[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3488392.3488397acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesclihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Intelligent Approaches in the Software Development Process: a Systematic Literature Mapping

Published: 22 November 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Accessibility in computing, when well applied, allows for the inclusion of users and the breaking of barriers in the interaction process. However, approaches to support accessibility validation are commonly unknown or ignored. The objective of this work is to understand accessibility issues considered in the software development process. This research has carried out an initial literature systematic mapping. The result indicates that there are gaps in the use of smart approaches to assess accessibility during the software development process.

References

[1]
K. Abernethy, J. Kelly, A. Sobel, J.D. Kiper, and J. Powell. 2000. Technology transfer issues for formal methods of software specification. In Thirteenth Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training. 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEE.2000.827014
[2]
Muhammad Bakhsh and Amjad Mehmood. 2012. Web Accessibility for Disabled: A Case Study of Government Websites in Pakistan. In 2012 10th International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology. 342–347. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIT.2012.68
[3]
Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa, Bruno Santana da Silva, Milene Selbach Silveira, Isabela Gasparini, Ticianne Darin, and Gabriel Diniz Junqueira Barbosa. 2021. Interação Humano-Computador e Experiência do Usuário. Autopublicação.
[4]
Diego Buchinger, Gustavo Cavalcanti, and Marcelo Hounsell. 2014. Mecanismos de busca acadêmica: uma análise quantitativa. Revista Brasileira de Computação Aplicada 6, 1 (abr. 2014), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.5335/rbca.2014.3452
[5]
Jaganmohan Chandrasekaran, Laleh Sh. Ghandehari, Yu Lei, Raghu Kacker, and D. Richard Kuhn. 2016. Evaluating the Effectiveness of BEN in Localizing Different Types of Software Fault. In 2016 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW). 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW.2016.44
[6]
Tatiany Xavier de Godoi, Laura Sánchez García, and Natasha Malveira Costa Valentim. 2020. Evaluating a Usability, User Experience and Accessibility Checklist for Assistive Technologies for Deaf People in a Context of Mobile Applications. In Proceedings of the 19th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Diamantina, Brazil) (IHC ’20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 14, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3424953.3426631
[7]
Ana Luiza Dias, Renata Pontin de Mattos Fortes, Paulo Cesar Masiero, and Rudinei Goularte. 2010. Uma revisão sistemática sobre a inserção de acessibilidade nas fases de desenvolvimento da engenharia de software em sistemas Web. In Simpósio Brasileiro de Bancos de Dados. SBC.
[8]
Laura Fathauer and Dhananjai M. Rao. 2019. Accessibility in an educational software system: Experiences and Design Tips. In 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028402
[9]
Andre Pimenta Freire, Rudinei Goularte, and Renata Pontin de Mattos Fortes. 2007. Techniques for Developing More Accessible Web Applications: A Survey towards a Process Classification. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM International Conference on Design of Communication (El Paso, Texas, USA) (SIGDOC ’07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1145/1297144.1297177
[10]
Teresa D. Gilbertson and Colin H. C. Machin. 2012. Guidelines, Icons and Marketable Skills: An Accessibility Evaluation of 100 Web Development Company Homepages. In Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (Lyon, France) (W4A ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 17, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207016.2207024
[11]
Asharul Islam Khan, Zuhoor Al-Khanjari, and Mohamed Sarrab. 2017. Crowd Sourced Evaluation Process for Mobile Learning Application Quality. In 2017 Second International Conference on Information Systems Engineering (ICISE). 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISE.2017.17
[12]
Barbara Kitchenham, O. Pearl Brereton, David Budgen, Mark Turner, John Bailey, and Stephen Linkman. 2009. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology 51, 1 (2009), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009 Special Section - Most Cited Articles in 2002 and Regular Research Papers.
[13]
Zui Young Lim, Jia Min Chua, Kaiting Yang, Wei Shin Tan, and Yinn Chai. 2020. Web Accessibility Testing for Singapore Government E-Services. In Proceedings of the 17th International Web for All Conference (Taipei, Taiwan) (W4A ’20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 22, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371300.3383353
[14]
Ke Mao, Ye Yang, Qing Wang, Yue Jia, and Mark Harman. 2015. Developer Recommendation for Crowdsourced Software Development Tasks. In 2015 IEEE Symposium on Service-Oriented System Engineering. 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1109/SOSE.2015.46
[15]
Lai Xing Ng, Jamie Ng, Keith T. W. Tang, Liyuan Li, Mark Rice, and Marcus Wan. 2019. Using Visual Intelligence to Automate Maintenance Task Guidance and Monitoring on a Head-Mounted Display. In Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Robotics and Artificial Intelligence (Singapore, Singapore) (ICRAI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373724.3373727
[16]
Débora Maria Barroso Paiva, André Pimenta Freire, and Renata Pontin de Mattos Fortes. 2021. Accessibility and Software Engineering Processes: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Systems and Software 171 (2021), 110819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.110819
[17]
Sandra Souza Rodrigues and Renata Pontin de Mattos Fortes. 2019. Uma revisão sobre acessibilidade no desenvolvimento de Internet das Coisas: oportunidades e tendências. Revista de Sistemas e Computação-RSC 9, 1(2019).
[18]
Víctor Romero-Chacón, Harry Muir-Camacho, Jonnathan Rodríguez-González, Annia Gómez-Blanco, and Mario Chacón-Rivas. 2019. Adapting SCRUM Methodology to Develop Accessible Web Sites. In 2019 International Conference on Inclusive Technologies and Education (CONTIE). 112–1124. https://doi.org/10.1109/CONTIE49246.2019.00029
[19]
Stuart Russell and Peter Norvig. 2002. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. (2002).
[20]
Flávia de Souza Santos, André de Lima Salgado, and Renata Pontin de Mattos Fortes. 2018. Um Mapeamento Sistemático sobre Acessibilidade e Usabilidade no Desenvolvimento de Jogos Digitais para Idosos. iSys - Revista Brasileira de Sistemas de Informação 11, 2 (jun. 2018), 63–90. http://seer.unirio.br/isys/article/view/6957
[21]
Cynthia C. Shelly and Mike Barta. 2010. Application of Traditional Software Testing Methodologies to Web Accessibility. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A) (Raleigh, North Carolina) (W4A ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 11, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1805986.1806002
[22]
Silvia Rodríguez Vázquez. 2013. Localizing Accessibility of Text Alternatives for Visual Content in Multilingual Websites. SIGACCESS Access. Comput.105 (Jan. 2013), 34–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/2444800.2444807
[23]
Silvia Rodríguez Vázquez. 2015. Unlocking the Potential of Web Localizers as Contributors to Image Accessibility: What Do Evaluation Tools Have to Offer?. In Proceedings of the 12th International Web for All Conference (Florence, Italy) (W4A ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 17, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2745555.2746662
[24]
Willian Massami Watanabe, Ana Luiza Dias, and Renata Pontin De Mattos Fortes. 2015. Fona: Quantitative Metric to Measure Focus Navigation on Rich Internet Applications. ACM Trans. Web 9, 4, Article 20 (Sept. 2015), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2812812
[25]
J. Zhang, D. Zage, and W. Zage. 2003. Improving project planning/tracking for student software engineering projects through SOPPTS. In Proceedings 16th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, 2003. (CSEE T 2003).185–192. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEE.2003.1191376

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Set of Professional Tools to Support the Design and Evaluation of Real-Time Payment Systems and Emergent UsersJournal on Interactive Systems10.5753/jis.2024.420715:1(790-809)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
  • (2023)Design Considerations for Real-Time Payment Systems and Emerging UsersProceedings of the XXII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3638067.3638107(1-11)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023

Index Terms

  1. Intelligent Approaches in the Software Development Process: a Systematic Literature Mapping
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        CLIHC '21: Proceedings of the X Latin American Conference on Human Computer Interaction
        November 2021
        87 pages
        ISBN:9781450384896
        DOI:10.1145/3488392
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 22 November 2021

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. Accessibility
        2. Human-Computer Interaction
        3. Software Engineering

        Qualifiers

        • Short-paper
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Conference

        CLIHC 2021

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 14 of 42 submissions, 33%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
        Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)A Set of Professional Tools to Support the Design and Evaluation of Real-Time Payment Systems and Emergent UsersJournal on Interactive Systems10.5753/jis.2024.420715:1(790-809)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
        • (2023)Design Considerations for Real-Time Payment Systems and Emerging UsersProceedings of the XXII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3638067.3638107(1-11)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023

        View Options

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media