[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3308560.3316526acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Incentive-Compatible Learning of Reserve Prices for Repeated Auctions

Published: 13 May 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Motivated by online advertising market, we consider a seller who repeatedly sells ex ante identical items via the second-price auction. Buyers’ valuations for each item are drawn i.i.d. from a distribution F that is unknown to the seller. We find that if the seller attempts to dynamically update a common reserve price based on the bidding history, this creates an incentive for buyers to shade their bids, which can hurt revenue. When there is more than one buyer, incentive compatibility can be restored by using personalized reserve prices, where the personal reserve price for each buyer is set using the historical bids of other buyers. In addition, we use a lazy allocation rule, so that buyers do not benefit from raising the prices of their competitors. Such a mechanism asymptotically achieves the expected revenue obtained under the static Myerson optimal auction for F. Further, if valuation distributions differ across bidders, the loss relative to the Myerson benchmark is only quadratic in the size of such differences. We extend our results to a contextual setting where the valuations of the buyers depend on observed features of the items.

References

[1]
Balcan et al. 2018Maria-Florina Balcan, Avrim Blum, Jason D Hartline, and Yishay Mansour. 2008. Reducing mechanism design to algorithm design via machine learning. J. Comput. System Sci. 74, 8 (2008), 1245–1270.
[2]
Dhangwatnotai et al. 2015Peerapong Dhangwatnotai, Tim Roughgarden, and Qiqi Yan. 2015. Revenue maximization with a single sample. Games and Economic Behavior91 (2015), 318–333.
[3]
Gorokh et al. 2017Artur Gorokh, Siddhartha Banerjee, and Krishnamurthy Iyer. 2017. From Monetary to Non-Monetary Mechanism Design via Artificial Currencies. (2017).
[4]
Hartline and Roughgarden 2009Jason D. Hartline and Tim Roughgarden. 2009. Simple versus Optimal Mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 225–234.
[5]
McAfee 2011Preston McAfee. 2011. The Design of Advertising Exchanges. Review of Industrial Organization 39, 3 (2011), 169–185.
[6]
Muthukrishnan 2009S. Muthukrishnan. 2009. Ad Exchanges: Research Issues. In Internet and Network Economics, 5th International Workshop (WINE). 1–12.
[7]
Myerson 1981Roger B. Myerson. 1981. Optimal Auction Design. Mathematics of Operations Research 6, 1 (1981), 58–73.
[8]
Paes Leme et al. 2016Renato Paes Leme, Martin Pál, and Sergei Vassilvitskii. 2016. A Field Guide to Personalized Reserve Prices. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 1093–1102.
[9]
Riley and Samuelson 1981John G. Riley and William F. Samuelson. 1981. Optimal Auctions. American Economic Review 71, 3 (1981), 381–392.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Incentives in Dominant Resource Fair Allocation Under Dynamic DemandsAlgorithmic Game Theory10.1007/978-3-031-71033-9_7(108-125)Online publication date: 31-Aug-2024
  • (2021)Linear Program-Based Approximation for Personalized Reserve PricesManagement Science10.1287/mnsc.2020.3897Online publication date: 5-Apr-2021

Index Terms

  1. Incentive-Compatible Learning of Reserve Prices for Repeated Auctions
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        WWW '19: Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference
        May 2019
        1331 pages
        ISBN:9781450366755
        DOI:10.1145/3308560
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        In-Cooperation

        • IW3C2: International World Wide Web Conference Committee

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 13 May 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Conference

        WWW '19
        WWW '19: The Web Conference
        May 13 - 17, 2019
        San Francisco, USA

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 19 Dec 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)Incentives in Dominant Resource Fair Allocation Under Dynamic DemandsAlgorithmic Game Theory10.1007/978-3-031-71033-9_7(108-125)Online publication date: 31-Aug-2024
        • (2021)Linear Program-Based Approximation for Personalized Reserve PricesManagement Science10.1287/mnsc.2020.3897Online publication date: 5-Apr-2021

        View Options

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media