Play to Inspect: How to Help Expert to Inspect UI
Article No.: 3, Pages 1 - 6
Abstract
La qualité des évaluations heuristiques dépend fortement des experts qui la pratique. Pour limiter ce biais, la collaboration entre évaluateurs est encouragée. En complément de la collaboration, une approche ludique a été proposée avec succès en enseignement avec le jeu JADE. Cet article étudie si ce jeu peut également être un outil utile aux experts dans leurs tâches d’inspection, en particulier comme support aux échanges. Il décrit une première étude avec deux couples d’experts de deux domaines (ergonomie et logiciel) lors de deux itérations du jeu. Dans ce contexte, JADE semble favoriser la communication en particulier pour inclure dans l’évaluation des personnes non expertes en ergonomie. Des pistes d’études sont envisagées afin de consolider ces premiers résultats. English version The quality of heuristic evaluations is highly dependent on the experts who perform them. To limit this bias, collaboration between evaluators is encouraged. As a complement to collaboration, a playful approach has been successfully proposed in teaching with the JADE game. This article investigates whether this game can also be a useful tool for experts in their inspection tasks, particularly as a support for exchanges. JADE seems encourage communication between experts in particular to include non-ergonomic experts in the evaluation process. Further studies are planned to consolidate these initial results.
References
[1]
Federico Botella, Cristian Rusu, Virginica Rusu, and Daniela Quiñones. 2018. How novel evaluators perceive their first heuristic evaluation. In Proceedings of the XIX International Conference on Human Computer Interaction. 1–4.
[2]
Eric Brangier, Michel Desmarais, Nemery Alexandra, and Sandrine Prom Tep. 2015. Évolution de l’inspection heuristique: vers une intégration des critères d’accessibilité, de praticité, d’émotion et de persuasion dans l’évaluation ergonomique. Journal d’Interaction Personne-Système 4, Special Issue" PISTIL" (2015).
[3]
Dana E Chisnell, Janice C Ginny Redish, and AMY Lee. 2006. New heuristics for understanding older adults as web users. Technical Communication 53, 1 (2006), 39–59.
[4]
Gilbert Cockton and Alan Woolrych. 2001. Understanding inspection methods: lessons from an assessment of heuristic evaluation. In People and Computers XV—Interaction without Frontiers: Joint Proceedings of HCI 2001 and IHM 2001. Springer, 171–191.
[5]
Gilbert Cockton and Alan Woolrych. 2002. Sale must end: should discount methods be cleared off HCI’s shelves?interactions 9, 5 (2002), 13–18.
[6]
Jon Fernández and José A Macías. 2021. Heuristic-based usability evaluation support: A systematic literature review and comparative study. In Proceedings of the XXI International Conference on Human Computer Interaction. 1–9.
[7]
Asbjørn Følstad, Effie Law, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2012. Analysis in practical usability evaluation: a survey study. In proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2127–2136.
[8]
Erin Friess. 2015. Personas in heuristic evaluation: an exploratory study. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 58, 2 (2015), 176–191.
[9]
Stéphanie Jean-Daubias. 2023. JADE: a board game to teach software ergonomics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03487 (2023).
[10]
Cristhy Jiménez, Hector Allende Cid, and Ismael Figueroa. 2017. PROMETHEUS: procedural methodology for developing heuristics of usability. IEEE Latin America Transactions 15, 3 (2017), 541–549.
[11]
Elizabeth Kemp and DT Setungamudalige. 2006. A resource support toolkit (R-IDE) supporting the DECIDE framework. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCHI New Zealand chapter’s international conference on Computer-human interaction: design centered HCI. 61–66.
[12]
Llúcia Masip, Marta Oliva, and Toni Granollers. 2011. OPEN-HEREDEUX: open heuristic resource for designing and evaluating user experience. In Human-Computer Interaction–INTERACT 2011: 13th IFIP TC 13 International Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, September 5-9, 2011, Proceedings, Part IV 13. Springer, 418–421.
[13]
Jakob Nielsen and Rolf Molich. 1990. Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 249–256.
[14]
Kwandee Phetcharakarn and Twittie Senivongse. 2018. Heuristic-Based Usability Evaluation Tool for Android Applications. Applied Computing & Information Technology (2018), 161–175.
Index Terms
- Play to Inspect: How to Help Expert to Inspect UI
Recommendations
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
March 2024
52 pages
ISBN:9798400706080
DOI:10.1145/3650104
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 24 May 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Work in progress
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
IHM '24
IHM '24: 35th International Francophone Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
March 25 - 29, 2024
Paris, France
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 103 of 199 submissions, 52%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 6Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)6
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in