Magic Mirror: Designing a Weight Change Visualization for Domestic Use
Article No.: 549, Pages 569 - 596
Abstract
Virtual mirrors displaying weight changes can support users in forming healthier habits by visualizing potential future body shapes. However, these often come with privacy, feasibility, and cost limitations. This paper introduces the Magic Mirror, a novel distortion-based mirror that leverages curvature effects to alter the appearance of body size while preserving privacy. We constructed the Magic Mirror and compared it to a video-based alternative. In an online study (N=115), we determined the optimal parameters for each system, comparing weight change visualizations and manipulation levels. Afterward, we conducted a laboratory study (N=24) to compare the two systems in terms of user perception, motivational potential, and willingness to use daily. Our findings indicate that the Magic Mirror surpasses the video-based mirror in terms of suitability for residential application, as it addresses feasibility concerns commonly associated with virtual mirrors. Our work demonstrates that mirrors that display weight changes can be implemented in users’ homes without any cameras, ensuring privacy.
References
[1]
Jascha Achenbach, Thomas Waltemate, Marc Erich Latoschik, and Mario Botsch. 2017. Fast generation of realistic virtual humans. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. 1–10. isbn:978-1-4503-5548-3 https://doi.org/10.1145/3139131.3139154
[2]
Imtiaz Ahmad, Taslima Akter, Zachary Buher, Rosta Farzan, Apu Kapadia, and Adam J. Lee. 2022. Tangible Privacy for Smart Voice Assistants: Bystanders’ Perceptions of Physical Device Controls. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., 6, CSCW2 (2022), Article 364, Nov., 31 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555089
[3]
Deemah Alqahtani, Caroline Jay, and Markel Vigo. 2020. The Effect of Goal Moderation on the Achievement and Satisfaction of Physical Activity Goals. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., 4, 4 (2020), Article 116, Dec, 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432209
[4]
Ana C. Andrés del Valle, Jeannie Huang, Karen Becerra, and Susan Fernandez. 2009. Evaluating weight perception using digital facial-image feedback. In CHI ’09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. 3035–3050. isbn:978-1-60558-247-4 https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520430
[5]
Katrin Arning and Martina Ziefle. 2015. “Get that Camera Out of My House!” Conjoint Measurement of Preferences for Video-Based Healthcare Monitoring Systems in Private and Public Places. In Inclusive Smart Cities and e-Health. Springer International Publishing, Cham. 152–164. isbn:978-3-319-19312-0 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19312-0_13
[6]
Marit Bentvelzen, Paweł W. Woźniak, Pia S.F. Herbes, Evropi Stefanidi, and Jasmin Niess. 2022. Revisiting Reflection in HCI: Four Design Resources for Technologies that Support Reflection. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., 6, 1 (2022), Article 2, Mar, 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517233
[7]
Franca Bianchini, Rudolf Kaaks, and Harri Vainio. 2002. Overweight, obesity, and cancer risk. The lancet oncology, 3, 9 (2002), 565–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(02)00849-5
[8]
Jürgen Bortz and Nicola Döring. 2007. Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human-und Sozialwissenschaftler: Limitierte Sonderausgabe. Springer-Verlag.
[9]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2021. Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21, 1 (2021), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
[10]
D. A. Brodie, K. Bagley, and P. D. Slade. 1994. Body-Image Perception in Pre- and Postadolescent Females. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 1 (1994), Feb., 147–154. issn:0031-5125 https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1994.78.1.147 Pub: SAGE Publications Inc
[11]
Xinya Chen, Jiaxin Huang, Yanrui Bin, Lu Yu, and Yiyi Liao. 2023. VeRi3D: Generative Vertex-based Radiance Fields for 3D Controllable Human Image Synthesis. In 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). IEEE, 8952–8963. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV51070.2023.00825
[12]
Oliver Clark, Sarah Grogan, Jenny Cole, and Nicola Ray. 2019. How might avatar appearance influence health-related outcomes? A systematic review and narrative meta-review. May, https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/j3675
[13]
Nina Döllinger, Carolin Wienrich, Erik Wolf, Mario Botsch, and Marc Erich Latoschik. 2019. ViTraS - Virtual Reality Therapy by Stimulation of Modulated Body Image - Project Outline. https://doi.org/10.18420/muc2019-ws-633
[14]
Nina Döllinger, Erik Wolf, David Mal, Nico Erdmannsdörfer, Mario Botsch, Marc Erich Latoschik, and Carolin Wienrich. 2022. Virtual Reality for Mind and Body: Does the Sense of Embodiment Towards a Virtual Body Affect Physical Body Awareness? In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. ACM, New Orleans LA USA. 1–8. isbn:978-1-4503-9156-6 https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519613
[15]
Nina Döllinger, Erik Wolf, David Mal, Stephan Wenninger, Mario Botsch, Marc Erich Latoschik, and Carolin Wienrich. 2022. Resize Me! Exploring the User Experience of Embodied Realistic Modulatable Avatars for Body Image Intervention in Virtual Reality. arxiv:2203.05060
[16]
Richard Chinedu Erem, Oyewole Oyekoya, and Margrethe Horlyck-Romanovsky. 2023. Effects of Varying Avatar Sizes on Food Choices in Virtual Environments. In Companion Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (ISS Companion ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. 24–26. isbn:9798400704253 https://doi.org/10.1145/3626485.3626534
[17]
Daniel Hepperle, Christian Felix Purps, Jonas Deuchler, and Matthias Wölfel. 2022. Aspects of visual avatar appearance: self-representation, display type, and uncanny valley. The Visual Computer, 38, 4 (2022), April, issn:1432-2315 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-021-02151-0
[18]
Daniel Hepperle, Hannah Ödell, and Matthias Wölfel. 2020. Differences in the Uncanny Valley between Head-Mounted Displays and Monitors. In 2020 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW). 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1109/CW49994.2020.00014 ISSN: 2642-3596
[19]
Hwajung Hong, Jennifer G. Kim, Gregory D. Abowd, and Rosa I. Arriaga. 2012. Designing a Social Network to Support the Independence of Young Adults with Autism. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. 627–636. isbn:9781450310864 https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145300
[20]
Paul M. Jenkinson and Catherine Preston. 2017. The ‘not-so-strange’ body in the mirror: A principal components analysis of direct and mirror self-observation. Consciousness and Cognition, 48 (2017), Feb., 262–272. issn:1053-8100 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.12.007
[21]
Kalypso Karastergiou, Steven R Smith, Andrew S Greenberg, and Susan K Fried. 2012. Sex differences in human adipose tissues – the biology of pear shape. Biology of Sex Differences, 3, 1 (2012), May, issn:2042-6410 https://doi.org/10.1186/2042-6410-3-13
[22]
Youjeong Kim and S. Shyam Sundar. 2012. Visualizing ideal self vs. actual self through avatars: Impact on preventive health outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 4 (2012), July, 1356–1364. issn:0747-5632 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.021
[23]
Florian Kirchbuchner, Tobias Grosse-Puppendahl, Matthias R. Hastall, Martin Distler, and Arjan Kuijper. 2015. Ambient Intelligence from Senior Citizens’ Perspectives: Understanding Privacy Concerns, Technology Acceptance, and Expectations. In Ambient Intelligence (Lecture Notes in Computer Science). Springer International Publishing, Cham. 48–59. isbn:978-3-319-26005-1 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26005-1_4
[24]
Rafal Kocielnik, Lillian Xiao, Daniel Avrahami, and Gary Hsieh. 2018. Reflection Companion: A Conversational System for Engaging Users in Reflection on Physical Activity. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., 2, 2 (2018), Article 70, Jul, 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3214273
[25]
Hsu-Chan Kuo, Chun-Chia Lee, and Wen-Bin Chiou. 2016. The Power of the Virtual Ideal Self in Weight Control: Weight-Reduced Avatars Can Enhance the Tendency to Delay Gratification and Regulate Dietary Practices. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19, 2 (2016), Feb., 80–85. issn:2152-2715, 2152-2723 https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0203
[26]
Mitchell A. Lazar. 2005. How Obesity Causes Diabetes: Not a Tall Tale. Science, 307, 5708 (2005), Jan., 373–375. issn:1095-9203 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1104342
[27]
Florian Mueller, Rohit Ashok Khot, Kathrin Gerling, and Regan Mandryk. 2016. Exertion Games. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, 10, 1 (2016), Dec., 1–86. issn:1551-3955 https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000041
[28]
Elizabeth L. Murnane, Yekaterina S. Glazko, Jean Costa, Raymond Yao, Grace Zhao, Paula M. L. Moya, and James A. Landay. 2023. Narrative-Based Visual Feedback to Encourage Sustained Physical Activity: A Field Trial of the WhoIsZuki Mobile Health Platform. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., 7, 1 (2023), Article 23, Mar, 36 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3580786
[29]
Melissa A. Napolitano, Sharon Hayes, Giuseppe Russo, Debora Muresu, Antonio Giordano, and Gary D. Foster. 2013. Using Avatars to Model Weight Loss Behaviors: Participant Attitudes and Technology Development. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 7, 4 (2013), July, 1057–1065. issn:1932-2968 https://doi.org/10.1177/193229681300700430 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc
[30]
Solène Neyret, Anna I. Bellido Rivas, Xavi Navarro, and Mel Slater. 2020. Which Body Would You Like to Have? The Impact of Embodied Perspective on Body Perception and Body Evaluation in Immersive Virtual Reality. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7 (2020), issn:2296-9144 https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frobt.2020.00031
[31]
Antti Oulasvirta, Aurora Pihlajamaa, Jukka Perkiö, Debarshi Ray, Taneli Vähäkangas, Tero Hasu, Niklas Vainio, and Petri Myllymäki. 2012. Long-term effects of ubiquitous surveillance in the home. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, Pittsburgh Pennsylvania. 41–50. isbn:978-1-4503-1224-0 https://doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370224
[32]
Sung Jun Park. 2019. Is Augmented Reality in Denial of the Convention? Examining the Presence of Uncanny Valley in Augmented Reality. Dartmouth College Undergraduate Theses, May, https://digitalcommons.dartmouth.edu/senior_theses/143
[33]
Paul Poirier, Thomas D. Giles, George A. Bray, Yuling Hong, Judith S. Stern, F. Xavier Pi-Sunyer, and Robert H. Eckel. 2006. Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease: Pathophysiology, Evaluation, and Effect of Weight Loss. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 26, 5 (2006), May, 968–976. issn:1524-4636 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.atv.0000216787.85457.f3
[34]
Cristina Portalés, Jesús Gimeno, Sergio Casas, Ricardo Olanda, and Francisco Giner Martínez. 2016. Interacting With Augmented Reality Mirrors. IGI Global, 18–46. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5469-1.ch002
[35]
Sarah Prange, Sarah Delgado Rodriguez, Lukas Mecke, and Florian Alt. 2022. “I Saw Your Partner Naked”: Exploring Privacy Challenges During Video-Based Online Meetings. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. 71–82. isbn:9781450398206 https://doi.org/10.1145/3568444.3568468
[36]
Catherine Preston, Benjamin J. Kuper-Smith, and H. Henrik Ehrsson. 2015. Owning the body in the mirror: The effect of visual perspective and mirror view on the full-body illusion. Scientific Reports, 5, 1 (2015), Dec., issn:2045-2322 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18345
[37]
Mohammad H Rajab and Mohammed Soheib. 2021. Privacy Concerns Over the Use of Webcams in Online Medical Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Cureus, 13, 2 (2021), Feb., issn:2168-8184 https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.13536
[38]
Michal Richter, Kiran Varanasi, Nils Hasler, and Christian Theobalt. 2012. Real-Time Reshaping of Humans. In Visualization Transmission 2012 Second International Conference on 3D Imaging, Modeling, Processing. 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1109/3DIMPVT.2012.81 ISSN: 1550-6185
[39]
Thomas D. Rossing and Christopher J. Chiaverina. 2019. Light Science: Physics and the Visual Arts. Springer International Publishing, Cham. isbn:978-3-030-27102-2 978-3-030-27103-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27103-9
[40]
Rob Sands, Wayne Maschette, and Christine Armatas. 2004. Measurement of Body Image Satisfaction Using Computer Manipulation of a Digital Image. The Journal of Psychology, 138, 4 (2004), Jan., 325–338. issn:0022-3980, 1940-1019 https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.138.4.325-338
[41]
Kripasindhu Sarkar, Lingjie Liu, Vladislav Golyanik, and Christian Theobalt. 2021. HumanGAN: A Generative Model of Human Images. In 2021 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV). 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1109/3DV53792.2021.00036
[42]
Valentin Schwind, Katrin Wolf, and Niels Henze. 2018. Avoiding the uncanny valley in virtual character design. Interactions, 25, 5 (2018), Aug., 45–49. issn:1072-5520 https://doi.org/10.1145/3236673
[43]
Mincheol Shin, Se Jung Kim, and Frank Biocca. 2019. The uncanny valley: No need for any further judgments when an avatar looks eerie. Computers in Human Behavior, 94 (2019), May, 100–109. issn:0747-5632 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.016
[44]
Julian Steil, Marion Koelle, Wilko Heuten, Susanne Boll, and Andreas Bulling. 2019. PrivacEye: Privacy-Preserving Head-Mounted Eye Tracking Using Egocentric Scene Image and Eye Movement Features. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (ETRA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. Article 26, 10 pages. isbn:9781450367097 https://doi.org/10.1145/3314111.3319913
[45]
Anne Thaler, Ivelina Piryankova, Jeanine K. Stefanucci, Sergi Pujades, Stephan de la Rosa, Stephan Streuber, Javier Romero, Michael J. Black, and Betty J. Mohler. 2018. Visual Perception and Evaluation of Photo-Realistic Self-Avatars From 3D Body Scans in Males and Females. Frontiers in ICT, 5 (2018), issn:2297-198X https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fict.2018.00018
[46]
Milka Trajkova and Francesco Cafaro. 2018. Takes Tutu to Ballet: Designing Visual and Verbal Feedback for Augmented Mirrors. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., 2, 1 (2018), Article 38, Mar, 30 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3191770
[47]
ARTHUR C. TRAUB. 1964. Psychophysical Studies of Body-Image: I. The Adjustable Body-Distorting Mirror. Archives of General Psychiatry, 11, 1 (1964), July, 53–66. issn:0003-990X https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1964.01720250055007
[48]
World Health Organization. 2022. World health statistics 2022: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals. World Health Organization, Geneva. isbn:978-92-4-005114-0 https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/356584 Section: ix, 125 p.
[49]
Chaojie Yang, Hanhui Li, Shengjie Wu, Shengkai Zhang, Haonan Yan, Nianhong Jiao, Jie Tang, Runnan Zhou, Xiaodan Liang, and Tianxiang Zheng. 2022. BodyGAN: General-purpose Controllable Neural Human Body Generation. In 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 7723–7732. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.00758
[50]
Serena Zheng, Noah Apthorpe, Marshini Chetty, and Nick Feamster. 2018. User Perceptions of Smart Home IoT Privacy. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2, CSCW (2018), Nov., 200:1–200:20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274469
[51]
Qiushi Zhou, Louise Grebel, Andrew Irlitti, Julie Ann Minaai, Jorge Goncalves, and Eduardo Velloso. 2023. Here and Now: Creating Improvisational Dance Movements with a Mixed Reality Mirror. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. Article 183, 16 pages. isbn:9781450394215 https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580666
[52]
Qiushi Zhou, Andrew Irlitti, Difeng Yu, Jorge Goncalves, and Eduardo Velloso. 2022. Movement Guidance using a Mixed Reality Mirror. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. 821–834. isbn:9781450393584 https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533466
[53]
Qiushi Zhou, Brandon Victor Syiem, Beier Li, Jorge Goncalves, and Eduardo Velloso. 2024. Reflected Reality: Augmented Reality through the Mirror. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., 7, 4 (2024), Article 202, Jan, 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3631431
Index Terms
- Magic Mirror: Designing a Weight Change Visualization for Domestic Use
Recommendations
Why Do You Need This?: Selective Disclosure of Data Among Citizen Scientists
CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsRecent scandals involving data from participatory research have contributed to broader public concern about online privacy. Such concerns might make people more reluctant to participate in research that asks them to volunteer personal data, compromising ...
Personalized magic mirror: interactive mirror based on user behavior
ICOST'07: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Smart homes and health telematicsUbiquitous computing is changing our daily life with evolving devices. A mirror, which is one of our daily tools, is also showing its role changing to the instrument of information displayer. These evolving devices already have their own traditional ...
Magic Mirror
ISM '07: Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE International Symposium on MultimediaThis investigation describes a novel design and implementation of an interactive multimedia mirror system, called "Magic Mirror." The Magic Mirror can be easily implemented in existing personal computers or hand-held device with normal peripherals and ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
December 2024
693 pages
Copyright © 2024 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 24 October 2024
Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue ISS
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Funding Sources
- German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 78Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)78
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)36
Reflects downloads up to 16 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in