[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3340631.3394849acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesumapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Cohort Modeling Based App Category Usage Prediction

Published: 13 July 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Smartphones utilize context signals, such as time and location, to predict users' app usage tailored to individual users. To be effective, such personalization relies on access to sufficient information about each user's behavioral habits. For new users, the behavior information may be sparse or non-existent. To handle these cases, app category usage prediction approaches can employ signals from users who are similar along one or more dimensions, i.e., those in the same cohort. In this paper, we describe a characterization and evaluation of the use of such cohort modeling to enhance app category usage prediction. We experiment with pre-defined cohorts from three taxonomies - demographics, psychographics, and behavioral patterns - independently and in combination. We also evaluate various approaches to assign users into the corresponding cohorts. We show, through extensive experiments with large-scale mobile app usage logs from a mobile advertising company, that leveraging cohort behavior can yield significant prediction performance gains than when using the personalized signals at the individual prediction level. In addition, compared to the personalized model, the cohort-based approach can significantly alleviate the cold-start problem, achieving strong predictive performance even with limited amount of user interactions.

Supplementary Material

VTT File (3340631.3394849.vtt)
MP4 File (3340631.3394849.mp4)
Supplemental Video

References

[1]
Gediminas Adomavicius and Alexander Tuzhilin. 2005. Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge & Data Engineering 6 (2005), 734--749.
[2]
Ricardo Baeza-Yates, Di Jiang, Fabrizio Silvestri, and Beverly Harrison. 2015. Predicting the next app that you are going to use. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 285--294.
[3]
Stuart J Barnes. 2002. The mobile commerce value chain: analysis and future developments. International journal of information management, Vol. 22, 2 (2002), 91--108.
[4]
Tianqi Chen, Tong He, Michael Benesty, Vadim Khotilovich, and Yuan Tang. 2015. Xgboost: extreme gradient boosting. R package version 0.4--2 (2015), 1--4.
[5]
Thomas Cover and Peter Hart. 1967. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE transactions on information theory, Vol. 13, 1 (1967), 21--27.
[6]
Paul Covington, Jay Adams, and Emre Sargin. 2016. Deep neural networks for youtube recommendations. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 191--198.
[7]
Trinh Minh Tri Do and Daniel Gatica-Perez. 2014. Where and what: Using smartphones to predict next locations and applications in daily life. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, Vol. 12 (2014), 79--91.
[8]
Evelyn Fix and Joseph L Hodges Jr. 1951. Discriminatory analysis-nonparametric discrimination: consistency properties. Technical Report. California Univ Berkeley.
[9]
Steve Fox, Kuldeep Karnawat, Mark Mydland, Susan Dumais, and Thomas White. 2005. Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), Vol. 23, 2 (2005), 147--168.
[10]
Google. 2018. Select a category for your app or game. https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/113475?hl=en-GB
[11]
Fadly Hamka, Harry Bouwman, Mark De Reuver, and Maarten Kroesen. 2014. Mobile customer segmentation based on smartphone measurement. Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 31, 2 (2014), 220--227.
[12]
Trevor Hastie, Robert Tibshirani, and Jerome Friedman. 2009. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction .Springer Science & Business Media.
[13]
Ke Huang, Chunhui Zhang, Xiaoxiao Ma, and Guanling Chen. 2012. Predicting mobile application usage using contextual information. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 1059--1065.
[14]
J Stuart Hunter. 1986. The exponentially weighted moving average. Journal of quality technology, Vol. 18, 4 (1986), 203--210.
[15]
Simon L Jones, Denzil Ferreira, Simo Hosio, Jorge Goncalves, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2015. Revisitation analysis of smartphone app use. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 1197--1208.
[16]
Farshad Kooti, Mihajlo Grbovic, Luca Maria Aiello, Eric Bax, and Kristina Lerman. 2017. iPhone's Digital Marketplace: Characterizing the Big Spenders. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 13--21.
[17]
Janette Lehmann, Mounia Lalmas, Elad Yom-Tov, and Georges Dupret. 2012. Models of user engagement. In International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. Springer, 164--175.
[18]
Huoran Li and Xuan Lu. 2017. Mining Device-Specific Apps Usage Patterns from Large-Scale Android Users. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.09252 (2017).
[19]
Huoran Li, Xuan Lu, Xuanzhe Liu, Tao Xie, Kaigui Bian, Felix Xiaozhu Lin, Qiaozhu Mei, and Feng Feng. 2015. Characterizing smartphone usage patterns from millions of Android users. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Internet Measurement Conference. ACM, 459--472.
[20]
Zhung-Xun Liao, Po-Ruey Lei, Tsu-Jou Shen, Shou-Chung Li, and Wen-Chih Peng. 2012. Mining temporal profiles of mobile applications for usage prediction. In Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on. IEEE, 890--893.
[21]
Zhung-Xun Liao, Shou-Chung Li, Wen-Chih Peng, S Yu Philip, and Te-Chuan Liu. 2013a. On the feature discovery for app usage prediction in smartphones. In Data Mining (ICDM), 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on. IEEE, 1127--1132.
[22]
Zhung-Xun Liao, Yi-Chin Pan, Wen-Chih Peng, and Po-Ruey Lei. 2013b. On mining mobile apps usage behavior for predicting apps usage in smartphones. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management. ACM, 609--618.
[23]
Jovian Lin, Kazunari Sugiyama, Min-Yen Kan, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2013. Addressing cold-start in app recommendation: latent user models constructed from twitter followers. In Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 283--292.
[24]
Nielsen Mobile. 2008. Critical mass: The worldwide state of the mobile web. Nielsen Company (2008).
[25]
Elizabeth L Murnane, Saeed Abdullah, Mark Matthews, Matthew Kay, Julie A Kientz, Tanzeem Choudhury, Geri Gay, and Dan Cosley. 2016. Mobile manifestations of alertness: Connecting biological rhythms with patterns of smartphone app use. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, 465--477.
[26]
Nagarajan Natarajan, Donghyuk Shin, and Inderjit S Dhillon. 2013. Which app will you use next?: collaborative filtering with interactional context. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Recommender systems. ACM, 201--208.
[27]
Thanasis Petsas, Antonis Papadogiannakis, Michalis Polychronakis, Evangelos P Markatos, and Thomas Karagiannis. 2017. Measurement, modeling, and analysis of the mobile app ecosystem. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Performance Evaluation of Computing Systems (TOMPECS), Vol. 2, 2 (2017), 7.
[28]
Paul Resnick, Neophytos Iacovou, Mitesh Suchak, Peter Bergstrom, and John Riedl. 1994. GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 175--186.
[29]
Alan Said, Ernesto W De Luca, and Sahin Albayrak. 2010. How social relationships affect user similarities. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Workshop on Social Recommender Systems, Hong Kong .
[30]
Choonsung Shin, Jin-Hyuk Hong, and Anind K Dey. 2012. Understanding and prediction of mobile application usage for smart phones. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 173--182.
[31]
Xiaoyuan Su and Taghi M Khoshgoftaar. 2009. A survey of collaborative filtering techniques. Advances in artificial intelligence, Vol. 2009 (2009).
[32]
Chang Tan, Qi Liu, Enhong Chen, and Hui Xiong. 2012. Prediction for mobile application usage patterns. In Nokia MDC Workshop, Vol. 12.
[33]
Zhen Tu, Runtong Li, Yong Li, Gang Wang, Di Wu, Pan Hui, Li Su, and Depeng Jin. 2018. Your Apps Give You Away: Distinguishing Mobile Users by Their App Usage Fingerprints. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Vol. 2, 3 (2018), 138.
[34]
Pascal Welke, Ionut Andone, Konrad Blaszkiewicz, and Alexander Markowetz. 2016. Differentiating smartphone users by app usage. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 519--523.
[35]
Wikipedia. 2018. Nearest centroid classifier -- Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nearest_centroid_classifier [Online; accessed 4-February-2018].
[36]
Tingxin Yan, David Chu, Deepak Ganesan, Aman Kansal, and Jie Liu. 2012. Fast app launching for mobile devices using predictive user context. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services. ACM, 113--126.
[37]
Yongfeng Zhang, Xu Chen, et al. 2020. Explainable Recommendation: A Survey and New Perspectives. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, Vol. 14, 1 (2020), 1--101.
[38]
Sha Zhao, Julian Ramos, Jianrong Tao, Ziwen Jiang, Shijian Li, Zhaohui Wu, Gang Pan, and Anind K Dey. 2016. Discovering different kinds of smartphone users through their application usage behaviors. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 498--509.
[39]
Sha Zhao, Yifan Zhao, Zhe Zhao, Zhiling Luo, Runhe Huang, Shijian Li, and Gang Pan. 2017. Characterizing a user from large-scale smartphone-sensed data. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, 482--487.
[40]
Ke Zhou, Shuang-Hong Yang, and Hongyuan Zha. 2011. Functional matrix factorizations for cold-start recommendation. In Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 315--324.
[41]
Ruth Ziff. 1971. Psychographics for market segmentation. Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 11, 2 (1971), 3--9.
[42]
Xun Zou, Wangsheng Zhang, Shijian Li, and Gang Pan. 2013. Prophet: What app you wish to use next. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing adjunct publication. ACM, 167--170.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Characterizing Internet Card User Portraits for Efficient Churn Prediction Model DesignIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2023.324120623:2(1735-1752)Online publication date: Feb-2024
  • (2023)Much Ado About GenderProceedings of the 2023 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3576840.3578316(269-279)Online publication date: 19-Mar-2023
  • (2023)AnyMApp for Online Usability Testing: The Use-Case of Inspirers-HTNHCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Posters10.1007/978-3-031-49215-0_60(503-510)Online publication date: 12-Dec-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
UMAP '20: Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
July 2020
426 pages
ISBN:9781450368612
DOI:10.1145/3340631
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 July 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. app usage prediction
  2. cold start
  3. demographics
  4. mobile app usage
  5. mobile user characterization
  6. user cohort

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

UMAP '20
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 162 of 633 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

UMAP '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Characterizing Internet Card User Portraits for Efficient Churn Prediction Model DesignIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2023.324120623:2(1735-1752)Online publication date: Feb-2024
  • (2023)Much Ado About GenderProceedings of the 2023 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3576840.3578316(269-279)Online publication date: 19-Mar-2023
  • (2023)AnyMApp for Online Usability Testing: The Use-Case of Inspirers-HTNHCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Posters10.1007/978-3-031-49215-0_60(503-510)Online publication date: 12-Dec-2023
  • (2022)FlooProceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications and Services10.1145/3498361.3538929(168-182)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2022
  • (2022)Smartphone App Usage Analysis: Datasets, Methods, and ApplicationsIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials10.1109/COMST.2022.316317624:2(937-966)Online publication date: Oct-2023
  • (2022)AnyMApp Framework: Anonymous Digital Twin Human-App InteractionsHCI International 2022 - Late Breaking Papers. Design, User Experience and Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-17615-9_15(214-225)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2022
  • (2021)What and How long: Prediction of Mobile App EngagementACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/346430140:1(1-38)Online publication date: 8-Sep-2021
  • (2021)Diversity-aware Recommendations for Social Justice? Exploring User Diversity and Fairness in Recommender SystemsAdjunct Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3450614.3463293(404-410)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2021
  • (2021)A Hybrid Framework for Session Context ModelingACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/344812739:3(1-35)Online publication date: 5-May-2021

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media