SemBeacon: A Semantic Proximity Beacon Solution for Discovering and Detecting the Position of Physical Things
Pages 9 - 16
Abstract
Discovering smart devices in the physical world often requires some type of indoor positioning system. Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) beacons are a well-established technique to create scalable low-cost positioning systems for indoor navigation, tracking and location awareness. While various BLE specifications aim to provide a generic way to uniquely identify a beacon and optionally detect its location, they are either deployment specific or do not broadcast enough information to be used without a proprietary database containing the locations of installed beacons. We present a novel BLE advertising solution and semantic ontology extension called SemBeacon that is backwards compatible with existing specifications such as iBeacon, Eddystone and AltBeacon. With the help of a prototype application, we demonstrate how SemBeacon enables the creation of real-time positioning systems that can describe their location as well as the environment in which they are located. In contrast to Eddystone-URL beacons which were originally used in Google’s Physical Web project to broadcast web pages of physical objects, SemBeacon is a specification for broadcasting semantic data about the environment and positioning systems that are available within a beacon’s proximity using linked data.
References
[1]
Tim Berners-Lee, James Hendler, and Ora Lassila. 2001. The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284, 5 (May 2001).
[2]
Danijel Čabarkapa, Ivana Grujić, and Petar Pavlović. 2015. Comparative Analysis of the Bluetooth Low-Energy Indoor Positioning Systems. In Proc. of TELSIKS 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/TELSKS.2015.7357741
[3]
Oscar Corcho 2021. A High-Level Ontology Network for ICT Infrastructures. In Proc. of ISWC 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88361-4_26
[4]
B. Louis Decker. 1986. World Geodetic System 1984. In Proc. of the International Geodetic Symposium on Satellite Positioning.
[5]
Cole Gleason 2018. Crowdsourcing the Installation and Maintenance of Indoor Localization Infrastructure to Support Blind Navigation. Proc. of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2, 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3191741
[6]
Yanying Gu, Anthony Lo, and Ignas Niemegeers. 2009. A Survey of Indoor Positioning Systems for Wireless Personal Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 11, 1 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2009.090103
[7]
Apple Inc.2015. Proximity Beacon Specification. Specification. Apple Inc.https://developer.apple.com/ibeacon/
[8]
Bluetooth SIG Inc.2015. Indoor Positioning Service. Specification. Bluetooth SIG Inc.https://bluetooth.com/specifications/specs/indoor-positioning-service-1-0/
[9]
Bluetooth SIG Inc.2020. Bluetooth Core Specification v5.1. Specification. Bluetooth SIG Inc.https://bluetooth.com/specifications/specs/core-specification-5-1/
[10]
Krzysztof Janowicz 2019. SOSA: A Lightweight Ontology for Sensors, Observations, Samples, and Actuators. Journal of Web Semantics 56 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2018.06.003
[11]
Krzysztof Janowicz and Michael Compton. 2010. The Stimulus-Sensor-Observation Ontology Design Pattern and its Integration Into the Semantic Sensor Network Ontology. In Proc. of SSN 2010. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-668/paper12.pdf
[12]
Kang Eun Jeon 2018. BLE Beacons for Internet of Things Applications: Survey, Challenges, and Opportunities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 5, 2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2017.2788449
[13]
Myungin Ji 2015. Analysis of Positioning Accuracy Corresponding to the Number of BLE Beacons in Indoor Positioning System. In Proc. of ICACT 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACT.2015.7224764
[14]
Zhu Jianyong 2014. RSSI Based Bluetooth Low Energy Indoor Positioning. In Proc. of IPIN 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPIN.2014.7275525
[15]
Sanya Khruahong 2017. Multi-Level Indoor Navigation Ontology for High Assurance Location-based Services. In Proc. of HASE 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/HASE.2017.9
[16]
Tim Kindberg and John Barton. 2001. A Web-based Nomadic Computing System. Computer Networks 35, 4 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1286(00)00181-X
[17]
Markus Koühne and Jürgen Sieck. 2014. Location-based Services With iBeacon Technology. In Proc. of AIMS 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIMS.2014.58
[18]
Kangjae Lee, Jiyeong Lee, and Mei-Po Kwan. 2017. Location-based Service Using Ontology-based Semantic Queries: A Study With a Focus on Indoor Activities in a University Context. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 62 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.10.009
[19]
Hui Liu 2007. Survey of Wireless Indoor Positioning Techniques and Systems. Transactions on SMC: Applications and Reviews 37, 6 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2007.905750
[20]
Google LLC. 2015. UriBeacon: The Web Uri Open Beacon Specification for the Internet of Things. https://github.com/google/uribeacon/tree/uribeacon-final.
[21]
Sujith Samuel Mathew 2011. Web of Things: Description, Discovery and Integration. In Proc. of IoT 2011 and CPSCom 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/iThings/CPSCom.2011.165
[22]
Dmitry Namiot and Manfred Sneps-Sneppe. 2015. The Physical Web in Smart Cities. In Proc. of RTUWO 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/RTUWO.2015.7365717
[23]
Jeff Z Pan. 2009. Resource Description Framework. In Handbook on Ontologies. Springer.
[24]
Vassilis Papataxiarhis 2008. MNISIKLIS: Indoor Location Based Services for All. Location Based Services and TelecCrtography II (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87393-8_16
[25]
Rodrigo VM Pereira 2017. A Digital Implementation of Eddystone Standard Using IBM 180nm Cell Library. In Proc. of SBESC 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/SBESC.2017.28
[26]
Salil Pradhan. 2000. Semantic Location. Personal Technologies 4, 4 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02391560
[27]
Dave Raggett. 2015. The Web of Things: Challenges and Opportunities. Computer 48, 5 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2015.149
[28]
HS Rajashree 2018. Indoor Localization using BLE Technology. IJERT 6, 13 (2018).
[29]
Andrei Vlad Sambra 2016. Solid: A Platform for Decentralized Social Applications Based on Linked Data. Technical Report. MIT CSAIL & QCRI.
[30]
Daeil Seo and Byounghyun Yoo. 2020. Interoperable Information Model for Geovisualization and Interaction in XR Environments. IJGIS 34, 7 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2019.1706739
[31]
Hamza Soganci, Sinan Gezici, and H Vincent Poor. 2011. Accurate Positioning in Ultra-Wideband Systems. IEEE Wireless Communications 18, 2 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2011.5751292
[32]
Maxim Van de Wynckel and Beat Signer. 2021. OpenHPS: Single Floor Fingerprinting and Trajectory Dataset. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4744380
[33]
Maxim Van de Wynckel and Beat Signer. 2022. POSO: A Generic Positioning System Ontology. In Proc. of ISWC 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19433-7_14
[34]
Web Bluetooth Community Group. 2023. Web Bluetooth Scanning. W3C Working Draft. https://webbluetoothcg.github.io/web-bluetooth/scanning.html
[35]
Deze Zeng, Song Guo, and Zixue Cheng. 2011. The Web of Things: A Survey. JOC 6, 6 (2011).
Index Terms
- SemBeacon: A Semantic Proximity Beacon Solution for Discovering and Detecting the Position of Physical Things
Recommendations
Intelligent beacon location and fingerprinting
AbstractThe complex way radio waves propagate indoors, leads to the derivation of location using fingerprinting techniques. In this cases, location is computed relying on WiFi signals strength mapping. Recent Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) provides new ...
Beacons positioning detection, a novel approach
AbstractRecent Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) beacons provide new opportunities to explore positioning. Beacon positioning determination using current approaches is supported by pre-calculated formulas, for generic beacons, whereas the position can be ...
Impact of the Physical Web and BLE Beacons
RIIT '16: Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference on Research in Information TechnologyThe Physical Web is a project announced by Google's Chrome team that essentially provides a framework to discover "smart" physical objects (e.g. vending machines, classroom, conference room, cafeteria etc.) and interact with specific, contextual content ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
November 2023
299 pages
ISBN:9798400708541
DOI:10.1145/3627050
Copyright © 2023 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 22 March 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
IoT 2023
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 28 of 84 submissions, 33%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 26Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)26
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format