[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article
Open access

Understanding the Relationship Between Social Identity and Self-Expression Through Animated Gifs on Social Media

Published: 26 April 2024 Publication History

Abstract

GIFs afford a high degree of personalization, as they are often created from popular movie and video clips with diverse and realistic characters, each expressing a nuanced emotional state through a combination of characters' own unique bodily gestures and distinctive visual backgrounds. These properties of high personalization and embodiment provide a unique window for exploring how individuals represent and express themselves on social media through the lens of the GIFs they use. In this study, we explore how Twitter users express their gender and racial identities through characters in GIFs. We conducted a behavioral study (n=398) to simulate a series of tweeting and GIF-picking scenarios. We annotated the gender and race identities of GIF characters, and we found that gender and race identities have significant impacts on users' GIF choices: men chose more gender-matching GIFs than women, and White participants chose more race-matching GIFs than Black participants. We also found that users' prior familiarity with the source of a GIF and perceptions about the composition of the audience (viz., having a matching identity) have significant effects on whether a user will choose race- and gender-matching GIFs. This work has implications for practitioners supporting personalized social identity construction and impression management mechanisms online.

References

[1]
2023. Bechdel Test. https://bechdeltest.com/
[2]
2023. Rashida Jones. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rashida_Jones
[3]
2023. TWINT - Twitter Intelligence Tool. https://github.com/twintproject/twint original-date: 2017-06--10T15:16:49Z.
[4]
James Ash. 2015. Sensation, networks, and the GIF: Toward an allotropic account of affect. Networked affect (2015), 119--133.
[5]
Paul Baker and Amanda Potts. 2013. ?Why do white people have thin lips?' Google and the perpetuation of stereotypes via auto-complete search forms. Critical Discourse Studies 10, 2 (May 2013), 187--204. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.744320 46 citations (Crossref) [2023-04-04] Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.744320.
[6]
Saeideh Bakhshi, David A. Shamma, Lyndon Kennedy, Yale Song, Paloma de Juan, and Joseph 'Jofish' Kaye. 2016. Fast, Cheap, and Good: Why Animated GIFs Engage Us. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 575--586. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858532 42 citations (Crossref) [2022-08--26].
[7]
Albkrt Bandura. 1965. Influence of models' reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1965), 589--595. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022070
[8]
Albert Bandura. 2001. Social Cognitive Theory of Mass Communication. Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2001), 121--153. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03
[9]
Francesco Barbieri and Jose Camacho-Collados. 2018. How Gender and Skin Tone Modifiers Affect Emoji Semantics in Twitter. The Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, 101--106. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/S18--2011 8 citations (Crossref) [2023-04--30].
[10]
Jelke Bethlehem. 2010. Selection bias in web surveys. International statistical review 78, 2 (2010), 161--188.
[11]
Elli Bourlai and Susan C. Herring. 2014. Multimodal communication on tumblr: "i have so many feels!". In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on Web science (WebSci '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 171--175. https://doi.org/10.1145/2615569.2615697 28 citations (Crossref) [2023-03--28].
[12]
Sarah Britto, Jenny Long, and Jana Bufkin. 2002. Symbolic Reality Bites: Women and Racial/Ethnic Minorities in Modern Film. Sociological Spectrum - SOCIOL SPECTRUM 22 (July 2002), 299--334. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732170290062658 47 citations (Crossref) [2023-04-04].
[13]
Jacob Cohen. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and psychological measurement 20, 1 (1960), 37--46.
[14]
Steve Craig. 1992. Men, Masculinity, and the Media. SAGE Publications, Inc., 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483326023
[15]
Henriette Cramer, Paloma de Juan, and Joel Tetreault. 2016. Sender-intended functions of emojis in US messaging. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, Florence Italy, 504--509. https://doi.org/10.1145/2935334.2935370 57 citations (Crossref) [2023-03-01].
[16]
Benjamin H. Detenber, Robert F. Simons, and Gary G. Bennett Jr. 1998. Roll ?em!: The effects of picture motion on emotional responses. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 42, 1 (1998), 113--127. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159809364437 Publisher: Taylor & Francis.
[17]
Eli Dresner and Susan C Herring. 2010. Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication theory 20, 3 (2010), 249--268.
[18]
Maeve Duggan and Joanna Brenner. [n. d.]. The Demographics of Social Media Users - 2012. ([n. d.]).
[19]
Jason Eppink. 2014. A brief history of the GIF (so far). Journal of Visual Culture 13, 3 (Dec. 2014), 298--306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412914553365 29 citations (Crossref) [2022-08--28] Publisher: SAGE Publications.
[20]
Shelly D. Farnham and Elizabeth F. Churchill. 2011. Faceted identity, faceted lives: social and technical issues with being yourself online. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 359--368. https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958880 78 citations (Crossref) [2022-08--28].
[21]
Sarah Florini. 2014. Tweets, Tweeps, and Signifyin': Communication and Cultural Performance on ?Black Twitter". Television & New Media 15, 3 (March 2014), 223--237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476413480247
[22]
Erving Goffman. 1959. PRESENTATION OF SELF IN EVERYDAY LIFE. (1959).
[23]
Sherri Grasmuck, Jason Martin, and Shanyang Zhao. 2009. Ethno-Racial Identity Displays on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 15, 1 (Oct. 2009), 158--188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083--6101.2009.01498.x 110 citations (Crossref) [2023-04--30].
[24]
Carla F Griggio, Arissa J Sato, Wendy E Mackay, and Koji Yatani. 2021. Mediating intimacy with dearboard: A co-customizable keyboard for everyday messaging. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--16.
[25]
Oliver Haimson. 2018. Social media as social transition machinery. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1--21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274332 Publisher: ACM New York, NY, USA.
[26]
Jeffrey T. Hancock, Catalina Toma, and Nicole Ellison. 2007. The truth about lying in online dating profiles. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 449--452. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240697
[27]
Aniko Hannak, Piotr Sapiezynski, Arash Molavi Kakhki, Balachander Krishnamurthy, David Lazer, Alan Mislove, and Christo Wilson. 2013. Measuring personalization of web search. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web. 527--538.
[28]
Forrest Helvie. 2013. The Bechdel Test and a Sexy Lamp: Detecting Gender Bias and Stereotypes in Mainstream Comics. http://sequart.org/magazine/34150/the-bechdel-test-and-a-sexy-lamp-detecting-gender-bias-and-stereotypesin-mainstream-comics/
[29]
Susan C. Herring and Sanja Kapidzic. 2015. Teens, Gender, and Self-Presentation in Social Media. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier, 146--152. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086--8.64108--9
[30]
Bernie Hogan. 2010. The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 30, 6 (Dec. 2010), 377--386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610385893
[31]
Weiyin Hong, James YL Thong, and Kar Yan Tam. 2004. Does animation attract online users' attention? The effects of flash on information search performance and perceptions. Information Systems Research 15, 1 (2004), 60--86. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0017 Publisher: INFORMS.
[32]
Ha Sung Hwang. 2014. Gender Differences in Emoticon Use on Mobile Text Messaging: Evidence from a Korean Sample. International Journal of Journalism & Mass Communication 2014 (Dec. 2014). https://doi.org/10.15344/2349--2635/2014/107 8 citations (Crossref) [2023-03-01] Publisher: Graphy Publications.
[33]
Ji Yoon Jang, Sangyoon Lee, and Byungjoo Lee. 2019. Quantification of Gender Representation Bias in Commercial Films based on Image Analysis. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 1--29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359300
[34]
Richard Jenkins. 2008. Social identity (3rd ed ed.). Routledge, London ; New York. OCLC: 181368794.
[35]
Jialun "Aaron" Jiang, Casey Fiesler, and Jed R. Brubaker. 2018. 'The Perfect One': Understanding Communication Practices and Challenges with Animated GIFs. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), 80:1--80:20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274349 12 citations (Crossref) [2022-08--30].
[36]
Zayira Jordán-Conde, Brian Mennecke, and Anthony Townsend. 2014. Late adolescent identity definition and intimate disclosure on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior 33 (April 2014), 356--366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.015
[37]
Sanja Kapidzic and Susan C Herring. 2015. Race, gender, and self-presentation in teen profile photographs. New Media & Society 17, 6 (June 2015), 958--976. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813520301 85 citations (Crossref) [2023-02--20] Publisher: SAGE Publications.
[38]
Matthew Kay, Cynthia Matuszek, and Sean A. Munson. 2015. Unequal Representation and Gender Stereotypes in Image Search Results for Occupations. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 38193828. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702520 159 citations (Crossref) [2023-03--28].
[39]
Jarmo Kuisma, Jaana Simola, Liisa Uusitalo, and Anssi Öörni. 2010. The effects of animation and format on the perception and memory of online advertising. Journal of Interactive Marketing 24, 4 (2010), 269--282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2010.07.002 Publisher: SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.
[40]
Juhi Kulshrestha, Motahhare Eslami, Johnnatan Messias, Muhammad Bilal Zafar, Saptarshi Ghosh, Krishna P. Gummadi, and Karrie Karahalios. 2019. Search bias quantification: investigating political bias in social media and web search. Information Retrieval Journal 22, 1 (April 2019), 188--227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-018--9341--2 45 citations (Crossref) [2023-04-04].
[41]
Peter J. Lang. 1979. A bio-informational theory of emotional imagery. Psychophysiology 16, 6 (1979), 495--512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469--8986.1979.tb01511.x Publisher: Wiley Online Library.
[42]
Latoya A. Lee. 2017. Black Twitter: A Response to Bias in Mainstream Media. Social Sciences 6, 1 (March 2017), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6010026 22 citations (Crossref) [2023-04-05] Number: 1 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
[43]
Hairong Li and Janice L. Bukovac. 1999. Cognitive impact of banner ad characteristics: An experimental study. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 76, 2 (1999), 341--353. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909907600211 Publisher: SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.
[44]
Andrew M. Lindner, Melissa Lindquist, and Julie Arnold. 2015. Million Dollar Maybe? The Effect of Female Presence in Movies on Box Office Returns. Sociological Inquiry 85, 3 (2015), 407--428. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12081 18 citations (Crossref) [2023-04-04] _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/soin.12081.
[45]
Emily Lowe-Calverley and Rachel Grieve. 2018. Thumbs up: A thematic analysis of image-based posting and liking behaviour on social media. Telematics and Informatics 35, 7 (Oct. 2018), 1900--1913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.06.003 27 citations (Crossref) [2023-03--28].
[46]
John Mager and James G. Helgeson. 2011. Fifty Years of Advertising Images: Some Changing Perspectives on Role Portrayals Along with Enduring Consistencies. Sex Roles 64, 3 (Feb. 2011), 238--252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010--9782--6 58 citations (Crossref) [2023-04-04].
[47]
Mykola Makhortykh, Aleksandra Urman, and Roberto Ulloa. 2021. Detecting race and gender bias in visual representation of AI on web search engines. Vol. 1418. 36--50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3-030--78818--6_5 arXiv:2106.14072 [cs].
[48]
Paul R. Messinger, Xin Ge, Kristen Smirnov, Eleni Stroulia, and Kelly Lyons. 2019. Reflections of the extended self: Visual self-representation in avatar-mediated environments. Journal of Business Research 100 (July 2019), 531--546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.020 19 citations (Crossref) [2023-02--22].
[49]
Danaë Metaxa, Michelle A. Gan, Su Goh, Jeff Hancock, and James A. Landay. 2021. An Image of Society: Gender and Racial Representation and Impact in Image Search Results for Occupations. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 1--23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449100 7 citations (Crossref) [2023-04-04].
[50]
Kate M. Miltner and Tim Highfield. 2017. Never Gonna GIF You Up: Analyzing the Cultural Significance of the Animated GIF. Social Media Society 3, 3 (July 2017), 205630511772522. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117725223 38 citations (Crossref) [2023-03--28].
[51]
Tsubasa Morioka, Nicole B. Ellison, and Michael Brown. 2016. Identity Work on Social Media Sites: Disadvantaged Students' College Transition Processes. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, San Francisco California USA, 848--859. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819959
[52]
Procheta Nag and Özge Nilay Yalç?n. 2020. Gender Stereotypes in Virtual Agents. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. ACM, Virtual Event Scotland UK, 1--8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3383652.3423876 7 citations (Crossref) [2023-04-06].
[53]
Safiya Umoja Noble. 2018. Algorithms of oppression: how search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press, New York.
[54]
Jahna Otterbacher. 2018. Addressing Social Bias in Information Retrieval. In Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Patrice Bellot, Chiraz Trabelsi, Josiane Mothe, Fionn Murtagh, Jian Yun Nie, Laure Soulier, Eric SanJuan, Linda Cappellato, and Nicola Ferro (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 121--127. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--98932--7_11 2 citations (Crossref) [2023-04-04].
[55]
Jahna Otterbacher, Alessandro Checco, Gianluca Demartini, and Paul Clough. 2018. Investigating User Perception of Gender Bias in Image Search: The Role of Sexism. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 933--936. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209978.3210094 17 citations (Crossref) [2023-04-04].
[56]
W. James Potter. 2014. A Critical Analysis of Cultivation Theory. Journal of Communication 64, 6 (Dec. 2014), 1015--1036. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12128 91 citations (Crossref) [2023-04-05].
[57]
Franziska Pradel. 2021. Biased Representation of Politicians in Google and Wikipedia Search? The Joint Effect of Party Identity, Gender Identity and Elections. Political Communication 38, 4 (July 2021), 447--478. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1793846 3 citations (Crossref) [2023-04-04].
[58]
Byron Reeves and Clifford Nass. 1996. The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people. Cambridge, UK 10 (1996), 236605.
[59]
Alexander Robertson, Walid Magdy, and Sharon Goldwater. 2020. Emoji Skin Tone Modifiers: Analyzing Variation in Usage on Social Media. ACM Transactions on Social Computing 3, 2 (June 2020), 1--25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377479 6 citations (Crossref) [2023-03--29].
[60]
Alexander Robertson, Walid Magdy, and Sharon Goldwater. 2021. Black or White but never neutral: How readers perceive identity from yellow or skin-toned emoji. arXiv:2105.05887 [cs] (May 2021). http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.05887 arXiv: 2105.05887.
[61]
Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Kandrea Wade, Caitlin Lustig, and Jed R Brubaker. 2020. How we've taught algorithms to see identity: Constructing race and gender in image databases for facial analysis. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-computer Interaction 4, CSCW1 (2020), 1--35.
[62]
Stacy L. Smith, Marc Choueiti, and Katherine Pieper. 2015. Inequality in 700 Popular Films: Examining Portrayals of Character Gender, Race, & LGBT Status from 2007 to 2014. University of Southern California. Google-Books-ID: uYhJuwEACAAJ.
[63]
Stacy L. Smith, Marc Choueiti, and Katherine Pieper. 2016. Inequality in 800 Popular Films: Examinning Portrayals of Gender, Race/ethnicity, LGBT, and Disability from 2007--2015. USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism. Google-Books-ID: Ln5izQEACAAJ.
[64]
S. Shyam Sundar and Sriram Kalyanaraman. 2004. Arousal, memory, and impression-formation effects of animation speed in web advertising. Journal of Advertising 33, 1 (2004), 7--17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2004.10639152 Publisher: Taylor & Francis.
[65]
Latanya Sweeney. 2013. Discrimination in Online Ad Delivery. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1301.6822 arXiv:1301.6822 [cs].
[66]
Miriam E. Sweeney and Kelsea Whaley. 2019. Technically white: Emoji skin-tone modifiers as American technoculture. First Monday (June 2019). https://doi.org/2013 7 citations (Crossref) [2023-03-01].
[67]
Amelia Tait. 2022. GIFs Are For Boomers Now, Sorry. https://www.vice.com/en/article/z3nzb4/gifs-are-for-boomersnow
[68]
Katrin Tiidenberg and Andrew Whelan. 2017. Sick bunnies and pocket dumps: ?Not-selfies" and the genre of self representation. Popular Communication 15, 2 (April 2017), 141--153. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2016.1269907 13 citations (Crossref) [2023-03--28] Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2016.1269907.
[69]
Jackson Tolins and Patrawat Samermit. 2016. GIFs as Embodied Enactments in Text-Mediated Conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49, 2 (April 2016), 75--91. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1164391 24 citations (Crossref) [2022-08--28] Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1164391.
[70]
Chad C. Tossell, Philip Kortum, Clayton Shepard, Laura H. Barg-Walkow, Ahmad Rahmati, and Lin Zhong. 2012. A longitudinal study of emoticon use in text messaging from smartphones. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 2 (March 2012), 659--663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.012 117 citations (Crossref) [2023-03-01].
[71]
Lance Ulanoff. 2016. The rise and fall and rise of the GIF. https://mashable.com/article/history-of-the-gif Section: Tech.
[72]
Asimina Vasalou, Adam Joinson, Tanja Bänziger, Peter Goldie, and Jeremy Pitt. 2008. Avatars in social media: Balancing accuracy, playfulness and embodied messages. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66, 11 (Nov. 2008), 801--811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.08.002 61 citations (Crossref) [2023-02--22].
[73]
Andrea Waguespack. 2015. Actors who've played roles that are of a different race or ? - chron. https://www.chron.com/entertainment/movies_tv/slideshow/Roles-played-by-actors-of-a-different-race-114866.php
[74]
Joseph B. Walther. 1997. Group and Interpersonal Effects in International Computer-Mediated Collaboration. Human Communication Research 23, 3 (March 1997), 342--369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468--2958.1997.tb00400.x 235 citations (Crossref) [2023-04--30].
[75]
Jacob O. Wobbrock, Leah Findlater, Darren Gergle, and James J. Higgins. 2011. The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only anova procedures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Vancouver BC Canada, 143--146. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978963
[76]
Alecia Wolf. 2000. Emotional Expression Online: Gender Differences in Emoticon Use. CyberPsychology & Behavior 3, 5 (Oct. 2000), 827--833. https://doi.org/10.1089/10949310050191809 166 citations (Crossref) [2023-03-01].
[77]
Rui Zhou, Jasmine Hentschel, and Neha Kumar. 2017. Goodbye text, hello emoji: Mobile communication on WeChat in China. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 748--759. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025800

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Is there an intergenerational discrepancy in the comprehension and aesthetic preference regarding emoji usage? Evidence from WeChatFrontiers in Psychology10.3389/fpsyg.2024.142472815Online publication date: 11-Jul-2024
  • (2024)LR-Auth: Towards Practical Implementation of Implicit User Authentication on EarbudsProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36997938:4(1-27)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2024
  • (2024)SpaceBeat: Identity-aware Multi-person Vital Signs Monitoring Using Commodity WiFiProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36785908:3(1-23)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 8, Issue CSCW1
CSCW
April 2024
6294 pages
EISSN:2573-0142
DOI:10.1145/3661497
Issue’s Table of Contents
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 April 2024
Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue CSCW1

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. animated gif
  2. gender
  3. race
  4. social media
  5. twitter

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)505
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)97
Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Is there an intergenerational discrepancy in the comprehension and aesthetic preference regarding emoji usage? Evidence from WeChatFrontiers in Psychology10.3389/fpsyg.2024.142472815Online publication date: 11-Jul-2024
  • (2024)LR-Auth: Towards Practical Implementation of Implicit User Authentication on EarbudsProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36997938:4(1-27)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2024
  • (2024)SpaceBeat: Identity-aware Multi-person Vital Signs Monitoring Using Commodity WiFiProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36785908:3(1-23)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Functional Now, Wearable Later: Examining the Design Practices of Wearable TechnologistsProceedings of the 2024 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers10.1145/3675095.3676615(71-81)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Emotion Recognition on the Go: Utilizing Wearable IMUs for Personalized Emotion RecognitionCompanion of the 2024 on ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing10.1145/3675094.3678452(537-544)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Thermal In Motion: Designing Thermal Flow Illusions with Tactile and Thermal InteractionProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676460(1-13)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Affective RelevanceIEEE Intelligent Systems10.1109/MIS.2024.339150839:4(12-22)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2024

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media