[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.14236/ewic/HCI2018.145guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article

Evaluating the usefulness of the adapted thematic analysis in the process of design

Published: 04 July 2018 Publication History

Abstract

A number of HCI studies reported thematic analysis method as a useful tool for evaluating existing technologies and informing design of new technologies. Whilst these studies reported on the resulting designs, they lacked detailed account about the use of the method itself or how the output of the method was linked to proposed designs. To explore this 'knowledge gap', thematic analysis method was applied to a data set resulting from semi-structured interviews conducted with five families. The adaptation of the thematic analysis approach led to a new 'output' in which findings were structured into a Design Map consisting of Categories, Themes and Codes. The usefulness of this Design Map in the process of design was evaluated in a study conducted with participants studying design at an undergraduate level. This paper describes the rationale for using Lean UX approach to refine the aims of the study and reports results from the Exit Questionnaires aiming to elicit participants' opinions about the use of a Design Map in the process of design.

References

[1]
Boyatzis, R.E. (1998) Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. SAGE Publications, Inc.
[2]
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77-101.
[3]
Brown, N. and Stockman, T. (2013) Examining the Use of Thematic Analysis as a Tool for Informing Design of New Family Communication Technologies. Proceedings of the BCS-HCI 2013, The 27<sup>th</sup> International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference: The Internet of Things. Uxbridge, UK, 9-13, September 2013.
[4]
Constable, G. (2015) Business assumptions exercise. http://giffconstable.com/2011/12/business-assumptions-exercise/ (28 March 2018).
[5]
de Bono, E. (1999) Six Thinking Hats. Back Bay Books, NY.
[6]
de Bono, E. (1970) Lateral Thinking: Creativity Step by Step. Harper Colophon, NY.
[7]
Dodero, G. Melonio, A., Gennari, R. and Torello, S. (2014) Gamified co-design with cooperative learning. In Proceedings of CHI 2014, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, April 26-May 1 2014. ACM.
[8]
Fereday, J. and Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006) Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods (IJQM), 5(1). 80-92.
[9]
Gothelf, J. and Seiden, J. (2013) Lean UX: Applying Lean Principles to Improve User Experience. The Lean Series. O'Reilly Media, Inc., 1005 Gravenstein Highway North, Sebastopol, CA.
[10]
Güldenpfennig, F., Reitberger, W. and Fitzpatrick, G. (2012) Of Unkempt Hair, Dirty Shirts and Smiling Faces: Capturing Behind the Mobile Camera. Proceedings of NordiCHI'12. Copenhagen, Denmark, 14-17 October 2012. 298-307.
[11]
Joffe, H. and Yardley, L. (2004) Content and thematic analysis, In Marks, D.F. and Yardley, L. (eds), Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology. London: Sage Publications. 56-67.
[12]
Money, A.G. et al. (2008) Older Adults' Experiences of Interacting with Online Forms. Workshop on HCI and the Older population. Proceedings of the BCS-HCI 2008, The 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers XXII: Culture, Creativity, Interaction - Volume 2. Liverpool John Moores University, UK, 1-5 September 2008. 27-28.
[13]
Pykhtina, O. et al. (2012) Magic Land: The Design and Evaluation of an Interactive Tabletop Supporting Therapeutic Play with Children. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS). Newcastle, UK, 11-15 June 2012. 136-145.
[14]
Rohrmann, B. (2007) Verbal qualifiers for rating scales: Sociolinguistic considerations and psychometric data. Technical report, University of Melbourne, Australia.
[15]
Tanaka, A. et al. (2012) Survey and Thematic Analysis Approach as Input to the Design of Mobile Music GUIs. Proceedings of the NIME'12. University of Michigan, Ann Arbour, USA, 21-23 May 2012.
[16]
Toth, N. et al. (2012) Teenagers Talking About Energy: Using Narrative Methods to Inform Design. Proceedings of the CHI '12, Austin, TX, USA, 5--10 May 2012. 2171-2176.
[17]
Vagias, W. M. (2006) Likert-type scale response anchors. Technical report, Clemson International Institute for Tourism & Research Development, Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management. Clemson University. https://www1.maine.gov/doe/arts/documents/likert-typeresponseanchors2.pdf (28 March 2018).
[18]
Liikkanen, L. A., Kilpio, H., Svan, L. and Hiltunen, M. (2014) Leanux: the next generation of user-centered agile development? In NordiCHI'14. Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational, pages 1095--1100. New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
HCI '18: Proceedings of the 32nd International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference
July 2018
1509 pages

Publisher

BCS Learning & Development Ltd.

Swindon, United Kingdom

Publication History

Published: 04 July 2018

Author Tags

  1. adapting qualitative methods
  2. design map
  3. design process
  4. lean UX
  5. questionnaires
  6. thematic analysis

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 22 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media