More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Open access

Being Social in VR Meetings: A Landscape Analysis of Current Tools

Authors:

Sabrina Fielder,

Joshua Mcveigh-Schultz,

Jialang Victor Li,

Diana R. Sanchez,

Katherine IsbisterAuthors Info & Claims

DIS '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference

Pages 1789 - 1809

https://doi.org/10.1145/3563657.3595959

Published: 10 July 2023 Publication History

All formats PDF

Abstract

In the 21st century workplace (especially in COVID times), much human social interaction occurs during virtual meetings. Unlike traditional screen-based remote meetings, VR meetings promise a more richly embodied form of communication. This paper maps the experiential terrain of seven commercial VR meeting applications, with a particular focus on the range of shared social experiences and collaborative abilities these applications may enable or constrain. We examine a range of applications including Spatial, Glue VR, MeetinVR, Mozilla Hubs, VRChat, AltspaceVR, and Rec Room. We analyze and map avatar system strategies, meeting environments and in-world cues, meeting invitation model, and different models of participation. In addition, we argue that commercial applications for meeting in VR that cater to workplace contexts might benefit from borrowing some of the strategies used in more leisure-focused environments for supporting social interaction.

Supplemental Material

MP4 File

Teaser Video

Download
11.16 MB

PDF File

Appendix (final)

Download
449.39 KB

PDF File

Appendix

Download
449.39 KB

References

[1]

Joseph Allen, Steven Rogelberg, and John Scott. 2008. Mind Your Meetings: Improve Your Organization’s Effectiveness One Meeting at a Time. Psychology Faculty Publications: Quality Press 41 (April 2008), 48–53. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/psychfacpub/93

[2]

Brooke B. Allison, Marissa L. Shuffler, and Allison M. Wallace. 2015. The successful facilitation of virtual team meetings. In The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science. Cambridge University Press, 680–705. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589735.029

[3]

Jeremy N. Bailenson. 2021. Nonverbal Overload: A Theoretical Argument for the Causes of Zoom Fatigue. Technology, Mind, and Behavior 2, 1 (Feb. 2021). https://doi.org/10.1037/TMB0000030

[4]

Jeremy N. Bailenson, Andrew C. Beall, Jack Loomis, Jim Blascovich, and Matthew Turk. 2004. Transformed Social Interaction: Decoupling Representation from Behavior and Form in Collaborative Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 13, 4 (Aug. 2004), 428–441. https://doi.org/10.1162/1054746041944803

Digital Library

[5]

Steven Baker, M. Ryan Kelly, Jenny Waycott, Romina Carrasco, Thuong Hoang, Frances Batchelor, Elizabeth Ozanne, Briony Dow, Jeni Warburton, and Frank Vetere. 2019. Interrogating Social Virtual Reality as a Communication Medium for Older Adults. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359251

Digital Library

[6]

Till Ballendat, Nicolai Marquardt, and Saul Greenberg. 2010. Proxemic Interaction: Designing for a Proximity and Orientation-Aware Environment. ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces - ITS ’10 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1936652

Digital Library

[7]

Bradford S. Bell and Steve W.J. Kozlowski. 2008. Active Learning: Effects of Core Training Design Elements on Self-Regulatory Processes, Learning, and Adaptability. Journal of Applied Psychology 93, 2 (March 2008), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.296

[8]

Steve Benford, John Bowers, Lennart E. Fahlen, Chris Greenhalgh, and Dave Snowdon. 1995. User embodiment in collaborative virtual environments. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, Vol. 1. ACM, 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1145/223904.223935

Digital Library

[9]

Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Tom Rodden, and James Pycock. 2001. Collaborative Virtual Environments. Commun. ACM 44, 7 (July 2001), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1145/379300.379322

Digital Library

[10]

Tony Bergstrom and Karrie Karahalios. 2007. Conversation Clock: Visualizing Audio Patterns in Co-located Groups. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2007.151

Digital Library

[11]

Jim Bizzocchi and Theresa Jean Tanenbaum. 2011. Well Read: Applying Close Reading Techniques to Gameplay Experiences. In Well played 3.0: video games, value and meaning, Drew Davidson (Ed.). Vol. 3. ETC Press, Pittsburgh, 262–290. https://www.academia.edu/740785/Well_Read_Applying_Close_Reading_Techniques_to_Gameplay_Experiences

[12]

Staffan Bjork and Jussi Holopainen. 2005. Patterns in game design. Charles River Media. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10078503

[13]

Lindsay Blackwell, Nicole Ellison, Natasha Elliott-Deflo, and Raz Schwartz. 2019. Harassment in Social Virtual Reality. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3359202

Digital Library

[14]

Anna Bleakley, Vincent Wade, and Benjamin R Cowan. 2020. Finally a Case for Collaborative VR? The Need to Design for Remote Multi-Party Conversations. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces. Association for Computing Machinery, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1145/3405755.3406144

Digital Library

[15]

Nathan Bos, N Sadat Shami, Judith S Olson, Arik Cheshin, and Ning Nan. 2004. In-group/Out-group Effects in Distributed Teams: An Experimental Simulation. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW ’04 (2004), 429–436. https://doi.org/10.1145/1031607

Digital Library

[16]

Liudmila Bredikhina, Toya Sakaguchi, and Akihiko Shirai. 2020. Web3D Distance live workshop for children in Mozilla Hubs. Proceedings - Web3D 2020: 25th ACM Conference on 3D Web Technology (Nov. 2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3424616.3424724

Digital Library

[17]

Mia Consalvo. 2011. Using your friends: Social mechanics in social games. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, FDG 2011 (2011), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1145/2159365.2159391

Digital Library

[18]

Steve Cranford. 2020. Zoom Fatigue, Hyperfocus, and Entropy of Thought. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2020.08.004

[19]

Sally Jo Cunningham and Matt Jones. 2005. Autoethnography: a tool for practice and education. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI New Zealand chapter’s international conference on Computer-human interaction: making CHI natural(CHINZ ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/1073943.1073944

Digital Library

[20]

Prajit K. Dutta. 1999. Strategies and Games: Theory and Practice. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

[21]

Abdallah El Ali, Monica Perusquia-Hernandez, Mariam Hassib, Yomna Abdelrahman, and Joshua Newn. 2021. MEEC: Second Workshop on Momentary Emotion Elicitation and Capture. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (May 2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3441351

Digital Library

[22]

Thomas Erickson and Wendy A. Kellogg. 2000. Social Translucence: An Approach to Designing Systems that Support Social Processes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 7, 1 (March 2000), 59–83. https://doi.org/10.1145/344949.345004

Digital Library

[23]

Thommy Eriksson. 2021. Failure and Success in Using Mozilla Hubs for Online Teaching in a Movie Production Course. 2021 7th International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN) (June 2021), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.23919/ILRN52045.2021.9459321

[24]

Sean Fernandes. 2020. Supporting Collaboration in Social VR. Ph. D. Dissertation. UC Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7f30q6dn

[25]

Cédric Fleury, Thierry Duval, Valérie Gouranton, and Anthony Steed. 2012. Evaluation of Remote Collaborative Manipulation for Scientific Data Analysis. Proceedings of the 18th ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology - VRST ’12 (2012), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1145/2407336

Digital Library

[26]

Jesse Fox, Michael Gilbert, and Wai Yen Tang. 2018. Player experiences in a massively multiplayer online game: A diary study of performance, motivation, and social interaction:. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818767102 20, 11 (April 2018), 4056–4073. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818767102

[27]

Guo Freeman, Samaneh Zamanifard, Divine Maloney, and Alexandra Adkins. 2020. My Body, My Avatar: How People Perceive Their Avatars in Social Virtual Reality. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382923

Digital Library

[28]

Maia Garau, Mel Slater, David-Paul Pertaub, and Sharif Razzaque. 2005. The Responses of People to Virtual Humans in an Immersive Virtual Environment. Presence 14, 1 (2005), 104–116. https://www-mitpressjournals-org.oca.ucsc.edu/doi/pdf/10.1162/1054746053890242

Digital Library

[29]

William Gaver. 2012. What Should We Expect From Research Through Design?Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676

Digital Library

[30]

Jennifer L. Geimer, Desmond J. Leach, Justin A. DeSimone, Steven G. Rogelberg, and Peter B. Warr. 2015. Meetings at work: Perceived effectiveness and recommended improvements. Journal of Business Research 68, 9 (Sept. 2015), 2015–2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2015.02.015

[31]

Jens Emil Grønbæk. 2018. Designing for interaction proxemics: Configurations and transitions. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings 2018-April (April 2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3173033

Digital Library

[32]

Jue-Qi Guan, Liang-Hui Wang, Qu Chen, Kai Jin, and Gwo-Jen Hwang. 2021. Effects of a virtual reality-based pottery making approach on junior high school students’ creativity and learning engagement. Interactive Learning Environments (Jan. 2021), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1871631

[33]

Stefan Gudjohnsen. 2014. Virtual teams and virtual meetings: Investigating the conventional wisdom that face-to-face communication is better. Ph. D. Dissertation. Reykjavík University, Iceland.

[34]

Edward T Hall. 1966. The hidden dimension. Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y.

[35]

Ryan Handley, Bert Guerra, Rukkmini Goli, and Douglas Zytko. 2022. Designing Social VR: A Collection of Design Choices Across Commercial and Research Applications. arXiv 4 (Jan. 2022), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.02253

[36]

Paul Heidicker, Eike Langbehn, and Frank Steinicke. 2017. Influence of avatar appearance on presence in social VR. 2017 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI) (Jan. 2017), 233–234. https://doi.org/10.1109/3DUI.2017.7893357

[37]

Kristina Höök. 2010. Transferring Qualities from Horseback Riding to Design. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Extending Boundaries - NordiCHI ’10. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA.

Digital Library

[38]

Natalie Hube, Katrin Angerbauer, Daniel Pohlandt, Kresimir Vidackovic, and Michael Sedlmair. 2021. VR Collaboration in Large Companies: An Interview Study on the Role of Avatars. 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct) (Nov. 2021), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-ADJUNCT54149.2021.00037

[39]

Masahiro Ide, Shoji Oshima, Shingo Mori, Masato Yoshimi, Junko Ichino, and Shunichi Tano. 2020. Effects of Avatar’s Symbolic Gesture in Virtual Reality Brainstorming. In 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery, 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1145/3441000.3441081

Digital Library

[40]

Ellen A Isaacs, Trevor Morris, and Thomas K Rodriguez. 1994. A Forum for Supporting Interactive Presentations to Distributed Audiences. Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW ’94 (1994), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1145/192844

Digital Library

[41]

Ellen A. Isaacs and John C. Tang. 1993. What video can and can’t do for collaboration. Proceedings of the first ACM international conference on Multimedia - MULTIMEDIA ’93 (1993), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1145/166266.166289

Digital Library

[42]

Sirkka L Jarvenpaa and Dorothy E Leidner. 1999. Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams. Organization Science 10, 6 (Dec. 1999), 791–815. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.6.791

Digital Library

[43]

Marcel Jonas, Steven Said, Daniel Yu, Chris Aiello, Nicholas Furlo, and Douglas Zytko. 2019. Towards a taxonomy of social VR application design. In CHI PLAY 2019 - Extended Abstracts of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, Vol. 19. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, 437–444. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341215.3356271

Digital Library

[44]

Sukran Karaosmanoglu, Enrico E Rukzio Frank Steinicke Lennart Nacke, Katja Rogers, Dennis Wolf, Enrico Rukzio, and Frank Steinicke. 2021. Feels like Team Spirit: Biometric and Strategic Interdependence in Asymmetric Multiplayer VR Games; Feels like Team Spirit: Biometric and Strategic Interdependence in Asymmetric Multiplayer VR Games. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764

Digital Library

[45]

Yuki Kato, Maki Sugimoto, Masahiro Inami, and Michiteru Kitazaki. 2021. Communications in virtual environment improve interpersonal impression. Proceedings - 2021 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops, VRW 2021 (March 2021), 613–614. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW52623.2021.00189

[46]

Elise Keith. 2015. 55 million: a fresh look at the number, effectiveness, and cost of meetings in the U.S.https://blog.lucidmeetings.com/blog/fresh-look-number-effectiveness-cost-meetings-in-us

[47]

Adam Kendon. 1990. Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters.Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, US.

[48]

Steve W J Kozlowski and Daniel R Ilgen. 2006. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams. Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society 7, 3 (Dec. 2006), 77–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x

[49]

Marc Erich Latoschik, Daniel Roth, Dominik Gall, Jascha Achenbach, Thomas Waltemate, Mario Botsch, and Marc Erich Latoschik. 2017. The Effect of Avatar Realism in Immersive Social Virtual Realities. 17, 10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3139131.3139156

Digital Library

[50]

Chiwon Lee, Hyunjong Joo, and Soojin Jun. 2021. Social VR as the New Normal? Understanding User Interactions for the Business Arena. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Number 420. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451740

Digital Library

[51]

Jie Li, Vinoba Vinayagamoorthy, Raz Schwartz, Wijnand Ijsselsteijn, David A. Shamma, and Pablo Cesar. 2020. Social VR: A New medium for remote communication and collaboration. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3375160

Digital Library

[52]

Jialang Victor Li, Max Kreminski, Sean M Fernandes, Anya Osborne, Joshua McVeigh-Schultz, and Katherine Isbister. 2022. Conversation Balance: A Shared VR Visualization to Support Turn-taking in Meetings. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts(CHI EA ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519879

Digital Library

[53]

Peter Abrahamsson Lindeblad, Yuliya Voytenko, Oksana Mont, and Peter Arnfalk. 2016. Organisational effects of virtual meetings. Journal of Cleaner Production 123 (June 2016), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.058

[54]

Qiaoxi Liu and Anthony Steed. 2021. Social Virtual Reality Platform Comparison and Evaluation Using a Guided Group Walkthrough Method. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 2 (2021). https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frvir.2021.668181

[55]

Divine Maloney and Guo Freeman. 2020. Falling Asleep Together: What Makes Activities in Social Virtual Reality Meaningful to Users. In CHI PLAY 2020 - Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, 510–521. https://doi.org/10.1145/3410404.3414266

Digital Library

[56]

Divine Maloney, Guo Freeman, and Andrew Robb. 2021. Stay Connected in An Immersive World: Why Teenagers Engage in Social Virtual Reality. Interaction Design and Children (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3459990

Digital Library

[57]

Divine Maloney, Guo Freeman, and Donghee Yvette Wohn. 2020. "Talking without A Voice": Understanding Non-Verbal Communication in Social Virtual Reality. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. (2020), 25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3415246

Digital Library

[58]

Gloria Mark, Jonathan Grudin, Steven E Poltrock, and Microsoft Research. 1999. Meeting at the Desktop: An Empirical Study of Virtually Collocated Teams. In Proceedings of ECSCW’99, The 6th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (1999), 159–178.

[59]

Paul Marshall, Yvonne Rogers, and Nadia Pantidi. 2011. Using F-formations to Analyse Spatial Patterns of Interaction in Physical Environments. Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW ’11 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824

Digital Library

[60]

Joshua McVeigh-Schultz and Katherine Isbister. 2021. A “beyond being there” for VR meetings: envisioning the future of remote work. Human–Computer Interaction (Dec. 2021), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2021.1994860

[61]

Joshua McVeigh-Schultz and Katherine Isbister. 2021. The Case for Weird Social in VR/XR. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (May 2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3450377

Digital Library

[62]

Joshua McVeigh-Schultz, Max Kreminski, Keshav Prasad, Perry Hoberman, and Scott S. Fisher. 2018. Immersive design fiction: Using VR to prototype speculative interfaces and interaction rituals within a virtual storyworld. DIS 2018 - Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (June 2018), 817–830. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196793

Digital Library

[63]

Joshua McVeigh-Schultz, Anya Osborne, and Katherine Isbister. 2019. Shaping pro-social interaction in VR an emerging design framework. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300794

Digital Library

[64]

Joshua McVeigh-Schultz, Anya Osborne, Max Kreminski, Sean Fernandes, Sabrina Fielder, Victor Li, and Katherine Isbister. 2021. Social Superpowers in Social VR. Social VR: A New Medium for Remote Communication & Collaboration 2021 Workshop in 2021 ACM CHI Virtual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2021), 1–5. https://442e4efe-5603-4db5-bb2c-b1a81a4eb29a.filesusr.com/ugd/3ad93e_8cf5a82bf8d746a3a7141289f4db3db5.pdf

[65]

Joshua McVeigh-Schultz, Elena Márquez Segura, Nick Merrill, and Katherine Isbister. 2018. What’s It Mean to "Be Social" in VR?: Mapping the Social VR Design Ecology. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197391.3205451

Digital Library

[66]

Jacquelyn Ford Morie. 2014. Avatar Appearance as Prima Facie Non-verbal Communication. In Nonverbal Communication in Virtual Worlds, Theresa Jean Tanenbaum, Magy Seif El-Nasr, and Michael Nixon (Eds.). ETC Press, 77–102. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2812755

[67]

Fares Moustafa and Anthony Steed. 2018. A Longitudinal Study of Small Group Interaction in Social Virtual Reality. ACM 10 (2018), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3281505

Digital Library

[68]

Joseph E. Mroz, Joseph A. Allen, Dana C. Verhoeven, and Marissa L. Shuffler. 2018. Do We Really Need Another Meeting? The Science of Workplace Meetings:. Association For Psychological Science 27, 6 (Oct. 2018), 484–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418776307

[69]

Keith M. Murphy. 2005. Collaborative imagining: The interactive use of gestures, talk, and graphic representation in architectural practice. Semiotica 156 (2005), 113–145. https://doi.org/10.1515/SEMI.2005.2005.156.113/HTML

[70]

Robby Nadler. 2020. Understanding “Zoom fatigue”: Theorizing spatial dynamics as third skins in computer-mediated communication. Computers and Composition 58 (Dec. 2020), 102613. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPCOM.2020.102613

[71]

Carman Neustaedter and Phoebe Sengers. 2012. Autobiographical design in HCI research: Designing and learning through use-it-yourself. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, DIS ’12. 514–523. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318034

Digital Library

[72]

J. Nielsen, R. L. Mack, K. H. Bergendorff, and N. L. Grischkowsky. 1986. Integrated software usage in the professional work environment: evidence from questionnaires and interviews. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’86). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 162–167. https://doi.org/10.1145/22627.22366

Digital Library

[73]

Seok Hee Oh and Taeg Keun Whangbo. 2018. A study on the effective interaction method to improve the presence in social virtual reality game. Proceedings of the 2017 4th International Conference on Computer Applications and Information Processing Technology, CAIPT 2017 2018-Janua (March 2018), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAIPT.2017.8320715

[74]

Monsurat Olaosebikan, Claudia Aranda Barrios, Blessing Kolawole, Lenore Cowen, and Orit Shaer. 2022. Identifying Cognitive and Creative Support Needs for Remote Scientific Collaboration using VR: Practices, Affordances, and Design Implications. In Creativity and Cognition(C&C ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1145/3527927.3532797

Digital Library

[75]

Patrick Aggergaard Olin, Ahmad Mohammad Issa, Tiare Feuchtner, and Kaj Grønbæk. 2020. Designing for Heterogeneous Cross-Device Collaboration and Social Interaction in Virtual Reality. In 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery, 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1145/3441000.3441070

Digital Library

[76]

Anya Osborne, Joshua Mcveigh-Schultz, and Katherine Isbister. 2019. Understanding Emerging Design Practices for Avatar Systems in the Commercial Social VR Ecology. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322352

Digital Library

[77]

Anna Samira Praetorius, Lara Krautmacher, Gabriela Tullius, and Cristóbal Curio. 2021. User-Avatar Relationships in Various Contexts: Does Context Influence a Users’ Perception and Choice of an Avatar?. In Mensch und Computer 2021(MuC ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1145/3473856.3474007

Digital Library

[78]

Rivu Radiah, Sarah Delgado Rodriguez, Yumeng Zhou, Lmu Munich, Germany Kay Köhle, Germany Ken Pfeuffer, Matthias Hoppe, Ville Mäkelä, Sarah Prange, Robin Piening, Kay Köhle, Ken Pfeuffer, Yomna Abdelrahman, Albrecht Schmidt, and Florian Alt. 2021. Remote VR Studies: A Framework for Running Virtual Reality Studies Remotely Via Participant-Owned HMDs. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 1, 1 (2021), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3472617

Digital Library

[79]

Jack Ratcliffe, Francesco Soave, Melynda Hoover, Francisco Raul Ortega, Nick Bryan-Kinns, Laurissa Tokarchuk, and Ildar Farkhatdinov. 2021. Remote XR Studies: Exploring Three Key Challenges of Remote XR Experimentation. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (May 2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3442472

Digital Library

[80]

Robin S. Rosenberg, Shawnee L. Baughman, and Jeremy N. Bailenson. 2013. Virtual Superheroes: Using Superpowers in Virtual Reality to Encourage Prosocial Behavior. PLOS ONE 8, 1 (Jan. 2013), e55003. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0055003

[81]

Daniel Roth, Gary Bente, Peter Kullmann, David Mal, Chris Felix Purps, Kai Vogeley, and Marc Erich Latoschik. 2019. Technologies for social augmentations in user-embodied virtual reality. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST, Vol. 5. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359996.3364269

Digital Library

[82]

Rebecca B. Rubin. 2009. Communication research measures : a sourcebook. Volume II. (2009), 505.

[83]

David Saffo, Sara Di Bartolomeo, Caglar Yildirim, and Cody Dunne. 2021. Remote and Collaborative Virtual Reality Experiments via Social VR Platforms. CHI ’21 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445426

Digital Library

[84]

David Saffo, Caglar Yildirim, Sara Di Bartolomeo, and Cody Dunne. 2020. Crowdsourcing virtual reality experiments using VRChat. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (April 2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382829

Digital Library

[85]

Johnny Saldaña. 2009. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage, Los Angeles, Calif.

[86]

Valentin Schwind. 2018. Implications of the uncanny valley of avatars and virtual characters for human-computer interaction. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-9936

[87]

N. Sadat Shami, Li Te Cheng, Steven Rohall, Andrew Sempere, and John Patterson. 2010. Avatars Meet Meetings: Design Issues in Integrating Avatars in Distributed Corporate Meetings. Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work, GROUP’10 (Nov. 2010), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/1880071.1880078

Digital Library

[88]

Mel Slater, Bernhard Spanlang, Maria V. Sanchez-Vives, and Olaf Blanke. 2010. First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality. PLoS ONE 5, 5 (2010), e10564. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010564

[89]

Harrison Jesse Smith and Michael Neff. 2018. Communication Behavior in Embodied Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173863

Digital Library

[90]

Robert Sommer and Hugo Ross. 1958. Social Interaction On a Geriatrics Ward. Int. J. Social Psychology 4, 2 (Sept. 1958), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/002076405800400207

[91]

Misha Sra, Ken Perlin, Luiz Velho, Mark Bolas, Ken Perlin, Mark Bolas, Luiz Velho, Mark Bolas, Ken Perlin, and Mark Bolas. 2018. Novel Interaction Techniques for Collaboration in VR. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vol. 2018-April. Association for Computing Machinery, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3170628

Digital Library

[92]

Frank Steinicke, Annika Meinecke, and Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock. 2020. A First Pilot Study to Compare Virtual Group Meetings using Video Conferences and (Immersive) Virtual Reality. Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (2020), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3385959

Digital Library

[93]

Theresa Jean Tanenbaum. 2015. Hermeneutic Inquiry for Digital Games Research. The Computer Games Journal 4, 1-2 (June 2015), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40869-015-0005-9

[94]

Theresa Jean Tanenbaum, Nazely Hartoonian, and Jeffrey Bryan. 2020. "How do I make this thing smile?": An Inventory of Expressive Nonverbal Communication in Commercial Social Virtual Reality Platforms. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376606

Digital Library

[95]

Anthony Tang, Michael Boyle, and Saul Greenberg. 2004. Display and Presence Disparity in Mixed Presence Groupware.Auic (2004), 73–82. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/auic/auic2004.html#TangBG04

[96]

Karima Toumi, Fabien Girandola, and Nathalie Bonnardel. 2021. Technologies for Supporting Creativity in Design: A View of Physical and Virtual Environments with Regard to Cognitive and Social Processes. Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications 8, 1 (May 2021), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2021-0012

[97]

Brenda K. Wiederhold. 2020. Connecting Through Technology During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: Avoiding “Zoom Fatigue”. https://home.liebertpub.com/cyber 23, 7 (July 2020), 437–438. https://doi.org/10.1089/CYBER.2020.29188.BKW

[98]

Julie R Williamson, Jie Li CWI Vinoba Vinayagamoorthy, David A Shamma Pablo Cesar, Jie Li, Vinoba Vinayagamoorthy, David A Shamma, and Pablo Cesar. 2021. Proxemics and Social Interactions in an Instrumented Virtual Reality Workshop. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 21 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764

Digital Library

[99]

Julie R. Williamson, Joseph O’Hagan, John Alexis Guerra-Gomez, John H Williamson, Pablo Cesar, and David A. Shamma. 2022. Digital Proxemics: Designing Social and Collaborative Interaction in Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517594

Digital Library

[100]

Andrea Stevenson Won, Jeremy Bailenson, Jimmy Lee, and Jaron Lanier. 2015. Homuncular Flexibility in Virtual Reality. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 20, 3 (May 2015), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12107

Digital Library

[101]

Xiaozhe Yang, Lin Lin, Pei-Yu Cheng, Xue Yang, Youqun Ren, and Yueh-Min Huang. 2018. Examining creativity through a virtual reality support system. Education Tech Research Dev 66, 5 (Oct. 2018), 1231–1254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9604-z

[102]

Nicole Yankelovich, Jonathan Kaplan, Simpson Nigel, and Joe Provino. 2007. Porta-Person: Telepresence for the Connected Conference Room. CHI 2007 (2007), 2789–2794. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240866

Digital Library

[103]

Amal Yassien, Passant Elagroudy, Elhassan Makled, and Slim Abdennadher. 2020. A Design Space for Social Presence in VR. In Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society, Vol. 20. Association for Computing Machinery, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420112

Digital Library

[104]

Nick Yee and Jeremy Bailenson. 2007. The proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research 33, 3 (July 2007), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00299.x

[105]

Andrew Yoshimura and Christoph W. Borst. 2020. Evaluation of Headset-based Viewing and Desktop-based Viewing of Remote Lectures in a Social VR Platform. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST (Nov. 2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3385956.3422124

Digital Library

[106]

Samaneh Zamanifard and Guo Freeman. 2019. "The Togetherness that We Crave": Experiencing Social VR in Long Distance Relationships. Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3311957

Digital Library

Cited By

Steed A(2024)Three technical challenges of scaling from social virtual reality to metaverse(s): interoperability, awareness and accessibilityFrontiers in Virtual Reality10.3389/frvir.2024.14329075Online publication date: 6-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2024.1432907
McVeigh-Schultz JMárquez Segura EIsbister K(2024)Designing our Weird Social XR Future: Tactics to support hybrid ways of embodied knowingProceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium10.1145/3686169.3686199(1-11)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686169.3686199
Chang VGao GPeng H(2024)Social VR for Professional Networking: A Spatial PerspectiveProceedings of the 2024 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3677386.3682094(1-10)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3677386.3682094
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Being Social in VR Meetings: A Landscape Analysis of Current Tools
1. Hardware
  1. Emerging technologies
    1. Emerging interfaces
2. Human-centered computing
  1. Collaborative and social computing
    1. Collaborative and social computing systems and tools
  2. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Interaction paradigms
      1. Virtual reality

Recommendations

Conversation Balance: A Shared VR Visualization to Support Turn-taking in Meetings
CHI EA '22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

This interactivity demonstration provides users with a visualization of their conversational turn-taking, within a shared Virtual Reality (VR) environment. It is intended to help support balanced communication in remote meetings. This prototype is part ...
What's It Mean to "Be Social" in VR?: Mapping the Social VR Design Ecology
DIS '18 Companion: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems

The emerging ecology of commercial social VR currently includes a diverse set of applications and competing models of what it means to be social in VR. This study maps a slice of this ecology, comparing and contrasting ways different applications frame, ...
The Case for “Weird Social” in VR/XR: A Vision of Social Superpowers Beyond Meatspace
CHI EA '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

COVID underscores the potential of VR meeting tools to compensate for lack of embodied communication in applications like Zoom. But both research and commercial VR meeting environments typically seek to approximate physical meetings, instead of exploring ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

DIS '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference

July 2023

2717 pages

ISBN:9781450398930

DOI:10.1145/3563657

Editors:
Daragh Byrne
Carnegie Mellon University
,
Nikolas Martelaro
Carnegie Mellon University
,
Andy Boucher
Northumbria University
,
David Chatting
Goldsmiths, University of London
,
Sarah Fdili Alaoui
LISN-Université Paris Saclay
,
Sarah Fox
Carnegie Mellon University
,
Iohanna Nicenboim
Delft University of Technology
,
Cayley MacArthur
University of Waterloo

Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 July 2023

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

National Science Foundation

Conference

DIS '23

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

DIS '23: Designing Interactive Systems Conference

July 10 - 14, 2023

PA, Pittsburgh, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

9
Total Citations
View Citations
1,667
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)1,187
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)149

Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Steed A(2024)Three technical challenges of scaling from social virtual reality to metaverse(s): interoperability, awareness and accessibilityFrontiers in Virtual Reality10.3389/frvir.2024.14329075Online publication date: 6-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2024.1432907
McVeigh-Schultz JMárquez Segura EIsbister K(2024)Designing our Weird Social XR Future: Tactics to support hybrid ways of embodied knowingProceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium10.1145/3686169.3686199(1-11)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686169.3686199
Chang VGao GPeng H(2024)Social VR for Professional Networking: A Spatial PerspectiveProceedings of the 2024 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3677386.3682094(1-10)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3677386.3682094
Wong EGrønbæk JVelloso E(2024)The Jamais Vu Effect: Understanding the Fragile Illusion of Co-Presence in Mixed RealityProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661574(2227-2246)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661574
Kukshinov EHarley DSzita KHadi Mogavi RMacarthur CNacke L(2024)Disembodied, Asocial, and Unreal: How Users Reinterpret Designed Affordances of Social VRProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661548(1914-1925)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661548
Lee SViola ISingla ACesar P(2024)Communication Challenges between Clients and Producers of Immersive Media Applications: can Social XR help?Proceedings of the 2024 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences10.1145/3639701.3656307(313-319)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3639701.3656307
Segal JRodriguez SRaghavan ABaez HJung CCollins JAzenkot SStevenson Won A(2024)SocialCueSwitch: Towards Customizable Accessibility by Representing Social Cues in Multiple SensesExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651109(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3651109
Park HAhn DLee J(2024)Lessons From Working in the Metaverse: Challenges, Choices, and Implications from a Case StudyProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3641972(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3641972
O'Hagan JMathis FMcGill M(2023)User Reviews as a Reporting Mechanism for Emergent Issues Within Social VR CommunitiesProceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3626705.3627780(236-243)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626705.3627780

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents