[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

ProcessGallery: Contrasting Early and Late Iterations for Design Principle Learning

Published: 26 April 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Traditional design galleries enable users to search for examples based on surface attributes (e.g., color or style), and largely obscure underlying principles (e.g., hierarchy or readability). We conducted three studies to explore how galleries could be constructed to help novices learn key design principles. Study 1 revealed that novices gain perspective by observing how designs evolve throughout a process. Study 2 found that novices are better at identifying design issues when viewing iterations that show improvements for just one principle at a time, rather than multiple. Building on these insights, we created ProcessGallery, a tool that enables users to browse contrasting pairs of early-and-late iterations of designs that highlight key improvements organized by design principles. In Study 3, a within-subjects experiment, sixteen participants iterated on a seed design after viewing examples in ProcessGallery versus a traditional gallery. Using ProcessGallery, participants found more appropriate examples, assessed designs better, and preferred ProcessGallery for learning compared to a traditional gallery.

References

[1]
2022. Amazon's Mechanical Turk. https://www.mturk.com/
[2]
2022. Behance.net. https://www.behance.net/
[3]
2022. Canva.com. https://www.canva.com/
[4]
2022. Coreldraw Design Principles. https://www.coreldraw.com/en/tips/graphic-design-principles/
[5]
2022. Design Critiques community on Reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/design_critiques/
[6]
2022. Dribble.com. https://dribbble.com/
[7]
2022. Learning through Examples: Inductive Learning. https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/course-design-ideas/learning-through-examples-inductive-learning/
[8]
2022. Open source for extracting dominant colors in examples: Color Thief. https://www.npmjs.com/package/colorthief
[9]
2022. Polotno Studio. https://studio.polotno.com/
[10]
2022. Qualtrics. https://www.qualtrics.com/
[11]
Marine Agogué, Akin Kazakçi, Benoit Weil, and Mathieu Cassotti. 2011. The impact of examples on creative design: explaining fixation and stimulation effects. In DS 68--2: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11), Impacting Society through Engineering Design, Vol. 2: Design Theory and Research Methodology, Lyngby/Copenhagen, Denmark, 15.-19.08. 2011.
[12]
Albert Bandura. 1965. Vicarious processes: A case of no-trial learning. In Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 2. Elsevier, 1--55.
[13]
Nathalie Bonnardel. 1999. Creativity in design activities: The role of analogies in a constrained cognitive environment. In Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Creativity & cognition. 158--165.
[14]
Lera Boroditsky. 2007. Comparison and the development of knowledge. Cognition 102, 1 (2007), 118--128.
[15]
Renske Bouwer, Marije Lesterhuis, Pieterjan Bonne, and Sven De Maeyer. 2018. Applying criteria to examples or learning by comparison: Effects on students' evaluative judgment and performance in writing. In Frontiers in Education, Vol. 3. Frontiers Media SA, 86.
[16]
John D Bransford, Jeffrey J Franks, Nancy J Vye, and Robert D Sherwood. 1989. New approaches to instruction: Because wisdom can't be told. Similarity and analogical reasoning 470 (1989), 497.
[17]
Julia Cambre, Scott Klemmer, and Chinmay Kulkarni. 2018. Juxtapeer: Comparative Peer Review Yields Higher Quality Feedback and Promotes Deeper Reflection. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173868
[18]
Alex Cao, Keshav K Chintamani, Abhilash K Pandya, and R Darin Ellis. 2009. NASA TLX: Software for assessing subjective mental workload. Behavior research methods 41 (2009), 113--117.
[19]
Paulo F Carvalho and Robert L Goldstone. 2015. What you learn is more than what you see: What can sequencing effects tell us about inductive category learning? Frontiers in psychology 6 (2015), 505.
[20]
Paulo F Carvalho and Robert L Goldstone. 2022. A computational model of context-dependent encodings during category learning. Cognitive Science 46, 4 (2022), e13128.
[21]
Seth Chaiklin et al. 2003. The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky's analysis of learning and instruction. Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context 1, 2 (2003), 39--64.
[22]
Joel Chan, Joseph Chee Chang, Tom Hope, Dafna Shahaf, and Aniket Kittur. 2018. SOLVENT: A Mixed Initiative System for Finding Analogies between Research Papers. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 31 (nov 2018), 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274300
[23]
Joel Chan, Katherine Fu, Christian Schunn, Jonathan Cagan, Kristin Wood, and Kenneth Kotovsky. 2011. On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design: Ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples. (2011).
[24]
Joel Chan, Pao Siangliulue, Denisa Qori McDonald, Ruixue Liu, Reza Moradinezhad, Safa Aman, Erin T Solovey, Krzysztof Z Gajos, and Steven P Dow. 2017. Semantically far inspirations considered harmful? accounting for cognitive states in collaborative ideation. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition. 93--105.
[25]
Siddhartha Chaudhuri, Evangelos Kalogerakis, Stephen Giguere, and Thomas Funkhouser. 2013. Attribit: content creation with semantic attributes. In Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. 193--202.
[26]
Michelene TH Chi. 2018. Learning from examples via self-explanations. In Knowing, learning, and instruction. Routledge, 251--282.
[27]
Michelene TH Chi, Marguerite Roy, and Robert GM Hausmann. 2008. Observing tutorial dialogues collaboratively: Insights about human tutoring effectiveness from vicarious learning. Cognitive science 32, 2 (2008), 301--341.
[28]
Michelene TH Chi and Ruth Wylie. 2014. The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational psychologist 49, 4 (2014), 219--243.
[29]
Evangelia G Chrysikou and Robert W Weisberg. 2005. Following the wrong footsteps: fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31, 5 (2005), 1134.
[30]
Amy Cook, Steven Dow, and Jessica Hammer. 2020. Designing interactive scaffolds to encourage reflection on peer feedback. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 1143--1153.
[31]
Nicola Dell, Vidya Vaidyanathan, Indrani Medhi, Edward Cutrell, and William Thies. 2012. " Yours is better!" participant response bias in HCI. In Proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems. 1321--1330.
[32]
Donis A Dondis. 1974. A primer of visual literacy. Mit Press.
[33]
Kees Dorst and Judith Dijkhuis. 1995. Comparing paradigms for describing design activity. Design studies 16, 2 (1995), 261--274.
[34]
Steven P Dow, Alana Glassco, Jonathan Kass, Melissa Schwarz, Daniel L Schwartz, and Scott R Klemmer. 2010. Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 17, 4 (2010), 1--24.
[35]
Jane L. E, Ohad Fried, Jingwan Lu, Jianming Zhang, Radomír Mech, Jose Echevarria, Pat Hanrahan, and James A. Landay. 2020. Adaptive Photographic Composition Guidance. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376635
[36]
Jane L. E, Kevin Y. Zhai, Jose Echevarria, Ohad Fried, Pat Hanrahan, and James A. Landay. 2021. Dynamic Guidance for Decluttering Photographic Compositions. In The 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Virtual Event, USA) (UIST '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 359--371. https://doi.org/10.1145/3472749.3474755
[37]
Leon Festinger. 1954. A theory of social comparison processes. Human relations 7, 2 (1954), 117--140.
[38]
Eureka Foong, Steven P. Dow, Brian P. Bailey, and Elizabeth M. Gerber. 2017. Online Feedback Exchange: A Framework for Understanding the Socio-Psychological Factors. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4454--4467. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025791
[39]
Katherine Fu, Joel Chan, Jonathan Cagan, Kenneth Kotovsky, Christian Schunn, and Kristin Wood. 2013. The meaning of ?near" and ?far": the impact of structuring design databases and the effect of distance of analogy on design output. Journal of Mechanical Design 135, 2 (2013).
[40]
Dedre Gentner, Keith J Holyoak, and Boicho N Kokinov. 2001. The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science. MIT press.
[41]
Dedre Gentner, Jeffrey Loewenstein, and Leigh Thompson. 2003. Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of educational psychology 95, 2 (2003), 393.
[42]
Dedre Gentner and Arthur B Markman. 1997. Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American psychologist 52, 1 (1997), 45.
[43]
Mary L Gick and Keith J Holyoak. 1980. Analogical problem solving. Cognitive psychology 12, 3 (1980), 306--355.
[44]
Mary L Gick and Keith J Holyoak. 1983. Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive psychology 15, 1 (1983), 1--38.
[45]
Mary L Gick and Katherine Paterson. 1992. Do contrasting examples facilitate schema acquisition and analogical transfer? Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie 46, 4 (1992), 539.
[46]
Elena L. Glassman, Jeremy Scott, Rishabh Singh, Philip J. Guo, and Robert C. Miller. 2015. OverCode: Visualizing Variation in Student Solutions to Programming Problems at Scale. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 22, 2, Article 7 (mar 2015), 35 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2699751
[47]
Rebecca A Grier. 2015. How high is high? A meta-analysis of NASA-TLX global workload scores. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 59. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 1727--1731.
[48]
Sandra G Hart. 2006. NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, Vol. 50. Sage publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 904--908.
[49]
Björn Hartmann, Scott Doorley, and Scott R Klemmer. 2006. Hacking, mashing, gluing: a study of opportunistic design and development. Pervasive Computing 7, 3 (2006), 46--54.
[50]
Marti Hearst. 2009. Search user interfaces. Cambridge university press.
[51]
Scarlett R. Herring, Chia-Chen Chang, Jesse Krantzler, and Brian P. Bailey. 2009. Getting Inspired! Understanding How and Why Examples Are Used in Creative Design Practice. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (CHI '09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 87--96. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518717
[52]
David G Jansson and Steven M Smith. 1991. Design fixation. Design studies 12, 1 (1991), 3--11.
[53]
Elahe Javadi. 2012. The impact of user interface design on idea integration in electronic brainstorming: an attention-based view. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
[54]
Hyeonsu B Kang, Gabriel Amoako, Neil Sengupta, and Steven P Dow. 2018. Paragon: An online gallery for enhancing design feedback with visual examples. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
[55]
Hyeonsu B. Kang, Xin Qian, Tom Hope, Dafna Shahaf, Joel Chan, and Aniket Kittur. 2022. Augmenting Scientific Creativity with an Analogical Search Engine. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. (mar 2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3530013 Just Accepted.
[56]
Sean HK Kang and Harold Pashler. 2012. Learning painting styles: Spacing is advantageous when it promotes discriminative contrast. Applied Cognitive Psychology 26, 1 (2012), 97--103.
[57]
Rubaiat Habib Kazi, Tovi Grossman, Hyunmin Cheong, Ali Hashemi, and George W Fitzmaurice. 2017. DreamSketch: Early Stage 3D Design Explorations with Sketching and Generative Design. In UIST, Vol. 14. 401--414.
[58]
Joy Kim, Maneesh Agrawala, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2017. Mosaic: Designing Online Creative Communities for Sharing Works-in-Progress. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 246--258. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998195
[59]
Nate Kornell and Robert A Bjork. 2008. Learning concepts and categories: Is spacing the ?enemy of induction"? Psychological science 19, 6 (2008), 585--592.
[60]
David R Krathwohl. 2002. A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice 41, 4 (2002), 212--218.
[61]
Chinmay Kulkarni, Steven P Dow, and Scott R Klemmer. 2014. Early and repeated exposure to examples improves creative work. In Design thinking research. Springer, 49--62.
[62]
Ranjitha Kumar, Jerry O. Talton, Salman Ahmad, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2011. Bricolage: Example-Based Retargeting for Web Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2197--2206. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979262
[63]
Brian Lee, Savil Srivastava, Ranjitha Kumar, Ronen Brafman, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2010. Designing with Interactive Example Galleries. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2257--2266. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753667
[64]
Chunggi Lee, Sanghoon Kim, Dongyun Han, Hongjun Yang, Young-Woo Park, Bum Chul Kwon, and Sungahn Ko. 2020. GUIComp: A GUI Design Assistant with Real-Time, Multi-Faceted Feedback. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376327
[65]
Chunggi Lee, Sanghoon Kim, Dongyun Han, Hongjun Yang, Young-Woo Park, Bum Chul Kwon, and Sungahn Ko. 2020. GUIComp: A GUI design assistant with real-time, multi-faceted feedback. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376327
[66]
Ellen Lupton. 2014. Thinking with type: A critical guide for designers, writers, editors, & students. Chronicle Books.
[67]
Richard L Marsh, Joshua D Landau, and Jason L Hicks. 1996. How examples may (and may not) constrain creativity. Memory & cognition 24, 5 (1996), 669--680.
[68]
Scarlett R Miller and Brian P Bailey. 2014. Searching for inspiration: An in-depth look at designers example finding practices. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Vol. 46407. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, V007T07A035.
[69]
Matthew E Mundy, Robert C Honey, and Dominic M Dwyer. 2009. Short Article: Superior Discrimination between Similar Stimuli after Simultaneous Exposure. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62, 1 (2009), 18--25.
[70]
Tricia J Ngoon, Joy O Kim, and Scott Klemmer. 2021. Shöwn: Adaptive Conceptual Guidance Aids Example Use in Creative Tasks. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. 1834--1845.
[71]
Thi Thao Duyen T. Nguyen, Thomas Garncarz, Felicia Ng, Laura A. Dabbish, and Steven P. Dow. 2017. Fruitful Feedback: Positive Affective Language and Source Anonymity Improve Critique Reception and Work Outcomes. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1024--1034. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998319
[72]
Amin Heyrani Nobari, Muhammad Fathy Rashad, and Faez Ahmed. 2021. Creativegan: Editing generative adversarial networks for creative design synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.06242 (2021).
[73]
Robert M Nosofsky. 2011. The generalized context model: An exemplar model of classification. Formal approaches in categorization (2011), 18--39.
[74]
Laura R Novick. 1988. Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition 14, 3 (1988), 510.
[75]
Peter O'Donovan, Aseem Agarwala, and Aaron Hertzmann. 2015. Designscape: Design with interactive layout suggestions. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. 1221--1224.
[76]
A Terry Purcell and John S Gero. 1991. The effects of examples on the results of a design activity. In Artificial Intelligence in Design'91. Elsevier, 525--542.
[77]
Lyle Regenwetter, Brent Curry, and Faez Ahmed. 2022. BIKED: A dataset for computational bicycle design with machine learning benchmarks. Journal of Mechanical Design 144, 3 (2022).
[78]
Todd Rogers and Avi Feller. 2016. Discouraged by peer excellence: Exposure to exemplary peer performance causes quitting. Psychological science 27, 3 (2016), 365--374.
[79]
D Royce Sadler. 1989. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional science 18, 2 (1989), 119--144.
[80]
Donald A Schön. 1987. Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.
[81]
Daniel L Schwartz, Catherine C Chase, Marily A Oppezzo, and Doris B Chin. 2011. Practicing versus inventing with contrasting cases: The effects of telling first on learning and transfer. Journal of educational psychology 103, 4 (2011), 759.
[82]
Daniel L Schwartz, Jessica M Tsang, and Kristen P Blair. 2016. The ABCs of how we learn: 26 scientifically proven approaches, how they work, and when to use them. WW Norton & Company.
[83]
Jonathan T Shemwell, Catherine C Chase, and Daniel L Schwartz. 2015. Seeking the general explanation: A test of inductive activities for learning and transfer. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52, 1 (2015), 58--83.
[84]
Pao Siangliulue, Joel Chan, Steven P. Dow, and Krzysztof Z. Gajos. 2016. IdeaHound: Improving Large-Scale Collaborative Ideation with Crowd-Powered Real-Time Semantic Modeling. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Tokyo, Japan) (UIST '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 609--624. https://doi.org/10.1145/2984511.2984578
[85]
Pao Siangliulue, Joel Chan, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, and Steven P. Dow. 2015. Providing Timely Examples Improves the Quantity and Quality of Generated Ideas. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (Glasgow, United Kingdom) (C&C '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 83--92. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757226.2757230
[86]
Pooja G Sidney, Shanta Hattikudur, and Martha W Alibali. 2015. How do contrasting cases and self-explanation promote learning? Evidence from fraction division. Learning and Instruction 40 (2015), 29--38.
[87]
Steven M Smith, Thomas B Ward, and Jay S Schumacher. 1993. Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Memory & cognition 21, 6 (1993), 837--845.
[88]
Charles Spearman. 1923. The nature of" intelligence" and the principles of cognition. Macmillan.
[89]
Claude M Steele. 1988. The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 21. Elsevier, 261--302.
[90]
Masaki Suwa and Barbara Tversky. 2002. External representations contribute to the dynamic construction of ideas. In Diagrammatic Representation and Inference: Second International Conference, Diagrams 2002 Callaway Gardens, GA, USA, April 18--20, 2002 Proceedings 2. Springer, 341--343. https://doi.org/10.1007/3--540--46037--3_33
[91]
David R Thomas. 2003. A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis. (2003).
[92]
Leigh Thompson, Dedre Gentner, and Jeffrey Loewenstein. 2000. Avoiding missed opportunities in managerial life: Analogical training more powerful than individual case training. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82, 1 (2000), 60--75.
[93]
Maryam Tohidi, William Buxton, Ronald Baecker, and Abigail Sellen. 2006. Getting the right design and the design right. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems. 1243--1252.
[94]
Joan Walker and Paul King. 2006. Contrasting cases: What we can learn from students' perceptions of ?good" design. (2006).
[95]
Robin Williams. 2015. The non-designer's design book: Design and typographic principles for the visual novice. Pearson Education.
[96]
Yu-Chun Grace Yen and Steven P. Dow. 2022. Seeking Exemplars in the Wild: Exploring How Students Find Design Examples to Support Personalized Learning. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (New York City, NY, USA) (L@S '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 418--421. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491140.3528303
[97]
Yu-Chun Grace Yen, Steven P Dow, Elizabeth Gerber, and Brian P Bailey. 2017. Listen to others, listen to yourself: Combining feedback review and reflection to improve iterative design. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition. 158--170.
[98]
Yu-Chun Grace Yen, Joy O Kim, and Brian P Bailey. 2020. Decipher: an interactive visualization tool for interpreting unstructured design feedback from multiple providers. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
[99]
Amy X Zhang and Justin Cranshaw. 2018. Making sense of group chat through collaborative tagging and summarization. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1--27.

Index Terms

  1. ProcessGallery: Contrasting Early and Late Iterations for Design Principle Learning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 8, Issue CSCW1
    CSCW
    April 2024
    6294 pages
    EISSN:2573-0142
    DOI:10.1145/3661497
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 26 April 2024
    Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue CSCW1

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. design gallery
    2. learner-sourcing
    3. learning from examples
    4. personalized learning
    5. vicarious learning
    6. visual design

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 180
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)180
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)29
    Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media