[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Perceptual Attributes Analysis of Real-world Materials

Published: 29 January 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Material appearance is often represented by a bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF). Although the concept of the BRDF is widely used in computer graphics and related applications, the number of actual captured BRDFs is limited due to a time and resources demanding measurement process. Several BRDF databases have already been provided publicly, yet subjective properties of underlying captured material samples, apart from single photographs, remain unavailable for users. In this article, we analyzed material samples, used in the creation of the UTIA BRDF database, in a psychophysical study with nine subjects and assessed its 12 visual, tactile, and subjective attributes. Further, we evaluated the relationship between the attributes and six material categories. We consider the presented perceptual analysis as valuable and complementary information to the database; that could aid users to select appropriate materials for their applications.

Supplementary Material

a1-filip-suppl.pdf (filip.zip)
Supplemental movie, appendix, image and software files for, Perceptual Attributes Analysis of Real-world Materials

References

[1]
P. Brodatz. 1966. A Photographic Album for Artists and Designers (Brodatz Texture Database). Dover Publications.
[2]
J. Filip, M. J. Chantler, P. R. Green, and M. Haindl. 2008. A psychophysically validated metric for bidirectional texture data reduction. ACM Trans. Graph. 27, 5 (Dec. 2008), 138.
[3]
J. Filip and R. Vavra. 2014. Template-based sampling of anisotropic BRDFs. Comput. Graph. Forum 33, 7 (Oct. 2014), 91--99.
[4]
J. Filip, R. Vavra, and M. Havlicek. 2014. Effective acquisition of dense anisotropic BRDF. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR’14). 2047--2052.
[5]
Roland W. Fleming. 2014. Visual perception of materials and their properties. Vision Res. 94, 0 (2014), 62--75.
[6]
R. W. Fleming, R. O. Dror, and E. H. Adelson. 2003. Real-world illumination and perception of surface reflectance properties. Journal of Vision 3, 5 (2003), 347--368.
[7]
Roland W. Fleming, Christiane Wiebel, and Karl Gegenfurtner. 2013. Perceptual qualities and material classes. J. Vision 13, 8 (2013), 9--9.
[8]
Johannes Günther, Tongbo Chen, Michael Goesele, Ingo Wald, and Hans-Peter Seidel. 2005. Efficient acquisition and realistic rendering of car paint. In Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Vision, Modeling, and Visualization (VMV’05).
[9]
Andrew F. Hayes and Klaus Krippendorff. 2007. Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Commun. Methods Measures 1, 1 (2007), 77--89.
[10]
C. Heaps and S. Handel. 1999. Similarity and features of natural textures. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 25, 2 (1999), 299.
[11]
Y. X. Ho, M. S. Landy, and L. T. Maloney. 2007. Conjoint measurement of gloss and surface texture. Psychol. Sci. 19 (2007), 194--204.
[12]
ITU. 2008. ITU-R.REC.P.910. Subjective Audivisual Quality Assessment Methods for Multimedia Applications. Technical Report.
[13]
A. Jarabo, H. Wu, J. Dorsey, H. Rushmeier, and D. Gutierrez. 2014. Effects of approximate filtering on the appearance of bidirectional texture functions. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graph. 20, 6 (June 2014), 880--892.
[14]
B. Keelan. 2003. ISO 20462: A psychophysical image quality measurement standard. In Proceedings of the SPIE (SPIE’03), vol. 5294. 181--189.
[15]
B.-G. Khang, J. J. Koenderink, and A. M. L. Kappers. 2006. Perception of illumination direction in images of 3D convex objects: Influence of surface materials and light fields. Perception 35, 5 (2006), 625--645.
[16]
Michael S. Landy and Norma Graham. 2004. Visual perception of texture. In The Visual Neurosciences. MIT Press, 1106--1118.
[17]
H. Long and W. K. Leow. 2002. A hybrid model for invariant and perceptual texture mapping. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Vol. 1. IEEE, 135--138.
[18]
J. Malik and P. Perona. 1990. Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. J. Optic. Soc. Amer. 7, 5 (1990), 923--932.
[19]
Stephen R. Marschner, Stephen H. Westin, Eric P. F. Lafortune, and Kenneth E. Torrance. 2000. Image-based bidirectional reflectance distribution function measurement. Appl. Opt. 39, 16 (June 2000), 2592--2600.
[20]
Rodrigo Martín, Julian Iseringhausen, Michael Weinmann, and Matthias B. Hullin. 2015. Multimodal perception of material properties. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception (SAP’15). 33--40.
[21]
W. Matusik, H. Pfister, M. Brand, and L. McMillan. 2003. A data-driven reflectance model. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 3 (2003), 759--769.
[22]
A. Mojsilovic, J. Kovacevic, D. Kall, R. J. Safranek, and S. Kicha Ganapathy. 2000. The vocabulary and grammar of color patterns. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 9, 3 (2000), 417--431.
[23]
I. Motoyoshi, S. Nishida, L. Sharan, and E. H. Adelson. 2007. Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities. Nature 447, 10 (2007), 206--209.
[24]
A. Ngan, F. Durand, and W. Matusik. 2005. Experimental analysis of BRDF models. Eurograp. Symp. Render. 2 (2005), 117--126.
[25]
F. E. Nicodemus, J. C. Richmond, J. J. Hsia, I. W. Ginsburg, and T. Limperis. 1977. Geometrical considerations and nomenclature for reflectance. NBS Monograph 160 (1977), 1--52.
[26]
S. Padilla, O. Drbohlav, P. R. Green, A. Spence, and M. J. Chantler. 2008. Perceived roughness of 1/f<sup>β</sup> noise surfaces. Vision Res. 48, 17 (2008), 1791--1797.
[27]
S. C. Pont, P. Sen, and P. Hanrahan. 2007. 2½D texture mapping: Real-time perceptual surface roughening. In Proceedings of the 4th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization. 69--72.
[28]
G. Ramanarayanan, J. Ferwerda, B. Walter, and K. Bala. 2007. Visual equivalence: Towards a new standard for image fidelity. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3 (2007), 76:1--76:10.
[29]
A. Ravishankar Rao and G. L. Lohse. 1996. Towards a texture naming system: Identifying relevant dimensions of texture. Vision Res. 36, 11 (1996), 1649--1669.
[30]
G. Schwartz and K. Nishino. 2013. Visual material traits: Recognizing per-pixel material context. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops. 883--890.
[31]
G. Schwartz and K. Nishino. 2015. Automatically discovering local visual material attributes. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’15). 3565--3573.
[32]
Ana Serrano, Diego Gutierrez, Karol Myszkowski, Hans-Peter Seidel, and Belen Masia. 2016. An intuitive control space for material appearance. ACM Trans. Graph. 35, 6, Article 186 (Nov. 2016).
[33]
Lavanya Sharan, Ce Liu, Ruth Rosenholtz, and Edward H. Adelson. 2013. Recognizing materials using perceptually inspired features. Int. J. Comput. Vision 103, 3 (July 2013), 348--371.
[34]
H. Tamura, S. Mori, and T. Yamawaki. 1978. Textural features corresponding to visual perception. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man Cybernet. 8, 6 (1978), 460--473.
[35]
Midori Tanaka and Takahiko Horiuchi. 2015. Investigating perceptual qualities of static surface appearance using real materials and displayed images. Vision Res. 115 (2015), 246--258.
[36]
S. F. te Pas and S. C. Pont. 2005. A comparison of material and illumination discrimination performance for real rough, real smooth and computer generated smooth spheres. In Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization. 57--58.
[37]
S. F. te Pas and S. C. Pont. 2005. Estimations of light-source direction depend critically on material BRDFs. Percept., ECVP Abstract Suppl. 34 (2005), 212.
[38]
P. Vangorp, J. Laurijssen, and P. Dutre. 2007. The influence of shape on the perception of material reflectance. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3 (2007), 77:1--77:10.
[39]
M. Vanrell and J. Vitria. 1997. A four-dimensional texture representation space. In Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, Vol. 1. 245--250.
[40]
M. Vanrell, J. Vitria, and X. Roca. 1997. A multidimensional scaling approach to explore the behavior of a texture perception algorithm. Mach. Vision Appl. 9, 5/6 (1997), 262--271.
[41]
Josh Wills, Sameer Agarwal, David Kriegman, and Serge Belongie. 2009. Toward a perceptual space for gloss. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 4, Article 103 (Sept. 2009), 15 pages.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Layered Modeling of Affective, Perception, and Visual Properties: Optimizing Structure With Genetic AlgorithmIEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems10.1109/THMS.2024.343457354:5(609-618)Online publication date: Oct-2024
  • (2023)Visually Significant Dimensions and Parameters for GlossJournal of Imaging10.3390/jimaging1001001010:1(10)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2023
  • (2021)Perception of material appearance: A comparison between painted and rendered imagesJournal of Vision10.1167/jov.21.5.1621:5(16)Online publication date: 17-May-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
ACM Transactions on Applied Perception  Volume 16, Issue 1
January 2019
104 pages
ISSN:1544-3558
EISSN:1544-3965
DOI:10.1145/3310277
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 January 2019
Accepted: 01 September 2018
Revised: 01 September 2018
Received: 01 August 2017
Published in TAP Volume 16, Issue 1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. BRDF
  2. attributes
  3. perception
  4. tactile
  5. user study
  6. visual

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

  • Czech Science Foundation

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 10 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Layered Modeling of Affective, Perception, and Visual Properties: Optimizing Structure With Genetic AlgorithmIEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems10.1109/THMS.2024.343457354:5(609-618)Online publication date: Oct-2024
  • (2023)Visually Significant Dimensions and Parameters for GlossJournal of Imaging10.3390/jimaging1001001010:1(10)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2023
  • (2021)Perception of material appearance: A comparison between painted and rendered imagesJournal of Vision10.1167/jov.21.5.1621:5(16)Online publication date: 17-May-2021
  • (2020)Does It Ping or Pong? Auditory and Tactile Classification of Materials by Bouncing EventsACM Transactions on Applied Perception10.1145/339389817:2(1-17)Online publication date: 18-May-2020
  • (2020)On Resilience in Cloud ComputingACM Computing Surveys10.1145/338892253:3(1-36)Online publication date: 28-May-2020
  • (2020)Dynamic Precision Autotuning with TAFFOACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization10.1145/338878517:2(1-26)Online publication date: 29-May-2020
  • (2020)Real-time Illumination and Visual Coherence for Photorealistic Augmented/Mixed RealityACM Computing Surveys10.1145/338649653:3(1-34)Online publication date: 28-May-2020
  • (2020)The Effect of Context on Small Screen and Wearable Device Users’ Performance - A Systematic ReviewACM Computing Surveys10.1145/338637053:3(1-44)Online publication date: 28-May-2020
  • (2020)Establishing Vibration-Based Tactile Line Profiles for Use in Multimodal GraphicsACM Transactions on Applied Perception10.1145/338345717:2(1-14)Online publication date: 18-May-2020
  • (2020)Three Perceptual Dimensions for Specular and Diffuse ReflectionACM Transactions on Applied Perception10.1145/338074117:2(1-26)Online publication date: 18-May-2020
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media