More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Open access

DimSum: A Decentralized Approach to Multi-language Semantics and Verification

Authors:

Michael Sammler,

Emanuele D'Osualdo,

Robbert Krebbers,

Derek DreyerAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, Volume 7, Issue POPL

Article No.: 27, Pages 775 - 805

https://doi.org/10.1145/3571220

Published: 11 January 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Prior work on multi-language program verification has achieved impressive results, including the compositional verification of complex compilers. But the existing approaches to this problem impose a variety of restrictions on the overall structure of multi-language programs (e.g. fixing the source language, fixing the set of involved languages, fixing the memory model, or fixing the semantics of interoperation). In this paper, we explore the problem of how to avoid such global restrictions.

Concretely, we present DimSum: a new, decentralized approach to multi-language semantics and verification, which we have implemented in the Coq proof assistant. Decentralization means that we can define and reason about languages independently from each other (as independent modules communicating via events), but also combine and translate between them when necessary (via a library of combinators).

We apply DimSum to a high-level imperative language Rec (with an abstract memory model and function calls), a low-level assembly language Asm (with a concrete memory model, arbitrary jumps, and syscalls), and a mathematical specification language Spec. We evaluate DimSum on two case studies: an Asm library extending Rec with support for pointer comparison, and a coroutine library for Rec written in Asm. In both cases, we show how DimSum allows the Asm libraries to be abstracted to Rec-level specifications, despite the behavior of the Asm libraries not being syntactically expressible in Rec itself. We also verify an optimizing multi-pass compiler from Rec to Asm, showing that it is compatible with these Asm libraries.

References

[1]

Martín Abadi and Gordon D. Plotkin. 2010. On Protection by Layout Randomization. In CSF. IEEE Computer Society, 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2010.30

Digital Library

[2]

Amal Ahmed and Matthias Blume. 2011. An equivalence-preserving CPS translation via multi-language semantics. In ICFP. ACM, 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1145/2034773.2034830

Digital Library

[3]

Rajeev Alur, Thomas A. Henzinger, Orna Kupferman, and Moshe Y. Vardi. 1998. Alternating Refinement Relations. In CONCUR (LNCS, Vol. 1466). Springer, 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0055622

[4]

Nick Benton and Chung-Kil Hur. 2009. Biorthogonality, step-indexing and compiler correctness. In ICFP. ACM, 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1145/1596550.1596567

Digital Library

[5]

Nick Benton and Chung-Kil Hur. 2010. Realizability and compositional compiler correctness for a polymorphic language. Microsoft Research. https://sf.snu.ac.kr/publications/cccmsrtr.pdf

[6]

Lennart Beringer, Gordon Stewart, Robert Dockins, and Andrew W. Appel. 2014. Verified Compilation for Shared-Memory C. In ESOP (LNCS, Vol. 8410). Springer, 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54833-8_7

Digital Library

[7]

Ashok K. Chandra, Dexter Kozen, and Larry J. Stockmeyer. 1981. Alternation. J. ACM, 28, 1 (1981), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1145/322234.322243

Digital Library

[8]

Robert W. Floyd. 1967. Nondeterministic Algorithms. J. ACM, 14, 4 (1967), 636–644. https://doi.org/10.1145/321420.321422

Digital Library

[9]

Carsten Fritz and Thomas Wilke. 2005. Simulation relations for alternating Büchi automata. Theor. Comput. Sci., 338, 1-3 (2005), 275–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2005.01.016

Digital Library

[10]

Lennard Gäher, Michael Sammler, Simon Spies, Ralf Jung, Hoang-Hai Dang, Robbert Krebbers, Jeehoon Kang, and Derek Dreyer. 2022. Simuliris: a separation logic framework for verifying concurrent program optimizations. Proc. ACM Program. Lang., 6, POPL (2022), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3498689

Digital Library

[11]

Ronghui Gu, Jérémie Koenig, Tahina Ramananandro, Zhong Shao, Xiongnan (Newman) Wu, Shu-Chun Weng, Haozhong Zhang, and Yu Guo. 2015. Deep Specifications and Certified Abstraction Layers. In POPL. ACM, 595–608. https://doi.org/10.1145/2676726.2676975

Digital Library

[12]

Ronghui Gu, Zhong Shao, Jieung Kim, Xiongnan (Newman) Wu, Jérémie Koenig, Vilhelm Sjöberg, Hao Chen, David Costanzo, and Tahina Ramananandro. 2018. Certified concurrent abstraction layers. In PLDI. ACM, 646–661. https://doi.org/10.1145/3192366.3192381

Digital Library

[13]

C. A. R. Hoare. 1978. Communicating Sequential Processes. Commun. ACM, 21, 8 (1978), 666–677. https://doi.org/10.1145/359576.359585

Digital Library

[14]

Chung-Kil Hur and Derek Dreyer. 2011. A Kripke logical relation between ML and assembly. In POPL. ACM, 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1145/1926385.1926402

Digital Library

[15]

Chung-Kil Hur, Derek Dreyer, Georg Neis, and Viktor Vafeiadis. 2012. The marriage of bisimulations and Kripke logical relations. In POPL. ACM, 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1145/2103656.2103666

Digital Library

[16]

Alan Jeffrey and Julian Rathke. 2005. Java Jr: Fully Abstract Trace Semantics for a Core Java Language. In ESOP (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3444). Springer, 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31987-0_29

Digital Library

[17]

Ralf Jung, Robbert Krebbers, Jacques-Henri Jourdan, Ales Bizjak, Lars Birkedal, and Derek Dreyer. 2018. Iris from the ground up: A modular foundation for higher-order concurrent separation logic. J. Funct. Program., 28 (2018), e20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956796818000151

[18]

Ralf Jung, David Swasey, Filip Sieczkowski, Kasper Svendsen, Aaron Turon, Lars Birkedal, and Derek Dreyer. 2015. Iris: Monoids and Invariants as an Orthogonal Basis for Concurrent Reasoning. In POPL. ACM, 637–650. https://doi.org/10.1145/2676726.2676980

Digital Library

[19]

Jeehoon Kang, Yoonseung Kim, Chung-Kil Hur, Derek Dreyer, and Viktor Vafeiadis. 2016. Lightweight verification of separate compilation. In POPL. ACM, 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1145/2837614.2837642

Digital Library

[20]

Jérémie Koenig and Zhong Shao. 2021. CompCertO: compiling certified open C components. In PLDI. ACM, 1095–1109. https://doi.org/10.1145/3453483.3454097

Digital Library

[21]

Robbert Krebbers, Jacques-Henri Jourdan, Ralf Jung, Joseph Tassarotti, Jan-Oliver Kaiser, Amin Timany, Arthur Charguéraud, and Derek Dreyer. 2018. MoSeL: A general, extensible modal framework for interactive proofs in separation logic. Proc. ACM Program. Lang., 2, ICFP (2018), 77:1–77:30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236772

Digital Library

[22]

Robbert Krebbers, Ralf Jung, Ales Bizjak, Jacques-Henri Jourdan, Derek Dreyer, and Lars Birkedal. 2017. The Essence of Higher-Order Concurrent Separation Logic. In ESOP (LNCS, Vol. 10201). Springer, 696–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54434-1_26

Digital Library

[23]

Robbert Krebbers, Amin Timany, and Lars Birkedal. 2017. Interactive proofs in higher-order concurrent separation logic. In POPL. ACM, 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1145/3009837.3009855

Digital Library

[24]

James Laird. 2007. A Fully Abstract Trace Semantics for General References. In ICALP (LNCS, Vol. 4596). Springer, 667–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73420-8_58

[25]

Xavier Leroy. 2006. Formal certification of a compiler back-end or: programming a compiler with a proof assistant. In POPL. ACM, 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1111037.1111042

Digital Library

[26]

Xavier Leroy and Sandrine Blazy. 2008. Formal verification of a C-like memory model and its uses for verifying program transformations. JAR, 41, 1 (2008), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10817-008-9099-0

Digital Library

[27]

Phillip Mates, Jamie Perconti, and Amal Ahmed. 2019. Under Control: Compositionally Correct Closure Conversion with Mutable State. In PPDP. ACM, 16:1–16:15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3354166.3354181

Digital Library

[28]

Jacob Matthews and Robert Bruce Findler. 2007. Operational semantics for multi-language programs. In POPL. ACM, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1190216.1190220

Digital Library

[29]

Robin Milner. 1999. Communicating and Mobile Systems: the π -Calculus. Cambridge University Press. isbn:978-0-521-65869-0

Digital Library

[30]

Robin Milner, Joachim Parrow, and David Walker. 1992. A Calculus of Mobile Processes, I/II. Inf. Comput., 100, 1 (1992), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-5401(92)90008-4

Digital Library

[31]

Georg Neis, Chung-Kil Hur, Jan-Oliver Kaiser, Craig McLaughlin, Derek Dreyer, and Viktor Vafeiadis. 2015. Pilsner: a compositionally verified compiler for a higher-order imperative language. In ICFP. ACM, 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1145/2784731.2784764

Digital Library

[32]

Max S. New and Amal Ahmed. 2018. Graduality from embedding-projection pairs. Proc. ACM Program. Lang., 2, ICFP (2018), 73:1–73:30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236768

Digital Library

[33]

Luca Padovani. 2010. Session Types = Intersection Types + Union Types. In ITRS (EPTCS, Vol. 45). 71–89. https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.45.6

[34]

Marco Patrignani. 2020. Why Should Anyone use Colours? or, Syntax Highlighting Beyond Code Snippets. CoRR, abs/2001.11334 (2020), arxiv:2001.11334

[35]

Marco Patrignani, Pieter Agten, Raoul Strackx, Bart Jacobs, Dave Clarke, and Frank Piessens. 2015. Secure Compilation to Protected Module Architectures. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst., 37, 2 (2015), 6:1–6:50. https://doi.org/10.1145/2699503

Digital Library

[36]

Daniel Patterson and Amal Ahmed. 2019. The next 700 compiler correctness theorems (functional pearl). Proc. ACM Program. Lang., 3, ICFP (2019), 85:1–85:29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341689

Digital Library

[37]

Daniel Patterson, Noble Mushtak, Andrew Wagner, and Amal Ahmed. 2022. Semantic soundness for language interoperability. In PLDI. ACM, 609–624. https://doi.org/10.1145/3519939.3523703

Digital Library

[38]

Daniel Patterson, Jamie Perconti, Christos Dimoulas, and Amal Ahmed. 2017. FunTAL: reasonably mixing a functional language with assembly. In PLDI. ACM, 495–509. https://doi.org/10.1145/3062341.3062347

Digital Library

[39]

James T. Perconti and Amal Ahmed. 2014. Verifying an Open Compiler Using Multi-language Semantics. In ESOP (LNCS, Vol. 8410). Springer, 128–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54833-8_8

Digital Library

[40]

Clément Pit-Claudel, Peng Wang, Benjamin Delaware, Jason Gross, and Adam Chlipala. 2020. Extensible Extraction of Efficient Imperative Programs with Foreign Functions, Manually Managed Memory, and Proofs. In IJCAR (LNCS, Vol. 12167). 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51054-1_7

Digital Library

[41]

Tahina Ramananandro, Zhong Shao, Shu-Chun Weng, Jérémie Koenig, and Yuchen Fu. 2015. A Compositional Semantics for Verified Separate Compilation and Linking. In CPP. ACM, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/2676724.2693167

Digital Library

[42]

Ingrid Rewitzky. 2003. Binary Multirelations. In Theory and Applications of Relational Structures as Knowledge Instruments (LNCS, Vol. 2929). Springer, 256–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24615-2_12

[43]

A. W. Roscoe. 2010. Understanding Concurrent Systems. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-258-0

[44]

Michael Sammler, Angus Hammond, Rodolphe Lepigre, Brian Campbell, Jean Pichon-Pharabod, Derek Dreyer, Deepak Garg, and Peter Sewell. 2022. Islaris: verification of machine code against authoritative ISA semantics. In PLDI. ACM, 825–840. https://doi.org/10.1145/3519939.3523434

Digital Library

[45]

Michael Sammler, Simon Spies, Youngju Song, Emanuele D’Osualdo, Robbert Krebbers, Deepak Garg, and Derek Dreyer. 2023. DimSum: A Decentralized Approach to Multi-language Semantics and Verification (Appendix). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7306313 Project webpage:

Digital Library

[46]

Michael Sammler, Simon Spies, Youngju Song, Emanuele D’Osualdo, Robbert Krebbers, Deepak Garg, and Derek Dreyer. 2023. DimSum: A Decentralized Approach to Multi-language Semantics and Verification (Coq development). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7306313 Project webpage:

Digital Library

[47]

Youngju Song, Minki Cho, Dongjoo Kim, Yonghyun Kim, Jeehoon Kang, and Chung-Kil Hur. 2020. CompCertM: CompCert with C-assembly linking and lightweight modular verification. Proc. ACM Program. Lang., 4, POPL (2020), 23:1–23:31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371091

Digital Library

[48]

Youngju Song, Minki Cho, Dongjae Lee, Chung-Kil Hur, Michael Sammler, and Derek Dreyer. 2023. Conditional Contextual Refinement. In POPL. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571232

Digital Library

[49]

Christoph Sprenger, Tobias Klenze, Marco Eilers, Felix A. Wolf, Peter Müller, Martin Clochard, and David A. Basin. 2020. Igloo: soundly linking compositional refinement and separation logic for distributed system verification. Proc. ACM Program. Lang., 4, OOPSLA (2020), 152:1–152:31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3428220

Digital Library

[50]

Gordon Stewart, Lennart Beringer, Santiago Cuellar, and Andrew W. Appel. 2015. Compositional CompCert. In POPL. ACM, 275–287. https://doi.org/10.1145/2676726.2676985

Digital Library

[51]

Andrew S. Tanenbaum and Herbert Bos. 2014. Modern Operating Systems (4th ed.). Prentice Hall Press, USA. isbn:013359162X https://dl.acm.org/doi/book/10.5555/2655363

Digital Library

[52]

Arthur Oliveira Vale, Paul-André Melliès, Zhong Shao, Jérémie Koenig, and Léo Stefanesco. 2022. Layered and object-based game semantics. Proc. ACM Program. Lang., 6, POPL (2022), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3498703

Digital Library

[53]

Moshe Y. Vardi. 1995. Alternating Automata and Program Verification. In Computer Science Today (LNCS, Vol. 1000). Springer, 471–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0015261

[54]

Peng Wang, Santiago Cuellar, and Adam Chlipala. 2014. Compiler verification meets cross-language linking via data abstraction. In OOPSLA. ACM, 675–690. https://doi.org/10.1145/2660193.2660201

Digital Library

[55]

Yuting Wang, Pierre Wilke, and Zhong Shao. 2019. An abstract stack based approach to verified compositional compilation to machine code. Proc. ACM Program. Lang., 3, POPL (2019), 62:1–62:30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290375

Digital Library

[56]

Li-yao Xia, Yannick Zakowski, Paul He, Chung-Kil Hur, Gregory Malecha, Benjamin C. Pierce, and Steve Zdancewic. 2020. Interaction trees: representing recursive and impure programs in Coq. Proc. ACM Program. Lang., 4, POPL (2020), 51:1–51:32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371119

Digital Library

Cited By

de Vilhena PLahav OVafeiadis VRaad A(2024)Extending the C/C++ Memory Model with Inline AssemblyProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36897498:OOPSLA2(1081-1107)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689749
Song YLee D(2024)Refinement Composition LogicProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36746458:ICFP(573-601)Online publication date: 15-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3674645
Thibault JBlanco RLee DArgo SAzevedo de Amorim AGeorges AHriţcu CTolmach ALuo BLiao XXu JKirda ELie D(2024)SECOMP: Formally Secure Compilation of Compartmentalized C ProgramsProceedings of the 2024 on ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security10.1145/3658644.3670288(1061-1075)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3658644.3670288
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

DimSum: A Decentralized Approach to Multi-language Semantics and Verification
1. Theory of computation
  1. Logic
    1. Logic and verification
  2. Semantics and reasoning
    1. Program semantics
      1. Operational semantics

Recommendations

Melocoton: A Program Logic for Verified Interoperability Between OCaml and C

In recent years, there has been tremendous progress on developing program logics for verifying the correctness of programs in a rich and diverse array of languages. Thus far, however, such logics have assumed that programs are written entirely in a ...
Verified peephole optimizations for CompCert
PLDI '16

Transformations over assembly code are common in many compilers. These transformations are also some of the most bug-dense compiler components. Such bugs could be elim- inated by formally verifying the compiler, but state-of-the- art formally verified ...
Verified peephole optimizations for CompCert
PLDI '16: Proceedings of the 37th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation

Transformations over assembly code are common in many compilers. These transformations are also some of the most bug-dense compiler components. Such bugs could be elim- inated by formally verifying the compiler, but state-of-the- art formally verified ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages

Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages Volume 7, Issue POPL

January 2023

2196 pages

EISSN:2475-1421

DOI:10.1145/3554308

Editor:

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 January 2023

Published in PACMPL Volume 7, Issue POPL

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Badges

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Dutch Research Council (NWO)
European Research Council

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

9
Total Citations
View Citations
1,258
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)545
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)65

Reflects downloads up to 21 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

de Vilhena PLahav OVafeiadis VRaad A(2024)Extending the C/C++ Memory Model with Inline AssemblyProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36897498:OOPSLA2(1081-1107)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689749
Song YLee D(2024)Refinement Composition LogicProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36746458:ICFP(573-601)Online publication date: 15-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3674645
Thibault JBlanco RLee DArgo SAzevedo de Amorim AGeorges AHriţcu CTolmach ALuo BLiao XXu JKirda ELie D(2024)SECOMP: Formally Secure Compilation of Compartmentalized C ProgramsProceedings of the 2024 on ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security10.1145/3658644.3670288(1061-1075)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3658644.3670288
Andrici CCiobâcă ȘHriţcu CMartínez GRivas ETanter ÉWinterhalter T(2024)Securing Verified IO Programs Against Unverified Code in F*Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36329168:POPL(2226-2259)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3632916
Zhang LWang YWu JKoenig JShao Z(2024)Fully Composable and Adequate Verified Compilation with Direct Refinements between Open ModulesProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36329148:POPL(2160-2190)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3632914
Mansky WDu K(2024)An Iris Instance for Verifying CompCert C ProgramsProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36328488:POPL(148-174)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3632848
Cho MSong YLee DGäher LDreyer D(2023)Stuttering for FreeProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36228577:OOPSLA2(1677-1704)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3622857
Guéneau AHostert JSpies SSammler MBirkedal LDreyer D(2023)Melocoton: A Program Logic for Verified Interoperability Between OCaml and CProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36228237:OOPSLA2(716-744)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3622823
Rao XGeorges ALegoupil MWatt CPichon-Pharabod JGardner PBirkedal L(2023)Iris-Wasm: Robust and Modular Verification of WebAssembly ProgramsProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/35912657:PLDI(1096-1120)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3591265

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents