[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3670013.3670081acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesic4eConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Empowering the Future: Developing a Comprehensive Robotics Curriculum for the Next Generation of Innovators

Published: 06 September 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Robotics is becoming part of the schools’ curriculum, and this is attributed to the reality that students will graduate into an era where robots will be widely used in one's everyday lives. Hence, innovative transformation must be reflected in the curriculum of the De La Salle Santiago Zobel School (DLSZ). A descriptive and collaborative action research design and ADDIE model were employed in this study. Quantitative data were extracted from curriculum and mastery report: performance data, rubrics, practice tasks, Likert scale, and performance tasks. Qualitative data were obtained from reflection journals, classroom observation, weekly learning guide, survey questionnaires, focus group discussion, and portfolio. The following stakeholders were involved in this study: Grades 3 to 12 students (n1=1,930), teachers (n2=10), parents (n3=30), and subject-area coordinators (n4=20). The study dealt with the following research questions: (1) How is the DLSZ current robotics program described in terms of: Perspectives on Creativity and Innovation (PCI), Effectiveness of Robotics Intervention Strategy (ERIS), Stakeholders Evaluation of the Robotics Program (SERP); (2) How is the proposed robotics curriculum designed; and (3) How are the essential features of the proposed robotics curriculum materials and activities developed, implemented, and evaluated in terms of: content, competencies, modalities, and assessment. Results revealed that coding and programming were the students’ constraints for them to be able to do the Robotics activities. The Robotics teachers took note of the stakeholders’ feedback and made adjustment to address better learning and appreciate the supposed learning experience. The DLSZ school allowed the Robotics teachers to set up appropriate delivery for online learning, by utilizing the DLSZ Do-it-Yourself Robot kit and apps for simulations that were fit for the learning targets and relevant to the Robotics skills being learned. Feedback from the stakeholders were the bases for the development of the comprehensive Robotics Curriculum for the next generation of innovators.

References

[1]
Astleitner, H.; Steinberg, R. (2005). Are there gender differences in web-based learning? An integrated model and related effect sizes. AACE Journal. International Forum on Information Technology and Education13, 47-63. 
[2]
Barker, B. S., & Ansorge, J. (2007). Robotics as means to increase achievement scores in an informal learning environment. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 229–243.
[3]
Barreto, F. & Benitti, V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 58, 978-988.
[4]
Basham, J. D., & Marino, M. T. (2013). Understanding STEM Education and Supporting Students through Universal Design for Learning. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 45(4), 8-15.
[5]
Benitti F.B.V. & Spolaôr N. (2017) How Have Robots Supported STEM Teaching? In: Khine M. (eds) Robotics in STEM Education. Springer, Cham.
[6]
McSporran, M.; Young, S. (2001). Does gender matter in online learning? Unitec New Zealand Working paper. Available at: http://hyperdisc.unitec.ac.nz/research/ALTJpaper_9.pdf
[7]
Ntemngwa, C. & Oliver, J.S. (2018). The Implementation of Integrated Science Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Instruction using Robotics in the Middle School Science Classroom. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 6(1), 12-40.
[8]
Papert, S. & Harel, I. (1991). Situating Constructionism. Constructionism, Ablex Publishing Corporation: 193-206. Retrieved from http://www.papert.org/articles/SituatingConstructionism.html.
[9]
Weber, E., Fox, S., Levings, S.B., & Bouwma-Gearhart, J. (2013). Teachers‘ Conceptualizations of Integrated STEM. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 17(3).
[10]
Wieman, C. (2012). Applying new research to improve science education: insights from several fields on how people learn to become experts can help us to dramatically enhance the effectiveness of science technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Issues in Science and Technology, 29(1).
[11]
Zawieska K. & Duffy B.R. (2015) The Social Construction of Creativity in Educational Robotics. In: Szewczyk R., Zieliński C., Kaliczyńska M. (eds) Progress in Automation, Robotics and Measuring Techniques. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 351. Springer, Cham.

Index Terms

  1. Empowering the Future: Developing a Comprehensive Robotics Curriculum for the Next Generation of Innovators

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IC4E '24: Proceedings of the 2024 15th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management and E-Learning
    March 2024
    474 pages
    ISBN:9798400717062
    DOI:10.1145/3670013
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 06 September 2024

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    IC4E 2024

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 15
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media