[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3610978.3640675acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open access

Let's Make this Fun!: Activities to Motivate Children and Teens to Complete Questionnaires

Published: 11 March 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Research in human-robot interaction and HCI frequently uses questionnaires, but these are boring, and participants, particularly children and teenagers, lack motivation to complete them. To improve participants' enjoyment, engagement, and motivation during this process, we propose adding a fun activity afterwards, where a completed questionnaire is needed for participation. We trialed several ideas during a slow game jam with 11--16-year-olds and a participatory design workshop for zoomorphic robots with 8--11-year-olds. Initial observations suggest these ideas were engaging for participants, helped with quick questionnaire completion, and helped build rapport between the researchers and participants. Therefore, we present guidelines for researchers wanting to use a fun activity or a series of fun activities like this. Further investigation is needed to establish if this approach has an impact on response quality.

Supplemental Material

MP4 File
Supplemental video

References

[1]
Daisy Abbott, Olga Chatzifoti, Sandy Louchart, Jamie Ferguson, and Shenando Stals. 2023. Serious "Slow' Game Jam: A Game Jam Model for Serious Game Design. Proceedings of the International Conference on Game Jams, Hackathons and Game Creation Events (ICGJ'23) (2023).
[2]
Patr'icia Alves-Oliveira, Patr'icia Arriaga, Ana Paiva, and Guy Hoffman. 2021. Children as robot designers. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 399--408.
[3]
Pippa Bailey, Gareth Pritchard, and Hollie Kernohan. 2015. Gamification in market research: Increasing enjoyment, participant engagement and richness of data, but what of data validity? International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 57, 1 (2015), 17--28.
[4]
Lara Dorcec, Dario Pevec, Hrvoje Vdovic, Jurica Babic, and Vedran Podobnik. 2019. How do people value electric vehicle charging service? A gamified survey approach. Journal of cleaner production, Vol. 210 (2019), 887--897.
[5]
Bill Gaver, Tony Dunne, and Elena Pacenti. 1999. Design: cultural probes. interactions, Vol. 6, 1 (1999), 21--29.
[6]
Juho Hamari, Jonna Koivisto, and Harri Sarsa. 2014. Does gamification work?--a literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In 2014 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Ieee, 3025--3034.
[7]
Johannes Harms, Stefan Biegler, Christoph Wimmer, Karin Kappel, and Thomas Grechenig. 2015. Gamification of online surveys: Design process, case study, and evaluation. In Human-Computer Interaction--INTERACT 2015: 15th IFIP TC 13 International Conference, Bamberg, Germany, September 14--18, 2015, Proceedings, Part I 15. Springer, 219--236.
[8]
Sandra Hart. 2006. NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, Vol. 50. Sage publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 904--908.
[9]
Sandra Hart and Lowell Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology. Vol. 52. Elsevier, 139--183.
[10]
Florian Keusch and Chan Zhang. 2017. A review of issues in gamified surveys. Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 35, 2 (2017), 147--166.
[11]
Nicole Koenig-Lewis, M Marquet, and A Palmer. 2013. The effects of gamification on market research engagement and response. In URL: marketing. conference-services. net/resources/327/3554/pdf/AM2013_0291_paper. pdf (accessed 11.12. 2016).
[12]
Jon A Krosnick. 1999. Survey research. Annual review of psychology, Vol. 50, 1 (1999), 537--567.
[13]
Jon A Krosnick, Sowmya Narayan, and Wendy R Smith. 1996. Satisficing in surveys: Initial evidence. New directions for evaluation, Vol. 1996, 70 (1996), 29--44.
[14]
Aigul Mavletova. 2015. Web surveys among children and adolescents: is there a gamification effect? Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 33, 3 (2015), 372--398.
[15]
Hendrik Müller, Aaron Sedley, and Elizabeth Ferrall-Nunge. 2014. Survey research in HCI. Ways of Knowing in HCI (2014), 229--266.
[16]
Jan M Noyes and Daniel PJ Bruneau. 2007. A self-analysis of the NASA-TLX workload measure. Ergonomics, Vol. 50, 4 (2007), 514--519.
[17]
Robert Plutchik. 2003. Emotions and life: Perspectives from psychology, biology, and evolution. American Psychological Association.
[18]
I. Rodríguez, A. Puig, D. Tellols, and K. Samsó. 2020. Evaluating the effect of gamification on the deployment of digital cultural probes for children. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 137 (2020), 102395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102395
[19]
Kamil Rogoda, Piotr Daniszewski, Kamil Florowski, Rishab Mathur, Kourosh Amouzgar, James Mackenzie, Kim Sauvé, and Abhijit Karnik. 2022. FoodChoices (Q): Exploring the Design of a Serious Game Proxy for Likert-style Survey Questionnaires. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 6, CHI PLAY (2022), 1--15.
[20]
Richard M Ryan and Edward L Deci. 2000 a. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, Vol. 25, 1 (2000), 54--67.
[21]
Richard M Ryan and Edward L Deci. 2000 b. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, Vol. 55, 1 (2000), 68.
[22]
Alexander J Simon, Courtney L Gallen, David A Ziegler, Jyoti Mishra, Elysa J Marco, Joaquin A Anguera, and Adam Gazzaley. 2023. Quantifying attention span across the lifespan. Frontiers in Cognition, Vol. 2 (2023).
[23]
Shenando Stals, Michael Smyth, and Wijnand Ijsselsteijn. 2014. Walking & Talking: Probing the Urban Lived Experience. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (Helsinki, Finland) (NordiCHI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 737--746. https://doi.org/10.1145/2639189.2641215
[24]
Shenando Stals, Michael Smyth, and Oli Mival. 2017. Exploring people's emotional bond with places in the city: a pilot study. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems. 207--212.
[25]
Katja Thoring, Carmen Luippold, and Roland M Mueller. 2013. Opening the cultural probes box: A critical reflection and analysis of the cultural probes method. In 5th International Congress of International Association of Societies of Design Research (IASDR). 222--233.
[26]
Di Wang, Tongran Liu, and Jiannong Shi. 2017. Development of monetary and social reward processes. Scientific reports, Vol. 7, 1 (2017), 11128.
[27]
Megan Zimmerman, Shelly Bagchi, Jeremy Marvel, and Vinh Nguyen. 2022. An analysis of metrics and methods in research from human-robot interaction conferences, 2015--2021. In 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 644--648.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Developing Assessment for Key Stakeholders in Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease: A Qualitative Pilot Study to Inform Designing a Medical Education Toy (Preprint)JMIR Formative Research10.2196/63818Online publication date: 30-Jun-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HRI '24: Companion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
March 2024
1408 pages
ISBN:9798400703232
DOI:10.1145/3610978
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 March 2024

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. gamification
  2. questionnaires
  3. research methods

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper

Funding Sources

Conference

HRI '24
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

HRI '25
ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
March 4 - 6, 2025
Melbourne , VIC , Australia

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)217
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)34
Reflects downloads up to 04 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Developing Assessment for Key Stakeholders in Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease: A Qualitative Pilot Study to Inform Designing a Medical Education Toy (Preprint)JMIR Formative Research10.2196/63818Online publication date: 30-Jun-2024

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media