[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3568813.3600121acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicerConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Engagement and Anonymity in Online Computer Science Course Forums

Published: 10 September 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Online discussion boards, designed to facilitate learning from peers and instructors in an accessible space, are a vital part of course design, especially in large scale computer science classes. Previous work has shown that women in computer science tend to use anonymity more often than men on these boards, a trend not found in humanities, social science or business courses. In this work, we build on these findings using an intersectional lens, analyzing both gender and race/ethnicity. We find this combined analysis reveals differences in anonymity that are not apparent when examining gender alone. For example, we find a significantly greater difference in anonymity use between Hispanic men and women than would be expected from analyzing race/ethnicity and gender independently. We additionally analyze type of content (e.g., questions, answers), course, platform, and data source to characterize the many factors at play in measuring students’ choice to participate anonymously. In doing so, we show that different approaches used in prior work for eliciting information on gender — whether using registrar data, a survey, or imputing gender based on name — changes how over of students are classified, particularly affecting nonbinary students and Asian students. Understanding when students participate anonymously can help educators and platform designers to make students’ experience of online discussion boards more welcoming.

References

[1]
Rediet Abebe, Solon Barocas, Jon Kleinberg, Karen Levy, Manish Raghavan, and David G Robinson. 2020. Roles for computing in social change. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency. 252–260.
[2]
Tawfiq Ammari, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Daniel Romero. 2019. Self-declared throwaway accounts on Reddit: How platform affordances and shared norms enable parenting disclosure and support. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1–30.
[3]
Social Justice Analysis. 2022. Using intersectionality to understand structural inequality in Scotland: evidence synthesis. Technical Report. Scottish Government.
[4]
Nazanin Andalibi, Oliver L Haimson, Munmun De Choudhury, and Andrea Forte. 2016. Understanding social media disclosures of sexual abuse through the lenses of support seeking and anonymity. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 3906–3918.
[5]
Lecia Jane Barker, Kathy Garvin-Doxas, and Michele Jackson. 2002. Defensive Climate in the Computer Science Classroom. In Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education(SIGCSE ’02). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/563340.563354
[6]
Natalya N Bazarova and Yoon Hyung Choi. 2014. Self-disclosure in social media: Extending the functional approach to disclosure motivations and characteristics on social network sites. Journal of Communication 64, 4 (2014), 635–657.
[7]
Michael Bernstein, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, Drew Harry, Paul André, Katrina Panovich, and Greg Vargas. 2011. 4chan and/b: An Analysis of Anonymity and Ephemerality in a Large Online Community. In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, Vol. 5. 50–57.
[8]
Katerine Bielaczyc and Allan Collins. 2009. Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. Instructional design theories and models 2 (2009), 269–291.
[9]
Sian Brooke. 2019. “Condescending, Rude, Assholes”: Framing gender and hostility on Stack Overflow. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Abusive Language Online. 172–180.
[10]
SJ Brooke. 2021. Trouble in programmer’s paradise: gender-biases in sharing and recognising technical knowledge on Stack Overflow. Information, Communication & Society 24, 14 (2021), 2091–2112.
[11]
Justin Cheng, Michael Bernstein, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, and Jure Leskovec. 2017. Anyone can become a troll: Causes of trolling behavior in online discussions. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing. 1217–1230.
[12]
Kate Crawford. 2011. Listening, not lurking: The neglected form of participation. Cultures of participation (2011), 63–74.
[13]
Kimberlé Crenshaw. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. u. Chi. Legal f. (1989), 139.
[14]
Francisco Cribari-Neto and Achim Zeileis. 2010. Beta Regression in R. Journal of Statistical Software 34, 2 (2010), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v034.i02
[15]
K Patricia Cross. 1998. Why learning communities? Why now?About campus 3, 3 (1998), 4–11.
[16]
Jenny L Davis and Nathan Jurgenson. 2014. Context collapse: Theorizing context collusions and collisions. Information, communication & society 17, 4 (2014), 476–485.
[17]
Munmun De Choudhury and Sushovan De. 2014. Mental health discourse on reddit: Self-disclosure, social support, and anonymity. In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, Vol. 8. 71–80.
[18]
Michael A DeVito, Ashley Marie Walker, and Jeremy Birnholtz. 2018. ’Too Gay for Facebook’ Presenting LGBTQ+ Identity Throughout the Personal Social Media Ecosystem. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1–23.
[19]
Inclusion Diversity and Access (DI&A) Initiative. 2023. Inclusion Icebreakers. Technical Report. Colorado School of Mines.
[20]
Corinne Dorsey. 2022. Transgender students fear being ‘deadnamed’ at college. Washington Post (2022).
[21]
Brendan Farrington. 2023. DeSantis seeks details on transgender university students. AP News (2023).
[22]
Denae Ford, Justin Smith, Philip J Guo, and Chris Parnin. 2016. Paradise unplugged: Identifying barriers for female participation on stack overflow. In Proceedings of the 2016 24th ACM SIGSOFT International symposium on foundations of software engineering. 846–857.
[23]
Karly S Ford, Ashley N Patterson, and Marc P Johnston-Guerrero. 2021. Monoracial normativity in university websites: Systematic erasure and selective reclassification of multiracial students.Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 14, 2 (2021), 252.
[24]
Mark Freeman, Paul Blayney, and Paul Ginns. 2006. Anonymity and in class learning: The case for electronic response systems. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 22 (Nov. 2006), 568–580. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1286
[25]
Erving Goffman 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday.
[26]
Cheng Guo and Kelly Caine. 2021. Anonymity, user engagement, quality, and trolling on Q&A sites. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1–27.
[27]
Apriel K Hodari, Maria Ong, Lily T Ko, and Rachel R Kachchaf. 2014. New enactments of mentoring and activism: US women of color in computing education and careers. In Proceedings of the tenth annual conference on International computing education research. 83–90.
[28]
Xiaoyun Huang and Jessica Vitak. 2022. " Finsta gets all my bad pictures": Instagram Users’ Self-Presentation Across Finsta and Rinsta Accounts. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW1 (2022), 1–25.
[29]
David A. Joyner, Lily Bernstein, Ian Bolger, Maria-Isabelle Dittamo, Stephanie Gorham, and Rachel Hudson. 2022. Anonymity: A Double-Edged Sword for Gender Equity in a CS1 Forum?. In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1(SIGCSE 2022). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 766–772. https://doi.org/10.1145/3478431.3499289
[30]
Os Keyes. 2018. The misgendering machines: Trans/HCI implications of automatic gender recognition. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1–22.
[31]
Sophia Krause-Levy, William G. Griswold, Leo Porter, and Christine Alvarado. 2021. The Relationship Between Sense of Belonging and Student Outcomes in CS1 and Beyond. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research(ICER 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3446871.3469748
[32]
Sophia Krause-Levy, William G Griswold, Leo Porter, and Christine Alvarado. 2021. The relationship between sense of belonging and student outcomes in CS1 and beyond. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. 29–41.
[33]
Alyson Latham and N Sharon Hill. 2014. Preference for anonymous classroom participation: Linking student characteristics and reactions to electronic response systems. Journal of Management Education 38, 2 (2014), 192–215.
[34]
Alex Leavitt. 2015. " This is a Throwaway Account" Temporary Technical Identities and Perceptions of Anonymity in a Massive Online Community. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 317–327.
[35]
Oscar T Lenning and Larry H Ebbers. 1999. The Powerful Potential of Learning Communities: Improving Education for the Future. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Vol. 26, No. 6.ERIC.
[36]
Eden Litt. 2012. Knock, knock. Who’s there? The imagined audience. Journal of broadcasting & electronic media 56, 3 (2012), 330–345.
[37]
Stephanie Lunn, Leila Zahedi, Monique Ross, and Matthew Ohland. 2021. Exploration of Intersectionality and Computer Science Demographics: Understanding the Historical Context of Shifts in Participation. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 21, 2, Article 10 (mar 2021), 30 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3445985
[38]
Jane Margolis. 2017. Stuck in the Shallow End: Education, Race, and Computing. MIT press.
[39]
Alice E Marwick and Danah Boyd. 2011. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New media & society 13, 1 (2011), 114–133.
[40]
Anna May, Johannes Wachs, and Anikó Hannák. 2019. Gender differences in participation and reward on Stack Overflow. Empirical Software Engineering 24 (2019), 1997–2019.
[41]
Cath Mazuro and Namrata Rao. 2011. Online discussion forums in higher education: Is lurking working. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education 2, 2 (2011), 364–371.
[42]
Mark Miller. Unknown. Framing the ‘Inclusive Minute’. Technical Report. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
[43]
Terumi Miyazoe and Terry Anderson. 2011. Anonymity in blended learning: Who would you like to be?Journal of Educational Technology & Society 14, 2 (2011), 175–187.
[44]
Michael Muller. 2012. Lurking as personal trait or situational disposition: lurking and contributing in enterprise social media. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work. 253–256.
[45]
Asako Ohno, Takahiro Yamasaki, and Kin-ichiroh Tokiwa. 2013. A discussion on introducing half-anonymity and gamification to improve students’ motivation and engagement in classroom lectures. In 2013 IEEE Region 10 Humanitarian Technology Conference. IEEE, 215–220.
[46]
Alannah Oleson, Benjamin Xie, Jean Salac, Jayne Everson, F Megumi Kivuva, and Amy J Ko. 2022. A Decade of Demographics in Computing Education Research: A Critical Review of Trends in Collection, Reporting, and Use. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research-Volume 1. 323–343.
[47]
John Ousterhout. "A little bit of slope makes up for a lot of y-intercept". https://gist.github.com/gtallen1187/e83ed02eac6cc8d7e185.
[48]
Dylan Paré. 2021. Queering computing and computing education. (2021).
[49]
Piazza. New Piazza Features and Product Updates. https://medium.com/piazza/new-piazza-features-and-product-updates-2fe3c05a6854
[50]
Vahab Pournaghshband and Paola Medel. 2020. Promoting Diversity-Inclusive Computer Science Pedagogies: A Multidimensional Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education(ITiCSE ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341525.3387360
[51]
Jennifer Preece and Ben Shneiderman. 2009. The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS transactions on human-computer interaction 1, 1 (2009), 13–32.
[52]
Adalbert Gerald Soosai Raj, Jignesh M Patel, Richard Halverson, and Erica Rosenfeld Halverson. 2018. Role of live-coding in learning introductory programming. In Proceedings of the 18th koli calling international conference on computing education research. 1–8.
[53]
Yolanda A. Rankin, Jakita O. Thomas, and Sheena Erete. 2021. Black Women Speak: Examining Power, Privilege, and Identity in CS Education. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 21, 4, Article 26 (oct 2021), 31 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3451344
[54]
Pei-Luen Patrick Rau, Qin Gao, and Yinan Ding. 2008. Relationship between the level of intimacy and lurking in online social network services. Computers in human behavior 24, 6 (2008), 2757–2770.
[55]
Lynne D. Roberts and Camilla J Rajah-Kanagasabai. 2013. "I’d be so much more comfortable posting anonymously": Identified versus anonymous participation in student discussion boards. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 29, 5 (Nov. 2013), 612–625. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.452
[56]
Marc J Rubin. 2013. The effectiveness of live-coding to teach introductory programming. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. 651–656.
[57]
Zick Rubin. 1975. Disclosing oneself to a stranger: Reciprocity and its limits. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 11, 3 (1975), 233–260.
[58]
Isabel Ruthotto, Quintin Kreth, Jillian Stevens, Clare Trively, and Julia Melkers. 2020. Lurking and participation in the virtual classroom: The effects of gender, race, and age among graduate students in computer science. Computers & Education 151 (2020), 103854.
[59]
Pooja Sankar, Jessica Gilmartin, and Melissa Sobel. 2015. An examination of belongingness and confidence among female computer science students. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society 45, 2 (July 2015), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2809957.2809960
[60]
Marlene Scardamalia and Carl Bereiter. 2006. Knowledge building. The Cambridge (2006).
[61]
Randall E. Schumacker. 2023. Learning Statistics Using R. SAGE Publications, Inc., 55 City Road, London, Chapter 12. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506300160
[62]
Oscar Schwartz. Untold History of AI: Invisible Women Programmed America’s First Electronic Computer.
[63]
Kristin A Searle and Yasmin B Kafai. 2015. Boys’ Needlework: Understanding Gendered and Indigenous Perspectives on Computing and Crafting with Electronic Textiles. In ICER. 31–39.
[64]
Paul Sebo. 2021. How accurate are gender detection tools in predicting the gender for Chinese names? A study with 20,000 given names in pinyin format. Journal of the Medical Library Association 110, 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1289
[65]
Joseph Seering, Jessica Hammer, Geoff Kaufman, and Diyi Yang. 2020. Proximate social factors in first-time contribution to online communities. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.
[66]
Bryan Semaan, Heather Faucett, Scott Robertson, Misa Maruyama, and Sara Douglas. 2015. Navigating imagined audiences: Motivations for participating in the online public sphere. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 1158–1169.
[67]
Edward H. Simpson. 1951. The Interpretation of Interaction in Contingency Tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 13, 2 (1951), 238–241.
[68]
Melissa Sobel, Jessica Gilmartin, and Pooja Sankar. 2016. Class size and confidence levels among female STEM students [Impact]. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 35, 1 (2016), 23–26.
[69]
Amber Solomon, DeKita Moon, Armisha L. Roberts, and Juan E. Gilbert. 2018. Not Just Black and Not Just a Woman: Black Women Belonging in Computing. In 2018 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT.2018.8491700
[70]
Erika M Sparby. 2017. Digital social media and aggression: Memetic rhetoric in 4chan’s collective identity. Computers and Composition 45 (2017), 85–97.
[71]
Frederic Stutzman and Woodrow Hartzog. 2012. Boundary regulation in social media. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work. 769–778.
[72]
John Suler. 2004. The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & behavior 7, 3 (2004), 321–326.
[73]
Lee Taber and Steve Whittaker. 2020. " On Finsta, I can say’Hail Satan’": Being Authentic but Disagreeable on Instagram. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–14.
[74]
Josh Terrell, Andrew Kofink, Justin Middleton, Clarissa Rainear, Emerson Murphy-Hill, Chris Parnin, and Jon Stallings. 2017. Gender differences and bias in open source: Pull request acceptance of women versus men. PeerJ Computer Science 3 (2017), e111.
[75]
Adrian Thinnyun, Ryan Lenfant, Raymond Pettit, and John R. Hott. 2021. Gender and Engagement in CS Courses on Piazza. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, Virtual Event USA, 438–444. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432395
[76]
Emily Van der Nagel and Jordan Frith. 2015. Anonymity, pseudonymity, and the agency of online identity: Examining the social practices of r/Gonewild. First Monday (2015).
[77]
Ellen Vanderhoven, Annelies Raes, Hannelore Montrieux, Tijs Rotsaert, and Tammy Schellens. 2015. What if pupils can assess their peers anonymously? A quasi-experimental study. Computers & Education 81 (2015), 123–132.
[78]
Bogdan Vasilescu, Andrea Capiluppi, and Alexander Serebrenik. 2012. Gender, representation and online participation: A quantitative study of stackoverflow. In 2012 International Conference on Social Informatics. IEEE, 332–338.
[79]
Sijia Xiao, Danaë Metaxa, Joon Sung Park, Karrie Karahalios, and Niloufar Salehi. 2020. Random, messy, funny, raw: Finstas as intimate reconfigurations of social media. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–13.
[80]
Nira Yuval-Davis. 2006. Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European journal of women’s studies 13, 3 (2006), 193–209.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Exploring the Effects of Grouping by Programming Experience in Q&A ForumsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3632620.3671107(206-221)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
  • (2024)The Trees in the Forest: Characterizing Computing Students' Individual Help-Seeking ApproachesProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3632620.3671099(343-358)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICER '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 1
August 2023
520 pages
ISBN:9781450399760
DOI:10.1145/3568813
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 September 2023

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. anonymity
  2. course forums
  3. inclusion

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

ICER 2023

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 189 of 803 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)377
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)35
Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Exploring the Effects of Grouping by Programming Experience in Q&A ForumsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3632620.3671107(206-221)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
  • (2024)The Trees in the Forest: Characterizing Computing Students' Individual Help-Seeking ApproachesProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3632620.3671099(343-358)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media