[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3610978.3640640acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open access

Taking Initiative in Human-Robot Action Teams: How Proactive Robot Behaviors Affect Teamwork

Published: 11 March 2024 Publication History

Abstract

People coordinate in action teams to accomplish shared goals in safety- and time-critical contexts such as healthcare and firefighting. Operational failures in these teams can cost lives. Therefore, in our work, we explore how robots that take initiative to support team and task success can augment action teams. We designed and studied proactive robot behaviors in non-dyadic (three humans and a robot) action teams to better understand factors that support the acceptance and effectiveness of proactive robots. Our work will support better human-robot teaming in action teams by addressing gaps in how robot initiative impacts team dynamics, preferences for proactive robot behaviors, and how proactive robots can take initiative based on task states to empower their teammates.

References

[1]
P. Alves-Oliveira, K. Mihata, R. Karim, E. A. Bjorling, and M. Cakmak. Flex-sdk: An open-source software development kit for creating social robots. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 1--10, 2022.
[2]
F. Babel, J. Kraus, L. Miller, M. Kraus, N. Wagner, W. Minker, and M. Baumann. Small talk with a robot? the impact of dialog content, talk initiative, and gaze behavior of a social robot on trust, acceptance, and proximity. International Journal of Social Robotics, pages 1--14, 2021.
[3]
A. Backhouse and M. Malik. Escape into patient safety: bringing human factors to life for medical students. BMJ open quality, 8(1):e000548, 2019.
[4]
J. Baraglia, M. Cakmak, Y. Nagai, R. Rao, and M. Asada. Initiative in robot assistance during collaborative task execution. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), pages 67--74. IEEE, 2016.
[5]
J. Baraglia, M. Cakmak, Y. Nagai, R. P. Rao, and M. Asada. Efficient human-robot collaboration: when should a robot take initiative? The International Journal of Robotics Research, 36(5--7):563--579, 2017.
[6]
V. Braun and V. Clarke. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2):77--101, 2006.
[7]
V. Braun and V. Clarke. One size fits all? what counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative research in psychology, 18(3):328--352, 2021.
[8]
S. Brown. A new study measures the actual impact of robots on jobs. it's significant., Jul 2020.
[9]
T. N. Cohen, A. C. Griggs, F. F. Kanji, K. A. Cohen, E. H. Lazzara, J. R. Keebler, and B. L. Gewertz. Advancing team cohesion: Using an escape room as a novel approach. Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management, 26(3):126--134, 2021.
[10]
A. C. Costa and N. Anderson. Measuring trust in teams: Development and validation of a multifaceted measure of formative and reflective indicators of team trust. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1):119--154, 2011.
[11]
A. Delfanti and B. Frey. Humanly extended automation or the future of work seen through amazon patents. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 46(3):655--682, 2021.
[12]
P. F. Dominey, G. Metta, F. Nori, and L. Natale. Anticipation and initiative in human-humanoid interaction. In Humanoids 2008--8th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pages 693--699. IEEE, 2008.
[13]
A. C. Edmondson. Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of management studies, 40(6):1419--1452, 2003.
[14]
J. Fink, S. Lemaignan, P. Dillenbourg, P. Rétornaz, F. Vaussard, A. Berthoud, F. Mondada, F. Wille, and K. Franinovic. Which robot behavior can motivate children to tidy up their toys? design and evaluation of ?ranger". In 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 439--446. IEEE, 2014.
[15]
Y. Gao, E. Sibirtseva, G. Castellano, and D. Kragic. Fast adaptation with meta-reinforcement learning for trust modelling in human-robot interaction. In 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 305--312. IEEE, 2019.
[16]
M. J. Gonzales, V. C. Cheung, and L. D. Riek. Designing collaborative healthcare technology for the acute care workflow. In 2015 9th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), pages 145--152. IEEE, 2015.
[17]
J. Guckian, L. Eveson, and H. May. The great escape? the rise of the escape room in medical education. Future healthcare journal, 7(2):112, 2020.
[18]
G. Hoffman and C. Breazeal. Effects of anticipatory action on human-robot teamwork efficiency, fluency, and perception of team. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction, pages 1--8, 2007.
[19]
G. Hoffman and C. Breazeal. Effects of anticipatory perceptual simulation on practiced human-robot tasks. Autonomous Robots, 28:403--423, 2010.
[20]
C.-M. Huang, M. Cakmak, and B. Mutlu. Adaptive coordination strategies for human-robot handovers. In Robotics: science and systems, volume 11, pages 1--10. Rome, Italy, 2015.
[21]
T. Iqbal, S. Rack, and L. D. Riek. Movement coordination in human--robot teams: a dynamical systems approach. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 32(4):909--919, 2016.
[22]
T. Iqbal and L. D. Riek. Temporal anticipation and adaptation methods for fluent human-robot teaming. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 3736--3743. IEEE, 2021.
[23]
M. F. Jung, N. Martelaro, and P. J. Hinds. Using robots to moderate team conflict: the case of repairing violations. In Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, pages 229--236, 2015.
[24]
A. Kalegina, G. Schroeder, A. Allchin, K. Berlin, and M. Cakmak. Characterizing the design space of rendered robot faces. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 96--104, 2018.
[25]
M. Kraus, N. Wagner, W. Minker, A. Agrawal, A. Schmidt, P. K. Prasad, and W. Ertel. Kurt: A household assistance robot capable of proactive dialogue. In 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 855--859. IEEE, 2022.
[26]
S. J. Levine and B. C. Williams. Concurrent plan recognition and execution for human-robot teams. In Twenty-Fourth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, 2014.
[27]
J. E. Mathieu, M. R. Kukenberger, L. D'innocenzo, and G. Reilly. Modeling reciprocal team cohesion--performance relationships, as impacted by shared leadership and members' competence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3):713, 2015.
[28]
S. Matsumoto, P. Ghosh, R. Jamshad, and L. D. Riek. Robot, uninterrupted: Telemedical robots to mitigate care disruption. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 495--505, 2023.
[29]
H. Nemlekar, N. Dhanaraj, A. Guan, S. K. Gupta, and S. Nikolaidis. Transfer learning of human preferences for proactive robot assistance in assembly tasks. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 575--583, 2023.
[30]
S. Nikolaidis, P. Lasota, R. Ramakrishnan, and J. Shah. Improved human--robot team performance through cross-training, an approach inspired by human team training practices. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 34(14):1711--1730, 2015.
[31]
S. Nikolaidis and J. Shah. Human-robot cross-training: computational formulation, modeling and evaluation of a human team training strategy. In 2013 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), pages 33--40. IEEE, 2013.
[32]
T. Nomura, T. Suzuki, T. Kanda, and K. Kato. Measurement of negative attitudes toward robots. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 7(3):437--454, 2006.
[33]
M. Patel. Longitudinal proactive robot assistance. In Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 775--777, 2023.
[34]
M. Patel and S. Chernova. Proactive robot assistance via spatio-temporal object modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.15501, 2022.
[35]
Z. Peng, Y. Kwon, J. Lu, Z. Wu, and X. Ma. Design and evaluation of service robot's proactivity in decision-making support process. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1--13, 2019.
[36]
S. Perez. Siri gains a new gender-neutral voice option in latest ios update, Feb 2022.
[37]
X. Puig, T. Shu, J. B. Tenenbaum, and A. Torralba. Nopa: Neurally-guided online probabilistic assistance for building socially intelligent home assistants. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.05223, 2023.
[38]
L. D. Riek. Wizard of oz studies in hri: a systematic review and new reporting guidelines. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 1(1):119--136, 2012.
[39]
N. L. Robinson, J. Connolly, G. M. Johnson, Y. Kim, L. Hides, and D. J. Kavanagh. Measures of incentives and confidence in using a social robot. Science Robotics, 3(21):eaat6963, 2018.
[40]
P. Schydlo, M. Rakovic, L. Jamone, and J. Santos-Victor. Anticipation in human- robot cooperation: A recurrent neural network approach for multiple action sequences prediction. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 5909--5914. IEEE, 2018.
[41]
S. Sebo, B. Stoll, B. Scassellati, and M. F. Jung. Robots in groups and teams: a literature review. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(CSCW2):1--36, 2020.
[42]
S. Strohkorb Sebo, L. L. Dong, N. Chang, and B. Scassellati. Strategies for the inclusion of human members within human-robot teams. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 309--317, 2020.
[43]
S. Strohkorb Sebo, M. Traeger, M. Jung, and B. Scassellati. The ripple effects of vulnerability: The effects of a robot's vulnerable behavior on trust in human- robot teams. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 178--186, 2018.
[44]
A. Taylor, H. R. Lee, A. Kubota, and L. D. Riek. Coordinating clinical teams: Using robots to empower nurses to stop the line. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW):1--30, 2019.
[45]
A. Taylor, M. Murakami, S. Kim, R. Chu, and L. D. Riek. Hospitals of the future: Designing interactive robotic systems for resilient emergency departments. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW2):1--40, 2022.
[46]
J. J. van Rensburg, C. M. Santos, S. B. de Jong, and S. Uitdewilligen. The five-factor perceived shared mental model scale: a consolidation of items across the contemporary literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 12:784200, 2022.
[47]
S. van Waveren, E. J. Carter, and I. Leite. Take one for the team: The effects of error severity in collaborative tasks with social robots. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, pages 151--158, 2019.
[48]
T. WILLIAMS, C. MATUSZEK, and N. DEPALMA. Scarecrows in oz: The use of large language models in hri. 2023.
[49]
P. Zaug, C.-I. Gros, D. Wagner, E. Pilavyan, F. Meyer, D. Offner, and M. Strub. Development of an innovative educational escape game to promote teamwork in dentistry. European Journal of Dental Education, 26(1):116--122, 2022.
[50]
Y. Zhang, V. Narayanan, T. Chakraborti, and S. Kambhampati. A human factors analysis of proactive support in human-robot teaming. In 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 3586--3593. IEEE, 2015.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Human-Robot Action Teams: A Behavioral Analysis of Team Dynamics2024 33rd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN)10.1109/RO-MAN60168.2024.10731176(1443-1448)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2024

Index Terms

  1. Taking Initiative in Human-Robot Action Teams: How Proactive Robot Behaviors Affect Teamwork

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '24: Companion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
      March 2024
      1408 pages
      ISBN:9798400703232
      DOI:10.1145/3610978
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 11 March 2024

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. group dynamics
      2. groups and teams
      3. human-robot teaming
      4. proactive robots

      Qualifiers

      • Short-paper

      Funding Sources

      • The Office of Naval Research (ONR)

      Conference

      HRI '24
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)311
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)57
      Reflects downloads up to 04 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Human-Robot Action Teams: A Behavioral Analysis of Team Dynamics2024 33rd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN)10.1109/RO-MAN60168.2024.10731176(1443-1448)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2024

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media