[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3610978.3640558acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Adapting Task Difficulty in a Cup-Stacking Rehabilitative Task

Published: 11 March 2024 Publication History

Abstract

As the need for accessible upper-body stroke rehabilitation grows, it becomes increasingly important to investigate how the difficulty level of rehabilitation tasks can be personalized to a patient and automatically adapted based on the patient's progress in therapy. We introduce a framework that uses Fitts' law to define task difficulty and iteratively apply it to dynamically adjust difficulty levels and to assign therapy tasks within the context of a cup-stacking occupational therapy activity. Our preliminary simulation results support the hypothesis that the model can adapt its difficulty levels based on a user's time taken to stack a cup at various points on a table. Future work includes exploring the impact of different variables on the model's adaptability and integrating personalized verbal feedback from a socially assistive robot.

Supplemental Material

MP4 File
Supplemental video

References

[1]
Justin A Beebe and Catherine E Lang. 2009. Active range of motion predicts upper extremity function 3 months after stroke. Stroke, Vol. 40, 5 (2009), 1772--1779.
[2]
Helma M De Morree and Samuele M Marcora. 2010. The face of effort: Frowning muscle activity reflects effort during a physical task. Biological psychology, Vol. 85, 3 (2010), 377--382.
[3]
Nathaniel Dennler, Amelia Cain, Erica De Guzman, Claudia Chiu, Carolee J Winstein, Stefanos Nikolaidis, and Maja J Matarić. 2023. A metric for characterizing the arm nonuse workspace in poststroke individuals using a robot arm. Science Robotics, Vol. 8, 84 (2023), eadf7723.
[4]
Paul M Fitts. 1954. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of experimental psychology, Vol. 47, 6 (1954), 381.
[5]
AR Fugel-Meyer, L Jaasko, I Leyman, S Ollson, and S Steglind. 1975. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient1, a method for evaluation of physical perpormance. Scand. J. Rahabil. Med, Vol. 7 (1975), 13--31.
[6]
Cheol E Han, Sujin Kim, Shuya Chen, Yi-Hsuan Lai, Jeong-Yoon Lee, Rieko Osu, Carolee J Winstein, and Nicolas Schweighofer. 2013. Quantifying arm nonuse in individuals poststroke. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, Vol. 27, 5 (2013), 439--447.
[7]
Shamsi T Iqbal and Brian P Bailey. 2004. Using eye gaze patterns to identify user tasks. In The Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing, Vol. 4. 2004.
[8]
Regan L Mandryk, Kori M Inkpen, and Thomas W Calvert. 2006. Using psychophysiological techniques to measure user experience with entertainment technologies. Behaviour & information technology, Vol. 25, 2 (2006), 141--158.
[9]
Jean-Claude Metzger, Olivier Lambercy, Antonella Califfi, Daria Dinacci, Claudio Petrillo, Paolo Rossi, Fabio M Conti, and Roger Gassert. 2014. Assessment-driven selection and adaptation of exercise difficulty in robot-assisted therapy: a pilot study with a hand rehabilitation robot. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, Vol. 11, 1 (2014), 1--14.
[10]
Navid Shirzad and HF Machiel Van der Loos. 2012. Error amplification to promote motor learning and motivation in therapy robotics. In 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE, 3907--3910.
[11]
Katelyn Swift-Spong, Elaine Short, Eric Wade, and Maja J Matarić. 2015. Effects of comparative feedback from a socially assistive robot on self-efficacy in post-stroke rehabilitation. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR). IEEE, 764--769.
[12]
Adriana Tapus and Maja J Mataric. 2008. Socially Assistive Robots: The Link between Personality, Empathy, Physiological Signals, and Task Performance. In AAAI spring symposium: emotion, personality, and social behavior. 133--140.
[13]
Connie W Tsao, Aaron W Aday, Zaid I Almarzooq, Cheryl AM Anderson, Pankaj Arora, Christy L Avery, Carissa M Baker-Smith, Andrea Z Beaton, Amelia K Boehme, Alfred E Buxton, et al. 2023. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2023 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, Vol. 147, 8 (2023), e93--e621.
[14]
Michelle L Woodbury, Kelly Anderson, Christian Finetto, Andrew Fortune, Blair Dellenbach, Emily Grattan, and Scott Hutchison. 2016. Matching task difficulty to patient ability during task practice improves upper extremity motor skill after stroke: a proof-of-concept study. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, Vol. 97, 11 (2016), 1863--1871.
[15]
Lukas Zimmerli, Carmen Krewer, Roger Gassert, Friedemann Müller, Robert Riener, and Lars Lünenburger. 2012. Validation of a mechanism to balance exercise difficulty in robot-assisted upper-extremity rehabilitation after stroke. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, Vol. 9, 1 (2012), 1--13.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Physical and Social Adaptation for Assistive Robot InteractionsAdjunct Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3672539.3686713(1-6)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024

Index Terms

  1. Adapting Task Difficulty in a Cup-Stacking Rehabilitative Task

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '24: Companion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
      March 2024
      1408 pages
      ISBN:9798400703232
      DOI:10.1145/3610978
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 11 March 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. assistive robotics
      2. task adaptation
      3. upper-limb rehabilitation

      Qualifiers

      • Short-paper

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      HRI '24
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)55
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 18 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Physical and Social Adaptation for Assistive Robot InteractionsAdjunct Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3672539.3686713(1-6)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media