Digital Platforms as Co-Producers of Space: A Lefebvrian Analysis of Tensions in Digital Platforms
Pages 11 - 43
Abstract
Research on digital platforms has paid scant attention to the entanglement of digital platforms with physical spaces, their interactions, and associated tensions. The entanglement is of increased consequence in the wake of ontological reversal wherein digital constructs the physical. Using Lefebvre's spatial triad of perceived, conceived, and lived space to study digital platform ecosystems, this paper argues that digital platforms through the production of digital space have dramatically transformed the access, experiences, and meanings of the offline physical spaces, thereby emerging as co-producers of contemporary physical space. We illustrate that this process of co-production can lead to gradual emergence of tensions that arise due to the divergence between conceived and lived space and the essential differences in the rationalities of physical and digital space. In doing so, we develop a new spatial understanding of how tensions emerge and build in digital platform ecosystems.
References
[1]
Alaimo, C., & Kallinikos, J. (2016). Encoding the everyday: The infrastructural apparatus of social data. In C. R. Sugimoto, H. R. Ekbia, & M. Mattioli (Eds.), Big data is not a monolith: Policies, practices, and problems (pp. 77--90). MIT Press.
[2]
Anders, P. (2001). Anthropic cyberspace: Defining electronic space from first principles. Leonardo, 34(5), 409--416. https://doi.org/10.1162/ 002409401753521520
[3]
Bakker, I., van der Voordt, T., Vink, P., & de Boon, J. (2014). Pleasure, arousal, dominance: Mehrabian and Russell revisited. Current Psychology, 33, 405--421.
[4]
Bakos, Y., & Katsamakas, E. (2008). Design and ownership of two-sided networks: Implications for internet platforms. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(2), 171--202. https://doi.org/10.2753/mis0742--1222250208
[5]
Baskerville, R. L., Myers, M. D., & Yoo, Y. (2020). Digital first: The ontological reversal and new challenges for information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 44(2), 509--523. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/14418
[6]
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/ 97814129862681.n339
[7]
Bratton, B. H. (2016). The black stack. In The stack: On software and sovereignty (pp. 351--366). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/ 9780262029575.003.0011
[8]
Caillaud, B., & Jullien, B. (2003). Chicken & egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. The RAND Journal of Economics, 34(2), 309--328. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593720
[9]
Cartwright, D., & Harary, F. (1956). Structural balance: A generalization of Heider's theory. Psychological Review, 63(5), 277--293. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046049
[10]
Castells, M. (2009). The rise of the network society. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444319514
[11]
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.13.4.84.s4
[12]
Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Mikalef, P., & Sarpong, D. (2023). Coopetition in the platform economy from ethical and firm performance perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 157, 1--10.
[13]
Chu, J., & Manchanda, P. (2016). Quantifying cross and direct network effects in online consumer-to-consumer platforms. Marketing Science, 35(6), 870--893. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2016.0976
[14]
Constantinides, P., Henfridsson, O., & Parker, G. (2018). Platforms and infrastructures in the digital age. Information Systems Research, 29(2), 381--400. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2018.0794
[15]
Cova, B., & Pace, S. (2006). Brand community of convenience products: New forms of customer empowerment -- the case "my Nutella The Community." European Journal of Marketing, 40(9/10), 1087--1105. https://doi.org/10.1108/ 03090560610681023
[16]
Dale, K., & Burrell, G. (2007). The spaces of organisation and the organisation of space: Power, identity and materiality at work. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.5040/ 9781350389373
[17]
de Freitas, C. A. (2010). Changing spaces: Locating public space at the intersection of the physical and digital. Geography Compass, 4(6), 630--643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749--8198.2009.00312.x
[18]
de Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., & Basole, R. C. (2018). The digital platform: A research agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 33(2), 124--135. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-016-0033--3
[19]
de Souza e Silva, A. (2006). From cyber to hybrid. Space and Culture, 9(3), 261--278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331206289022
[20]
Dodge, M., & Kitchin, R. (2003). Mapping cyberspace. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/ 9780203165270
[21]
Dodge, M., & Kitchin, R. (2005). Code and the transduction of space. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(1), 162--180.
[22]
Dodge, M., Kitchin, R., & Perkins, C. (Eds.). (2011). The map reader: Theories of mapping practice and cartographic representation. John Wiley & Sons.
[23]
Edelman, B. (2015). How to launch your digital platform. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2015/04/how-to-launch-your-digital-platform
[24]
Edelman, B., Jaffe, S., & Kominers, S. (2016). To Groupon or not to Groupon: The profitability of deep discounts. Marketing Letters, 27(1), 39--53.
[25]
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532--550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr. 1989.4308385
[26]
Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 92. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849803311.00013
[27]
Elden, S. (2007). There is a politics of space because space is political. Radical Philosophy Review, 10(2), 101--116. https://doi.org/10.5840/ radphilrev20071022
[28]
Fang, R. (2021). How Groupon went from the fastest growing unicorn to nothing. Medium. https://medium.com/cornertechandmarketing/how-groupon-went-from-the-fastest-growing-unicorn-to-nothing-a17eab2bbdc1
[29]
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 645--672). Sage.
[30]
Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43(7), 1239--1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006
[31]
Gawer, A. (2021). Digital platforms' boundaries: The interplay of firm scope, platform sides, and digital interfaces. Long Range Planning, 54(5), 102045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2020.102045
[32]
Ghazawneh, A., & Henfridsson, O. (2013). Balancing platform control and external contribution in thirdparty development: The boundary resources model. Information Systems Journal, 23(2), 173--192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365--2575.2012.00406.x
[33]
Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W., & Wicki, B. (2008). What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Management Journal, 29(13), 1465--1474. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473915480.n46
[34]
Gibson, B., & Hartman, J. (2014). Rediscovering grounded theory. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1108/qrom-07--2014--1242
[35]
Gieseking, J. J., Mangold, W., Katz, C., Low, S., & Saegert, S. (2014). The people, place, and space reader (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315816852
[36]
Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of 'platforms.' New Media & Society, 12(3), 347--364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738
[37]
Guest, G., MacQueen, K., & Namey, E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384436
[38]
Hanseth, O., & Aanestad, M. (2003). Design as bootstrapping: On the evolution of ICT networks in health care. Methods of Information in Medicine, 42(4), 385--391. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038--1634234
[39]
Hanseth, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building internet. Journal of Information Technology, 25(1), 1--19. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2009.19
[40]
Hansson, L., Wrangmo, A., & Solberg Søilen, K. (2013). Optimal ways for companies to use Facebook as a marketing channel. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 11(2), 112--126. https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-12--2012-0024
[41]
Harvey, D. (2013). The political economy of public space. In S. Low & N. Smith (Eds.), The politics of public space (pp. 17--34). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203390306
[42]
Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. The Journal of Psychology, 21(1), 107--112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1946.9917275
[43]
Helmond, A. (2015). The platformization of the web: Making web data platform ready. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 1--11. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 2056305115603080
[44]
Henfridsson, O., & Bygstad, B. (2013). The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 907--931. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2013/37.3.11
[45]
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Lang, K. R. (2011). Boundary management in online communities: Case studies of the Nine Inch Nails and ccMixter music remix sites. Long Range Planning, 44(5--6), 440--457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2011.09.002
[46]
Jiménez, A., & Zheng, Y. (2021). Unpacking the multiple spaces of innovation hubs. The Information Society, 37(3), 163--176. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2021.1897913
[47]
Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A., & Marton, A. (2013). The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 357--370. https://doi.org/10. 25300/misq/2013/37.2.02
[48]
Keutel, M., Michalik, B., & Richter, J. (2014). Towards mindful case study research in IS: A critical analysis of the past ten years. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(3), 256--272. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2013.26
[49]
Kiesling, L. (2018). Toward a market epistemology of the platform economy. In S. Horwitz (Ed.), Austrian economics: The next generation (Vol. 23, pp. 45--70). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1529--213420180000023006
[50]
Kirsch, S. (1995). The incredible shrinking world? Technology and the production of space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 13(5), 529--555. https://doi.org/10.1068/d130529
[51]
Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67--94. https://doi.org/10.2307/249410
[52]
Knowledge at Wharton Staff. (2017). The death of the daily deal. Knowledge at Wharton. https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/death-daily-deal/
[53]
Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61--72. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935
[54]
Kung, L.-C., & Huang, C.-Y. (2017). The optimal pricing strategy of a mobile payment service in a two-sided market. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, 235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2017.02.003
[55]
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.4324/ 9780203132357--14
[56]
Leong, C., Pan, S. L., Leidner, D. E., & Huang, J. S. (2019). Platform leadership: Managing boundaries for the network growth of digital platforms. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(10), 1531--1565. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00577
[57]
Leszczynski, A. (2020). Glitchy vignettes of platform urbanism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 38(2), 189--208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775819878721
[58]
Li, Z., & Agarwal, A. (2017). Platform integration and demand spillovers in complementary markets: Evidence from Facebook's integration of Instagram. Management Science, 63(10), 3438--3458. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2502
[59]
Lin, M., Li, S., & Whinston, A. B. (2011). Innovation and price competition in a two-sided market. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(2), 171--202. https://doi.org/10.2753/mis0742--1222280207
[60]
Lindgren, R., Eriksson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2015). Managing identity tensions during mobile ecosystem evolution. Journal of Information Technology, 30(3), 229--244. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.8
[61]
Ma, N., Yuan, C., Ghafurian, M., & Hanrahan, B. (2018). Using stakeholder theory to examine drivers' stake in Uber. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3173574.3173657
[62]
Macrorie, R., Marvin, S., & While, A. (2021). Robotics and automation in the city: A research agenda. Urban Geography, 42(2), 197--217. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1698868
[63]
Martin, D., & Miller, B. (2003). Space and contentious politics. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 8(2), 143--156. https://doi.org/10.17813/ maiq.8.2.m886w54361j81261
[64]
Mattila, J., & Seppälä, T. (2015). Blockchains as a path to a network of systems: An emerging new trend of the digital platforms in industry and society. In ETLA reports (Vol. 45).
[65]
McQuire, S. (2006). The politics of public space in the media city. First Monday, 11(Special Issue 4), 17--34. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v0i0.1544
[66]
Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1973). A measure of arousal seeking tendency. Environment and Behavior, 5(3), 315.
[67]
Mini, T., & Widjaja, T. (2019). Tensions in digital platform business models: A literature review. International Conference on Information Systems, 1--17.
[68]
Möhlmann, M., & Zalmanson, L. (2017). Hands on the wheel: Navigating algorithmic management and Uber drivers' autonomy. International Conference on Information Systems.
[69]
Molotch, H. (1993). The space of Lefebvre. Theory and Society, 22(6), 887--895. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00993685
[70]
Myers, M. D., & Newman, M. (2007). The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. Information and Organization, 17(1), 2--26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001
[71]
Newcomb, T. M. (1953). An approach to the study of communicative acts. Psychological Review, 60(6), 393--404. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063098
[72]
Plantin, J.-C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P. N., & Sandvig, C. (2018). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 20(1), 293--310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553
[73]
Prey, R. (2015). Henri Lefebvre and the production of music streaming spaces. Sociologica, 9(3), 1--22. https://doi.org/10.2383/82481
[74]
Rochet, J., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990--1029.
[75]
Rochet, J., & Tirole, J. (2006). Two-sided markets: A progress report. RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 645--667.
[76]
Romano, N. C., Donovan, C., Chen, H., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2003). A methodology for analyzing web-based qualitative data. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 213--246.
[77]
Rosenblat, A. (2018). Uberland: How algorithms are rewriting the rules of work. University of California Press.
[78]
Santos, F. M., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2005). Organizational boundaries and theories of organization. Organization Science, 16(5), 491--508. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0152
[79]
Schmid, C. (2008). Henri Lefebvre's theory of the production of space: Towards a three-dimensional dialectic. In Space, difference, everyday life. Routledge.
[80]
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381--403.
[81]
Srnicek, N. (2017). The challenges of platform capitalism: Understanding the logic of a new business model. Juncture, 23(4), 254--257. https://doi.org/10.1111/newe.12023
[82]
Stockburger, A. (2007). Playing the third place: Spatial modalities in contemporary game environments. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media, 3(2), 223--236. https://doi.org/10.1386/padm.3.2--3.223_1
[83]
Sutherland, W., & Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 328--341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.004
[84]
Tassinari, A., & Maccarrone, V. (2020). Riders on the storm: Workplace solidarity among gig economy couriers in Italy and the UK. Work, Employment and Society, 34(1), 35--54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019862954
[85]
Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. A. (2010). Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675--687. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0323
[86]
Treiblmaier, H., & Petrozhitskaya, E. (2023). Is it time for marketing to reappraise B2C relationship management? The emergence of a new loyalty paradigm through blockchain technology. Journal of Business Research, 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113725
[87]
Turkle, S. (2011). The tethered self: Technology reinvents intimacy and solitude. Continuing Higher Education Review, 75, 28--31.
[88]
Varian, H. R. (2010). Computer mediated transactions. American Economic Review, 100(2), 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.2.1
[89]
Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 74--81. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.1995.9
[90]
Walsham, G. (2006). Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 320--330. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis. 3000589
[91]
Wen, W., & Zhu, F. (2019). Threat of platformowner entry and complementor responses: Evidence from the mobile app market. Strategic Management Journal, 40(9), 1336--1367. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3031
[92]
Wohlwill, J. F., & Kohn, I. (1976). Dimensionalizing the environmental manifold. In S. Wapner, S. B. Cohen, & B. Kaplan (Eds.), Experiencing the environment (pp. 19--53). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--1--4613--4259--5_3
[93]
Wood, A. J., Lehdonvirta, V., & Graham, M. (2018). Workers of the internet unite? Online freelancer organisation among remote gig economy workers in six Asian and African countries. New Technology, Work and Employment, 33(2), 95--112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12112
[94]
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage.
[95]
Zhu, F., & Furr, N. (2016). Products to platforms: Making the leap. Harvard Business Review, 94(4), 72--78.
[96]
Zhu, F., & Liu, Q. (2018). Competing with complementors: An empirical look at Amazon.com. Strategic Management Journal, 39(10), 2618--2642. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2932
Index Terms
- Digital Platforms as Co-Producers of Space: A Lefebvrian Analysis of Tensions in Digital Platforms
Recommendations
Managing Digital Platforms in User Organizations: The Interactions Between Digital Options and Digital Debt
As organizations increasingly use digital platforms to facilitate innovation, researchers are seeking to understand how platforms shape business practices. Although extant literature offers important insights into platform management from a platform-...
Affordances of digital platforms in sub‐Saharan Africa: An analytical review
AbstractThe proliferation of digital platforms in sub‐Saharan Africa (SSA) has increased job opportunities for informal businesses. However, the technological affordance of digital platforms in SSA has received very little attention in literature ...
Introduction-Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age
In the last few years, leading-edge research from information systems, strategic management, and economics have separately informed our understanding of platforms and infrastructures in the digital age. Our motivation for undertaking this special issue ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
February 2025
120 pages
EISSN:1532-0936
DOI:10.1145/3715966
- Editors:
- K.D. Joshi,
- Nancy Deng,
- Jessica Assink,
- Mina Jafarijoo
Copyright © 2025 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s).
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 28 January 2025
Published in SIGMIS Volume 56, Issue 1
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 23Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)23
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)23
Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in