[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article

The active lurker: a new viewpoint for evaluating the influence of an in-house online community

Published: 01 December 2002 Publication History

Abstract

In this study, we focus on participants called lurkers, who do not post any messages in an online community such as interactive mailing lists and bulletin board systems. We propose a method of classifying participants including lurkers based on two criteria: what types of actions they take outside the online community, and whether or not the online community affects their thoughts. We conduct a questionnaire survey of all participants in two in-house online communities to verify our method. There are a considerable number of lurkers who have a strong and wide influence outside the online community. We conclude that such lurkers cannot be neglected in an evaluation of online communities within a company. These results could also lead us to discuss a possibility of an online community management by focusing on not only posters but also lurkers who are indirect contributors to increasing the influence of an online community on its outside environment.

References

[1]
Cohen, D. and Prusak, L. In Good Company. How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work, Boston, MA., Harvard Business School Press, 2001.
[2]
Dourish, P. and Bly, S. Portholes: Supporting Awareness in a Distributed Work Group, In Proceedings of CHI 92, Monterey, California, 1992, 541--547.
[3]
Holeton, R. Wired Frosh, available at http://www.stanford.edu/holeton/wired-frosh/index.html, 1997.
[4]
Kollock, P. and Smith, M. Managing the Virtual Commons: Cooperation and Conflict in Computer Communities, In Proceedings of Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social, and Cross-Cultural Perspectives, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1996, 109--128.
[5]
Mason, B. Issues in Virtual Ethnography, In Proceedings of Ethnographic Studies in Real and Virtual Environments: lnhabited Information Spaces and Connected Communities, Edinburgh, 1999, 61--69.
[6]
Nonnecke, B. Lurking in Email-based Discussion Lists, a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of South Bank University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, March, 2000.
[7]
Nonnecke, B. and Preece, J. Lurker Demographics: Counting the Silent, In Proceedings of CHI 2000, The Hague, 2000, 73--80.
[8]
Nonnecke, B. and Preece, J. Why Lurkers Lurk, Americas Conference on Information Systems, 2001.
[9]
Perkins, J. and Newman, K. Two Archetypes in E-discourse: Lurkers and Virtuosos, International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 2, 2--3, 1996, 155--170.
[10]
Preece, J. Supporting Community and Building Social Capital, Communications of the ACM, 45, 4, 2002, 37--39.
[11]
Smith, M. A. and Fiore, A. T. Visualization Components for Persistent Conversations, In Proceedings of CHI 2001, Seattle, Washington, 2001, 136--143.
[12]
Takahashi, M., Kitayama, S. and Kaneko, I. Measuring and Visualizing Organizational Awareness of Network Communities, Information Processing Society of Japan Journal, Vol. 40, No. 11 (In Japanese), 1999.
[13]
The KNOW Network, available at http://www.knowledgebusiness.com.
[14]
Willett, J. VECO - an Online Community Making a Difference, an Evaluation of the Project, Australian Student Traineeship Foundation and Dusseldorp Skills Forum, Sydney, 1998.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Investigating the lurking mechanism of SNS users: a comprehensive examination of context-specific cues and role stressesInformation Technology & People10.1108/ITP-08-2023-0844Online publication date: 22-Oct-2024
  • (2018)UnaWare: supporting tacit design knowledge exchangeInternational Journal of Web Based Communities10.1504/IJWBC.2006.0086132:1(31-44)Online publication date: 21-Dec-2018
  • (2017)Factors affecting active participation in B2B online communitiesInformation and Management10.1016/j.im.2016.11.00454:4(516-530)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2017
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. The active lurker: a new viewpoint for evaluating the influence of an in-house online community

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM SIGGROUP Bulletin
      ACM SIGGROUP Bulletin  Volume 23, Issue 3
      December 2002
      45 pages
      ISSN:2372-7403
      EISSN:2372-739X
      DOI:10.1145/990017
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 01 December 2002
      Published in SIGGROUP Volume 23, Issue 3

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. classification
      2. discussion list
      3. evaluation
      4. influence
      5. lurker
      6. lurking
      7. mailing list
      8. management
      9. online community
      10. social capital
      11. value

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Investigating the lurking mechanism of SNS users: a comprehensive examination of context-specific cues and role stressesInformation Technology & People10.1108/ITP-08-2023-0844Online publication date: 22-Oct-2024
      • (2018)UnaWare: supporting tacit design knowledge exchangeInternational Journal of Web Based Communities10.1504/IJWBC.2006.0086132:1(31-44)Online publication date: 21-Dec-2018
      • (2017)Factors affecting active participation in B2B online communitiesInformation and Management10.1016/j.im.2016.11.00454:4(516-530)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2017
      • (2016)Are Online Reviewers Leaving? Heterogeneity in Reviewing BehaviorE-Life: Web-Enabled Convergence of Commerce, Work, and Social Life10.1007/978-3-319-45408-5_11(126-142)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2016
      • (2014)Definitions and Meanings of Online LurkersEncyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Third Edition10.4018/978-1-4666-5888-2.ch632(6438-6445)Online publication date: 31-Jul-2014
      • (2011)A Comparison of Lurkers and Posters Within Infertility Online Support GroupsCIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing10.1097/NCN.0b013e318224b31d29:10(564-573)Online publication date: Oct-2011
      • (2010)The Design and Evaluation of a Peer Ratings System for Online Learning CommunitiesProceedings of the 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences10.1109/HICSS.2010.370(1-10)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2010
      • (2009)Wiki professionnel et coopération en réseauxRéseaux10.3917/res.154.0195n° 154:2(195-227)Online publication date: 10-Apr-2009
      • (2008)Self-Reported Differences in Empowerment Between Lurkers and Posters in Online Patient Support GroupsJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/jmir.99210:2(e18)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2008

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media