[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

A Ding Ontology of Chinese Bronze

Published: 09 August 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Ding is a significant type of Chinese bronze that holds key cultural value. Traditional humanists have primarily focused on dating and classifying Ding. However, in the context of Digital Humanities, the research perspective of humanities scholars is gradually shifting towards data-driven research, with linked data emerging as a popular topic. A well-defined and standard ontology representing the complete domain knowledge is essential for linked Ding data. Unfortunately, most existing ontology cannot represent fine-grained knowledge of Ding or is too restrictive to represent partial knowledge of bronze Ding. In this context, we propose a fine-grained Ding ontology to represent the bronze Ding knowledge. In this paper, we present in detail the Ding ontology of Chinese bronze during the Shang and Zhou dynasties (from 1600 BC to 256 BC). We provide a detailed exposition of the Ding ontology and evaluate its effectiveness using OOPS!, OntoMetrics, and by answering competency questions in SPARQL. The building methodology of Ding ontology follows the ISO principles (ISO 1087 and ISO 704). The objective of this paper is to develop an open ontology of Ding during the Shang and Zhou dynasties, which can serve as a valuable resource for bilingual terminology dictionaries. The Ding ontology was published at http://www.dhontology.com/ChineseCulture/data/bronze.owl.

References

[1]
E. Hyvönen. 2012. Publishing and using cultural heritage linked data on the semantic web. In Synthesis Lectures on the Semantic Web: Theory and Technology, James Hendler and Ying Ding (Eds.). Morgan & Claypool, San Rafael, CA, 1-159.
[2]
T. Wei, C. Roche, M. Papadopoulou, and Y. Jia. 2021. Using ISO and Semantic Web standard for building a multilingual terminology e-Dictionary: A use case of Chinese ceramic vases. Journal of Information Science. (2021).
[3]
C. Roche. 2007. Saying is not modelling. In 4th International Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Cognitive Science (NLPCS 2007). Funchal, Portugal, 47–56.
[4]
M. Vakulenko. 2014. Term and terminology: Basic approaches, definitions, and investigation methods (Eastern-European perspective). In Terminology Science & Research 24 (2014), 13–28.
[5]
T. Wei, C. Roche, M. Papadopoulou, and Y. Jia. 2022. The TAO CI ontology of vases of the Ming and Qing dynasties. Applied Ontology 17 (2022), 423–441.
[6]
马承源, 中国青铜器全集, 文物出版社, 北京, 1996.
[7]
吴镇烽, 商周青铜器铭文暨图像集成, 上海古籍出版社, 上海, 2012.
[8]
S. Baskauf and J. K. Baskauf. 2021. Using the W3C generating RDF from tabular data on the web recommendation to manage small Wikidata datasets. Semantic Web. (2021).
[9]
J. Blaney. 2017. Introduction to the principles of linked open data. Programming Historian. (2017).
[10]
C. Roche and M. Papadopoulou. 2019. Mind the gap: Ontology authoring for humanists. In JOWO, 2019.
[11]
E. Hyvönen, E. Heino, P. Leskinen, E. Ikkala, M. Koho, M. Tamper, J. Tuominen, and E. Mäkelä. 2016. WarSampo data service and semantic portal for publishing linked open data about the Second World War history. In H. Sack, E. Blomqvist, M. d'Aquin, C. Ghidini, S. P. Ponzetto, and C. Lange (Eds.). The Semantic Web. Latest Advances and New Domains, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 758–773.
[12]
A. Miles and S. Bechhofer. 2009. SKOS simple knowledge organization system reference, W3C Recommendation. (2009).
[13]
C. Kakali, I. Lourdi, T. Stasinopoulou, L. Bountouri, C. Papatheodorou, M. Doerr, and M. Gergatsoulis. 2007. Integrating Dublin core metadata for cultural heritage collections using ontologies. In International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications. 128–139.
[14]
M. Doerr. 2005. The CIDOC CRM, an ontological approach to schema heterogeneity. In Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik.
[15]
M. Doerr, S. Gradmann, S. Hennicke, A. Isaac, C. Meghini, and H. Van de Sompel. 2010. The Europeana Data Model (EDM). In World Library and Information Congress: 76th IFLA General Conference and Assembly. 15.
[16]
C. Dijkshoorn, L. Aroyo, J. van Ossenbruggen, and G. Schreiber. 2018. Modeling cultural heritage data for online publication. Applied Ontology 13 (2018), 255–271.
[17]
M. L. Platas, H. Bermúdez-Sabel, S. Ros, E. Gonzalez-Blanco Garcia, O. Corcho, O. Gómez, L. Hernández Lorenzo, M. De Sisto, J. de la Rosa, Á. Pérez, A. Diez, and J. Rodriguez. 2022. Description of Postdata Poetry Ontology V1.0. In Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), Krakow,
[18]
E. Gruber, R. Gondek, and T. J. Smith. 2019. Kerameikos.org: Linked Open Data for Greek Pottery. In 4th Plotting Poetry Conference, Prague, 19-34.
[19]
R. Brancato, M. N. Asmundo, G. Pagano, D. F. Santamaria, and S. Ucchino. 2019. An ontology for legacy data on ancient ceramics of the Plain of Catania. In Italian Conference on Computational Logic.
[20]
V. A. Carriero, A. Gangemi, M. L. Mancinelli, L. Marinucci, A. G. Nuzzolese, V. Presutti, and C. Veninata. 2019. ArCo ontology network and LOD on Italian Cultural Heritage. In ODOCH@CAiSE, 2019.
[21]
H. Rantala, E. Ikkala, V. Rohiola, M. Koho, J. Tuominen, E. Oksanen, A. Wessman, and E. Hyvönen. 2022. FindSampo: A linked data based portal and data service for analyzing and disseminating archaeological object finds. In The Semantic Web. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022, 478–494.
[22]
ISO 1087-1, Standard ISO 1087: Terminology—Vocabulary, International Standards Organization, Geneva, 2019.
[23]
ISO 704, Terminology Work – Principles and Methods, International Standards Organisation, Geneva, 2009.
[24]
F. Baader, I. Horrocks, C. Lutz, and U. Sattler. 2014. An Introduction to Description Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017.
[25]
M. Spies and C. Roche. 2008. Aristotelian ontologies and OWL modeling, (2008).
[26]
D. Vrandečić. 2009. Ontology evaluation. In Handbook on Ontologies. Springer, 2009. 293–313.
[27]
Y. Ren, A. Parvizi, C. Mellish, J. Z. Pan, K. van Deemter, and R. Stevens. 2014. Towards competency question-driven ontology authoring. In V. Presutti, C. d'Amato, F. Gandon, M. d'Aquin, S. Staab, A. Tordai (Eds.). The Semantic Web: Trends and Challenges. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2014. 752–767.
[28]
M. Poveda-Villalón, A. Gómez-Pérez, and M. C. Suárez-Figueroa. 2014 Oops! (OntOlogy Pitfall Scanner!): An on-line tool for ontology evaluation. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS) 10 (2014), 7–34.
[29]
B. Lantow. 2016. OntoMetrics: Putting metrics into use for ontology evaluation. In KEOD, 2016. 186–191.
[30]
S. Peroni, D. Shotton, and F. Vitali. 2012. Latest developments to LODE. In 18th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Galway City. Ireland.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Linking past insights with contemporary understanding: an ontological and knowledge graph approach to the transmission of ancient Chinese classicsHeritage Science10.1186/s40494-024-01504-x12:1Online publication date: 5-Nov-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage   Volume 16, Issue 4
December 2023
473 pages
ISSN:1556-4673
EISSN:1556-4711
DOI:10.1145/3615351
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 August 2023
Online AM: 17 July 2023
Accepted: 18 May 2023
Received: 09 August 2022
Published in JOCCH Volume 16, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Cultural heritage
  2. Ontology
  3. Terminology
  4. Digital humanities
  5. Semantic Web

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • NSFC

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)155
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)22
Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Linking past insights with contemporary understanding: an ontological and knowledge graph approach to the transmission of ancient Chinese classicsHeritage Science10.1186/s40494-024-01504-x12:1Online publication date: 5-Nov-2024

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media