More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

From Adolescents' Eyes: Assessing an Indicator-Based Intervention to Combat Misinformation on TikTok

Authors:

Katrin Hartwig,

Franziska Schneider,

Christian ReuterAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '24: Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Article No.: 905, Pages 1 - 20

https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642264

Published: 11 May 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Misinformation poses a recurrent challenge for video-sharing platforms (VSPs) like TikTok. Obtaining user perspectives on digital interventions addressing the need for transparency (e.g., through indicators) is essential. This article offers a thorough examination of the comprehensibility, usefulness, and limitations of an indicator-based intervention from an adolescents’ perspective. This study (N = 39; aged 13-16 years) comprised two qualitative steps: (1) focus group discussions and (2) think-aloud sessions, where participants engaged with a smartphone-app for TikTok. The results offer new insights into how video-based indicators can assist adolescents’ assessments. The intervention received positive feedback, especially for its transparency, and could be applicable to new content. This paper sheds light on how adolescents are expected to be experts while also being prone to video-based misinformation, with limited understanding of an intervention’s limitations. By adopting teenagers’ perspectives, we contribute to HCI research and provide new insights into the chances and limitations of interventions for VSPs.

Supplemental Material

MP4 File - Video Preview

Video Preview

Download
9.55 MB

MP4 File - Video Presentation

Video Presentation

Transcript for: Video Presentation

References

[1]

Malik Almaliki. 2019. Online Misinformation Spread: A Systematic Literature Map. In Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Information System and Data Mining(ICISDM 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325917.3325938

Digital Library

[2]

Nadia Alonso-López. 2021. Beyond Challenges and Viral Dance Moves: TikTok as a Vehicle for Disinformation and Fact-Checking in Spain, Portugal, Brazil, and the USA. Analisi: Quaderns de Comunicacio i Cultura 64, 1 (2021), 65–84.

[3]

Filipe Altoe and H. Sofia Pinto. 2023. Towards a Personalized Online Fake News Taxonomy. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. ACM, Limassol Cyprus, 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1145/3565472.3592963

Digital Library

[4]

Theo Araujo, Natali Helberger, Sanne Kruikemeier, and Claes H. de Vreese. 2020. In AI We Trust? Perceptions about Automated Decision-Making by Artificial Intelligence. AI & SOCIETY 35, 3 (Sept. 2020), 611–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00931-w

Digital Library

[5]

A Ardevol-Abreu, P Delponti, and C Rodriguez-Wanguemert. 2020. Intentional or Inadvertent Fake News Sharing? Fact-checking Warnings and Users’ Interaction with Social Media Content. Profesional de la Informacion 29, 5 (2020), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.07

[6]

Patricia Aufderheide. 1992. A Report of the National Leadership Conference on Media Literacy.Technical Report. The Aspen Institute Wye Center, Queenstown. 9–16 pages.

[7]

Jackie Ayoub, X. Jessie Yang, and Feng Zhou. 2021. Combat COVID-19 Infodemic Using Explainable Natural Language Processing Models. Information Processing & Management 58, 4 (July 2021), 102569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102569

Digital Library

[8]

Bence Bago, David G. Rand, and Gordon Pennycook. 2020. Fake News, Fast and Slow: Deliberation Reduces Belief in False (but Not True) News Headlines.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 149, 8 (Aug. 2020), 1608–1613. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000729

[9]

Joseph B. Bak-Coleman, Ian Kennedy, Morgan Wack, Andrew Beers, Joseph S. Schafer, Emma S. Spiro, Kate Starbird, and Jevin D. West. 2022. Combining Interventions to Reduce the Spread of Viral Misinformation. Nature Human Behaviour 6, 10 (Oct. 2022), 1372–+. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01388-6

[10]

Ava Bartolome and Shuo Niu. 2023. A Literature Review of Video-Sharing Platform Research in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581107

Digital Library

[11]

Ranojoy Barua, Rajdeep Maity, Dipankar Minj, Tarang Barua, and Ashish Kumar Layek. 2019. F-NAD: An Application for Fake News Article Detection Using Machine Learning Techniques. In 2019 IEEE Bombay Section Signature Conference (IBSSC). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Mumbai, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IBSSC47189.2019.8973059

[12]

Corey H. Basch, Grace C. Hillyer, and Christie Jaime. 2022. COVID-19 on TikTok: Harnessing an Emerging Social Media Platform to Convey Important Public Health Messages. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health 34, 5 (Oct. 2022), 367–369. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2020-0111

[13]

Federico Battaglia, Denis Gross, Hanna Herweg, and Eva Kappl. 2023. Cats, War and Creators: TikTok as Place for (Dis)Information for Teenagers (Translated from German). Technical Report. Amadeu Antonio Stiftung, Berlin.

[14]

Puneet Bhargava, Katie MacDonald, Christie Newton, Hause Lin, and Gordon Pennycook. 2023. How Effective Are TikTok Misinformation Debunking Videos?Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review 4, 2 (March 2023), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-114

[15]

Prasanta Bhattacharya, Raj Kumar Gupta, and Yinping Yang. 2023. Exploring the Contextual Factors Affecting Multimodal Emotion Recognition in Videos. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 14, 2 (April 2023), 1547–1557. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2021.3071503

Digital Library

[16]

MD Momen Bhuiyan, Hayden Whitley, Michael Horning, Sang Won Lee, and Tanushree Mitra. 2021. Designing Transparency Cues in Online News Platforms to Promote Trust: Journalists’ & Consumers’ Perspectives. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2 (Oct. 2021), 395:1–395:31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479539

Digital Library

[17]

Danah Boyd. 2017. Did Media Literacy Backfire?Journal of Applied Youth Studies 1, 4 (2017), 83–89.

[18]

Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke, Nikki Hayfield, and Gareth Terry. 2019. Thematic Analysis. In Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences, Pranee Liamputtong (Ed.). Springer, Singapore, 843–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103

[19]

Monica Bulger and Patrick Davison. 2018. The Promises, Challenges, and Futures of Media Literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education 10, 1 (2018), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2018-10-1-1

[20]

Cody Buntain, Richard Bonneau, Jonathan Nagler, and Joshua A. Tucker. 2021. YouTube Recommendations and Effects on Sharing Across Online Social Platforms. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 11:1–11:26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449085

Digital Library

[21]

Kelly Caine. 2016. Local Standards for Sample Size at CHI. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 981–992. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858498

Digital Library

[22]

Valerio Capraro and Tatiana Celadin. 2022. "I Think This News Is Accurate": Endorsing Accuracy Decreases the Sharing of Fake News and Increases the Sharing of Real News. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 0, 0 (2022), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221117691

[23]

Sijing Chen, Lu Xiao, and Akit Kumar. 2022. Spread of Misinformation on Social Media: What Contributes to It and How to Combat It. Computers in Human Behavior 141 (Dec. 2022), 107643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107643

Digital Library

[24]

Correctiv.org. 2023. Wie erkenne ich Falschmeldungen?

[25]

Jonas De Keersmaecker and Arne Roets. 2017. ‘Fake News’: Incorrect, but Hard to Correct. The Role of Cognitive Ability on the Impact of False Information on Social Impressions. Intelligence 65 (Nov. 2017), 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.10.005

[26]

Lindsay Levkoff Diamond, Hande Batan, Jennings Anderson, and Leysia Palen. 2022. The Polyvocality of Online COVID-19 Vaccine Narratives That Invoke Medical Racism. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New Orleans LA USA, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501892

Digital Library

[27]

Elena-Alexandra Dumitru. 2020. Testing Children and Adolescents’ Ability to Identify Fake News: A Combined Design of Quasi-Experiment and Group Discussions. Societies 10, 3 (Sept. 2020), 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10030071

[28]

Jared Duval, Ferran Altarriba Bertran, Siying Chen, Melissa Chu, Divya Subramonian, Austin Wang, Geoffrey Xiang, Sri Kurniawan, and Katherine Isbister. 2021. Chasing Play on TikTok from Populations with Disabilities to Inspire Playful and Inclusive Technology Design. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445303

Digital Library

[29]

Serge Egelman and Eyal Peer. 2015. The Myth of the Average User: Improving Privacy and Security Systems through Individualization. In Proceedings of the 2015 New Security Paradigms Workshop. ACM, Twente, 16–28.

Digital Library

[30]

K J Kevin Feng, Kevin Song, Kejing Li, Marshini Chetty, and Oishee Chakrabarti. 2022. Investigating How University Students in the United States Encounter and Deal With Misinformation in Private WhatsApp Chats During COVID-19. In Eighteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS), Vol. 18. USENIX Association, Boston Massachusetts USA, 427–446.

[31]

Diana Freed, Natalie N. Bazarova, Sunny Consolvo, Eunice J Han, Patrick Gage Kelley, Kurt Thomas, and Dan Cosley. 2023. Understanding Digital-Safety Experiences of Youth in the U.S. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Hamburg Germany, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581128

Digital Library

[32]

Tomoya Furuta and Yu Suzuki. 2021. A Fact-checking Assistant System for Textual Documents. In 2021 IEEE 4th International Conference on Multimedia Information Processing and Retrieval (MIPR). IEEE, Tokyo, 243–246. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIPR51284.2021.00046

[33]

Sukeshini Grandhi, Linda Plotnick, and Starr Roxanne Hiltz. 2021. By the Crowd and for the Crowd: Perceived Utility and Willingness to Contribute to Trustworthiness Indicators on Social Media. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, GROUP (July 2021), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3463930

Digital Library

[34]

Xinning Gui, Yubo Kou, Kathleen H. Pine, and Yunan Chen. 2017. Managing Uncertainty: Using Social Media for Risk Assessment during a Public Health Crisis. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Denver Colorado USA, 4520–4533. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025891

Digital Library

[35]

Lee Hadlington, Lydia J. Harkin, Daria Kuss, Kristina Newman, and Francesca C. Ryding. 2023. Perceptions of Fake News, Misinformation, and Disinformation amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Exploration.Psychology of Popular Media 12, 1 (Jan. 2023), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000387

[36]

Loni Hagen, Mary Falling, Oleksandr Lisnichenko, AbdelRahim A. Elmadany, Pankti Mehta, Muhammad Abdul-Mageed, Justin Costakis, and Thomas E. Keller. 2019. Emoji Use in Twitter White Nationalism Communication. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, Austin TX USA, 201–205. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311957.3359495

Digital Library

[37]

Sven Ove Hansson. 2017. Science Denial as a Form of Pseudoscience. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 63 (June 2017), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.05.002

[38]

Katrin Hartwig, Frederic Doell, and Christian Reuter. 2023. The Landscape of User-centered Misinformation Interventions – A Systematic Literature Review. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.06517 arxiv:2301.06517 [cs]

[39]

Katrin Hartwig and Christian Reuter. 2019. TrustyTweet: An Indicator-Based Browser-Plugin to Assist Users in Dealing with Fake News on Twitter. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI), Vol. 14. AIS, Siegen, Germany, 1844–1855.

[40]

Amelia Hassoun, Ian Beacock, Sunny Consolvo, Beth Goldberg, Patrick Gage Kelley, and Daniel M. Russell. 2023. Practicing Information Sensibility: How Gen Z Engages with Online Information. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581328

Digital Library

[41]

Paula Herrero-Diz, Jesús Conde-Jiménez, and Salvador Reyes de Cózar. 2020. Teens’ Motivations to Spread Fake News on WhatsApp. Social Media + Society 6, 3 (July 2020), 2056305120942879. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120942879

[42]

Paula Herrero-Diz, Jesús Conde-Jiménez, and Salvador Reyes-de-Cózar. 2021. Spanish Adolescents and Fake News: Level of Awareness and Credibility of Information (Los Adolescentes Españoles Frente a Las Fake News: Nivel de Conciencia y Credibilidad de La Información). Culture and Education 33, 1 (Jan. 2021), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2020.1859739

[43]

https://www.facebook.com/cbckidsca. 2023. WATCH — How to Spot What’s Not Real on TikTok CBC Kids News. https://www.cbc.ca/kidsnews/post/watch-how-to-spot-whats-not-real-on-tiktok/.

[44]

Institut für Medienpädagogik und Kommunikation and Wissenschaftsstadt Darmstadt. 2023. Media Check: What Smartphone and Internet Can Mean for You (Tranlated from German). Technical Report. Haus der digitalen Medienbildung (HddM).

[45]

Se-Hoon Jeong, Hyunyi Cho, and Yoori Hwang. 2012. Media Literacy Interventions: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Communication 62, 3 (2012), 454–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01643.x

[46]

Shan Jiang, Ronald E. Robertson, and Christo Wilson. 2019. Bias Misperceived:The Role of Partisanship and Misinformation in YouTube Comment Moderation. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 13 (July 2019), 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3229

[47]

Hyerim Jo, Fan Yang, and Qing Yan. 2022. Spreaders vs Victims: The Nuanced Relationship between Age and Misinformation via FoMO and Digital Literacy in Different Cultures. New Media & Society 11, 1 (Nov. 2022), 146144482211304. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221130476

[48]

Joseph Kahne and Benjamin Bowyer. 2017. Educating for Democracy in a Partisan Age: Confronting the Challenges of Motivated Reasoning and Misinformation. American Educational Research Journal 54, 1 (Feb. 2017), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216679817

[49]

Eleni Kapantai, Androniki Christopoulou, Christos Berberidis, and Vassilios Peristeras. 2021. A Systematic Literature Review on Disinformation: Toward a Unified Taxonomical Framework. New Media & Society 23, 5 (May 2021), 1301–1326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820959296

[50]

Kulvinder Kaur and Pawan Kumar. 2022. Social Media: A Blessing or a Curse? Voice of Owners in the Beauty and Wellness Industry. The TQM Journal 34, 5 (Nov. 2022), 1039–1056. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-03-2021-0074

[51]

Jan Kirchner and Christian Reuter. 2020. Countering Fake News: A Comparison of Possible Solutions Regarding User Acceptance and Effectiveness. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW2 (2020), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3415211

Digital Library

[52]

Markus Langer, Cornelius J. König, Caroline Back, and Victoria Hemsing. 2023. Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Comparing Trust Processes Between Human and Automated Trustees in Light of Unfair Bias. Journal of Business and Psychology 38, 3 (June 2023), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-022-09829-9

[53]

Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan Heidi Feng, and Harry Hochheiser. 2017. Chapter 8 - Interviews and Focus Groups. In Research Methods in Human Computer Interaction (Second Edition), Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan Heidi Feng, and Harry Hochheiser (Eds.). Morgan Kaufmann, Boston, 187–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805390-4.00008-X

[54]

Clayton Lewis. 1982. Using the Thinking-Aloud Method in Cognitive Interface Design. IBM TJ Watson Research Center, NY.

[55]

Chen Ling, Krishna P. Gummadi, and Savvas Zannettou. 2023. "Learn the Facts about COVID-19": Analyzing the Use of Warning Labels on TikTok Videos. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 17 (June 2023), 554–565. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22168

[56]

Eugène Loos, Loredana Ivan, and Donald Leu. 2018. “Save the Pacific Northwest Tree Octopus”: A Hoax Revisited. Or: How Vulnerable Are School Children to Fake News?Information and Learning Science 119, 9/10 (Oct. 2018), 514–528. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2018-0031

[57]

C Martel, M Mosleh, and DG Rand. 2021. You’re Definitely Wrong, Maybe: Correction Style Has Minimal Effect on Corrections of Misinformation Online. Media and Communication 9, 1 (2021), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3519

[58]

Giovanni Da San Martino, Shaden Shaar, Yifan Zhang, Seunghak Yu, Alberto Barrón-Cedeño, and Preslav Nakov. 2020. Prta: A System to Support the Analysis of Propaganda Techniques in the News. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations. Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 287–293. arxiv:2005.05854

[59]

Thomas Mildner, Gian-Luca Savino, Philip R. Doyle, Benjamin R. Cowan, and Rainer Malaka. 2023. About Engaging and Governing Strategies: A Thematic Analysis of Dark Patterns in Social Networking Services. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Hamburg Germany, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580695

Digital Library

[60]

Ashlee Milton, Leah Ajmani, Michael Ann DeVito, and Stevie Chancellor. 2023. “I See Me Here”: Mental Health Content, Community, and Algorithmic Curation on TikTok. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581489

Digital Library

[61]

Muhammad Naeem and Ozuem Wilson. 2022. Understanding Misinformation and Rumors That Generated Panic Buying as a Social Practice during COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Twitter, YouTube and Focus Group Interviews. Information Technology & People 35, 7 (2022), 2140–2166.

[62]

Shuo Niu, Zhicong Lu, Amy X. Zhang, Jie Cai, Carla F. Griggio, and Hendrik Heuer. 2023. Building Credibility, Trust, and Safety on Video-Sharing Platforms. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3573809

Digital Library

[63]

Thomas Nygren and Mona Guath. 2019. Swedish Teenagers’ Difficulties and Abilities to Determine Digital News Credibility. Nordicom Review 40, 1 (Feb. 2019), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0002

[64]

Brendan Nyhan and Jason Reifler. 2010. When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions. Political Behavior 32, 2 (June 2010), 303–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2

[65]

Niall J. O’Sullivan, Greg Nason, Rustom P. Manecksha, and Fardod O’Kelly. 2022. The Unintentional Spread of Misinformation on ‘TikTok’; A Paediatric Urological Perspective. Journal of Pediatric Urology 18, 3 (June 2022), 371–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.03.001

[66]

Katherine O’Toole. 2023. Collaborative Creativity in TikTok Music Duets. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581380

Digital Library

[67]

Marinella Paciello, Giuseppe Corbelli, and Francesca D’Errico. 2023. The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Dealing with Misinformation among Adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology 14 (2023), 1–7.

[68]

Concetta Papapicco, Isabella Lamanna, and Francesca D’Errico. 2022. Adolescents’ Vulnerability to Fake News and to Racial Hoaxes: A Qualitative Analysis on Italian Sample. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 6, 3 (March 2022), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6030020

[69]

Ana Pérez, Anna Potocki, Marc Stadtler, Mônica Macedo-Rouet, Johanna Paul, Ladislao Salmerón, and Jean-François Rouet. 2018. Fostering Teenagers’ Assessment of Information Reliability: Effects of a Classroom Intervention Focused on Critical Source Dimensions. Learning and Instruction 58 (Dec. 2018), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.006

[70]

Erez Porat, Ina Blau, and Azy Barak. 2018. Measuring Digital Literacies: Junior High-School Students’ Perceived Competencies versus Actual Performance. Computers & Education 126 (Nov. 2018), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.030

[71]

Cynthia Putnam, Melisa Puthenmadom, Marjorie Ann Cuerdo, Wanshu Wang, and Nathaniel Paul. 2020. Adaptation of the System Usability Scale for User Testing with Children. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382840

Digital Library

[72]

Thomas Reinhold and Christian Reuter. 2023. Zur Debatte über die Einhegung eines Cyberwars: Analyse militärischer Cyberaktivitäten im Krieg Russlands gegen die Ukraine. Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung 12, 1 (April 2023), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42597-023-00094-y

[73]

Hilda Ruokolainen and Gunilla Widén. 2020. Conceptualising Misinformation in the Context of Asylum Seekers. Information Processing & Management 57, 3 (May 2020), 102127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102127

Digital Library

[74]

Joni Salminen, Soon-Gyo Jung, Shammur Chowdhury, Sercan Sengün, and Bernard J. Jansen. 2020. Personas and Analytics: A Comparative User Study of Efficiency and Effectiveness for a User Identification Task. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376770

Digital Library

[75]

Emily Saltz, Soubhik Barari, Claire Leibowicz, and Claire Wardle. 2021. Misinformation Interventions Are Common, Divisive, and Poorly Understood. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review 2, 5 (Oct. 2021), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-81

[76]

Emily Saltz, Claire R Leibowicz, and Claire Wardle. 2021. Encounters with Visual Misinformation and Labels Across Platforms: An Interview and Diary Study to Inform Ecosystem Approaches to Misinformation Interventions. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451807

Digital Library

[77]

Carmen Sanchez and David Dunning. 2018. Overconfidence among Beginners: Is a Little Learning a Dangerous Thing?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 114, 1 (Jan. 2018), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000102

[78]

Anastasia Schaadhardt, Yue Fu, Cory Gennari Pratt, and Wanda Pratt. 2023. “Laughing so I Don’t Cry”: How TikTok Users Employ Humor and Compassion to Connect around Psychiatric Hospitalization. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581559

Digital Library

[79]

Stefka Schmid, Katrin Hartwig, Robert Cieslinski, and Christian Reuter. 2022. Digital Resilience in Dealing with Misinformation on Social Media during COVID-19 A Web Application to Assist Users in Crises. Information Systems Frontiers 0, 0 (2022), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10347-5

Digital Library

[80]

Wolfgang Schweiger, Sarah Heinisch, Sophie Kitzmann, Jennifer Madelmond, Marco Herbst, and Constantin Schell. 2020. Informationskompetenz: Erkennen, Was Wahr Und Richtig Ist. Technical Report. Landesmedienzentrum Baden-Württemberg, Stuttgart.

[81]

Imani N. Sherman, Jack W. Stokes, and Elissa M. Redmiles. 2021. Designing Media Provenance Indicators to Combat Fake Media. In 24th International Symposium on Research in Attacks, Intrusions and Defenses. ACM, San Sebastian Spain, 324–339. https://doi.org/10.1145/3471621.3471860

Digital Library

[82]

Kai Shu, Amy Sliva, Suhang Wang, Jiliang Tang, and Huan Liu. 2017. Fake News Detection on Social Media. ACM SIGKDD explorations newsletter 19, 1 (2017), 22–36.

[83]

H. Colleen Sinclair. 2020. 10 Ways to Spot Online Misinformation. http://theconversation.com/10-ways-to-spot-online-misinformation-132246.

[84]

Francesca Spezzano. 2021. Using Service-Learning in Graduate Curriculum to Address Teenagers’ Vulnerability to Web Misinformation. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 2. ACM, Virtual Event Germany, 637–638. https://doi.org/10.1145/3456565.3460039

Digital Library

[85]

Kate Starbird, Ahmer Arif, and Tom Wilson. 2019. Disinformation as Collaborative Work: Surfacing the Participatory Nature of Strategic Information Operations. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359229

Digital Library

[86]

Kate Starbird, Dharma Dailey, Owla Mohamed, Gina Lee, and Emma S. Spiro. 2018. Engage Early, Correct More: How Journalists Participate in False Rumors Online during Crisis Events. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2018). ACM, Montreal QC Canada, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173679

Digital Library

[87]

Stefan Strauß. 2021. Deep Automation Bias: How to Tackle a Wicked Problem of AI?Big Data and Cognitive Computing 5, 2 (June 2021), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc5020018

[88]

Kurt Thomas, Patrick Gage Kelley, Sunny Consolvo, Patrawat Samermit, and Elie Bursztein. 2022. “It’s Common and a Part of Being a Content Creator”: Understanding How Creators Experience and Cope with Hate and Harassment Online. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501879

Digital Library

[89]

Jan-Willem van Prooijen and Karen M. Douglas. 2018. Belief in Conspiracy Theories: Basic Principles of an Emerging Research Domain. European Journal of Social Psychology 48, 7 (Dec. 2018), 897–908. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2530

[90]

Ingrid Volkmer. 2022. Social Media and COVID-19: A Global Study of Digital Crisis Interaction among Gen Z and Millennials. Technical Report. University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

[91]

Yuxi Wang, Martin McKee, Aleksandra Torbica, and David Stuckler. 2019. Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social Media. Social Science & Medicine 240 (Nov. 2019), 112552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112552

[92]

Theresa Webb and Kathryn Martin. 2012. Evaluation of a Us School-Based Media Literacy Violence Prevention Curriculum on Changes in Knowledge and Critical Thinking Among Adolescents. Journal of Children and Media 6, 4 (Nov. 2012), 430–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2012.724591

[93]

Don Winiecki, Francesca Spezzano, and Chandler Underwood. 2023. Understanding Teenagers’ Real and Fake News Sharing on Social Media. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference. ACM, Chicago IL USA, 598–602. https://doi.org/10.1145/3585088.3593864

Digital Library

[94]

Liang Wu and Huan Liu. 2018. Tracing Fake-News Footprints: Characterizing Social Media Messages by How They Propagate. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, Marina Del Rey CA USA, 637–645. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159652.3159677

Digital Library

[95]

Alex J. Xu, Jacob Taylor, Tian Gao, Rada Mihalcea, Veronica Perez-Rosas, and Stacy Loeb. 2021. TikTok and Prostate Cancer: Misinformation and Quality of Information Using Validated Questionnaires. BJU International 128, 4 (Oct. 2021), 435–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15403

[96]

Luisa Dolores Zozaya-Durazo, Charo Sádaba-Chalezquer, and Beatriz Feijoo-Fernández. 2023. “Fake or Not, I’m Sharing It”: Teen Perception about Disinformation in Social Networks. Young Consumers 0, 0 (Jan. 2023), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-06-2022-1552

Cited By

Kaufhold M(2024)Exploring the evolving landscape of human-centred crisis informatics: current challenges and future trendsi-com10.1515/icom-2024-000223:2(155-163)Online publication date: 6-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2024-0002
Hartwig KDoell FReuter C(2024)The Landscape of User-centered Misinformation Interventions - A Systematic Literature ReviewACM Computing Surveys10.1145/367472456:11(1-36)Online publication date: 22-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3674724

Index Terms

From Adolescents' Eyes: Assessing an Indicator-Based Intervention to Combat Misinformation on TikTok
1. Human-centered computing

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Sexting experiences and motivations among adolescents with ADHD and ASD
Abstract
Sexting (i.e., to send and receive self-produced sexual materials) has become a common element in adolescents’ socio-sexual exploration. Although often harmless, sexting also involves the risk of abuse, and potentially more so for some ...
Highlights
- Adolescents, including those with ADHD/ASD, mainly use sexting for sexual gratification and exploration.
Sexual intensity of adolescents' online self-presentations

Adolescents produce and distribute a vast quantity of digital media content. A growing literature examines the sexually explicit (i.e., nude) content that adolescents share online. Because adolescents' sexual content need not be sexually explicit, ...
Romantic motivations for social media use, social comparison, and online aggression among adolescents

This study examines whether adolescent motivations for social media use, social comparison tendencies and gender are related to online aggression victimization and/or perpetration. Results from a national cross-sectional survey of adolescents (N=340) ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '24: Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 2024

18961 pages

ISBN:9798400703300

DOI:10.1145/3613904

Editors:
Florian Floyd Mueller
Monash University
,
Penny Kyburz
The Australian National University
,
Julie R. Williamson
University of Glasgow
,
Corina Sas
Lancaster University
,
Max L. Wilson
University of Nottingham
,
Phoebe Toups Dugas
Monash University/New Mexico State University
,
Irina Shklovski
University of Copenhagen

Copyright © 2024 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 May 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

CHI '24

Sponsor:

CHI '24: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 11 - 16, 2024

HI, Honolulu, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
1,349
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)1,349
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)194

Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Kaufhold M(2024)Exploring the evolving landscape of human-centred crisis informatics: current challenges and future trendsi-com10.1515/icom-2024-000223:2(155-163)Online publication date: 6-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2024-0002
Hartwig KDoell FReuter C(2024)The Landscape of User-centered Misinformation Interventions - A Systematic Literature ReviewACM Computing Surveys10.1145/367472456:11(1-36)Online publication date: 22-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3674724

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View full text|Download PDF

View Table of Contents