A Discrete Event Model of Viability Building in a Public University Organization
Abstract
In the context of today's interconnected world, public higher education is confronted with a shift of its role from public good to public service, which is accompanied by new challenges in building and maintaining the viability of public universities. There is a vast literature on this topic, but there is not yet reported a systematic approach in modeling the basic steps of decision making and problem solving to be completed by a public university to remain viable. Starting from the concepts of service system, and consonance and resonance as key viability conditions, this paper proposes a discrete event model of the viability building and maintaining process in a generic public university organization. The model evolution is driven by events conditioned by internal, external, or mixed causes. Some of the uncontrollable events occurring in the process may drive the discrete evolution to disturbance rejection states, where specific recovery strategies are applied. If recovery is successful, disturbances may become sources of innovation. The discrete event model can be used as a theoretical and conceptual tool for building and testing instances of the viability building and maintaining processes in public universities, and also for refining academic evaluation criteria by the authorities.
References
[1]
Ahmed S, Mehta HK (2015) On applying big data and cloud computing for quality improvement in higher education. Proc. Internat. Conf. Adv. Big Data Analytics (ABDA '15), July 27-30, Las Vegas, 50-56.
[2]
APPA (2013) Thought Leaders report 2013: The rising cost in higher education. Retrieved March 1, 2017, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED547781.
[3]
Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges (2016) Consequential board governance in public higher education systems. Retrieved March 1, 2017, https://www.agb.org/reports/2016/consequential-board-governance-in-public-higher-education-systems.
[4]
Astin AW (1999) Student involvement: A development for higher education. J. College Student Development 40(5):518-529.
[5]
Azizi A, Elezi Z, Mazreku A (2013) Competition between public and private universities: International experiences in case of Macedonia. J. Educational Instructional Stud. World 3(2):203-208.
[6]
Badinelli R, Barile S, Ng I, Polese F, Savioano M, Di Nauta P (2012) Viable service systems and decision making in service management. J. Service Management 23(4):498-526.
[7]
Bady A, Konczal M (2012) From master plan to no plan: The slow death of public higher education. Dissent. Retrieved March 1, 2017, https://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/from-master-plan-to-no-plan-the-slow-death-of-public-higher-education.
[8]
Barile S, Polese F (2010a) Smart service systems and viable service systems: Applying systems theory to service science. Service Sci. 2(1/2): 21-40.
[9]
Barile S, Polese F (2010b) Linking the viable system and many-to-many network approaches to service-dominant logic and service science. Internat. J. Quality Service Sci. 2(1):23-42.
[10]
British Council (2012) The shape of things to come: Higher education global trends and emerging opportunities to 2020. Retrieved March 1, 2017, https://www.britishcouncil.org/education/ihe/knowledge-centre/global-landscape/report-shape-of-things-to-come-1.
[11]
Buchanan JM (1968) The Demand and Supply of Public Goods (Rand McNally, Chicago).
[12]
Case J (2017) Is higher education for the public good? University World News (March 3), http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story_20170228104023624.
[13]
Charbonnier F, Alla H, David R (1999) The supervised control of discrete event dynamic systems. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Tech. 7(2):175-187.
[14]
Cheah S, Yu C (2016) Assessing economic impact of research and innovation originating from public research institutions and universities-- Case of Singapore PRIs. Triple Helix 3(December):6.
[15]
Cho M-H (2014) Technological catch-up and the role of universities: South Korea's innovation-based growth explained through the corporate helix model. Triple Helix 1(December):2.
[16]
Cowen T (2008) Public goods. Henderson DR, ed. The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics, 2nd ed. Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved March 14, 2017, http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/PublicGoods.html.
[17]
CRIS (2011) Strategic R&D program for growth and innovation for services (Cresterea si Inovare în domeniul Serviciilor-CRIS). Foresight project, contract 207 CP/II/2010, University of Economic Sciences of Bucharest and the National Authority for Scientific Research (ANCS), Bucharest, Romania.
[18]
Cummings WK (2003) The Institutions of Education: A Comparative Study of Educational Development in the Six Core Nations (Symposium Books, Oxford, UK).
[19]
de Weert E (2011) Perspectives on higher education and the labour market: Review of international policy developments. Report C11W158, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
[20]
Dill DD (1997) Higher education markets and public policy. Higher Ed. Policy 10(3-4):167-185.
[21]
Dorri M, Yarmohammadianb MH, Nadic MA (2012) A review on value chain in higher education. Procedia--Soc. Behav. Sci. 46:3842-3846.
[22]
Edwards C, McCluskey N (2015) Higher education subsidies. Accessed July 8, 2017, https://www.downsizinggovernment.org/education/higher-education-subsidies.
[23]
Franck B, Owen RF (2010) International migration of brains, educational competition and national interests: A two-country, game-theoretic approach. Presentation in ParallelSession 7, Eur. Trade Study Group (ETSG), 12th Annual Conf., Lausanne, Switzerland, September 9-11.
[24]
Friedenthal S, Moore A, Steiner R (2009) OMG systems modeling language (OMG SysML) tutorial. Retrieved January 10, 2017, http://www.omgsysml.org/INCOSE-OMGSysML-Tutorial-Final-090901.pdf.
[25]
Fukiharu T (2005) The reform of higher education in Japan: A game-theoretic analysis of intensified competition. Zerger A, Argent RM, eds. MODSIM Internat. Congress Model. Simulation, 1007-1013.
[26]
Golinelli GM (2010) Viable Systems Approach (VSA). Governing Business Dynamics (Kluwer/CEDAM, Padua, Italy).
[27]
Kapitza, PL (1980) Basic factors in the organization of science and how they are handled in the U.S.S.R. Kapitza PL, ed. Experiment, Theory, Practice. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 46 (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 183-194.
[28]
Karorsa DL, Polka WS (2015) The equity-quality dilemma of higher education expansion: A goal-oriented planning approach for maintaining high quality standards in Ethiopia. J. Internat. Soc. Ed. Planning 22(3):19-36.
[29]
Katzan H (2008) Foundations of service science concepts and facilities. J. Service Sci. 1(1):1-22.
[30]
Kwok L (2015) A vision for the development of i-campus. Smart Learn. Environments 2(January):2.
[31]
Larson RC (2009) Editorial column--Education: Our most important service sector. Service Sci. 1(4):i-iii.
[32]
Lemey E, Poels G (2011) Towards a service system ontology for service science. Kapel G, Maamar Z, Mootahari-Nezhad HR, eds. Service Oriented Computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7084 (Springer, Heidelberg, Germany), 250-264.
[33]
Levy F, Murnane RJ (2005) How computerized work and globalization shape human skill demands. Working Paper IPC-05-006, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
[34]
Lyons K, Tracy S (2013) Characterizing organizations as service systems. J. Human Factors Ergonomics Manufacturing Service Industries 23(1): 19-27.
[35]
Maglio PP, Spohrer J (2008) Fundamentals of service science. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 36(1):18-20.
[36]
Marginson S, Rhoades G (2002) Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Ed. 43(3):281-309.
[37]
MEGA (2017) Business process analysis. Retrieved March 26, 2017, http://www.mega.com/en/product/business-process-analysis.
[38]
Meredith T (2014) Public university systems: A checklist for success. Trusteeship Magazine 22(5). Retrieved March 1, 2017, https://www.agb.org/trusteeship/2014/9/public-university-systems-checklist-success.
[39]
Naidu P, Derani NES (2016) A comparative study on quality of education received by students of private universities versus public universities. Procedia Econom. Finance 35:659-666.
[40]
OECD (2003) Glossary of statistical terms. Retrieved March 1, 2017, https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID_743.
[41]
Ogbogu CO (2013) The role of committees in decision-making process in Nigerian universities. Internat. J. Bus. Management 8(16):72-77.
[42]
Oltean VE, Borangiu T, Dragoicea M (2016) On a qualitative game theoretic approach of teacher-student interaction in a public higher education service system. Borangiu T, Dragoicea M, Nóvoa H, eds. Exploring Services Sci., 7th Internat. Conf., IESS 2016. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Vol. 247 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 15-29.
[43]
Ostrom V, Ostrom E (1999) Public goods and public choices. McGinnis MD, ed. Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor), 75-103.
[44]
Pathak V, Pathak K (2010) Reconfiguring the higher education value chain. Management Ed. 24(4):166-171.
[45]
Pixel, ed. (2016) Conference Proceedings: The Future of Education, 6th ed. (Libreria Universitaria, Florence).
[46]
Ramdage PJ, Wonham WM (1989) The control of discrete event systems. Proc. IEEE 77(1):81-89.
[47]
Romero L, del Rey E (2004) Competition between public and private universities: Quality, prices and exams. Working Paper 04-64, Department of Economics, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Madrid.
[48]
Sahin A (2004) The incentive effects of higher education subsidies on student effort. Report 192, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York.
[49]
Samuelson PA (1954) The pure theory of public expenditure. Rev. Econom. Statist. 36(4):387-389.
[50]
Selim TH (2008) The education market in Egypt: A game theory approach. Working Paper 422, Economic Research Forum, Giza, Egypt.
[51]
Sitaloppi J, Koskela-Huotari K, Vargo SL (2016) Institutional complexity as a driver for innovation in service ecosystems. Service Sci. 8(3): 333-343.
[52]
Spohrer J, Kwan SK (2009) Service science, management, engineering, and design (SSMED): An emerging discipline--Outline and references. Internat. J. Info. Systems Service Sector 3:1-31.
[53]
Spohrer J, Golinelli GM, Piciocchi P, Clara B (2010) An integrated SS-VSA analysis of changing job roles. Service Sci. 2(1/2):1-20.
[54]
Stejar C (2011) Higher education: Public good or public service. Analysis from the perspective of internationalization of education. Management Marketing 6(1):139-150.
[55]
Strausser J, Morris R (2015) Examining the application of big data analytics to increase university retention and promote student success. Issues Inform. Systems 16(2):140-148.
[56]
Vârbanescu R, Dobrescu R, Avram A, Iordan A (2010) Overusing the Internet--Problems in technical education. Chova LG, Belenguer DM, Torres IC, eds. Proc. 4th Internat. Tech., Ed. Development (INTED) Conf. (International Academy of Technology, Education and Development, Valencia, Spain), 848-852.
[57]
Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J. Marketing 68(1):1-17.
[58]
Zhu ZT, Yu M-H, Riezebos P (2016) A research framework of smart education. Smart Learn. Environments 3(December):4.
- A Discrete Event Model of Viability Building in a Public University Organization
Recommendations
ICT-enabled co-production of public services: Barriers and enablers. A systematic review
Information and communication technologies (ICTs) are being heralded by governments and international organizations as a means of augmenting co-production of public services and a number of major initiatives are being rolled out around the world. ...
Ontology Model for Public Services in Morocco Based on 5W1H Approach: PSOM-eGovMa
AbstractMorocco has launched several e-government programs to develop efficient public e-services which meet the needs of users. However, while digitizing public services processes for Moroccan administrations, the designers of information systems record ...
Exploring Public Sector’s Roles in Collaborative Consumption – A Research Agenda
Electronic ParticipationAbstractMotivated by the growing significance of sharing economy within our society, we here discuss which role the public sector may have within collaborative consumption (CC). CC refers to a business model grounded on peer-to-peer based sharing of goods ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Publisher
INFORMS
Linthicum, MD, United States
Publication History
Published: 01 December 2017
Accepted: 29 June 2017
Received: 28 November 2016
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025