[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3209280.3209534acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocengConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring an AR-based User Interface for Authoring Multimedia Presentations

Published: 28 August 2018 Publication History

Abstract

This paper describes the BumbAR approach for composing multimedia presentations and evaluates it through a qualitative study based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The BumbAR proposal is based on the event-condition-action model of Nested Context Model (NCM) and explores the use of augmented reality and real-world objects (markers) as an innovative user interface to specify the behavior and relationships between the media objects in a presentation. The qualitative study aimed at measuring the users' attitude towards using BumbAR and an augmented reality environment for authoring multimedia presentations. The results show that the participants found the BumbAR approach both useful and easy-to-use, while most of them (66,67%) found the system more convenient than traditional desktop-based authoring tools.

References

[1]
ABNT. 2011. 15606-2, 2011. Digital Terrestrial Television-Data Coding and Transmission Specification for Digital Broadcasting-Part 2: Ginga-NCL for fixed and mobile receivers-XML application language for application coding.
[2]
Adobe. 2018. Adobe Animate CC Website. https://www.adobe.com/products/animate.html Accessed: February, 01 2018.
[3]
Khaled M Alraimi, Hangjung Zo, and Andrew P Ciganek. 2015. Understanding the MOOCs continuance: The role of openness and reputation. Computers & Education 80 (2015), 28--38.
[4]
R. G. de A. Azevedo, E. C. Araújo, Bruno Lima, L. F. G. Soares, and M. F. Moreno. 2014. Composer: meeting non-functional aspects of hypermedia authoring environment. Multimedia Tools and Applications 70, 2 (May 2014), 1199--1228.
[5]
Alexandru Balog and Costin Pribeanu. 2010. The role of perceived enjoyment in the students' acceptance of an augmented reality teaching platform: A structural equation modelling approach. Studies in Informatics and Control 19, 3 (2010), 319--330.
[6]
Dick C.A. Bulterman, Lynda Hardman, Jack Jansen, K.Sjoerd Mullender, and Lloyd Rutledge. 1998. GRiNS: A GRaphical INterface for creating and playing SMIL documents. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 30, 1-7 (April 1998), 519--529.
[7]
Julie Carmigniani, Borko Furht, Marco Anisetti, Paolo Ceravolo, Ernesto Damiani, and Misa Ivkovic. 2011. Augmented reality technologies, systems and applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications 51, 1 (Jan. 2011), 341--377.
[8]
Fred D Davis. 1985. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Ph.D. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
[9]
Fred D. Davis. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 3 (Sept. 1989), 319.
[10]
Fred D Davis, Richard P Bagozzi, and Paul R Warshaw. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science 35, 8 (1989), 982--1003.
[11]
Romain Deltour and Cécile Roisin. 2006. The Limsee3 Multimedia Authoring Model. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering (DocEng '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 173--175.
[12]
Luiz Gomes Soares, Marcio Moreno, Carlos Salles Soares Neto, and Marcelo Moreno. 2010. Ginga-NCL: Declarative middleware for multimedia IPTV services. IEEE Communications Magazine 48, 6 (June 2010), 74--81.
[13]
Ian S Graham. 1995. The HTML sourcebook. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[14]
Taejin Ha, Woontack Woo, Youngho Lee, Junhun Lee, Jeha Ryu, Hankyun Choi, and Kwanheng Lee. 2010. ARtalet: Tangible User Interface Based Immersive Augmented Reality Authoring Tool for Digilog Book. IEEE, 40--43.
[15]
Anne-Cecilie Haugstvedt and John Krogstie. 2012. Mobile augmented reality for cultural heritage: A technology acceptance study. In Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 2012 IEEE International Symposium on. IEEE, 247--255.
[16]
PTC Inc. 2018. Vuforia Augmented Reality SDK. https://www.vuforia.com/
[17]
Hiroshi Ishii. 2008. The tangible user interface and its evolution. Commun. ACM 51, 6 (June 2008), 32.
[18]
ITU-T. 2009. H. 761, Nested Context Language (NCL) and Ginga-NCL for IPTV Services, Geneva, Apr. 2009.
[19]
Hyung-Keun Jee, Sukhyun Lim, Jinyoung Youn, and Junsuk Lee. 2014. An augmented reality-based authoring tool for E-learning applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications 68, 2 (Jan. 2014), 225--235.
[20]
Rodrigo Laiola Guimarães, Carlos de Salles Soares Neto, and Luiz Fernando Gomes Soares. 2008. A visual approach for modeling spatiotemporal relations. In Proceedings of the eighth ACM symposium on Document engineering. ACM, 285--288.
[21]
Tobias Langlotz, Stefan Mooslechner, Stefanie Zollmann, Claus Degendorfer, Gerhard Reitmayr, and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2012. Sketching up the world: in situ authoring for mobile Augmented Reality. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 16, 6 (Aug. 2012), 623--630.
[22]
Moralejo Lucrecia, Sanz Cecilia, Pesado Patricia, and Baldassarri Sandra. 2013. AuthorAR: Authoring tool for building educational activities based on Augmented Reality. IEEE, 503--507.
[23]
Blair MacIntyre, Maribeth Gandy, Steven Dow, and Jay David Bolter. 2004. DART: a toolkit for rapid design exploration of augmented reality experiences. ACM Press, 197.
[24]
Luís Fernando Maia, Carleandro Nolêto, Messias Lima, Cristiane Ferreira, Cláudia Marinho, Windson Viana, and Fernando Trinta. 2017. LAGARTO: A LocAtion based Games AuthoRing TOol enhanced with augmented reality features. Entertainment Computing 22 (July 2017), 3--13.
[25]
Erick Lazaro Melo, Caio César Viel, Cesar Augusto Camillo Teixeira, Alexandre Coelho Rondon, Daniel de Paula Silva, Danilo Gasques Rodrigues, and Endril Capelli Silva. 2012. WebNCL: A Web-based Presentation Machine for Multimedia Documents. In Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web (WebMedia '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 403--410.
[26]
Douglas Paulo de Mattos, Júlia Varanda da Silva, and Débora Christina Muchaluat-Saade. 2013. NEXT: graphical editor for authoring NCL documents supporting composite templates. ACM Press, 89.
[27]
Paul A Pavlou. 2003. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International journal of electronic commerce 7, 3 (2003), 101--134.
[28]
Benoît Pellan and Cyril Concolato. 2009. Authoring of scalable multimedia documents. Multimedia Tools and Applications 43, 3 (01 Jul 2009), 225--252.
[29]
Lloyd Rutledge. 2001. SMIL 2.0: XML for Web multimedia. IEEE Internet Computing 5, 5 (2001), 78--84.
[30]
Hartmut Seichter, Julian Looser, and Mark Billinghurst. 2008. ComposAR: An intuitive tool for authoring AR applications. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE/ACM international symposium on mixed and augmented reality. IEEE Computer Society, 177--178.
[31]
Midieum Shin, Byung-soo Kim, and Jun Park. 2005. AR storyboard: an augmented reality based interactive storyboard authoring tool. In Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2005. Proceedings. Fourth IEEE and ACM International Symposium on. IEEE, 198--199.
[32]
Esdras Caleb Oliveira Silva, Joel A. F. dos Santos, and Débora C. Muchaluat-Saade. 2013. NCL4WEB: Translating NCL Applications to HTML5 Web Pages. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering (DocEng '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 253--262.
[33]
G. Sinem and Steven Feiner. 2003. Authoring 3D hypermedia for wearable augmented and virtual reality. In 2012 16th International Symposium on Wearable Computers. IEEE Computer Society, 118--118. http://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/iswc/2003/2034/00/20340118.pdf
[34]
Luiz Fernando Gomes Soares and Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa. 2009. Programando em NCL 3.0: desenvolvimento de aplicaçoes para middleware Ginga: TV digital e Web. Elsevier.
[35]
Luiz Fernando Gomes Soares, Rogério Ferreira Rodrigues, and Romualdo Monteiro de Resende Costa. 2005. Nested Context Model 3.0. Monographs in Computer Sciences 18/05 (2005), 35.
[36]
Unity Technologies. 2018. Unity 3D. https://unity3d.com/
[37]
Wade M Vagias. 2006. Likert-type Scale Response Anchors. Clemson International Institute for Tourism. & Research Development, Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management, Clemson University (2006).
[38]
Viswanath Venkatesh and Fred D Davis. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science 46, 2 (2000), 186--204.
[39]
Fernando Vera and J. Alfredo Sánchez. 2016. SITUAR: A platform for in-situ augmented reality content creation. Avances en Interacción Humano-Computadora 1, 1 (2016), 90--92.
[40]
Fernando Vera, J. Alfredo Sánchez, and Ofelia Cervantes. 2017. A Platform for Creating Augmented Reality Content by End Users. In Applications for Future Internet, Enrique Sucar, Oscar Mayora, and Enrique Munoz de Cote (Eds.). Vol. 179. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 167--171. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-49622-1_18
[41]
Rafał Wojciechowski and Wojciech Cellary. 2013. Evaluation of learners' attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments. Computers & Education 68 (2013), 570--585.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)An augmented reality-based multimedia environment for experimental educationMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-020-09684-xOnline publication date: 3-Sep-2020

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
DocEng '18: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering 2018
August 2018
311 pages
ISBN:9781450357692
DOI:10.1145/3209280
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

  • SIGDOC: ACM Special Interest Group on Systems Documentation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 August 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Augmented Reality
  2. Authoring Tool
  3. Multimedia
  4. User Interface

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

DocEng '18
Sponsor:
DocEng '18: ACM Symposium on Document Engineering 2018
August 28 - 31, 2018
NS, Halifax, Canada

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 194 of 564 submissions, 34%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)An augmented reality-based multimedia environment for experimental educationMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-020-09684-xOnline publication date: 3-Sep-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media