More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

The Promise of Research on Open Source Software

Authors: Georg von Krogh, Eric von HippelAuthors Info & Claims

Management Science, Volume 52, Issue 7

Pages 975 - 983

https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0560

Published: 01 July 2006 Publication History

Abstract

Breaking with many established assumptions about how innovation ought to work, open source software projects offer eye-opening examples of novel innovation practices for students and practitioners in many fields. In this article we briefly review existing research on the open source phenomenon and discuss the utility of open source software research findings for many other fields. We categorize the research into three areas: motivations of open source software contributors; governance, organization, and the process of innovation in open source software projects; and competitive dynamics enforced by open source software. We introduce the articles in this special issue of Management Science on open source software, and show how each contributes insights to one or more of these areas.

References

[1]

Asklund U., Bendix L. A study of configuration management in open source software projects. IEE Proc. (2002) 149(1):40–46

[2]

Bergquist M., Ljungberg J. The power of gifts: Organizing social relationships in open source communities. Inform. Systems J. (2001) 11(4):305–320

[3]

Bonaccorsi A., Rossi C. Why open source software can succeed? Res. Policy (2003) 32:1243–1258

[4]

Crowston K., Annabi H., Howison J., Masango C. Towards a portfolio of FLOSS project success measures. (2004) . Working paper, MIT, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved April 4, 2006, http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/crowston04towards.pdf

[5]

Cusumano M., Gawer A. The elements of platform leadership. MIT Sloan Management Rev. (2002) 43(3):51–58

[6]

Dahlander L., Magnusson M. G. Relationships between open source software companies and communities: Observations from Nordic firms. Res. Policy (2005) 34(4):481–493

[7]

Dalle J.-M., David P. A. The allocation of software development resources in “open source” production mode. (2003) . Discussion Paper 02-27, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Stanford, CA

[8]

Dalle J.-M., Julien N. “Libre” software: Turning fads into institutions? Res. Policy (2003) 32(1):1–11

[9]

Dam K. W. Some economic considerations in the intellectual property protection of software. J. Legal Stud. (1995) 24(2):321–377

[10]

Deci E. L., Koestner R., Ryan R. M. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psych. Bull. (1999) 125(6):627–668

[11]

Dempsey B. J., Weiss D., Jones P., Greenberg J. Who is an open source developer? Comm. ACM (2002) 45(2):67–72

Digital Library

[12]

Duyk G. Attrition and translation. Science (2003) 302(5645):603–605

[13]

Feller J., Fitzgerald B. A framework for understanding the open source software development paradigm. ICIS Conf. Proc., Atlanta (2000) Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, GA:58–69

[14]

Franck E., Jungwirth C. Reconciling investors and donators: The governance structure of open source. (2002) . Working Paper 8, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

[15]

Franke N., von Hippel E. Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: The case of Apache security software. Res. Policy (2003) 32(7):1199–1215

[16]

Gacek C., Arief B. The many meanings of open source software. IEEE Software (2004) 21(1):34–40

Digital Library

[17]

Gallivan M. J. Striking a balance between trust and control in virtual organizations: A content analysis of open source software case studies. Inform. Systems J. (2001) 11(4):277–304

[18]

Garud R., Jain S., Kumaraswamy A. Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of SUN Microsystems and Java. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(1):196–214

[19]

Ghosh R. A., Glott R., Krieger B., Robles G. Free/Libre and open source software: Survey and study. (2002) . Working paper, International Institute of Infonomics, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands

[20]

Grand S., von Krogh G., Leonard D., Swap W. Resource allocation beyond firm boundaries: A multi-level model for open source innovation. Long Range Planning (2004) 37(6):591–610

[21]

Granstrand O.The Economics and Management of Intellectural Property (1999) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK)

[22]

Hann I., Roberts J., Slaughter S., Fielding R. An empirical analysis of economic returns to open source participation. (2006) . Working Paper 2006-E5, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA

[23]

Harhoff D., Henkel J., von Hippel E. Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. Res. Policy (2003) 32(10):1753–1769

[24]

Hars A., Ou S. Working for free? Motivations for participating in open-source projects. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (2002) 6(3):25–39

Digital Library

[25]

Heller M., Eisenberg R. Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science (1998) 280:698–701

[26]

Henkel J., Uhr W., Esswein W., Schoop W. Software development in embedded Linux: Informal collaboration of competing firms. Proc. 6. Internat. Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik Physica (2003) Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany

[27]

Hertel G., Niedner S., Herrmann S. Motivation of software developers in open source projects: An internet-based survey of contributions to the Linux kernel. Res. Policy (2003) 32(7):1159–1177

[28]

Jeppesen L. B., Fredriksen L. Why firm-established user communities work for innovation: The personal attributes of innovation users in the case of computer-controlled music. Organ. Sci. (2006) . Forthcoming

[29]

Koch S., Schneider G. Effort, cooperation, and coordination in an open source software project: GNOME. Inform. Systems J. (2002) 12(1):27–42

[30]

Kogut B., Metiu A. Open source software development and distributed innovation. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy (2001) 17(2):248–264

[31]

Kuan J. Open source software as lead-user’s make or buy decision: A study of open and closed source quality. (2002) . Working paper, Stanford Institute of Economic Policy Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

[32]

Lakhani K., von Hippel E. How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Res. Policy (2003) 32(6):923–943

[33]

Lakhani K., Wolf B., Bates J., DiBona C. The Boston Consulting Group hacker survey. (2002) . Boston Consulting Group Report. Retrieved April 4th, 2006, http://www.osdn.com/bcg

[34]

Lanzara G. V., Morner M. The knowledge ecology of open source software projects. 19th EGOS Colloquium, Copenhagen, Denmark (2003)

[35]

Lee G., Cole R. From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(6):633–649

Digital Library

[36]

Lerner J., Tirole J. The scope of open source licensing. (2002) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA

[37]

Lin Y. The institutionalization of hacking practices. Ubiquity (2003) 4(4):18–24

[38]

Merrill W., Schneider N. Government firms in oligopoly industries. A short-run analysis. Quart. J. Econom. (1966) 33:400–412

[39]

Mockus A., Fielding R. T., Herbsleb J. Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Trans. Software Engrg. Methodology (2002) 11(3):309–346

Digital Library

[40]

Monteiro E., Oesterlie T., Rolland K. R., Royrvik E. Keeping it going: The everyday practices of open source software. (2004) . Working paper, Department of Computer and Information Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

[41]

Mustonen M. Copyleft: The economics of Linux and other open source software. (2003) . Discussion Paper 493, Department of Economics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

[42]

Mustonen M. When does a firm support substitute open source programming? J. Econom. Management Strategy (2005) 14(1):121–139

[43]

Nonneke B., Preece J. Lurker demographics: Counting the silent. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (2000) (Association for Computing Machinery, ACM Press, New York) 73–80

[44]

O’Mahony S. Guarding the commons: How community managed software projects protect their work. Res. Policy (2003) 32:1179–1198

[45]

Osterloh M., Rota S., von Wartburg I. Open source: New rules in software development. (2004) . Working paper, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

[46]

Raymond E.The Cathedral and the Bazaar (1999) (O’Reilly, Sebastopol, CA)

Digital Library

[47]

Sawyer S., Guinan P. J. Software development: Process and performance. IBM Systems J. (1998) 37(4):552–569

Digital Library

[48]

Scacchi W. Understanding the requirements for developing open source software systems. IEE Software Proc. (2002) 149(1):24–39

[49]

Stenborg M. Explaining open source. (2004) . Working Paper 947, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Helsinki, Finland

[50]

Tuomi I.Networks of Innovation: Change and Meaning in the Age of the Internet (2003) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK)

[51]

Ulhoi J. P. Open source development: A hybrid in innovation and management theory. Management Decision (2004) 42(9):1095–1114

[52]

von Hippel E. Economics of product development by users: The impact of sticky local information. Management Sci. (1998) 44(5):629–644

Digital Library

[53]

von Hippel E. Innovation by user communities: Learning from open source software. MIT Sloan Management Rev. (2001) 42(4):82–86

[54]

von Hippel E. Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation. J. Betriebswirtschaft (2005) 55(1):63–78

[55]

von Hippel E., von Krogh G. Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14:209–225

Digital Library

[56]

von Krogh G., Spaeth S., Haefliger S. Knowledge reuse in open source software: An exploratory study of 15 open source projects. Proc. 38th Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2005) IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA

[57]

von Krogh G., Spaeth S., Lakhani K. Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Res. Policy (2003) 32:1217–1241

[58]

West J. How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Res. Policy (2003) 32:1258–1286

[59]

West J., O’Mahony S. Contrasting community building in sponsored and community founded open source projects. Proc. 38th Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2005) IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA

[60]

Yamauchi Y., Yokozawa M., Shinohara T., Ishida T. Collaboration with lean media: How open source software succeeds. ACM 2000 Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work, Philadelphia (2000) (ACM Press, New York) 329–338

[61]

Zeitlyn D. Gift economies in the development of open source software: Anthropological reflections. Res. Policy (2003) 32(7):1287–1291

Cited By

Li XZhang YOsborne CZhou MJin ZLiu H(2024)Systematic Literature Review of Commercial Participation in Open Source SoftwareACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/369063234:2(1-31)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3690632
Hergueux JHenry EBenkler YAlgan Y(2023)Social Exchange and the Reciprocity Roller CoasterOrganization Science10.1287/orsc.2021.151534:6(2296-2314)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2021.1515
Braught GHuss-Lederman SJackson STurner WWurst KDoyle MStephenson BDorn BSoh LBattestilli L(2023)Engagement Models in Education-Oriented H/FOSS ProjectsProceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3545945.3569835(409-415)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3545945.3569835
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

The Promise of Research on Open Source Software
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Management of computing and information systems
      1. Project and people management
2. Software and its engineering
  1. Software creation and management
  2. Software notations and tools
    1. Software configuration management and version control systems

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

License Choice and the Changing Structures of Work in Organization Owned Open Source Projects: [Best Paper Nominee]
SIGMIS-CPR '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computers and People Research

Digitally enabled transformations have allowed organizations and individuals to adopt open source as a viable mode of software development. In fact, organizations are increasingly moving away from traditional licenses in favor of open source licenses. ...
Code Reuse in Open Source Software

Code reuse is a form of knowledge reuse in software development that is fundamental to innovation in many fields. However, to date there has been no systematic investigation of code reuse in open source software projects. This study uses quantitative ...
The open source software phenomenon: Characteristics that promote research

Since the turn of the century, open source software has triggered a vast volume of research. In this essay, based on a brief review of selected work, we show that research in many different fields and disciplines of the social sciences have shed light ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Management Science

Management Science Volume 52, Issue 7

July 2006

153 pages

ISSN:0025-1909

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2006, INFORMS.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. You are free to download this work and share with others commercially or noncommercially, but cannot change in any way, and you must attribute this work as “Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0560, used under a Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/.”

Publisher

INFORMS

Linthicum, MD, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 July 2006

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

81
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 24 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Li XZhang YOsborne CZhou MJin ZLiu H(2024)Systematic Literature Review of Commercial Participation in Open Source SoftwareACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/369063234:2(1-31)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3690632
Hergueux JHenry EBenkler YAlgan Y(2023)Social Exchange and the Reciprocity Roller CoasterOrganization Science10.1287/orsc.2021.151534:6(2296-2314)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2021.1515
Braught GHuss-Lederman SJackson STurner WWurst KDoyle MStephenson BDorn BSoh LBattestilli L(2023)Engagement Models in Education-Oriented H/FOSS ProjectsProceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3545945.3569835(409-415)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3545945.3569835
Feitelson D(2023)“We do not appreciate being experimented on”Journal of Systems and Software10.1016/j.jss.2023.111774204:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.jss.2023.111774
Bailey DFaraj SHinds PLeonardi Pvon Krogh G(2022)We Are All Theorists of Technology NowOrganization Science10.1287/orsc.2021.156233:1(1-18)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2021.1562
Gupta RKaushik K(2022)Linking text characteristics of ideas to their popularity in online user innovation communitiesComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2022.107382136:COnline publication date: 1-Nov-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107382
August TChen WZhu K(2021)Competition Among Proprietary and Open-Source Software FirmsManagement Science10.1287/mnsc.2020.367467:5(3041-3066)Online publication date: 1-May-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3674
Greenstein SGu GZhu F(2021)Ideology and Composition Among an Online CrowdManagement Science10.1287/mnsc.2020.366167:5(3067-3086)Online publication date: 1-May-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3661
Liu MHansen STu Q(2021)Sustaining collaborative software development through strategic consortiumThe Journal of Strategic Information Systems10.1016/j.jsis.2021.10167130:3Online publication date: 1-Sep-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101671
Zorina A(2021)Overcoming resource challenges in peer-production communities through bricolageInformation and Organization10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.10036531:3Online publication date: 1-Sep-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100365
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

View Issue’s Table of Contents