[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3290607.3312956acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

A Mouse (H)Over a Hotspot Survey: An Exploration of Patterns of Hesitation through Cursor Movement Metrics

Published: 02 May 2019 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents the results of an empirical exploration of 10 cursor movement metrics designed to measure respondent hesitation in online surveys. As a use case, this work considers an online survey aimed at exploring how people gauge the electricity consumption of domestic appliances. The cursor metrics were derived computationally from the mouse trajectories when rating the consumption of each appliance and analyzed using Multidimensional Scaling, Jenks Natural Breaks, and the Jaccard Similarity Index techniques. The results show that despite the fact that the metrics measure different aspects of the mouse trajectories, there is an agreement with respect to the appliances that generated higher levels of hesitation. The paper concludes with an outline of future work that should be carried out in order to further understand how cursor trajectories can be used to measure respondent hesitation.

References

[1]
Catia Cepeda, João Rodrigues, Maria Camila Dias, Diogo Oliveira, Dina Rindlisbacher, Marcus Cheetham, and Hugo Gamboa. 2018. Mouse Tracking Measures and Movement Patterns with Application for Online Surveys. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Andreas Holzinger, Peter Kieseberg, A Min Tjoa, and Edgar Weippl (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Hamburg, Germany, 28--42.
[2]
Y. Chen, Y. Liu, M. Zhang, and S. Ma. 2017. User Satisfaction Prediction with Mouse Movement Information in Heterogeneous Search Environment. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 29, 11 (Nov. 2017), 2470--2483.
[3]
Silvana Churruca. 2011. Patterns of cursor movement for different devices. Comparative study of cursor movement patterns between a touchpad and a mouse devices. Master. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
[4]
Clicktale. 2019. Enterprise Experience Analytics | Conversions Optimization. https://www.clicktale.com/
[5]
M. S. R. Dijkstra. 2013. The diagnosis of self-efficacy using mouse and keyboard input. Master. Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. http://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/280262
[6]
Qi Guo and Eugene Agichtein. 2008. Exploring Mouse Movements for Inferring Query Intent. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 707--708.
[7]
Jeff Huang, Ryen W. White, and Susan Dumais. 2011. No Clicks, No Problem: Using Cursor Movements to Understand and Improve Search. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1225--1234.
[8]
Jeffrey L. Jenkins, Ross Larsen, Robert Bodily, Daniel Sandberg, Parker Williams, Steve Stokes, Spencer Harris, and Joseph S. Valacich. 2015. A multi-experimental examination of analyzing mouse cursor trajectories to gauge subject uncertainty. In 2015 Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2015. Americas Conference on Information Systems, Fajardo, Puerto Rico, 1--14.
[9]
Tzafilkou Katerina and Protogeros Nicolaos. 2018. Mouse Behavioral Patterns and Keystroke Dynamics in End-User Development. Comput. Hum. Behav. 83, C (June 2018), 288--305.
[10]
Florian Mueller and Andrea Lockerd. 2001. Cheese: Tracking Mouse Movement Activity on Websites, a Tool for User Modeling. In CHI '01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '01). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 279--280.
[11]
Vidhya Navalpakkam and Elizabeth Churchill. 2012. Mouse Tracking: Measuring and Predicting Users' Experience of Web-based Content. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2963--2972.
[12]
Lucas Pereira and Yoram Chisik. 2017. A Mouse over a Hotspot Survey: An exploration of perceptions of electricity consumption and patterns of indecision. In Proceedings of the fifth IFIP Conference on Sustainable Internet and ICT for Sustainability. IEEE / IFIP, Funchal, Portugal, 1--4.
[13]
Daniel Reinhardt and Jörn Hurtienne. 2018. Cursor Entropy Reveals Decision Fatigue. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Companion (IUI '18 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 31:1--31:2.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Guessing or Solving?Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3334480.3383005(1-8)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2020

Index Terms

  1. A Mouse (H)Over a Hotspot Survey: An Exploration of Patterns of Hesitation through Cursor Movement Metrics

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '19: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2019
      3673 pages
      ISBN:9781450359719
      DOI:10.1145/3290607
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 02 May 2019

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. hesitation patterns
      2. mouse tracking
      3. online survey
      4. single- and multi-target metrics
      5. user experience

      Qualifiers

      • Abstract

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      CHI '19
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI 2025
      ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 26 - May 1, 2025
      Yokohama , Japan

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 29 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2020)Guessing or Solving?Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3334480.3383005(1-8)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2020

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media