More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Article

Near-optimal network design with selfish agents

Authors:

Elliot Anshelevich,

Anirban Dasgupta,

Tom WexlerAuthors Info & Claims

STOC '03: Proceedings of the thirty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing

Pages 511 - 520

https://doi.org/10.1145/780542.780617

Published: 09 June 2003 Publication History

Abstract

We introduce a simple network design game that models how independent selfish agents can build or maintain a large network. In our game every agent has a specific connectivity requirement, i.e. each agent has a set of terminals and wants to build a network in which his terminals are connected. Possible edges in the network have costs and each agent's goal is to pay as little as possible. Determining whether or not a Nash equilibrium exists in this game is NP-complete. However, when the goal of each player is to connect a terminal to a common source, we prove that there is a Nash equilibrium as cheap as the optimal network, and give a polynomial time algorithm to find a (1+ε)-approximate Nash equilibrium that does not cost much more. For the general connection game we prove that there is a 3-approximate Nash equilibrium that is as cheap as the optimal network, and give an algorithm to find a (4.65+ε)-approximate Nash equilibrium that does not cost much more.

References

[1]

A. Agrawal, P. Klein, and R. Ravi. When trees collide: An approximation algorithm for the generalized Steiner problem on networks. SIAM Journal on Computing, 24(3) 445--456 (1995).

Digital Library

[2]

A. Akella, R. Karp, C. Papadimitrou, S. Seshan, and S. Shenker. Selfish Behavior and Stability of the Internet: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of TCP. In Proceedings of SIGCOMM, 2002

Digital Library

[3]

E. Anshelevich, A. Dasgupta, É. Tardos, and T. Wexler. Near-Optimal Network Design with Selfish Agents. See www.cs.cornell.edu/~wexler/

[4]

V. Bala and S. Goyal. A Non-Cooperative Model of Network Formation. In Econometrica 68(2000), 1181--1229.

[5]

M. Charikar, C. Chekuri, T. Cheung, Z. Dai, A. Goel, S. Guha. Approximation Algorithms for Directed Steiner Problems. In SODA, 1998.

Digital Library

[6]

A. Czumaj, P. Krysta, and B. Vöcking. Selfish Traffic Allocation for Server Farms. In STOC, 287--296, 2002.

Digital Library

[7]

A. Czumaj and B. Vöcking. Tight bounds for worst-case equilibria. In SODA, 413--420, 2002.

Digital Library

[8]

D. Dutta A. Goel, and J. Heidemann. Oblivious AQM and Nash Equilibrium. In Proceeding of the IEEE Infocom, 2003.

[9]

A. Fabrikant, A. Luthra, E. Maneva, S. Papadimitriou, and S. Shenker. On a Network Creation Game. Unpublished manuscript.

[10]

U. Feige. A threshold of lg n for approximating set-cover. In STOC, 314--318, 1996.

Digital Library

[11]

J. Feigenbaum, C. H. Papadimitriou, S. Shenker. Sharing the Cost of Multicast Transmissions. JCSS 63 (1) pages 21--41, 2001.

Digital Library

[12]

M. Goemans, and D. Williamson. A General Approximation Technique for Constrained Forest Problems. SIAM Journal on Computing, 296--317, 1995.

Digital Library

[13]

H. Heller and S. Sarangi. Nash Networks with Heterogeneous Agents. Working Paper Series 2001, E-2001-1, Virginia Tech.

[14]

K. Jain and V. Vazirani. Applications of Approximation Algorithms to Cooperative Games. In STOC, 2001.

Digital Library

[15]

E. Koutsoupias and C. Papadimitriou. Worst-case equilibria. In STACS, 404--413, 1999.

Digital Library

[16]

M. Mavronicolas and P. Spirakis. The price of selfish routing. In STOC, 510--519, 2001.

Digital Library

[17]

C. Papadimitriou. Algorithms, Games, and the Internet. In STOC, 749--753, 2001.

Digital Library

[18]

G. Robins and A. Zelikovsky. Improved Steiner Tree Approximation in Graphs. In SODA, 770--779, 2000.

Digital Library

[19]

T. Roughgarden. The price of anarchy is independent of the network topology. In STOC, 2002.

Digital Library

[20]

T. Roughgarden. Stackelberg scheduling strategies. In STOC, pages 104--113, 2001.

Digital Library

[21]

T. Roughgarden and É. Tardos. How bad is selfish routing? In FOCS, 93--102, 2000. Full version to appear in Journal of the ACM.

Digital Library

[22]

A. Schulz and N. Stier Moses. On the Performance of User Equilibria in Traffic Networks. To appear in SODA, 2003.

Digital Library

[23]

S. Shenker. Making Greed Work in Networks: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Switch Service Disciplines. In IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 819--831, 1995.

Digital Library

[24]

A. Vetta. Nash equilibria in competitive societies with applications to facility location, traffic routing and auctions. In FOCS, 2002.

Digital Library

Cited By

Jacobs-Crisioni CDijkstra LKučas A(2024)Does Density Foster Shorter Public Transport Networks? A Network Expansion Simulation ApproachLand10.3390/land1301007713:1(77)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/land13010077
Nickerl JMödinger DLorenz J(2021)From Local Network Formation Game to Peer-to-Peer Protocol2021 International Symposium on Electrical, Electronics and Information Engineering10.1145/3459104.3459184(483-492)Online publication date: 19-Feb-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3459104.3459184
Abam MQafari M(2019)Geometric spanner gamesTheoretical Computer Science10.1016/j.tcs.2019.07.020Online publication date: Jul-2019
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2019.07.020
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Near-optimal network design with selfish agents
1. Theory of computation
  1. Design and analysis of algorithms

Recommendations

Large Market Games with Near Optimal Efficiency
EC '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation

As is well known, many classes of markets have efficient equilibria, but this depends on agents being non-strategic, i.e. that they declare their true demands when offered goods at particular prices, or in other words, that they are price-takers. An ...
Designing Network Protocols for Good Equilibria

Designing and deploying a network protocol determines the rules by which end users interact with each other and with the network. We consider the problem of designing a protocol to optimize the equilibrium behavior of a network with selfish users. We ...
How Bad is Selfish Caching?
Mobihoc '19: Proceedings of the Twentieth ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing

Caching networks can reduce the routing costs of accessing contents by caching contents closer to users. However, cache nodes may belong to different entities and behave selfishly to maximize their own benefits, which often lead to performance ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

STOC '03: Proceedings of the thirty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing

June 2003

740 pages

ISBN:1581136749

DOI:10.1145/780542

Conference Chair:
Lawrence L. Larmore
University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV
,
Program Chair:
Michel X. Goemans
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA

Copyright © 2003 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 June 2003

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

STOC03

Sponsor:

STOC03: The 35th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing

June 9 - 11, 2003

CA, San Diego, USA

Acceptance Rates

STOC '03 Paper Acceptance Rate 80 of 270 submissions, 30%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,469 of 4,586 submissions, 32%

Upcoming Conference

STOC '25

Sponsor:
sigact

57th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2025)

June 23 - 27, 2025

Prague , Czech Republic

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

143
Total Citations
View Citations
1,423
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)26
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Jacobs-Crisioni CDijkstra LKučas A(2024)Does Density Foster Shorter Public Transport Networks? A Network Expansion Simulation ApproachLand10.3390/land1301007713:1(77)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/land13010077
Nickerl JMödinger DLorenz J(2021)From Local Network Formation Game to Peer-to-Peer Protocol2021 International Symposium on Electrical, Electronics and Information Engineering10.1145/3459104.3459184(483-492)Online publication date: 19-Feb-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3459104.3459184
Abam MQafari M(2019)Geometric spanner gamesTheoretical Computer Science10.1016/j.tcs.2019.07.020Online publication date: Jul-2019
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2019.07.020
Belloni ADeng CPekeč S(2017)Mechanism and Network Design with Private Negative ExternalitiesOperations Research10.1287/opre.2016.158565:3(577-594)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/opre.2016.1585
Graham RHamilton LLevavi ALoh P(2016)Anarchy Is Free in Network CreationACM Transactions on Algorithms10.1145/272997812:2(1-10)Online publication date: 12-Feb-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2729978
Battiston P(2016)Constrained Network FormationItalian Economic Journal10.1007/s40797-016-0040-02:3(347-362)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2016
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40797-016-0040-0
Jacobs-Crisioni CKoopmans C(2016)Transport link scanner: simulating geographic transport network expansion through individual investmentsJournal of Geographical Systems10.1007/s10109-016-0233-y18:3(265-301)Online publication date: 10-Jun-2016
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-016-0233-y
Demaine EHajiaghayi MMahini HZadimoghaddam M(2016)Network Creation GamesEncyclopedia of Algorithms10.1007/978-1-4939-2864-4_752(1408-1412)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2016
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2864-4_752
Angelucci ABilò VFlammini MMoscardelli L(2015)On the sequential price of anarchy of isolation gamesJournal of Combinatorial Optimization10.1007/s10878-013-9694-929:1(165-181)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10878-013-9694-9
Feldman MRon T(2015)Capacitated Network Design GamesTheory of Computing Systems10.1007/s00224-014-9540-157:3(576-597)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s00224-014-9540-1
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents