[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3689050.3707682acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewFull TextPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract
Free access

Engaging with the making and the end-of-life of artificial interactive nails

Published: 04 March 2025 Publication History

1 Introduction

As wearable technology has seamlessly become an integral part of our daily lives, HCI research continues to provide innovative solutions that intersect multiple disciplines [23, 24].
Significant effort has been made toward developing devices such as smartwatches [1, 46, 56], earbuds [27, 42], and armbands [40] that enable individuals to monitor their health, ensuring hands-free communication and streamlined notifications for safety.
Beyond these efforts, wearable technology has expanded its applications to include fashion items worn daily, such as rings [3], shoes  [2, 45], and jackets  [16]. A more recent trend includes fashion items worn for aesthetic enhancements, such as artificial nails, eyelashes, hair, and makeup, collectively referred to as beauty technology  [53].
Figure 1:
Figure 1: We experimented with the formula of the Bio-e-Nails to show variations in shape and opacity.
Beauty technology encompasses the body of work that augments everyday cosmetics by adding features supported by electronics [51, 53]. Thus, besides the typical motivations for cosmetic use, such as beautification or altering appearances, beauty technology adds features by utilizing electronics.
FX e-makeup  [50], for example, is a prototype for special effects makeup embedded with electronics to sense and use facial muscle movements as inputs for performing commands (e.g., turning on a TV). iSkin  [54] is an on-the-skin tattoo-like interface combining aesthetically appealing designs with electronics that utilize touch as input.
Similarly to fast fashion, beauty technology presents sustainability challenges influenced by factors such as material composition, production processes, and end-of-life disposal, with the added caveat of e-waste [22].
For instance, wearables for beauty technology integrate electronics or conductive coatings [53], posing difficulties for proper recycling due to the challenges of separating electronic components from off-the-shelf cosmetics [22].
Concerned with sustainability, recent Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) research shows a growing interest in biobased materials, such as mycelium skin  [49], mycelium composites  [32, 48, 55], bioplastics  [8, 29, 58], biofoams  [30, 31], bioclays [14, 17, 19, 41], and bacterial cellulose [10, 20, 36].
This interest is driven by the ability of these materials to break down in a home-compostable environment, enabling the reuse or reharvest of electronic components at the end of the wearable or interactive artifact’s life.

2 Bio-e-Nails

We designed these artificial nails, which we call Bio-e-Nails, with a sustainable approach using biobased materials. While the Bio-e-Nails can be attached to the human nail and worn similarly to their plastic counterparts (Figure  2), we differentiate in the choice of material, and in the making process.
We chose to formulate the material ourselves, from raw ingredients that were biologically derived, such as agar (originating from algae) and chitosan (originating from insects crust). Thus, our making has been intimate [14] and includes biodegradable plastics, such as Alganyl [8], which can be easily tuned for strength and flexibility. These materials decompose in soil, and completely disappear in chemical solvents. We experimented with a hands-on process, went through hundreds of iteration and engaged with various raw ingredients.
The unlocked freedom of customization allowed us to explore color variation, manipulation of bioplastic layers, and use of embellishments. As a result, the Bio-e-Nails ranged from purely aesthetical, to interactive wearables embedding photo and thermochromic pigments and NFC chips.
In our process, we chose to intersect the material-driven design [18, 43] and intimate making [14] approaches, willing to actively listen to and learn about the material, rather than rely on our own expertise. With each new nail, we used touch, sight, and feel to get informed about the following steps: whether we needed more rigidity in the material, a smoother texture, a more vibrant color, or more dramatic length and curvature.
As we delved deeper in the biochemistry of the materials, we expanded our understanding of where these nails, as extension of our bodies, should end. We dedicated a lot of time to the making of the nails. Similarly, we strove to give equal attention to their end-of-life, focusing on their re-use and on creative mechanisms for their decomposition.
Figure 2:
Figure 2: The Bio-e-Nails can worn like regular plastic nails.
We then experimented with adding functionality to the Bio-e-nails by embedding NFC (near field communication) chips. By doing so, we tapped into a previously explored area within HCI, that is of hands-free interactions meant to cover situations where the typical finger-based gestures such as tapping or swiping may be inaccessible due to impairment  [57], distractions-induced risks  [25], or while mobile [21, 44].
Figure 3:
Figure 3: The Bio-e-Nails embed an NFC chip that can be programmed to turn on the phone flashlight.
Prior research has shown that by embedding electronics, such as Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) chips, in artificial nails, interactions with mobile phones can become swift and seamless  [33, 34, 52]. However, these past works have used off-the-shelf materials such as acrylic nails or stickers [26, 52] as substrates for the electronic components, thus creating a composite material that is hard to recycle or biodegrade, raising sustainability concerns. Building upon prior research, we explore the affordances of biodegradable materials that provide an ideal landscape for designing and fabricating temporary wearables, such as smart artificial nails, typically intended as non-permanent beauty enhancements.
We engaged directly with our Bio-e-Nails, by wearing them daily for one week during which we programmed them to trigger specific functions on the phone with a quick and discrete tap. Aligning with prior research, we focused on scenarios where ob- taining assistance can be critical and usual gestures are unavailable. Thus, we programmed the bio-e-nails to perform three functions: (1) navigate to a predefined location while driving, (2) discreetly call for help when in danger, and (3) automatically text the current location to a friend.
The Bio-e-Nails presented in this work illustrate our commitment to fostering sustainability in beauty technology by exploring diverse biomaterial affordances beyond biodegradability. The affordances we consider in our approach include low-tech fabrication, customization, and flexibility in design. Our nail-based interactions showcase their potential, especially when traditional gestures may be impractical or unavailable during critical moments.
We envision the exhibition visitors to engage with our Bio-e-Nails either by using a provided UV pen to excited the photochromic pigments or by interacting with the NFC chips embedded in the nails.
Figure 4:
Figure 4: Our interdisciplinary approach enables the exploration of multiple methods for the end-of-life of the Bio-e-Nails. The mechanical method involves separating the layers and puling out the electronics. The chemical method dissolves the substrate bio-material in water or vinegar. The biological method decomposes the biomaterial substrate in a soil mixture containing micro-organisms. These methods can be combined for a more effective degradation.

3 Sustainability Aspects

Leveraging the interdisciplinary nature of our project, we explored various approaches that offer a sustainable end-of-life to the Bio-e-Nails.
Re-use is one of the sustainable end-of-life options that is often overlooked in favor of recycling or composting. While more cumbersome, re-using limits disposal and uses more efficiently the materials. During this project, we iterated through hundreds of nails, some of which did not lend the intended aesthetic and functional properties (Figure 5). We experimented re-using those nails by leveraging their chemical end-of-life option. While experimenting, we realized that re-use we can enable wider aesthetic explorations, such as embedding artistic thermochromic and photochromic pigments, which otherwise would not be considered sustainable since their chemical composition is not disclosed by the production companies. Thus, using small amounts of vinegar as a solvent (just enough to cover the nail), we heat the thermochromic nail in the microwave for 1 minute and then pour it back into the clay mold. After curing, we obtained a new nail that kept the thermochromic properties but was thinner and more transparent than the original (due to the added solvent) – we obtained a thicker result when we re-used the material for a smaller nail.
Figure 5:
Figure 5: The intermediate versions, considered failure from an aesthetic and functional perspectives, were re-used to create new nails. This was possible because we chose a bio-material that can be reversed from solid to fluid state by adding water and heating them in the microwave.
End-of-life: mechanical. Our proposed fabrication process, based on thermo-adhesion enables easy separation of the bioplastic layers, simply by using manual mechanical force. We successfully harvested and re-programmed the NFC chips. The remainder of the bioplastic can be melted down, cured, and re-shaped into a new bioplastic layer (see Figure 4).
End-of-life: chemical. We leveraged the water-solubility of the bioplastic at low temperatures (<50 °C), to successfully recover and reprogram the NFC chips. When using small amounts of water (20 mL), the solution containing the dissolved bioplastic can be brought to boil and poured into a new bioplastic layer (see Figure 4).
End-of-life: biological. Alternatively, our Bio-e-Nails can decompose in soil over time. Our experiments show a slow mass loss (10% over 10 days) in soil inoculated with bacteria and fungus and kept at 40°C and over 80% humidity (see Figure 4).

4 Installation

We envision an installation encased in a suitcase as depicted in the Figure 6. The installation will capture aspects of the fabrication process, from the molding, pouring, filing and embedding the NFC chips. We will showcase various iterations of the nails, including intermediate versions. We plan to show other aspects of the fabrication such as some of the tools used (in Figure 7 we show the exact nail filer we used in the process).
Figure 6:
Figure 6: We envision the installation in a suitcase.
Figure 7:
Figure 7: The installation will showcase the process, as well as various intermediate nails. The exhibition participants will have the option to interact with the final Bio-e-Nails.
The finalized Bio-e-nails shown on the right side of Figure 7 are interactive. As shown in Figure 8, the exhibition participants will be able to use a UV pen to interact with the photochromic pigments embedded in the nails, and thus trigger their color change in real time. Using their phones, the exhibition participants will be able to interact with the NFC chips programmed to link to the page revealing more information about the project. Last, we plan to embroider the artist statement in the textile that will become the background of the installation. The artist statement will capture our positioning as well as our vision.
Figure 8:
Figure 8: An ultra-violet (UV) pen is exciting the photochromic pigments in the nails. As a result the nail change colors from pink to dark purple. The change lasts for an amount of time proportional to the UV exposure. Inside, the effect is temporary and the nails regain their original color within seconds. When worn outside, the color change can last longer depending on the sun UV intensity.

5 Participating Artists

Mirela Alistar is a bioartist, HCI researcher, and an Assistant Professor in Soft Materials at ATLAS Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, USA. Intersecting microbiology and HCI, her work extends the human to include interactions with their own microbiome and other living organisms [5, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 31, 37]. She has developed tangible living-media interfaces [28, 35, 39], and biochip-based systems for personalized healthcare [4, 6, 7, 38]. She has extensive experience organizing workshops in the context of DIYBio labs that she led or co-funded. In the academic context, her research attracts significant interest in the HCI research community: the workshop on bioplastics that she co-organized for TEI’22 [9] had over 50 participants.
Shirp David is a graduate student researching regenerative and compostable materials. With a background in fashion studies in Philadelphia, Shirp is fascinated by the collaboration between nature and science. Exploring fungal and bacteria materials as textiles or building components, Shirp identifies as a designer and architect, and definitely as an alchemist, humanist, and craftsman.
Eldy Vasquez Lazaro is a Peruvian designer with an MFA in design from University of California Davis and a B. Arch. from San Pedro University in Peru. Prior to joining CU Boulder, she was a resident at Autodesk Technology Center in San Francisco where she researched the use of mycelium bio-composites for applications in product design and wearable technology using digital fabrication techniques. She is currently a doctoral student at the ATLAS Institute of CU Boulder researching across the Unstable Design Lab and Living Matter Lab. Eldy’s research interests include the use of compostable conductive materials for creating tangible interfaces and wearable technologies while addressing challenges in sustainability [30, 31, 32, 47, 48, 49].

References

[1]
(n.d.). ActiGraph-Academic Research. https://theactigraph.com/academic-research Accessed: 2024-02-08.
[2]
(n.d.). Infineon Lighting Shoe - Infineon Technologies. https://www.infineon.com/cms/en/product/promopages/lighting-shoe/ Accessed: 2024-02-08.
[3]
(n.d.). Oura Ring. Smart Ring for Fitness, Stress, Sleep & Health.https://ouraring.com Accessed: 2024-02-08.
[4]
Mirela Alistar and Urs Gaudenz. 2017. OpenDrop: An integrated do-it-yourself platform for personal use of biochips. Bioengineering 4, 2 (2017), 45.
[5]
Mirela Alistar and Margherita Pevere. 2020. Semina Aeternitatis: Using Bacteria for Tangible Interaction with Data. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
[6]
Mirela Alistar, Paul Pop, and Jan Madsen. 2013. Application-specific fault-tolerant architecture synthesis for digital microfluidic biochips. In 2013 18th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC). IEEE, 794–800.
[7]
Mirela Alistar, Paul Pop, and Jan Madsen. 2013. Operation placement for application-specific digital microfluidic biochips. In 2013 Symposium on Design, Test, Integration and Packaging of MEMS/MOEMS (DTIP). IEEE, 1–6.
[8]
Fiona Bell, Latifa Al Naimi, Ella McQuaid, and Mirela Alistar. 2022. Designing with Alganyl. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (<conf-loc>, <city>Daejeon</city>, <country>Republic of Korea</country>, </conf-loc>) (TEI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 2, 14 pages.
[9]
Fiona Bell and Mirela Alistar. 2022. Designing with Alganyl: A Hands-on Exploration of Biodegradable Plastics. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. 1–5.
[10]
Fiona Bell, Joshua Coffie, and Mirela Alistar. 2024. Bio-Digital Calendar: Attuning to Nonhuman Temporalities for Multispecies Understanding. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. 1–15.
[11]
Fiona Bell, Alice Hong, Andreea Danielescu, Aditi Maheshwari, Ben Greenspan, Hiroshi Ishii, Laura Devendorf, and Mirela Alistar. 2021. Self-deStaining Textiles: Designing Interactive Systems with Fabric, Stains and Light. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.
[12]
Fiona Bell, F. Ria Khan, Theresa Matick, Malika Rakhmanova, Arva Syed, Shenali Uragoda, and Mirela Alistar. 2020. MyCo Domicilia. Amazon. Retrieved May 16, 2021 from https://www.amazon.com/MyCo-Domicilia-Farjana-Ria-Khan/dp/B08H6RYKDJ
[13]
Fiona Bell, Ella McQuaid, and Mirela Alistar. 2022. Alganyl: Cooking Sustainable Clothing. Diseña20 (2022), 4–4.
[14]
Fiona Bell, Netta Ofer, and Mirela Alistar. 2022. ReClaym our Compost: Biodegradable Clay for Intimate Making. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–15.
[15]
Fiona Bell, Michelle Ramsahoye, Joshua Coffie, Julia Tung, and Mirela Alistar. 2023. μ Me: Exploring the Human Microbiome as an Intimate Material for Living Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 2019–2033.
[16]
Sibrecht Bouwstra, Wei Chen, Loe Feijs, and Sidarto Bambang Oetomo. 2009. Smart jacket design for neonatal monitoring with wearable sensors. In 2009 Sixth International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks. IEEE, 162–167.
[17]
Leah Buechley and Ruby Ta. 2023. 3D Printable Play-Dough: New Biodegradable Materials and Creative Possibilities for Digital Fabrication. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (, Hamburg, Germany,) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 850, 15 pages.
[18]
Serena Camere and Elvin Karana. 2018. Fabricating materials from living organisms: An emerging design practice. Journal of Cleaner Production 186 (2018), 570–584.
[19]
Kristin N. Dew and Daniela K. Rosner. 2019. Designing with Waste: A Situated Inquiry into the Material Excess of Making. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (San Diego, CA, USA) (DIS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1307–1319.
[20]
Gerd Geleff Nielsen and Teresa Almeida. 2022. Designing with the Immune System: The Abject, Bodily Fluids, and Micro(be) Interactions. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Digital and Interactive Arts (<conf-loc>, <city>Aveiro, Portugal</city>, <country>Portugal</country>, </conf-loc>) (ARTECH ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 79, 4 pages.
[21]
Jun Gong, Xing-Dong Yang, and Pourang Irani. 2016. Wristwhirl: One-handed continuous smartwatch input using wrist gestures. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 861–872.
[22]
Olga Gurova, Timothy Robert Merritt, Eleftherios Papachristos, and Jenna Vaajakari. 2020. Sustainable solutions for wearable technologies: mapping the product development life cycle. Sustainability 12, 20 (2020), 8444.
[23]
Steve Harrison, Deborah Tatar, and Phoebe Sengers. 2007. The three paradigms of HCI. In Alt. Chi. Session at the SIGCHI Conference on human factors in computing systems San Jose, California, USA. 1–18.
[24]
H Rex Hartson. 1998. Human–computer interaction: Interdisciplinary roots and trends. Journal of systems and software 43, 2 (1998), 103–118.
[25]
Jibo He, Jason S McCarley, Kirsten Crager, Murtuza Jadliwala, Lesheng Hua, and Sheng Huang. 2018. Does wearable device bring distraction closer to drivers? Comparing smartphones and Google Glass. Applied ergonomics 70 (2018), 156–166.
[26]
Hsin-Liu Kao, Artem Dementyev, Joseph A Paradiso, and Chris Schmandt. 2015. NailO: fingernails as an input surface. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3015–3018.
[27]
Fahim Kawsar, Chulhong Min, Akhil Mathur, and Alessandro Montanari. 2018. Earables for personal-scale behavior analytics. IEEE Pervasive Computing 17, 3 (2018), 83–89.
[28]
Raphael Kim, Pat Pataranutaporn, Jack Forman, Seung Ah Lee, Ingmar H Riedel-Kruse, Mirela Alistar, Eldy S Lazaro Vasquez, Katia Vega, Roland Van Dierendonck, Gilad Gome, et al. 2021. Microbe-HCI: Introduction and Directions for Growth. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–4.
[29]
Marion Koelle, Madalina Nicolae, Aditya Shekhar Nittala, Marc Teyssier, and Jürgen Steimle. 2022. Prototyping soft devices with interactive bioplastics. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 1–16.
[30]
Eldy S. Lazaro Vasquez, Lily M Gabriel, Mikhaila Friske, Shanel Wu, Sasha De Koninck, Laura Devendorf, and Mirela Alistar. 2023. Designing Dissolving Wearables. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2023 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing & the 2023 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computing (<conf-loc>, <city>Cancun, Quintana Roo</city>, <country>Mexico</country>, </conf-loc>) (UbiComp/ISWC ’23 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 286–290.
[31]
Eldy S Lazaro Vasquez, Netta Ofer, Shanel Wu, Mary Etta West, Mirela Alistar, and Laura Devendorf. 2022. Exploring Biofoam as a Material for Tangible Interaction. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 1525–1539.
[32]
Eldy S Lazaro Vasquez, Hao-Chuan Wang, and Katia Vega. 2020. Introducing the sustainable prototyping life cycle for digital fabrication to designers. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 1301–1312.
[33]
DoYoung Lee, Jiwan Kim, and Ian Oakley. 2021. Fingertext: Exploring and optimizing performance for wearable, mobile and one-handed typing. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–15.
[34]
DoYoung Lee, SooHwan Lee, and Ian Oakley. 2020. Nailz: Sensing hand input with touch sensitive nails. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
[35]
Timothy Merritt, Foad Hamidi, Mirela Alistar, and Marta DeMenezes. 2020. Living media interfaces: a multi-perspective analysis of biological materials for interaction. Digital Creativity 31, 1 (2020), 1–21.
[36]
Audrey Ng. 2017. Grown microbial 3D fiber art, Ava: fusion of traditional art with technology(ISWC ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 209–214.
[37]
Netta Ofer, Fiona Bell, and Mirela Alistar. 2021. Designing direct interactions with bioluminescent algae. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. 1230–1241.
[38]
Paul Pop, Mirela Alistar, Elena Stuart, and Jan Madsen. 2015. Fault-Tolerant Digital Microfuidic Biochips. US: Springer (2015).
[39]
Purnendu, Sasha M Novack, Eric Acome, Christoph Keplinger, Mirela Alistar, Mark D Gross, Carson Bruns, and Daniel Leithinger. 2021. Electriflow: Soft electrohydraulic building blocks for prototyping shape-changing interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 1280–1290.
[40]
Seema Rawat, Somya Vats, and Praveen Kumar. 2016. Evaluating and exploring the MYO ARMBAND. In 2016 International Conference System Modeling & Advancement in Research Trends (SMART). IEEE, 115–120.
[41]
Michael L. Rivera, S. Sandra Bae, and Scott E. Hudson. 2023. Designing a Sustainable Material for 3D Printing with Spent Coffee Grounds. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (<conf-loc>, <city>Pittsburgh</city>, <state>PA</state>, <country>USA</country>, </conf-loc>) (DIS ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 294–311.
[42]
Tobias Röddiger, Tobias King, Dylan Ray Roodt, Christopher Clarke, and Michael Beigl. 2022. Openearable: Open hardware earable sensing platform. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2022 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and the 2022 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 246–251.
[43]
Valentina Rognoli, Bruna Petreca, Barbara Pollini, and Carmem Saito. 2022. Materials biography as a tool for designers’ exploration of bio-based and bio-fabricated materials for the sustainable fashion industry. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 18, 1 (2022), 749–772.
[44]
Gaganpreet Singh, William Delamare, and Pourang Irani. 2018. D-SWIME: A design space for smartwatch interaction techniques supporting mobility and encumbrance. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
[45]
Maike Stoeve, Dominik Schuldhaus, Axel Gamp, Constantin Zwick, and Bjoern M Eskofier. 2021. From the laboratory to the field: IMU-based shot and pass detection in football training and game scenarios using deep learning. Sensors 21, 9 (2021), 3071.
[46]
Kristof Van Laerhoven, Alexander Hoelzemann, Iris Pahmeier, Andrea Teti, and Lars Gabrys. 2022. Validation of an open-source ambulatory assessment system in support of replicable activity studies. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research 52, 2 (2022), 262–272.
[47]
Eldy S Lazaro Vasquez, Mirela Alistar, Laura Devendorf, and Michael L Rivera. 2024. Desktop Biofibers Spinning: An Open-Source Machine for Exploring Biobased Fibers and Their Application Towards Sustainable Smart Textile Design. In CHI. 856–1.
[48]
Eldy S Lazaro Vasquez and Katia Vega. 2019. From plastic to biomaterials: prototyping DIY electronics with mycelium. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 308–311.
[49]
Eldy S Lazaro Vasquez and Katia Vega. 2019. Myco-accessories: sustainable wearables with biodegradable materials. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 306–311.
[50]
Katia Vega, Abel Arrieta, Felipe Esteves, and Hugo Fuks. 2014. FX e-makeup for muscle based interaction. In Design, User Experience, and Usability. User Experience Design for Everyday Life Applications and Services: Third International Conference, DUXU 2014, Held as Part of HCI International 2014, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, June 22-27, 2014, Proceedings, Part III 3. Springer, 643–652.
[51]
Katia Vega and Hugo Fuks. 2013. Beauty technology as an interactive computing platform. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international conference on Interactive tabletops and surfaces. 357–360.
[52]
Katia Vega and Hugo Fuks. 2014. Beauty tech nails: interactive technology at your fingertips. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on tangible, embedded and embodied interaction. 61–64.
[53]
Katia Vega and Hugo Fuks. 2016. Beauty Technology: Designing Seamless Interfaces for Wearable Computing. Springer International Publishing.
[54]
Martin Weigel, Tong Lu, Gilles Bailly, Antti Oulasvirta, Carmel Majidi, and Jürgen Steimle. 2015. Iskin: flexible, stretchable and visually customizable on-body touch sensors for mobile computing. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2991–3000.
[55]
Jennifer Weiler, Piyum Fernando, Nipuni Siyambalapitiya, and Stacey Kuznetsov. 2019. Mycelium artifacts: Exploring shapeable and accessible biofabrication. In Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion. 69–72.
[56]
Gordon Williams. (n.d.). The World’s First Open Source Hackable Smart Watch. https://banglejs.com/ Accessed: 2024-02-08.
[57]
Jacob O Wobbrock. 2019. Situationally-induced impairments and disabilities. Web Accessibility: A Foundation for Research (2019), 59–92.
[58]
Nadia Campo Woytuk and Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard. 2023. From menstrual care to environmental care. interactions 30, 4 (2023), 28–33.

Index Terms

  1. Engaging with the making and the end-of-life of artificial interactive nails

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    TEI '25: Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
    March 2025
    1305 pages
    ISBN:9798400711978
    DOI:10.1145/3689050
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the owner/author(s).

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 04 March 2025

    Check for updates

    Author Tag

    1. Bio-HCI; Biodesign; Biomaterials; DIYBio; Sustainability; Wearables

    Qualifiers

    • Abstract

    Conference

    TEI '25
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 393 of 1,367 submissions, 29%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 105
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)105
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)105
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media