[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article

Financing and Investment Efficiency, Information Quality, and Accounting Biases

Published: 01 September 2014 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the effect of accounting biases on firms' financing decisions and the role of accounting biases in endogenous information quality. We show that in industries with generally low-profit prospects, a downward-biased accounting system performs better than a neutral accounting system, and a more downward bias helps mitigate both investment and financing inefficiency; whereas for industries with generally high-profit prospects, an upward-biased accounting system is better than a neutral accounting system, and a more upward bias helps improve financing efficiency. In addition, we find that a more downward-biased accounting system motivates good firms to exert more effort to improve the information quality, which improves overall efficiency.
This paper was accepted by Mary Barth, accounting.

References

[1]
Bagnoli M, Watts SG (2005) Conservative accounting choices. Management Sci. 51(5):786-801.
[2]
Beyer A (2012) Conservatism and aggregation: The effect on cost of equity capital and the efficiency of debt contracts. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
[3]
Bolton P, Dewatripont M (2005) Contract Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
[4]
Bushman RM, Indjejikian RJ (1993) Stewardship value of "distorted" accounting disclosures. Accounting Rev. 68(4):765-782.
[5]
Chen Q, Hemmer T, Zhang Y (2007) On the relation between conservatism in accounting standards and incentives for earnings management. J. Accounting Res. 45(3):541-565.
[6]
Chen YJ, Deng M (2010) The signaling role of accounting conservatism in debt contracting. Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
[7]
Cohen DA, Zarowin P (2008) Earnings management and excess investment: Accrual-based versus real activities. Working paper, New York University, New York.
[8]
Dutta S, Gigler F (2002) The effect of earnings forecasts on earnings management. J. Accounting Res. 40(3):631-655.
[9]
Fan Q, Zhang X (2012) Accounting conservatism, information aggregation, and the quality of financial reporting. Contemporary Accounting Res. 29(1):38-56.
[10]
Financial Accounting Standards Board (1985) Summary of statement no. 86--Accounting for the costs of computer software to be sold, leased, or otherwise marketed. FASB, Norwalk, CT.
[11]
Fortune (2008) Top industries: Most profitable. (May 5), http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2008/performers/industries/profits/.
[12]
Gigler F, Hemmer T (2001) Conservatism, optimal disclosure policy, and the timeliness of financial reports. The Accounting Rev. 76:471-493.
[13]
Gigler F, Kanodia C, Sapra H, Venugopalan R (2009) Accounting conservatism and the efficiency of debt contracts. J. Accounting Res. 47(3):767-797.
[14]
Gox RF, Wagenhofer A (2009) Optimal impairment rules. J. Accounting Econom. 48(1):2-16.
[15]
Li J (2013) Accounting conservatism and debt contracts: Efficient liquidation and covenant renegotiation. Contemporary Accounting Res. 30(3):1082-1098.
[16]
Liang PJ, Zhang X-J (2006) Accounting treatment of inherent versus incentive uncertainties and the capital structure of the firm. J. Accounting Res. 44(1):145-176.
[17]
Mailath GJ, Okuno-Fujiwara M, Postlewaite A (1993) Belief-based refinements in signalling games. J. Econom. Theory 60(2): 241-276.
[18]
Myers SC, Majluf N (1984) Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. J. Financial Econom. 13(2):187-221.
[19]
Schmidt W, Gaur V, Lai R, Raman A (2012) Signaling to partially informed investors in the newsvendor model. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.
[20]
Venugopalan R (2006) Conservatism in accounting: Good or bad? Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.
[21]
Watts RL (2003) Conservatism in accounting part I: Explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons 17(3):207-221.

Cited By

View all
  1. Financing and Investment Efficiency, Information Quality, and Accounting Biases

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Management Science
      Management Science  Volume 60, Issue 9
      September 2014
      273 pages

      Publisher

      INFORMS

      Linthicum, MD, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 01 September 2014
      Accepted: 21 October 2013
      Received: 19 January 2012

      Author Tags

      1. accounting
      2. cost-benefit analysis
      3. decision analysis

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      View options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media