More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Open access

"Like rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic"? Feasibility, Fairness, and Ethical Concerns of a Citizen Carbon Budget for Reducing CO2 Emissions

Authors:

Gisela Reyes-Cruz,

Anna-Maria Piskopani,

Liz Dowthwaite,

Justyna Lisinska,

Elnaz Shafipour,

Sebastian Stein,

Joel FischerAuthors Info & Claims

FAccT '24: Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency

Pages 267 - 278

https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3658904

Published: 05 June 2024 Publication History

All formats PDF

Abstract

Radical and disruptive interventions are needed to reach "Net Zero" by 2050 to avert the climate catastrophe. Although governments, companies, cities, and institutions have pledged to take action and reduce their carbon emissions, the idea of personal carbon allowances or budgets for individuals has also been proposed as a potential national policy in the UK. In this paper, we employ a Research through Design approach to explore the notion of a carbon budget. We present combined results from two studies: firstly a workshop with members of environmental organisations (industry, charity, and policymaking) discussing the concept of a Citizen Carbon Budget (CCB) and app, from the wide perspective of societal desirability drawn from Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI); and secondly, a one-month deployment of a CCB mobile app with twelve members of the public based in the UK. Key findings from the combination of these approaches showed that the CCB app was fruitful in supporting awareness of personal carbon emissions and reflections about people’s lifestyles. However, several concerns were raised, including the unfairness of treating all people equally in environmental policy, regardless of their background and context. We provide considerations for policymaking and design, including intertwined perspectives drawn from the differing approaches of individual and collective action.

References

[1]

Wolmet Barendregt, Aksel Biørn-Hansen, and David Andersson. 2020. Users’ experiences with the use of transaction data to estimate consumption-based emissions in a carbon calculator. Sustainability 12, 18 (2020), 7777.

[2]

Emily M. Bender, Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Shmargaret Shmitchell. 2021. On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big?. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Virtual Event, Canada) (FAccT ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922

Digital Library

[3]

Aksel Biørn-Hansen, Cecilia Katzeff, and Elina Eriksson. 2022. Exploring the Use of a Carbon Footprint Calculator Challenging Everyday Habits. In Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference. 1–10.

Digital Library

[4]

Luke Bodell and Molly Rusell. 2023. Taylor Swift’s Private Jet: The Dassault Falcon 900. Retrieved January 18, 2024 from https://simpleflying.com/taylor-swift-private-jet-dassault-falcon-900/

[5]

Laurens Boer and Jared Donovan. 2012. Provotypes for participatory innovation. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom) (DIS ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 388–397. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318014

Digital Library

[6]

Susanne Boll, Kaisa Väänänen, Nicola Bidwell, Marc Hassenzahl, and Robin Neuhaus. 2023. A Human-Computer Interaction Perspective to Drive Change towards Sustainable Future (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 23092). (2023).

[7]

Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2021. Thematic analysis: a practical guide. SAGE Publications Ltd, London.

[8]

Mario Burgui-Burgui and Emilio Chuvieco. 2020. Beyond carbon footprint calculators. New approaches for linking consumer behaviour and climate action. Sustainability 12, 16 (2020), 6529.

[9]

Milena Büchs, AbuBakr S. Bahaj, Luke Blunden, Leonidas Bourikas, Jane Falkingham, Patrick James, Mamusu Kamanda, and Yue Wu. 2018. Promoting low carbon behaviours through personalised information? Long-term evaluation of a carbon calculator interview. Energy Policy 120 (2018), 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.030

[10]

Alessandra Calvi and Dimitris Kotzinos. 2023. Enhancing AI fairness through impact assessment in the European Union: a legal and computer science perspective. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Chicago, IL, USA) (FAccT ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1229–1245. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3594076

Digital Library

[11]

Stuart Capstick, Susie Wang, and Radhika Khosla. 2020. Bridging the gap – the role of equitable low-carbon lifestyles (UNEP Emissions Gap Report 2020).

[12]

Sarah Castañeda. 2024. Playing for the Planet: Gamification as a Tool for Environmental Engagement. https://thedecisionlab.com/insights/environment/playing-for-the-planet-gamification-as-a-tool-for

[13]

Jo Clay. 2023. Never fly again? Go vegan? It was too hard. But I still cut my emissions by 61% and it made life simpler and better. Retrieved January 18, 2024 from https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/nov/04/never-fly-again-go-vegan-it-was-too-hard-but-i-still-cut-my-emissions-by-61-and-it-made-life-simpler-and-better

[14]

Carbon Cloud. 2024. Carbon Cloud. Accurate carbon data trusted by the food industry. Retrieved January 18, 2024 from https://carboncloud.com/

[15]

Climate Change Committee. 2020. Sixth Carbon Budget. Retrieved November 27, 2023 from https://www.theccc.org.uk/publication/sixth-carbon-budget/

[16]

Climate Change Committee. 2021. Government’s Net Zero Strategy is a major step forward, CCC says. Retrieved November 27, 2023 from https://www.theccc.org.uk/2021/10/26/governments-net-zero-strategy-is-a-major-step-forward-ccc-says/

[17]

Commons. 2024. Commons. Earn rewards when you spend sustainably.Retrieved January 18, 2024 from https://theindexproject.org/award/nominees/7797

[18]

Enrico Costanza, Joel E. Fischer, James A. Colley, Tom Rodden, Sarvapali D. Ramchurn, and Nicholas R. Jennings. 2014. Doing the laundry with agents: a field trial of a future smart energy system in the home. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 813–822. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557167

Digital Library

[19]

Paul Coulton, Joseph Galen Lindley, and Rachel Cooper. 2018. The Little Book of Design Fiction for the Internet of Things. Lancaster University.

[20]

Peter J Craigon, Justin Sacks, Steve Brewer, Jeremy Frey, Anabel Gutierrez, Naomi Jacobs, Samantha Kanza, Louise Manning, Samuel Munday, Alexsis Wintour, 2023. Ethics by design: Responsible research & innovation for AI in the food sector. Journal of Responsible Technology 13 (2023), 100051.

[21]

Kate Crawford. 2021. The atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.

[22]

Energy & Industrial Strategy Department for Business. 2021. BEIS Public Attitudes Tracker (March 2021, Wave 37, UK). Retrieved November 27, 2023 from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/985092/BEIS_PAT_W37_-_Key_Findings.pdf

[23]

Jesse Dodge, Taylor Prewitt, Remi Tachet des Combes, Erika Odmark, Roy Schwartz, Emma Strubell, Alexandra Sasha Luccioni, Noah A. Smith, Nicole DeCario, and Will Buchanan. 2022. Measuring the Carbon Intensity of AI in Cloud Instances. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (FAccT ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1877–1894. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533234

Digital Library

[24]

Tina Fawcett. 2010. Personal carbon trading: A policy ahead of its time?Energy policy 38, 11 (2010), 6868–6876.

[25]

Joel E. Fischer, Sarvapali D. Ramchurn, Michael Osborne, Oliver Parson, Trung Dong Huynh, Muddasser Alam, Nadia Pantidi, Stuart Moran, Khaled Bachour, Steve Reece, Enrico Costanza, Tom Rodden, and Nicholas R. Jennings. 2013. Recommending energy tariffs and load shifting based on smart household usage profiling. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Santa Monica, California, USA) (IUI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1145/2449396.2449446

Digital Library

[26]

Department for Energy Security, Net Zero, and Energy & Industrial Strategy Department for Business. 2022. Greenhouse gas reporting: conversion factors 2021. Retrieved January 18, 2024 from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/greenhouse-gas-reporting-conversion-factors-2021

[27]

Observatory for Responsible Research and Innovation in ICT (ORBIT). [n. d.]. AREA 4P Framework, Orbit RRI. Retrieved January 18, 2024 from https://www.orbit-rri.org/about/area4pframework/

[28]

Francesco Fuso Nerini, Tina Fawcett, Yael Parag, and Paul Ekins. 2021. Personal carbon allowances revisited. Nature Sustainability 4, 12 (2021), 1025–1031.

[29]

Audley Genus and Andy Stirling. 2018. Collingridge and the dilemma of control: Towards responsible and accountable innovation. Research Policy 47, 1 (2018), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.012

[30]

Ipsos Group. 2021. Perils of Perception: climate change. Retrieved January 18, 2024 from https://www.ipsos.com/en/ipsos-perils-perception-climate-change

[31]

Jutta Haider, Malte Rödl, and Sofie Joosse. 2022. Algorithmically embodied emissions: The environmental harm of everyday life information in digital culture. Information Research (CoLIS 11) (2022). https://doi.org/10.47989/colis2224

[32]

Lon Åke Erni Johannes Hansson, Teresa Cerratto Pargman, and Daniel Sapiens Pargman. 2021. A decade of sustainable HCI: connecting SHCI to the sustainable development goals. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–19.

Digital Library

[33]

Matthew J Hornsey, Cassandra M Chapman, and Dexter M Oelrichs. 2022. Why it is so hard to teach people they can make a difference: Climate change efficacy as a non-analytic form of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning 28, 3 (2022), 327–345.

[34]

Rachel A Howell. 2012. Living with a carbon allowance: The experiences of Carbon Rationing Action Groups and implications for policy. Energy Policy 41 (2012), 250–258.

[35]

Corso Technologies Inc.2024. Aerial. Climate action for everyone. Retrieved January 18, 2024 from https://www.aerial.is/

[36]

Carbon Independent. 2023. UK average greenhouse gas emissions. Retrieved November 27, 2023 from https://www.carbonindependent.org/23.html

[37]

Naomi Jacobs, Steve Brewer, Peter J Craigon, Jeremy Frey, Anabel Gutierrez, Samantha Kanza, Louise Manning, Samuel Munday, Simon Pearson, and Justin Sacks. 2021. Considering the ethical implications of digital collaboration in the Food Sector. Patterns 2, 11 (2021).

[38]

Michael Katell, Meg Young, Dharma Dailey, Bernease Herman, Vivian Guetler, Aaron Tam, Corinne Bintz, Daniella Raz, and P. M. Krafft. 2020. Toward situated interventions for algorithmic equity: lessons from the field. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Barcelona, Spain) (FAT* ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372874

Digital Library

[39]

Joseph A Maxwell. 2021. Why qualitative methods are necessary for generalization.Qualitative Psychology 8, 1 (2021), 111. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/qup0000173

[40]

Juana Isabel Méndez, Therese Peffer, Pedro Ponce, Alan Meier, and Arturo Molina. 2022. Empowering saving energy at home through serious games on thermostat interfaces. Energy and Buildings 263 (2022), 112026.

[41]

United Nations. 2023. The 17 Goals. Sustainable Development. Retrieved January 18, 2024 from https://sdgs.un.org/goals

[42]

United Nations. 2023. For a livable climate: Net-zero commitments must be backed by credible action. Retrieved November 27, 2023 from https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/net-zero-coalition

[43]

Office of Gas and Electricity Markets. 2020. Consumer attitudes towards decarbonisation and net zero. Retrieved November 27, 2023 from https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2020/10/consumer_attitudes_towards_decarbonisation_and_net_zero_1.pdf

[44]

Anna Offenwanger, Alan John Milligan, Minsuk Chang, Julia Bullard, and Dongwook Yoon. 2021. Diagnosing Bias in the Gender Representation of HCI Research Participants: How it Happens and Where We Are. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 399, 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445383

Digital Library

[45]

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2023. AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2023 – Longer report. Retrieved January 18, 2024 from https://report.ipcc.ch/ar6syr/pdf/IPCC_AR6_SYR_LongerReport.pdf

[46]

Richard Owen, Phil Macnaghten, and Jack Stilgoe. 2012. Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy 39, 6 (12 2012), 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/spp/article-pdf/39/6/751/4588094/scs093.pdf

[47]

El Pais. 2023. Shakira’s confessions in court: ’I landed the plane in Barcelona just to give Gerard a kiss’. Retrieved January 18, 2024 from https://english.elpais.com/culture/2023-06-17/shakiras-confessions-in-court-i-landed-the-plane-in-barcelona-just-to-give-gerard-a-kiss.html

[48]

Yael Parag, Stuart Capstick, and Wouter Poortinga. 2011. Policy attribute framing: A comparison between three policy instruments for personal emissions reduction. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 30, 4 (2011), 889–905.

[49]

Yael Parag and Tina Fawcett. 2014. Personal carbon trading: a review of research evidence and real-world experience of a radical idea. Energy and emission control technologies (2014), 23–32.

[50]

Michael Quinn Patton. 2014. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.

[51]

Carla Pestana, Luísa Barros, Sabrina Scuri, and Mary Barreto. 2021. Can HCI help increase people’s engagement in sustainable development? A case study on energy literacy. Sustainability 13, 14 (2021), 7543.

[52]

United Nations Environment Programme. 2023. Climate change undermines nearly all Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved January 18, 2024 from https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/climate-change-undermines-nearly-all-sustainable-development-goals

[53]

Bogdana Rakova and Roel Dobbe. 2023. Algorithms as Social-Ecological-Technological Systems: an Environmental Justice Lens on Algorithmic Audits. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Chicago, IL, USA) (FAccT ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 491. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3594014

Digital Library

[54]

UK Research and Innovation. 2023. Framework for responsible research and innovation. Retrieved November 27, 2023 from https://www.ukri.org/who-we-are/epsrc/our-policies-and-standards/framework-for-responsible-innovation/

[55]

Janet Salem, Manfred Lenzen, and Yasuhiko Hotta. 2021. Are we missing the opportunity of low-carbon lifestyles? International climate policy commitments and demand-side gaps. Sustainability 13, 22 (2021), 12760.

[56]

Christos Sardianos, Christos Chronis, Iraklis Varlamis, George Dimitrakopoulos, Yassine Himeur, Abdullah Alsalemi, Faycal Bensaali, and Abbes Amira. 2020. Real-time personalised energy saving recommendations. In 2020 International conferences on internet of things (IThings) and IEEE green computing and communications (GreenCom) and IEEE cyber, physical and social computing (CPSCom) and IEEE smart data (SmartData) and IEEE congress on cybermatics (Cybermatics). IEEE, 366–371.

[57]

Ali Akbar Septiandri, Marios Constantinides, Mohammad Tahaei, and Daniele Quercia. 2023. WEIRD FAccTs: How Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic is FAccT?. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Chicago, IL, USA) (FAccT ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3593985

Digital Library

[58]

European Union’s Copernicus Climate Change Service. 2024. Global Climate Highlights 2023. Retrieved January 18, 2024 from https://climate.copernicus.eu/global-climate-highlights-2023

[59]

Gill Seyfang, Irene Lorenzoni, and Michael Nye. 2009. Personal Carbon Trading: a critical examination ofproposals for the UK. Retrieved January 18, 2024 from https://tyndall.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/twp136.pdf

[60]

Muhammad Farrukh Shahzad, Shuo Xu, Obaid ul Rehman, and Iqra Javed. 2023. Impact of gamification on green consumption behavior integrating technological awareness, motivation, enjoyment and virtual CSR. Scientific Reports 13, 1 (2023), 21751. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48835-6

[61]

Robert Soden, Austin Toombs, and Michaelanne Thomas. 2024. Evaluating Interpretive Research in HCI. Interactions 31, 1 (2024), 38–42. https://interactions.acm.org/archive/view/january-february-2024/evaluating-interpretive-research-in-hci

Digital Library

[62]

Climate Technology Solutions. 2024. Capture. Accelerate the shift to a sustainable world. Retrieved January 18, 2024 from https://www.thecapture.club/

[63]

Jack Stilgoe, Richard Owen, and Phil Macnaghten. 2013. Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy 42, 9 (2013), 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008

[64]

Anna-Lena Theus. 2023. Striving for Affirmative Algorithmic Futures: How the Social Sciences can Promote more Equitable and Just Algorithmic System Design. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Chicago, IL, USA) (FAccT ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 558–568. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3594022

Digital Library

[65]

Lachlan D. Urquhart and Peter J. Craigon. 2021. The Moral-IT Deck: a tool for ethics by design. Journal of Responsible Innovation 8, 1 (2021), 94–126.

[66]

Rene Von Schomberg. 2011. Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields. Retrieved January 18, 2024 from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/60153e8a-0fe9-4911-a7f4-1b530967ef10/language-en pg9-10

[67]

Devon Wemyss, Francesca Cellina, Manuel Grieder, and Felix Schlüter. 2023. Looking beyond the hype: Conditions affecting the promise of behaviour change apps as social innovations for low-carbon transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 47 (2023), 100702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2023.100702

[68]

Lorraine Whitmarsh, Gill Seyfang, and Saffron O’Neill. 2011. Public engagement with carbon and climate change: To what extent is the public ‘carbon capable’?Global environmental change 21, 1 (2011), 56–65.

[69]

John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704

Digital Library

Cited By

Dowthwaite LReyes-Cruz GLu YLisinska JCraigon PPiskopani AShafipour EStein SFischer J(2024)Technology for Environmental Policy: Exploring Perceptions, Values, and Trust in a Citizen Carbon Budget AppProceedings of the Second International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems10.1145/3686038.3686065(1-13)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686038.3686065

Index Terms

"Like rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic"? Feasibility, Fairness, and Ethical Concerns of a Citizen Carbon Budget for Reducing CO2 Emissions
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Empirical studies in HCI

Recommendations

Prediction on Net Carbon Emissions of Yunnan under Emissions and Forest Carbon Sinks
CDCIEM '11: Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Computer Distributed Control and Intelligent Environmental Monitoring

This paper predicts Net Carbon Emissions of Yunnan form 2007 to 2050 through energy consumption carbon emissions based on economic growth model and forest carbon sinks based on CO2FIX model. Further, we analyze the influencing factors of carbon ...
Prdiction and Analysis on Provincial Carbon Emissions and Carbon Peak
PCCNT '23: Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Power, Communication, Computing and Networking Technologies

Countries all around the world are placing significant emphasis on research related to carbon emission prediction and analysis as they work toward "carbon peak and carbon neutrality" goals. The disparate economic development across China's regions and ...
ICT sector electricity consumption and greenhouse gas emissions – 2020 outcome
Abstract
The Information and Communication Technology (ICT) sector has gained much attention in the discussions on climate change, as it could impact global emissions both positively and negatively. The objective of the present study is to provide ...
Highlights
- ICT sector represents ∼4% of global electricity consumption in 2020.
- ICT sector represents 1.4% of global GHG emissions in 2020.
- User devices represents a majority of GHG emissions (∼57%).
- Embodied emissions represent 36% of ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

FAccT '24: Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency

June 2024

2580 pages

ISBN:9798400704505

DOI:10.1145/3630106

Copyright © 2024 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 05 June 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Conference

FAccT '24

FAccT '24: The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency

June 3 - 6, 2024

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1
Total Citations
View Citations
291
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)291
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)42

Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Dowthwaite LReyes-Cruz GLu YLisinska JCraigon PPiskopani AShafipour EStein SFischer J(2024)Technology for Environmental Policy: Exploring Perceptions, Values, and Trust in a Citizen Carbon Budget AppProceedings of the Second International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems10.1145/3686038.3686065(1-13)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686038.3686065

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents