[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

DriveR: Towards Generating a Dynamic Road Safety Map with Causal Contexts

Published: 24 September 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Road safety remains a critical global concern, with millions of crashes reported annually. Understanding the safety of individual road junctions is vital, especially in areas prone to road rage and reckless driving. However, current navigation systems lack detailed safety information, increasing risk for drivers and pedestrians. Recognizing this need, this paper introduces øurmethod that automatically annotates the road segments with a driving safety level to aid cautious maneuvering and safe driving practices. By leveraging onboard sensors, øurmethod identifies causal chains behind poor driving maneuvers, enabling the modeling of safety levels for various road segments. We perform a thorough evaluation of øurmethod over publicly available and collected datasets from multiple countries and observe >80% accuracy (in terms of F1-score) in correctly annotating the safety concerns. In addition, a thorough user study indicates the generalizability and usability of the proposed approach for its practical deployment considerations.

References

[1]
Ammar Al-Taie, Yasmeen Abdrabou, Shaun Alexander Macdonald, Frank Pollick, and Stephen Anthony Brewster. 2023. Keep it Real: Investigating Driver-Cyclist Interaction in Real-World Traffic. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--15.
[2]
Jon Arróspide, Luis Salgado, and Marcos Nieto. 2012. Video analysis-based vehicle detection and tracking using an MCMC sampling framework. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, Vol. 2012, 1 (2012), 1--20.
[3]
Sujata Basu and Pritam Saha. 2022. Evaluation of risk factors for road accidents under mixed traffic: Case study on Indian highways. IATSS Research, Vol. 46, 4 (2022), 559--573.
[4]
Nishit Bhardwaj, Anupriya Pal, Debasis Das, et al. 2023. Adaptive Context based Road Accident Risk Prediction using Spatio-temporal Deep Learning. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence (2023).
[5]
John Brooke et al. 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry, Vol. 189, 194 (1996), 4--7.
[6]
Debasree Das, Sugandh Pargal, Sandip Chakraborty, and Bivas Mitra. 2022. DriBe: on-Road Mobile Telemetry for Locality-Neutral Driving Behavior Annotation. In 23rd IEEE MDM. 159--168.
[7]
Xiaoyi Fan, Feng Wang, Danyang Song, Yuhe Lu, and Jiangchuan Liu. 2019. GazMon: eye gazing enabled driving behavior monitoring and prediction. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing (2019).
[8]
Kaiqun Fu, Zhiqian Chen, and Chang-Tien Lu. 2018. Streetnet: preference learning with convolutional neural network on urban crime perception. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGSPATIAL. 269--278.
[9]
Andreas Geiger, Philip Lenz, Christoph Stiller, and Raquel Urtasun. 2013. Vision meets robotics: The kitti dataset. The International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 32, 11 (2013), 1231--1237.
[10]
Tarek Ghoul, Tarek Sayed, and Chuanyun Fu. 2023. Dynamic identification of short-term and longer-term hazardous locations using a conflict-based real-time extreme value safety model. Analytic methods in accident research, Vol. 37 (2023), 100262.
[11]
Clive WJ Granger. 1969. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society (1969), 424--438.
[12]
Sandra G Hart. 2006. NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, Vol. 50. Sage publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 904--908.
[13]
Kaiming He, Georgia Gkioxari, Piotr Dollár, and Ross Girshick. 2017. Mask r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 2961--2969.
[14]
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 770--778.
[15]
Songtao He, Mohammad Amin Sadeghi, Sanjay Chawla, Mohammad Alizadeh, Hari Balakrishnan, and Samuel Madden. 2021. Inferring high-resolution traffic accident risk maps based on satellite imagery and GPS trajectories. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 11977--11985.
[16]
Kai Holländer, Mark Colley, Enrico Rukzio, and Andreas Butz. 2021. A taxonomy of vulnerable road users for hci based on a systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--13.
[17]
Honda. 2013. Honda - safety map. https://www.honda.co.jp/safetymap/. Online Accessed: today.
[18]
Ronghang Hu, Jacob Andreas, Marcus Rohrbach, Trevor Darrell, and Kate Saenko. 2017. Learning to reason: End-to-end module networks for visual question answering. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 804--813.
[19]
Weiming Hu, Xuejuan Xiao, Dan Xie, Tieniu Tan, and Steve Maybank. 2004. Traffic accident prediction using 3-D model-based vehicle tracking. IEEE transactions on vehicular technology, Vol. 53, 3 (2004), 677--694.
[20]
Pedestrian island mooted at Chingrighata crossing. 2021. News Article. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kolkata/pedestrian-island-mooted-at-chingrighata-crossing/articleshow/87836994.cms. Online Accessed: today.
[21]
Paul Jaccard. 1912. The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone. 1. New phytologist, Vol. 11, 2 (1912), 37--50.
[22]
Ashesh Jain, Hema S Koppula, Bharad Raghavan, Shane Soh, and Ashutosh Saxena. 2015. Car that knows before you do: Anticipating maneuvers via learning temporal driving models. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 3182--3190.
[23]
Ishani Janveja, Akshay Nambi, Shruthi Bannur, Sanchit Gupta, and Venkat Padmanabhan. 2020. Insight: monitoring the state of the driver in low-light using smartphones. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Vol. 4, 3 (2020), 1--29.
[24]
Zhixiong Jin, Byeongjoon Noh, Haechan Cho, and Hwasoo Yeo. 2022. Deep Learning-based Approach on Risk Estimation of Urban Traffic Accidents. In 2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). IEEE, 1446--1451.
[25]
Hoang Thanh Lam. 2016. A concise summary of spatial anomalies and its application in efficient real-time driving behaviour monitoring. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL. 1--9.
[26]
James R Lewis. 1992. Psychometric evaluation of the post-study system usability questionnaire: The PSSUQ. In Proceedings of the human factors society annual meeting, Vol. 36. Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 1259--1260.
[27]
Gongbo Liang, Janet Zulu, Xin Xing, and Nathan Jacobs. 2023. Unveiling Roadway Hazards: Enhancing Fatal Crash Risk Estimation Through Multiscale Satellite Imagery and Self-Supervised Cross-Matching. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, Vol. 17 (2023), 535--546.
[28]
Scott Lundberg and Su-In Lee. 2017. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1705.07874
[29]
Márcia ROBC Macedo, Maria LA Maia, Emília R Kohlman Rabbani, Oswaldo CC Lima Neto, and Maurício Andrade. 2022. Traffic accident prediction model for rural highways in Pernambuco. Case studies on transport policy, Vol. 10, 1 (2022), 278--286.
[30]
Dietrich Manstetten, Frank Beruscha, Hans-Joachim Bieg, Fanny Kobiela, Andreas Korthauer, Wolfgang Krautter, and Claus Marberger. 2020. The Evolution of Driver Monitoring Systems: A Shortened Story on Past, Current and Future Approaches How Cars Acquire Knowledge About the Driver's State. In 22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI 2020). 1--6.
[31]
Andrii Matviienko, Florian Heller, and Bastian Pfleging. 2021. Quantified cycling safety: Towards a mobile sensing platform to understand perceived safety of cyclists. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--6.
[32]
Sobhan Moosavi, Behrooz Omidvar-Tehrani, R Bruce Craig, Arnab Nandi, and Rajiv Ramnath. 2017. Characterizing driving context from driver behavior. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGSPATIAL. 1--4.
[33]
Sobhan Moosavi, Mohammad Hossein Samavatian, Srinivasan Parthasarathy, Radu Teodorescu, and Rajiv Ramnath. 2019. Accident risk prediction based on heterogeneous sparse data: New dataset and insights. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. 33--42.
[34]
Alameen Najjar, Shun?ichi Kaneko, and Yoshikazu Miyanaga. 2017. Combining satellite imagery and open data to map road safety. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 31.
[35]
Abhinav Nippani, Dongyue Li, Haotian Ju, Haris N Koutsopoulos, and Hongyang R Zhang. 2023. Graph Neural Networks for Road Safety Modeling: Datasets and Evaluations for Accident Analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.00164 (2023).
[36]
Trond Nordfjærn, Stig Jørgensen, and Torbjorn Rundmo. 2011. A cross-cultural comparison of road traffic risk perceptions, attitudes towards traffic safety and driver behaviour. Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 14, 6 (2011), 657--684.
[37]
Thomas A O'Neill. 2017. An overview of interrater agreement on Likert scales for researchers and practitioners. Frontiers in psychology, Vol. 8 (2017), 264983.
[38]
Kostas Patroumpas, Nikos Pelekis, and Yannis Theodoridis. 2018. On-the-fly mobility event detection over aircraft trajectories. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGSPATIAL. 259--268.
[39]
V. Ramanishka, Y. Chen, T. Misu, and K. Saenko. 2018. Toward Driving Scene Understanding: A Dataset for Learning Driver Behavior and Causal Reasoning. In 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 7699--7707. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00803
[40]
Joseph Redmon and Ali Farhadi. 2018. YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement. arXiv (2018).
[41]
Eduardo Romera, Luis M Bergasa, and Roberto Arroyo. 2016. Need data for driver behaviour analysis? Presenting the public UAH-DriveSet. In 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). IEEE, 387--392.
[42]
Arpan Man Sainju and Zhe Jiang. 2020. Mapping road safety features from streetview imagery: A deep learning approach. ACM Transactions on Data Science, Vol. 1, 3 (2020), 1--20.
[43]
Md Sifat Bin Siraj, Fazle Rabbi, Md Jubayadul Islam, and Mossa Soniya Asma. 2021. Road Accident Analysis: A Case Study Dhaka Metropolitan Area. Journal of Transportation Systems, Vol. 6, 3 (2021), 48--54.
[44]
Mahan Tabatabaie and Suining He. 2024. Driver Maneuver Interaction Identification with Anomaly-Aware Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Feature Representations. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Vol. 7, 4 (2024), 1--28.
[45]
Mahan Tabatabaie, Suining He, and Xi Yang. 2022. Driver maneuver identification with multi-representation learning and meta model update designs. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Vol. 6, 2 (2022), 1--23.
[46]
Patara Trirat, Susik Yoon, and Jae-Gil Lee. 2023. MG-TAR: Multi-View Graph Convolutional Networks for Traffic Accident Risk Prediction. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 24, 4 (2023), 3779--3794.
[47]
Udacity. 2017. Public driving dataset. https://www.udacity.com/self-driving-car. Online Accessed: today.
[48]
Muhammad Umair, Irfan Ahmad Rana, and Rida Hameed Lodhi. 2022. The impact of urban design and the built environment on road traffic crashes: A case study of Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Case studies on transport policy, Vol. 10, 1 (2022), 417--426.
[49]
Marcel Walch, Marcel Woide, Kristin Mühl, Martin Baumann, and Michael Weber. 2019. Cooperative Overtaking: Overcoming Automated Vehicles' Obstructed Sensor Range via Driver Help. In 11th ACM AutomotiveUI. 144--155.
[50]
MinJuan Wang, Sus Lundgren Lyckvi, and Fang Chen. 2016. Why and how traffic safety cultures matter when designing advisory traffic information systems. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2808--2818.
[51]
Gesa Wiegand, Malin Eiband, Maximilian Haubelt, and Heinrich Hussmann. 2020. 'I'd like an Explanation for That!' Exploring Reactions to Unexpected Autonomous Driving. In 22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI 2020). 1--11.
[52]
Peijie Wu, Li Song, and Xianghai Meng. 2021. Influence of built environment and roadway characteristics on the frequency of vehicle crashes caused by driver inattention: A comparison between rural roads and urban roads. Journal of safety research, Vol. 79 (2021), 199--210.
[53]
Fisher Yu, Wenqi Xian, Yingying Chen, Fangchen Liu, Mike Liao, Vashisht Madhavan, and Trevor Darrell. 2018. Bdd100k: A diverse driving video database with scalable annotation tooling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.04687, Vol. 2, 5 (2018), 6.
[54]
Jiadi Yu, Zhongyang Chen, Yanmin Zhu, Yingying Chen, Linghe Kong, and Minglu Li. 2016. Fine-grained abnormal driving behaviors detection and identification with smartphones. IEEE transactions on mobile computing, Vol. 16, 8 (2016), 2198--2212.
[55]
Hengshuang Zhao, Jianping Shi, Xiaojuan Qi, Xiaogang Wang, and Jiaya Jia. 2017. Pyramid scene parsing network. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2881--2890.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 8, Issue MHCI
MHCI
September 2024
1136 pages
EISSN:2573-0142
DOI:10.1145/3697825
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 September 2024
Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue MHCI

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. auto-annotation
  2. driving behavior
  3. road segments
  4. spatio-temporal events

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 108
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)108
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)24
Reflects downloads up to 18 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media