. 1996. Potential Games. Games and Economic Behavior, 14(1): 124-143.
[31]
Peters, H.; Schröder, M.; and Vermeulen, D. 2018. Hotelling's location model with negative network externalities. International Journal of Game Theory, 47: 811-837.
[32]
Procaccia, A. D.; and Tennenholtz, M. 2013. Approximate Mechanism Design without Money. ACM Trans. Economics and Comput., 1(4): 18:1-18:26.
[33]
ReVelle, C. S.; and Eiselt, H. A. 2005. Location Analysis: A Synthesis and Survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 165(1): 1-19.
[34]
Rosenthal, R. W. 1973. A class of games possessing pure-strategy Nash equilibria. International Journal of Game Theory, 2: 65-67.
[35]
Schaffer, A. A. 1991. Simple local search problems that are hard to solve. SIAM Journal on Computing, 20(1): 56-87.
[36]
Schmand, D.; Schröder, M.; and Skopalik, A. 2019. Network Investment Games with Wardrop Followers. In ICALP, 151:1-151:14.
[37]
Schon, C.; and Saini, P. 2018. Market-oriented service network design when demand is sensitive to congestion. Transportation Science, 52(5): 1253-1275.
[38]
Shen, W.; and Wang, Z. 2017. Hotelling-Downs Model with Limited Attraction. In AAMAS, 660-668.
[39]
Vetta, A. 2002. Nash Equilibria in Competitive Societies, with Applications to Facility Location, Traffic Routing and Auctions. FOCS, 416-425.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Strategic resource selection with homophilic agentsProceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.24963/ijcai.2023/301(2701-2709)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
AAAI'23/IAAI'23/EAAI'23: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-Fifth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Thirteenth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence
February 2023
16496 pages
ISBN:978-1-57735-880-0

Sponsors

  • Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence

Publisher

AAAI Press

Publication History

Published: 07 February 2023

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Strategic resource selection with homophilic agentsProceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.24963/ijcai.2023/301(2701-2709)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2023

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media