[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3340555.3353729acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Task-independent Multimodal Prediction of Group Performance Based on Product Dimensions

Published: 14 October 2019 Publication History

Abstract

This paper proposes an approach to develop models for predicting the performance for multiple group meeting tasks, where the model has no clear correct answer. This paper adopts ”product dimensions” [Hackman et al. 1967] (PD) which is proposed as a set of dimensions for describing the general properties of written passages that are generated by a group, as a metric measuring group output. This study enhanced the group discussion corpus called the MATRICS corpus including multiple discussion sessions by annotating the performance metric of PD. We extract group-level linguistic features including vocabulary level features using a word embedding technique, topic segmentation techniques, and functional features with dialog act and parts of speech on the word level. We also extracted nonverbal features from the speech turn, prosody, and head movement. With a corpus including multiple discussion data and an annotation of the group performance, we conduct two types of experiments thorough regression modeling to predict the PD. The first experiment is to evaluate the task-dependent prediction accuracy, in the situation that the samples obtained from the same discussion task are included in both the training and testing. The second experiments is to evaluate the task-independent prediction accuracy, in the situation that the type of discussion task is different between the training samples and testing samples. In this situation, regression models are developed to infer the performance in an unknown discussion task. The experimental results show that a support vector regression model archived a 0.76 correlation in the discussion-task-dependent setting and 0.55 in the task-independent setting.

References

[1]
Oya Aran and Daniel Gatica-Perez. 2013. One of a Kind: Inferring Personality Impressions in Meetings. In Proceeding of ACM ICMI. 11–18.
[2]
Umut Avci and Oya Aran. 2016. Predicting the Performance in Decision-Making Tasks: From Individual Cues to Group Interaction. IEEE Transaction on Multimedia 18, 4 (2016), 643–658.
[3]
T. Baltrušaitis, C. Ahuja, and L. Morency. 2019. Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomy. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 41, 2 (Feb 2019), 423–443.
[4]
David M Blei, Andrew Y Ng, and Michael I Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3, Jan (2003), 993–1022.
[5]
Jean Carletta. 2007. Unleashing the killer corpus: experiences in creating the multi-everything AMI Meeting Corpus. Language Resources and Evaluation 41, 2 (2007), 181–190.
[6]
Launor Carter, William Haythorn, and Margaret Howell. 1950. A further investigation of the criteria of leadership.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 45, 2(1950), 350.
[7]
Lei Chen, R. Travis Rose, Ying Qiao, Irene Kimbara, Fey Parrill, Haleema Welji, Tony Xu Han, Jilin Tu, Zhongqiang Huang, Mary Harper, Francis Quek, Yingen Xiong, David McNeill, Ronald Tuttle, and Thomas Huang. 2006. VACE Multimodal Meeting Corpus. In Proceedings of MLMI. 40–51.
[8]
Mark G Core and James Allen. 1997. Coding dialogs with the DAMSL annotation scheme. In Proceedings of AAAI fall symposium on communicative action in humans and machines, Vol. 56. Boston, MA, 28–35.
[9]
Wen Dong, Taemie Kim, and Alex Pentland. 2009. A quantitative analysis of the collective creativity in playing 20-questions games. In Proceedings of ACM conference on Creativity and cognition. 365–366.
[10]
Wen Dong and Alex ”Sandy” Pentland. 2010. Quantifying Group Problem Solving with Stochastic Analysis. In Proceedings of ICMI-MLMI. Article 40, 4 pages.
[11]
Daniel Gatica-Perez. 2009. Automatic nonverbal analysis of social interaction in small groups: A review. Image Vision Computing 27, 12 (nov 2009), 1775–1787.
[12]
Daniel Gatica-Perez, Oya Aran, and Dinesh Babu Jayagopi. 2017. Analysis of Small Groups. Chapter 25, Social Signal Processing(2017), 349–367.
[13]
J Richard Hackman, Lawrence E Jones, and Joseph E McGrath. 1967. A set of dimensions for describing the general properties of group-generated written passages.Psychological Bulletin 67, 6 (1967), 379.
[14]
H. Hung and D. Gatica-Perez. 2010. Estimating Cohesion in Small Groups Using Audio-Visual Nonverbal Behavior. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 12, 6 (Oct 2010), 563–575.
[15]
Adam Janin, Don Baron, Jane Edwards, Dan Ellis, David Gelbart, Nelson Morgan, Barbara Peskin, Thilo Pfau, Elizabeth Shriberg, Andreas Stolcke, and Chuck Wooters. 2003. The ICSI Meeting Corpus. I–364–I–367.
[16]
Dinesh Babu Jayagopi, Dairazalia Sanchez-Cortes, Kazuhiro Otsuka, Junji Yamato, and Daniel Gatica-Perez. 2012. Linking speaking and looking behavior patterns with group composition, perception, and performance. In Proceeding of ACM ICMI. 433–440.
[17]
Taku KUDO. 2004. Applying Conditional Random Fields to Japanese Morphological Analysis. In Proceedings of EMNLP. 230–237.
[18]
J. Richard Landis and Gary G. Koch. 1977. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics 33, 1 (1977), 159–174.
[19]
Patrick R Laughlin. 1980. Social combination processes of cooperative problem-solving groups on verbal intellective tasks. Progress in social psychology 1 (1980), 127–155.
[20]
Quoc Le and Tomas Mikolov. 2014. Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In Proceeding of ICML. 1188–1196.
[21]
Yun-Shao Lin and Chi-Chun Lee. 2018. Using Interlocutor-Modulated Attention BLSTM to Predict Personality Traits in Small Group Interaction. In Proceedings of ACM ICMI. 163–169.
[22]
Tomas Mikolov, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeffrey Dean. 2013. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781(2013).
[23]
Michael T Mills and Nikolaos G Bourbakis. 2014. Graph-based methods for natural language processing and understanding—a survey and analysis. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 44, 1(2014), 59–71.
[24]
Gabriel Murray and Catharine Oertel. 2018. Predicting Group Performance in Task-Based Interaction. (2018), 14–20.
[25]
Fumio Nihei, Yukiko I. Nakano, Yuki Hayashi, Hung-Hsuan Hung, and Shogo Okada. 2014. Predicting Influential Statements in Group Discussions Using Speech and Head Motion Information. In Proceedings of ACM ICMI. 136–143.
[26]
Fumio Nihei, Yukiko I Nakano, and Yutaka Takase. 2017. Predicting meeting extracts in group discussions using multimodal convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of ACM ICMI. 421–425.
[27]
Shogo Okada, Yoshihiko Ohtake, Yukiko I Nakano, Yuki Hayashi, Hung-Hsuan Huang, Yutaka Takase, and Katsumi Nitta. 2016. Estimating communication skills using dialogue acts and nonverbal features in multiple discussion datasets. In Proceedings of ACM ICMI. 169–176.
[28]
S. J. Pan and Q. Yang. 2010. A Survey on Transfer Learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 22, 10 (Oct 2010), 1345–1359.
[29]
Dairazalia Sanchez-Cortes, Oya Aran, Dinesh Babu Jayagopi, Marianne Schmid Mast, and Daniel Gatica-Perez. 2013. Emergent leaders through looking and speaking: from audio-visual data to multimodal recognition. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 7, 1-2 (2013), 39–53.
[30]
Dairazalia Sanchez-Cortes, Oya Aran, Marianne Schmid Mast, and Daniel Gatica-Perez. 2012. A Nonverbal Behavior Approach to Identify Emergent Leaders in Small Groups. IEEE Transaction on Multimedia 14, 3-2 (2012).
[31]
M. E. Shaw. 1973. Scaling group tasks: A method for dimensional analysis. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 3, 8 (1973).
[32]
Elizabeth Shriberg, Raj Dhillon, Sonali Bhagat, Jeremy Ang, and Hannah Carvey. 2004. The ICSI meeting recorder dialog act (MRDA) corpus. In Proceedings of the 5th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue at HLT-NAACL 2004. 97–100.
[33]
Gokhan Tur and Renato De Mori. 2011. Spoken language understanding: Systems for extracting semantic information from speech. John Wiley & Sons.
[34]
Alexander Waibel and Rainer Stiefelhagen. 2009. Computers in the Human Interaction Loop(1st ed.). Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated.
[35]
Anita Williams Woolley, Christopher F Chabris, Alex Pentland, Nada Hashmi, and Thomas W Malone. 2010. Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. science 330, 6004 (2010), 686–688.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Co-Located Human–Human Interaction Analysis Using Nonverbal Cues: A SurveyACM Computing Surveys10.1145/362651656:5(1-41)Online publication date: 25-Nov-2023
  • (2023)Turn-taking analysis of small group collaboration in an engineering discussion classroomLAK23: 13th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference10.1145/3576050.3576099(650-656)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023
  • (2023)Instructor-in-the-Loop Exploratory Analytics to Support Group WorkLAK23: 13th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference10.1145/3576050.3576093(284-292)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICMI '19: 2019 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
October 2019
601 pages
ISBN:9781450368605
DOI:10.1145/3340555
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 October 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Group Analysis
  2. Group performance
  3. Multimodal

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

ICMI '19

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 453 of 1,080 submissions, 42%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Co-Located Human–Human Interaction Analysis Using Nonverbal Cues: A SurveyACM Computing Surveys10.1145/362651656:5(1-41)Online publication date: 25-Nov-2023
  • (2023)Turn-taking analysis of small group collaboration in an engineering discussion classroomLAK23: 13th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference10.1145/3576050.3576099(650-656)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023
  • (2023)Instructor-in-the-Loop Exploratory Analytics to Support Group WorkLAK23: 13th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference10.1145/3576050.3576093(284-292)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023
  • (2021)How Can High-Frequency Sensors Capture Collaboration? A Review of the Empirical Links between Multimodal Metrics and Collaborative ConstructsSensors10.3390/s2124818521:24(8185)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2021
  • (2020)Estimating the Intensity of Facial Expressions Accompanying Feedback Responses in Multiparty Video-Mediated CommunicationProceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction10.1145/3382507.3418878(144-152)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2020
  • (2020)Multimodal, Multiparty Modeling of Collaborative Problem Solving PerformanceProceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction10.1145/3382507.3418877(423-432)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media