More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Open access

Empirically Understanding the Potential Impacts and Process of Social Influence in Human-AI Teams

Authors:

Christopher Flathmann,

Nathan J. Mcneese,

Allyson Hauptman,

Rui ZhangAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 8, Issue CSCW1

Article No.: 49, Pages 1 - 32

https://doi.org/10.1145/3637326

Published: 26 April 2024 Publication History

Abstract

In the coming years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) will be applied as a teammate that works alongside and collaborates with humans. Prior research in teaming and CSCW has shown that teammates have the ability to change the thoughts and behaviors of each other through simple interactions in a process known as social influence. However, to date, research has yet to identify the social influence that AI teammates could have in these human-AI teams, which has led to a limited understanding of how AI teammates will change the behaviors of their human teammates. To remedy this gap, we conduct a mixed-methods study (N=33) with young individuals to explore how humans could behaviorally adapt and perceive their behavioral adaptation due to interaction with an AI teammate. Qualitative results report that perceived three unique stages they had to experience for the social influence of their AI teammate to lead to adaptation (i.e., perceiving a sense of control, identifying a technological or performative justification, and gaining first-hand experience). Quantitative results validate and illustrate the results of this perceived process, as results show that participants adapted their behaviors to complement the behaviors of different types of AI teammates. This study contributes to the CSCW/HCI field by developing an initial understanding of AI teammates' social influence in human-AI teams, which will be a pivotal design and research consideration in future efforts.

References

[1]

Abrams, D. E., and Hogg, M. A. Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances. Springer-Verlag Publishing, 1990.

[2]

Al-Jabri, I. M., and Roztocki, N. Adoption of ERP systems: Does information transparency matter? Telematics and Informatics 32, 2 (2015), 300--310. Publisher: Elsevier.

Digital Library

[3]

Amershi, S., Weld, D., Vorvoreanu, M., Fourney, A., Nushi, B., Collisson, P., Suh, J., Iqbal, S., Bennett, P. N., Inkpen, K., et al. Guidelines for human-ai interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 chi conference on human factors in computing systems (2019), pp. 1--13.

Digital Library

[4]

Ashkenas, R. There'sa difference between cooperation and collaboration. Harvard Business Review 20 (2015).

[5]

Ashktorab, Z., Dugan, C., Johnson, J., Pan, Q., Zhang, W., Kumaravel, S., and Campbell, M. Effects of communication directionality and ai agent differences in human-ai interaction. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2021), pp. 1--15.

Digital Library

[6]

Auernhammer, J. Human-centered AI: The role of Human-centered Design Research in the development of AI. DRS Biennial Conference Series (Aug. 2020).

[7]

Barrett, S., Stone, P., Kraus, S., and Rosenfeld, A. Teamwork with limited knowledge of teammates. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2013), vol. 27, pp. 102--108.

[8]

Bedwell, W. L., Ramsay, P. S., and Salas, E. Helping fluid teams work: a research agenda for effective team adaptation in healthcare. Translational behavioral medicine 2, 4 (2012), 504--509.

[9]

Begerowski, S. R., Hedrick, K. N., Waldherr, F., Mears, L., and Shuffler, M. L. The forgotten teammate: Considering the labor perspective in human-autonomy teams. Computers in Human Behavior 145 (2023), 107763.

Digital Library

[10]

Bennett, S., Maton, K., and Kervin, L. The ?digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence. British journal of educational technology 39, 5 (2008), 775--786.

[11]

Bhattacherjee, A., and Harris, M. Individual Adaptation of Information Technology. Journal of Computer Information Systems 50, 1 (Sept. 2009), 37--45. Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/08874417.2009.11645360.

[12]

Braun, V., and Clarke, V. Thematic analysis. American Psychological Association, 2012.

[13]

Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Salas, E., Pierce, L., and Kendall, D. Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology 91, 6 (2006), 1189--1207. Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.

[14]

Caldwell, S., Sweetser, P., O'Donnell, N., Knight, M. J., Aitchison, M., Gedeon, T., Johnson, D., Brereton, M., Gallagher, M., and Conroy, D. An agile new research framework for hybrid human-ai teaming: Trust, transparency, and transferability. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 12, 3 (2022), 1--36.

[15]

Carroll, M., Shah, R., Ho, M. K., Griffiths, T., Seshia, S., Abbeel, P., and Dragan, A. On the Utility of Learning about Humans for Human-AI Coordination. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2019), vol. 32, Curran Associates, Inc.

[16]

Cartwright, D. Influence, leadership, control. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship (1965).

[17]

Chen, J. Y., and Barnes, M. J. Supervisory control of multiple robots: Effects of imperfect automation and individual differences. Human Factors 54, 2 (2012), 157--174.

[18]

Chen, J. Y. C., Lakhmani, S. G., Stowers, K., Selkowitz, A. R., Wright, J. L., and Barnes, M. Situation awareness-based agent transparency and human-autonomy teaming effectiveness. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 19, 3 (May 2018), 259--282. Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2017.1315750.

[19]

Chong, L., Zhang, G., Goucher-Lambert, K., Kotovsky, K., and Cagan, J. Human confidence in artificial intelligence and in themselves: The evolution and impact of confidence on adoption of ai advice. Computers in Human Behavior 127 (2022), 107018.

Digital Library

[20]

Choudhry, A., Han, J., Xu, X., and Huang, Y. "I Felt a Little Crazy Following a 'Doll'": Investigating Real Influence of Virtual Influencers on Their Followers. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, GROUP (Jan. 2022), 43:1--43:28.

Digital Library

[21]

Chowdhary, K. Natural language processing. Fundamentals of artificial intelligence (2020), 603--649.

[22]

Chowdhury, M., and Sadek, A. W. Advantages and limitations of artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence applications to critical transportation issues 6, 3 (2012), 360--375.

[23]

Chryssochoou, X. Cultural diversity: Its social psychology. Blackwell Publishing, 2004.

[24]

Das, S., Kramer, A. D., Dabbish, L. A., and Hong, J. I. The role of social influence in security feature adoption. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (2015), pp. 1416--1426.

Digital Library

[25]

Davis, F. D. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 3 (1989), 319--340. Publisher: Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota.

Digital Library

[26]

de Visser, E. J., Phillips, E., Tenhundfeld, N., Donadio, B., Barentine, C., Kim, B., Madison, A., Ries, A., and Tossell, C. C. Trust in automated parking systems: A mixed methods evaluation. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 96 (2023), 185--199.

[27]

Demir, M., and Cooke, N. J. Human teaming changes driven by expectations of a synthetic teammate. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2014), vol. 58, SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, pp. 16--20.

[28]

Demir, M., McNeese, N. J., Gorman, J. C., Cooke, N. J., Myers, C. W., and Grimm, D. A. Exploration of Teammate Trust and Interaction Dynamics in Human-Autonomy Teaming. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 51, 6 (Dec. 2021), 696--705. Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[29]

Drenten, J., and Brooks, G. Celebrity 2.0: Lil Miquela and the rise of a virtual star system. Feminist Media Studies 20, 8 (Nov. 2020), 1319--1323. Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2020.1830927.

[30]

Flathmann, C., McNeese, N. J., Schelble, B., Knijnenburg, B., and Freeman, G. Understanding the impact and design of ai teammate etiquette. Human--Computer Interaction (2023), 1--28.

[31]

Flathmann, C., Schelble, B., Tubre, B., McNeese, N., and Rodeghero, P. Invoking Principles of Groupware to Develop and Evaluate Present and Future Human-Agent Teams. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (New York, NY, USA, Nov. 2020), HAI '20, Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 15--24.

Digital Library

[32]

Flathmann, C., Schelble, B. G., McNeese, N. J., Knijnenburg, B., Gramopadhye, A. K., and Chalil Madathil, K. The purposeful presentation of ai teammates: Impacts on human acceptance and perception. International Journal of Human--Computer Interaction (2023), 1--18.

[33]

Flathmann, C., Schelble, B. G., Rosopa, P. J., McNeese, N. J., Mallick, R., and Madathil, K. C. Examining the impact of varying levels of ai teammate influence on human-ai teams. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 177 (2023), 103061.

Digital Library

[34]

Gabel, S. Expanding the scope of leadership training in medicine. Academic Medicine 89, 6 (2014), 848--852.

[35]

Gruenfeld, D. H., Martorana, P. V., and Fan, E. T. What do groups learn from their worldliest members? direct and indirect influence in dynamic teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82, 1 (2000), 45--59.

[36]

Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., and Namey, E. E. Applied thematic analysis. sage publications, 2011.

[37]

Haenlein, M., and Kaplan, A. A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. California management review 61, 4 (2019), 5--14.

[38]

Hashimoto, D. A., Witkowski, E., Gao, L., Meireles, O., and Rosman, G. Artificial intelligence in anesthesiology: current techniques, clinical applications, and limitations. Anesthesiology 132, 2 (2020), 379--394.

[39]

Hilgard, E. R. Hypnotic susceptibility.

[40]

Hogg, M. A., Abrams, D., Otten, S., and Hinkle, S. The social identity perspective: Intergroup relations, self-conception, and small groups. Small group research 35, 3 (2004), 246--276.

[41]

Hojat, M., Michalec, B., Veloski, J. J., and Tykocinski, M. L. Can Empathy, Other Personality Attributes, and Level of Positive Social Influence in Medical School Identify Potential Leaders in Medicine? Academic Medicine 90, 4 (Apr. 2015), 505--510.

[42]

Hu, H., Lerer, A., Peysakhovich, A., and Foerster, J. ?Other-Play" for Zero-Shot Coordination. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning (Nov. 2020), PMLR, pp. 4399--4410. ISSN: 2640--3498.

Digital Library

[43]

Ji, H., Xie, X.-Y., Xiao, Y.-P., Gan, X.-L., and Feng, W. Does power hierarchy benefit or hurt team performance? the roles of hierarchical consistency and power struggle. Acta Psychologica Sinica (2019).

[44]

Kumar, R. L., Smith, M. A., and Bannerjee, S. User interface features influencing overall ease of use and personalization. Information & Management 41, 3 (2004), 289--302. Publisher: Elsevier.

Digital Library

[45]

Leahey, T. M., Kumar, R., Weinberg, B. M., and Wing, R. R. Teammates and Social Influence Affect Weight Loss Outcomes in a Team-Based Weight Loss Competition. Obesity 20, 7 (2012), 1413--1418. _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1038/oby.2012.18.

[46]

Leahey, T. M., Kumar, R., Weinberg, B. M., and Wing, R. R. Teammates and social influence affect weight loss outcomes in a team-based weight loss competition. Obesity 20, 7 (2012), 1413--1418.

[47]

Lee, S.-L. The Meanings of Fashion on the Social Media of Virtual Influencer Lil Miquela. Journal of Digital Convergence 19, 9 (2021), 323--333. Publisher: The Society of Digital Policy and Management.

[48]

Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., and Larsen, K. R. The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 12 (2003).

[49]

Liudmila, B. Designing identity in VTuber era. In Virtual Reality International Conference Proceedings (2020).

[50]

Logg, J. M., Minson, J. A., and Moore, D. A. Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 151 (2019), 90--103.

[51]

Lu, Z., Shen, C., Li, J., Shen, H., and Wigdor, D. More Kawaii than a Real-Person Live Streamer: Understanding How the Otaku Community Engages with and Perceives Virtual YouTubers. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, May 2021), CHI '21, Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 1--14.

[52]

Luo, R., Du, N., and Yang, X. J. Evaluating effects of enhanced autonomy transparency on trust, dependence, and human-autonomy team performance over time. International Journal of Human--Computer Interaction 38, 18--20 (2022), 1962--1971.

[53]

Mahaini, M. I., Li, S., and Saglam, R. B. Building taxonomies based on human-machine teaming: Cyber security as an example. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (2019), pp. 1--9.

Digital Library

[54]

Maxwell, J. A. Qualitative research design: An interactive approach, vol. 41. SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012.

[55]

McNeese, N., Demir, M., Chiou, E., Cooke, N., and Yanikian, G. Understanding the Role of Trust in Human-Autonomy Teaming. Accepted: 2019-01-02T23:39:25Z.

[56]

McNeese, N. J., Demir, M., Chiou, E. K., and Cooke, N. J. Trust and Team Performance in Human--Autonomy Teaming. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 25, 1 (Jan. 2021), 51--72. Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2021.1846854.

[57]

McNeese, N. J., Demir, M., Cooke, N. J., and Myers, C. Teaming With a Synthetic Teammate: Insights into Human-Autonomy Teaming. Human Factors 60, 2 (Mar. 2018), 262--273. Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.

[58]

McNeese, N. J., Flathmann, C., O'Neill, T. A., and Salas, E. Stepping out of the shadow of human-human teaming: Crafting a unique identity for human-autonomy teams. Computers in Human Behavior 148 (2023), 107874.

Digital Library

[59]

Mendel, T., and Toch, E. Susceptibility to social influence of privacy behaviors: Peer versus authoritative sources. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (2017), pp. 581--593.

Digital Library

[60]

Moore, R. K. Susceptibility to hypnosis and susceptibility to social influence. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 68, 3 (1964), 282.

[61]

Morrell, D. L., Moake, T. R., and Medina-Craven, M. N. Learning through automated processes: negative social influence among coworkers. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal ahead-of-print, ahead-of-print (Jan. 2021).

[62]

Moynihan, L. M., Roehling, M. V., LePine, M. A., and Boswell, W. R. A Longitudinal Study of the Relationships Among Job Search Self-Efficacy, Job Interviews, and Employment Outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology 18, 2 (Dec. 2003), 207--233.

[63]

Muchnik, L., Aral, S., and Taylor, S. J. Social influence bias: A randomized experiment. Science 341, 6146 (2013), 647--651.

[64]

Müller, V. C., and Bostrom, N. Future progress in artificial intelligence: A survey of expert opinion. In Fundamental issues of artificial intelligence. Springer, 2016, pp. 555--572.

[65]

Musick, G., O'Neill, T. A., Schelble, B. G., McNeese, N. J., and Henke, J. B. What Happens When Humans Believe Their Teammate is an AI? An Investigation into Humans Teaming with Autonomy. Computers in Human Behavior 122 (2021), 106852. Publisher: Elsevier.

[66]

Neerincx, M. A., van der Waa, J., Kaptein, F., and van Diggelen, J. Using Perceptual and Cognitive Explanations for Enhanced Human-Agent Team Performance. In Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics (Cham, 2018), D. Harris, Ed., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer International Publishing, pp. 204--214.

Digital Library

[67]

Oc, B., and Bashshur, M. R. Followership, leadership and social influence. The Leadership Quarterly 24, 6 (2013), 919--934.

[68]

Olson, W. A., and Sarter, N. B. " as long as i'm in control...": pilot preferences for and experiences with different approaches to automation management. In Proceedings Fourth Annual Symposium on Human Interaction with Complex Systems (1998), IEEE, pp. 63--72.

[69]

O'Neill, T. A., Flathmann, C., McNeese, N. J., and Salas, E. Human-autonomy teaming: Need for a guiding team-based framework? Computers in Human Behavior 146 (2023), 107762.

Digital Library

[70]

O'Neill, T., McNeese, N., Barron, A., and Schelble, B. Human--Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature. Human Factors 64, 5 (Aug. 2022), 904--938. Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.

[71]

Panipucci, D. When teams devalue diversity. Academy of Management Proceedings 2003, 1 (Aug. 2003), D1--D6. Publisher: Academy of Management.

[72]

Park, H., Ahn, D., Hosanagar, K., and Lee, J. Human-AI Interaction in Human Resource Management: Understanding Why Employees Resist Algorithmic Evaluation at Workplaces and How to Mitigate Burdens. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, May 2021), CHI '21, Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 1--15.

[73]

Patterson, M. M., Carron, A. V., and Loughead, T. M. The influence of team norms on the cohesion--self-reported performance relationship: a multi-level analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 6, 4 (July 2005), 479--493.

[74]

Paulhus, D. L., Westlake, B. G., Calvez, S. S., and Harms, P. D. Self-presentation style in job interviews: the role of personality and culture. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 43, 10 (2013), 2042--2059. _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jasp.12157.

[75]

Paulus, P. B., Nakui, T., and Putman, V. L. Group Brainstorming and Teamwork: Some Rules for the Road to Innovation. In Creativity and Innovation in Organizational Teams. Psychology Press, 2005. Num Pages: 18.

[76]

Perfumi, S. C., Bagnoli, F., Caudek, C., and Guazzini, A. Deindividuation effects on normative and informational social influence within computer-mediated-communication. Computers in human behavior 92 (2019), 230--237.

[77]

Piccoli, V., Carnaghi, A., Grassi, M., Stragà, M., and Bianchi, M. Cyberbullying through the lens of social influence: Predicting cyberbullying perpetration from perceived peer-norm, cyberspace regulations and ingroup processes. Computers in human behavior 102 (2020), 260--273.

[78]

Puig, X., Shu, T., Li, S., Wang, Z., Liao, Y.-H., Tenenbaum, J. B., Fidler, S., and Torralba, A. Watch-And-Help: A Challenge for Social Perception and Human-AI Collaboration. arXiv:2010.09890 [cs] (May 2021). arXiv: 2010.09890.

[79]

Rashotte, L. Social influence. The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology (2007).

[80]

Robert, L. P., Pierce, C., Marqis, L., Kim, S., and Alahmad, R. Designing fair ai for managing employees in organizations: a review, critique, and design agenda. Human--Computer Interaction 35, 5--6 (2020), 545--575.

[81]

Rosenfeld, A., and Richardson, A. Explainability in human--agent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 33, 6 (Nov. 2019), 673--705.

Digital Library

[82]

Rosero, A., Dinh, F., de Visser, E. J., Shaw, T., and Phillips, E. Two many cooks: Understanding dynamic human-agent team communication and perception using overcooked 2. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.03071 (2021).

[83]

Saari, D. G. Susceptibility to manipulation. Public Choice 64, 1 (1990), 21--41.

[84]

Safety, N. H. T., and others. Preliminary statement of policy concerning automated vehicles. Washington, DC 1 (2013), 14.

[85]

Salas, E., Sims, D. E., and Burke, C. S. Is there a Big Five" in Teamwork? Small Group Research 36, 5 (Oct. 2005), 555--599. Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.

[86]

Salas, E., Wilson, K. A., Murphy, C. E., King, H., and Salisbury, M. Communicating, coordinating, and cooperating when lives depend on it: tips for teamwork. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 34, 6 (2008), 333--341.

[87]

Schelble, B., Canonico, L.-B., McNeese, N., Carroll, J., and Hird, C. Designing human-autonomy teaming experiments through reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2020), vol. 64, SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, pp. 1426--1430.

[88]

Schelble, B. G., Flathmann, C., McNeese, N. J., Freeman, G., and Mallick, R. Let's Think Together! Assessing Shared Mental Models, Performance, and Trust in Human-Agent Teams. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, GROUP (Jan. 2022), 13:1--13:29.

Digital Library

[89]

Seeber, I., Bittner, E., Briggs, R. O., de Vreede, T., de Vreede, G.-J., Elkins, A., Maier, R., Merz, A. B., Oeste-Reiss, S., Randrup, N., Schwabe, G., and Söllner, M. Machines as teammates: A research agenda on AI in team collaboration. Information & Management 57, 2 (Mar. 2020), 103174.

Digital Library

[90]

Shih, A., Sawhney, A., Kondic, J., Ermon, S., and Sadigh, D. On the critical role of conventions in adaptive human-ai collaboration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.02871 (2021).

[91]

Smilowitz, M., Compton, D. C., and Flint, L. The effects of computer mediated communication on an individual's judgment: A study based on the methods of asch's social influence experiment. Computers in Human Behavior 4, 4 (1988), 311--321.

[92]

Sohmen, V. S. Leadership and teamwork: Two sides of the same coin. Journal of IT and Economic Development 4, 2 (2013), 1--18.

[93]

Steizel, S., and Rimbau-Gilabert, E. Upward influence tactics through technology-mediated communication tools. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 2 (Mar. 2013), 462--472.

Digital Library

[94]

Stevens, C. K., and Kristof, A. L. Making the right impression: A field study of applicant impression management during job interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology 80, 5 (1995), 587--606. Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.

[95]

Stevenson, W. B., and Radin, R. F. Social Capital and Social Influence on the Board of Directors. Journal of Management Studies 46, 1 (2009), 16--44. _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467--6486.2008.00800.x.

[96]

Sun, P.-C., and Cheng, H. K. The design of instructional multimedia in e-Learning: A Media Richness Theory-based approach. Computers & Education 49, 3 (Nov. 2007), 662--676.

Digital Library

[97]

Surendran, P. Technology Acceptance Model: A Survey of Literature. International Journal of Business and Social Research 2, 4 (2012), 175--178. Publisher: MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research.

[98]

Szajna, B. Empirical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model. Management Science 42, 1 (Jan. 1996), 85--92. Publisher: INFORMS.

[99]

Taggar, S., and Ellis, R. The role of leaders in shaping formal team norms. The Leadership Quarterly 18, 2 (Apr. 2007), 105--120.

[100]

Takács, K., Flache, A., and Mäs, M. Is there negative social influence? Disentangling effects of dissimilarity and disliking on opinion shifts. PLOS ONE 11, 6 (June 2016), e0157948. arXiv:1406.0900 [physics].

[101]

Textor, C., Zhang, R., Lopez, J., Schelble, B. G., McNeese, N. J., Freeman, G., Pak, R., Tossell, C., and de Visser, E. J. Exploring the relationship between ethics and trust in human--artificial intelligence teaming: A mixed methods approach. Journal of cognitive engineering and decision making 16, 4 (2022), 252--281.

[102]

Thomas, M. Deconstructing digital natives: Young people, technology, and the new literacies. Taylor & Francis, 2011.

[103]

Toth, J. A. The effects of interactive graphics and text on social influence in computer-mediated small groups. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (1994), pp. 299--310.

Digital Library

[104]

Varma, S., and Marler, J. H. The dual nature of prior computer experience: More is not necessarily better for technology acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 4 (2013), 1475--1482.

Digital Library

[105]

Venkatesh, V. Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research 11, 4 (Dec. 2000), 342--365. Publisher: INFORMS.

[106]

Venkatesh, V., and Bala, H. Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences 39, 2 (2008), 273--315. _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1540--5915.2008.00192.x.

[107]

Walliser, J. C., de Visser, E. J., and Shaw, T. H. Exploring system wide trust prevalence and mitigation strategies with multiple autonomous agents. Computers in Human Behavior 143 (2023), 107671.

Digital Library

[108]

Wang, D., Weisz, J. D., Muller, M., Ram, P., Geyer, W., Dugan, C., Tausczik, Y., Samulowitz, H., and Gray, A. Human-ai collaboration in data science: Exploring data scientists' perceptions of automated ai. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1--24.

Digital Library

[109]

Wei, J., Stankosky, M., Calabrese, F., and Lu, L. A framework for studying the impact of national culture on knowledge sharing motivation in virtual teams. Vine (2008).

[110]

West, D. M. The future of work: Robots, AI, and automation. Brookings Institution Press, 2018.

[111]

Xu, W. Toward human-centered ai: a perspective from human-computer interaction. interactions 26, 4 (2019), 42--46.

Digital Library

[112]

Xu, Y., Poole, E. S., Miller, A. D., Eiriksdottir, E., Kestranek, D., Catrambone, R., and Mynatt, E. D. This is not a one-horse race: understanding player types in multiplayer pervasive health games for youth. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work (2012), pp. 843--852.

Digital Library

[113]

Yuan, Y., Fulk, J., Shumate, M., Monge, P. R., Bryant, J. A., and Matsaganis, M. Individual Participation in Organizational Information Commons. Human Communication Research 31, 2 (2005), 212--240. _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1468--2958.2005.tb00870.x.

[114]

Zhang, R., McNeese, N. J., Freeman, G., and Musick, G. " an ideal human" expectations of ai teammates in human-ai teaming. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW3 (2021), 1--25.

[115]

Zhao, R., Song, J., Haifeng, H., Gao, Y., Wu, Y., Sun, Z., and Wei, Y. Maximum entropy population based training for zero-shot human-ai coordination. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.11701 (2021).

Cited By

Flathmann CSchelble BGaleano A(2024)Empirical Impacts of Independent and Collaborative Training on Task Performance and Improvement in Human-AI TeamsProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting10.1177/10711813241274425Online publication date: 13-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241274425
Duan WWeng NScalia MZhang RTuttle JYin XZhou SFreeman GGorman JFunke GTolston MMcNeese N(2024)Getting Along With Autonomous Teammates: Understanding the Socio-Emotional and Teaming Aspects of Trust in Human-Autonomy TeamsProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting10.1177/10711813241272123Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241272123
Mullins TNecaise AFiore SAmon M(2024)Navigating Trust: The Interplay of Trust in Automation and Team Communication in an Extended Simulated Military MissionProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting10.1177/10711813241262991Online publication date: 29-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241262991
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Empirically Understanding the Potential Impacts and Process of Social Influence in Human-AI Teams
1. Computing methodologies
  1. Artificial intelligence
2. Human-centered computing
  1. Collaborative and social computing
    1. Collaborative and social computing devices
  2. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Empirical studies in HCI

Recommendations

Modeling and Guiding the Creation of Ethical Human-AI Teams
AIES '21: Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society

With artificial intelligence continuing to advance, so too do the ethical concerns that can potentially negatively impact humans and the greater society. When these systems begin to interact with humans, these concerns become much more complex and much ...
Examining the impact of varying levels of AI teammate influence on human-AI teams
Abstract
The implementation of AI teammates is creating a wealth of research that examines how AI teammates impact human-AI teams. However, AI teammates themselves are not static, and their roles and responsibilities in human-AI teams are ...
Highlights
- Foundational exploration on the influence AI teammates have on shared work.
- AI ...
Understanding the influence of AI autonomy on AI explainability levels in human-AI teams using a mixed methods approach
Abstract
An obstacle to effective teaming between humans and AI is the agent’s "black box" design. AI explanations have proven benefits, but few studies have explored the effects that explanations can have in a teaming environment with AI agents operating ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 8, Issue CSCW1

CSCW

April 2024

6294 pages

EISSN:2573-0142

DOI:10.1145/3661497

Editor:
Jeff Nichols
Apple Inc., United States

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 April 2024

Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue CSCW1

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

4
Total Citations
View Citations
479
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)479
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)109

Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Flathmann CSchelble BGaleano A(2024)Empirical Impacts of Independent and Collaborative Training on Task Performance and Improvement in Human-AI TeamsProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting10.1177/10711813241274425Online publication date: 13-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241274425
Duan WWeng NScalia MZhang RTuttle JYin XZhou SFreeman GGorman JFunke GTolston MMcNeese N(2024)Getting Along With Autonomous Teammates: Understanding the Socio-Emotional and Teaming Aspects of Trust in Human-Autonomy TeamsProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting10.1177/10711813241272123Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241272123
Mullins TNecaise AFiore SAmon M(2024)Navigating Trust: The Interplay of Trust in Automation and Team Communication in an Extended Simulated Military MissionProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting10.1177/10711813241262991Online publication date: 29-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241262991
Mallick RFlathmann CDuan WSchelble BMcNeese N(2024)What you say vs what you doInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103355192:COnline publication date: 1-Dec-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103355

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents